http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60454
Bug ID: 60454
Summary: Code mistakenly detected as doing bswap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60453
--- Comment #1 from Eternal Sorrow ---
Created attachment 32295
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32295&action=edit
fft.i
This was output of LC_ALL=C gcc -v -c -O2 -floop-interchange fft.i
Sorry tor that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60453
Bug ID: 60453
Summary: ICE when building chromium with -O2 and graphite
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20140306 (experimental) [trunk revision 208366] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.7.3 -O1 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60418
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
sort_by_operand_rank in reassoc.cin has
/* Lastly, make sure the versions that are the same go next to each
other. We use SSA_NAME_VERSION because it's stable. */
if ((oeb->rank - oea->rank == 0)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60451
Bug ID: 60451
Summary: X86 vectorization improve: pack instead of pshufb
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60418
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
Sources have many FP loops contains codes like:
rsq11 = dx11*dx11+dy11*dy11+dz11*dz11;
When they are compiled with
-O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -fwhole-program -flto=jobserver
-fuse-linker-plugin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Mar 6 21:45:31 2014
New Revision: 208386
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208386&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-06 Paul Thomas
Janus Weil
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60162
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2)
> Created attachment 32120 [details]
> Reduced from gzip.
>
> Command line options.
>
> -march=armv7-a -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -mthumb -O3 -mlra
So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60450
Bug ID: 60450
Summary: ICE with SHAPE intrinsic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60081
--- Comment #3 from lmat ---
Created attachment 32292
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32292&action=edit
Another reproduction
For what it's worth, I just uploaded bugreprt.gz which has more code that
reproduces the issue along
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60081
--- Comment #2 from lmat ---
Right, changed unique_ptr to shared_ptr in my code base and the error goes
away. Have you seen if this bug still appears on a 4.8 build ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60081
lmat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dartmetrash at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Alisdair Meredith from comment #8)
> I am still surprised that I get an error for calling the move
> operations of 'local' though (in the second example) rather than getting an
> ambiguous lookup.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
--- Comment #3 from Chengnian Sun ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> I'm not convinced there is anything wrong. The reason to warn about if(a =
> b) or if(a = a + b) is that way too often people just mean to write if(a ==
> b)
> or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #12 from Nistor, Mihail-Marian ---
The ppc gcc uses the DWARF register number mapping that is defined by the
psABI, but the main problem is: the psABI is for AI32/64 architectures. The
DWARF register number mapping is also used to enco
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #203 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #202)
> LTO miscompiles 435.gromacs in SPEC CPU 2006 on x32 with
>
> -mx32 -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math
>
> since r208165 (PR 60418). Can you try r208163?
Yes. U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60429
--- Comment #6 from Allan Jensen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Can you identify the inlined call? Is it
>
> if (pSLL && y == pSLL->scanline) {
> loadAET(&AET, pSLL->edgelist);
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60418
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
One pass removes a preheader in
if (_47 > 0)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
:
# n_20 = PHI <1(3), n_269(7)>
and becomes:
if (_47 > 0)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
# n_20 = PHI <1(2), n_269(6)>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #1)
> "&&": g++-4.8.2 for 'void f(int &&r) {}' produces
> DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type.
>
> Or do you mean something else?
"ref qualifiers" is a term from C++11 relating
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot
com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Implicit preincludes should probably be disabled when preprocessing .S
files (though I don't know if that would help with this issue).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #202 from H.J. Lu ---
LTO miscompiles 435.gromacs in SPEC CPU 2006 on x32 with
-mx32 -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math
since r208165 (PR 60418). Can you try r208163?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 32291
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32291&action=edit
Untested proposed fix
Untested proposed fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #8 from Alisdair Meredith ---
I agree with Mark's analysis. I was trying to force use of swap on a local
class, and found a pattern that worked for libc++ but missed that neither
template would be more specialized - my original attemp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #201 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
With current gcc trunk and mozilla-central trunk Firefox crashes on startup
when
build with -flto (--enable-optimize=-O3):
0x75ce5d8f in nsCOMPtr_base::assign_with_AddRef(nsISupports*) [clone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #200 from Martin Jambor ---
I currently cannot build Firefox with LTO due to PR 60449 (yeah, I
know, using gcc configured with checking makes life hard, sometimes
unnecessarily).
I get errors like
/home/mjambor/mozilla/mzc2/media/lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:01:52PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
>
> --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 32290
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32290&action=edit
Part two of a testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 32289
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32289&action=edit
Part one of a testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
Bug ID: 60449
Summary: Merging function DECLs discards leaf attribute which
causes cfg verifier to fail
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6)
> libc++ sfinae constrains std::swap.
More precisely: they do have swap declared before iter_swap, if you remove the
=delete it is ambiguous with libc++ as well, it jus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
libc++ sfinae constrains std::swap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Slightly different version of that last test:
namespace tagged
{
template
struct Swappable {};
#ifndef NO_CUSTOM_SWAP
template
void swap(Swappable & a, Swappable & b) {
static_cast(a).swap(static_cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60384
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Looks like the difference between libc++ and libstdc++ is whether std::swap()
is declared before std::swap_ranges or not, this reproduces the same behaviour,
with swapper replacing swap_ranges:
namespace ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 32288
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32288&action=edit
gcc49-pr58572.patch
That didn't work for some reason (tried that just manually, after make
bootstrap-lean did ln
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't understand what we can be doing wrong in the library, we just call
std::iter_swap(it1, it2) which calls swap(*it1, *it2) unqualified.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Alisdair Meredith from comment #1)
> Created attachment 32287 [details]
> Cleaner tagging scheme for the local class
>
> Simplified the example to more directly expose the local class via ADL
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 02:45:38PM +, vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> I see, but I just wanted to print the content or pipe it somewhere, so I don't
> think that resolves it.
>
I did not say that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Fuka ---
I see, but I just wanted to print the content or pipe it somewhere, so I don't
think that resolves it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
--- Comment #7 from Akim Demaille ---
Hi all,
I'd really love to have some feedback on this issue. It looks like nobody is
having a look at this.
Thanks for all the good work, and sorry for insisting.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Adding "-nostdinc" is a simple workaround.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
when I revert this check-inm the build-succeeds:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=208150
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #1 from Alisdair Meredith ---
Created attachment 32287
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32287&action=edit
Cleaner tagging scheme for the local class
Simplified the example to more directly expose the local class via
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Fuka ---
-o option for what?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |
Severity|norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
Bug ID: 60448
Summary: swap_ranges does not use ADL correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Mar 6 13:41:46 2014
New Revision: 208382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/60197
c-family/
* cilk.c (contains_cilk_spawn_stmt): New fun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60236
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447
Bug ID: 60447
Summary: Empty .s file created when using -E flag
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
But what exceptions are you talking about? I believe for .dwarf_frame PPC now
emits the psABI mandated register numbers, and .eh_frame, being a GCC
invention, simply has different register numbering, there i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #10 from Nistor, Mihail-Marian ---
Could you please show me where this information is in the GNU ABI?
My request is to add all exceptions from the standards to release note.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Mar 6 12:24:11 2014
New Revision: 208381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't install vtv_*.o unless --enable-vtable-verify (PR libgcc/59339)
PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60446
--- Comment #1 from Wojciech Migda ---
Created attachment 32284
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32284&action=edit
Proposed patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60446
Bug ID: 60446
Summary: [PATCH] [TIC6X] implementing abssf2/absdf2 insns,
_fabs/_fabsf/__builtin_c6x_fabs/__builtin_c6x_fabsf
intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 6 12:07:07 2014
New Revision: 208380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/58595
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_tls_symbol_p): Remove.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60431
Wojciech Migda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Bug 60424 depends on bug 60427, which changed state.
Bug 60427 Summary: [4.9 Regression] r208312 causes ICE and wrong code for
Fortran with -flto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
What|Removed |A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, the -flto fails I can reproduce locally and are caused by r208312 (now
reverted). Still trying to reproduce with plain -Ofast as seen on one of
the testers...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-06 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60445
PR lto/60424
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60427
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-06 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60445
PR lto/60424
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 6 11:19:13 2014
New Revision: 208379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-06 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60445
PR lto/60424
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 tmp % gdb --args /var/tmp/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++
-DTABLES_NEXT_TO_CODE -x assembler-with-cpp -c ghc3240_8.s
Reading symbols from /var/tmp/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++...done.
(gdb) run
Starti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60445
Bug ID: 60445
Summary: [4.9 Regression] 473.astar miscompares with -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60429
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60444
Bug ID: 60444
Summary: No -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60424
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60435
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Can't verify it as there isn't a compilable testcase. But I guess this is
just because GCC doesn't have a code hoisting pass, not because of
int vs. long. See PR23286 of which this is a duplicate I think.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
Nistor, Mihail-Marian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|IN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60387
--- Comment #7 from Nistor, Mihail-Marian ---
Hello,
Doe to the fact that the gcc is not compatible with the DWARF and PPC ABI for
the PPC processors, as you said that is a fact of life and we need to live with
it. Users must always be informed w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60443
Bug ID: 60443
Summary: Target specific options that change the ABI should be
marked
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Strange, can't reproduce this myself using the same options, neither in
bootstrapped cc1, nor in non-bootstrapped -O0 built, nor bootstrapped cc1 under
valgrind, both 4.8 (older and latest) and trunk.
I'd have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
ASAN:SIGSEGV
=
==20669==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0018 (pc
0x023044cf sp 0x7fff99677740 bp 0x8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60442
Bug ID: 60442
Summary: No -Wparentheses warning for "if (a += b)"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59339
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60434
--- Comment #3 from Egor Suvorov ---
Yes, here is result both with C++03 and with C++11 (they're absolutely the
same):
a.cpp: In function 'int main()':
a.cpp:5:19: warning: format '%f' expects argument of type 'double', but
argument 2 has type 'l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60441
Bug ID: 60441
Summary: Incorrect textual representation for
std::mersenne_twister_engine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60434
--- Comment #2 from Egor Suvorov ---
Created attachment 32283
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32283&action=edit
Output of gcc with '-v -save-temps -std=c++11 -Wformat'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60436
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
