[Bug c++/21802] Two-stage name lookup fails for operators

2014-05-17 Thread richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802 --- Comment #4 from Richard Smith --- EDG accepts this (which I believe is the correct answer). Clang and GCC reject (in Clang's case, the callee is resolved in the template definition, but then ADL is accidentally performed during template insta

[Bug tree-optimization/61140] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-05-17 Thread su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61140 --- Comment #5 from Zhendong Su --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4) > Thanks a lot for the PR, getting a nice short testcase so soon after the > commit, while the patch was still fresh in my mind, was very useful. You're welcome Marc.

[Bug libstdc++/60758] Infinite backtrace in __cxa_end_cleanup

2014-05-17 Thread sandra at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758 Sandra Loosemore changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at codesourcery dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/61214] New: [4.9 regression] Weird interaction between -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, inline virtuals and devirtualization

2014-05-17 Thread delr...@dolphin-emu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214 Bug ID: 61214 Summary: [4.9 regression] Weird interaction between -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, inline virtuals and devirtualization Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug libfortran/52539] I/O: Wrong result for UTF-8/UCS-4 list-directed and namelist read and nml write

2014-05-17 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539 --- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun May 18 02:34:02 2014 New Revision: 210575 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210575&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-17 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/52539 * gfortran.dg

[Bug libfortran/52539] I/O: Wrong result for UTF-8/UCS-4 list-directed and namelist read and nml write

2014-05-17 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539 --- Comment #27 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun May 18 02:29:27 2014 New Revision: 210574 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210574&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-17 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/52539 * io/io.h (gf

[Bug c++/58664] [c++11] ICE initializing array of incomplete type within union

2014-05-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58664 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/61208] armhf: generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -Os

2014-05-17 Thread mh+gcc at glandium dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61208 --- Comment #2 from Mike Hommey --- This doesn't happen with gcc 4.9.

[Bug ipa/60854] [4.9 Regression] inline constructor of extern template

2014-05-17 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60854 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat May 17 22:18:25 2014 New Revision: 210563 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210563&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/60854 * ipa.c (symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes): Mark targe

[Bug c++/52875] ADL failure + ICE in decltype

2014-05-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52875 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/52875] ADL failure + ICE in decltype

2014-05-17 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52875 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sat May 17 20:22:30 2014 New Revision: 210562 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210562&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-17 Paolo Carlini PR c++/52875 * g++.dg/cpp0x

[Bug c++/52875] ADL failure + ICE in decltype

2014-05-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52875 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- This is fixed in 4.8.3, 4.9.0 and trunk. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.

[Bug c++/61213] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] std::forward_as_tuple and std::tuple and any rvalue loose data

2014-05-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61213 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61213] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] std::forward_as_tuple and std::tuple and any rvalue loose data

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61213 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Are you sure the code is valid? It doesn't seem so to me. gcc's optimizers have become good enough to recycle the space from dead temporaries.

[Bug c++/61213] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] std::forward_as_tuple and std::tuple and any rvalue loose data

2014-05-17 Thread tower120 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61213 --- Comment #2 from tower120 --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Using -fno-indirect-inlining gives the correct result I not see this with -std=c++11 -O2 -fno-indirect-inlining -Wall -pedantic -pthread http://coliru.stacked-croo

[Bug c++/61213] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] std::forward_as_tuple and std::tuple and any rvalue loose data

2014-05-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61213 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

2014-05-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4 Known to fail|

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

2014-05-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Sat May 17 13:01:11 2014 New Revision: 210557 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210557&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60966 * include/std/future (__future_base::_State_ba

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

2014-05-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Sat May 17 12:58:46 2014 New Revision: 210556 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210556&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/60966 * include/std/future (__future_base::_State_ba

[Bug c++/61213] New: std::forward_as_tuple and std::tuple and any rvalue loose data

2014-05-17 Thread tower120 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61213 Bug ID: 61213 Summary: std::forward_as_tuple and std::tuple and any rvalue loose data Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/61110] Simplify value_replacement in phiopt

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61110 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Another extension is discussed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00704.html (also transform if there is a second phi but it could be turned into a cmove)

[Bug tree-optimization/61197] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61197 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/61150] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61150 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/61140] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61140 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/61197] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61197 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Sat May 17 12:37:58 2014 New Revision: 210554 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210554&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-17 Marc Glisse PR tree-optimization/61140 PR tree-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/61140] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61140 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Sat May 17 12:37:58 2014 New Revision: 210554 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210554&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-17 Marc Glisse PR tree-optimization/61140 PR tree-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/61150] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61150 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Sat May 17 12:37:58 2014 New Revision: 210554 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210554&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-05-17 Marc Glisse PR tree-optimization/61140 PR tree-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/61194] [4.9/4.10 Regression] vectorization failed with "bit-precision arithmetic not supported" even if conversion to int is requested

2014-05-17 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61194 --- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse --- Seems related to PR 57328.

[Bug c/61212] New: gcc build failure on "dos file system" due to warnings treated as errors

2014-05-17 Thread tprince at computer dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61212 Bug ID: 61212 Summary: gcc build failure on "dos file system" due to warnings treated as errors Product: gcc Version: fortran-dev Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/61210] bootstrap failure with clang

2014-05-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61210 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1) > In which sense are they interesting? They show bugs in gcc trunk. Same as running cppcheck over gcc trunk shows bugs. Both both cases, I've reported th

[Bug rtl-optimization/60969] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in output_129 in MMXMOV of mode MODE_SF for march=pentium4

2014-05-17 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60969 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/60969] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in output_129 in MMXMOV of mode MODE_SF for march=pentium4

2014-05-17 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60969 --- Comment #24 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sat May 17 10:35:44 2014 New Revision: 210549 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210549&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2014-04-25 H.J. Lu PR targe

[Bug ipa/61211] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge points to wrong declaration with -O3 -fno-inline

2014-05-17 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61211 Bug ID: 61211 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge points to wrong declaration with -O3 -fno-inline Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UN

[Bug bootstrap/61210] bootstrap failure with clang

2014-05-17 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61210 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug bootstrap/61210] New: bootstrap failure with clang

2014-05-17 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61210 Bug ID: 61210 Summary: bootstrap failure with clang Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c++/47202] Endless recursion during mangling

2014-05-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47202 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/21802] Two-stage name lookup fails for operators

2014-05-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com,

[Bug middle-end/61196] Optimizer does not handle memory accesses with two pointers to same location correctly

2014-05-17 Thread bjoern.m.haase at web dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61196 --- Comment #2 from Björn Haase --- @Eric: Thank you for your fast feedback :-). I have contacted the maintainer of the library and the original author of the code so that we may fix the problem there. I've just again learnt something on an addit