http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60317
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
Roman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roman.vasiliev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #35 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 32217
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32217&action=edit
Substantial patch
This patch is larger then it looks due to my editor judiciously removing
trailing space in wri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57935
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Feb 26 04:41:53 2014
New Revision: 208166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208166&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Apply mainline r207798
PR target/58675
PR target/57935
* confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58675
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Feb 26 04:41:53 2014
New Revision: 208166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208166&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Apply mainline r207798
PR target/58675
PR target/57935
* confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57936
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Bill, the ppc64-abi-dfp-1.c ICE is cured by the patch committed for pr58675 on
the trunk. Now committed to ibm-4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60155
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Rather than special case TRAP_IF, I think we just need to walk through the
pattern. If we find no assignments or > 1 assignment, then we assert.
note_stores, or walking similar to hash_scan_insn where we ke
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60280
bin.cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #1 from Steve Chapel ---
Created attachment 32215
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32215&action=edit
source code file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
--- Comment #2 from Steve Chapel ---
Created attachment 32216
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32216&action=edit
included source code file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341
Bug ID: 60341
Summary: ICE compiling Nonmem 6.2.0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31887
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57936
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16602
--- Comment #17 from Sebastian Unger ---
Well, it is a bug. The question is whether it is a bug in GCC or in the
standard. I will raise it in the mailing list as suggested, but GCC could of
course again lead the way and implement this as a GNU ext
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16602
--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
It is *not a bug*, and so should remain closed, and no new bug should be
opened. See the explicit "not the array type" wording already quoted.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16602
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sebastian Unger from comment #14)
> So how do I go about re-opening this? Or should I raise a new one?
Maybe you should raise it in the C standards mailing/news (news:comp.std.c)
group as my rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60280
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Feb 26 01:49:35 2014
New Revision: 208165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208165&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60280
* tree-cfgcleanup.c (tree_forwarder_block
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60155
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 25-Feb-14, at 1:36 AM, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> It really feels like this is papering over the real problem, namely
> that
> get_pressure_class_and_nregs simply doesn't handle things t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16602
--- Comment #14 from Sebastian Unger ---
So how do I go about re-opening this? Or should I raise a new one?
/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20140225 (experimental) [trunk revision 208111] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -c small.c
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -fcheck-data-deps -c small.c
$ gcc-4.6.4 -O1 -fcheck-data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 32214
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32214&action=edit
preserve permanent values in a separate table
vt_initialize still took way too long in the insn-recog testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56926
Emma changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ai.emma.me at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from Em
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 32213
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32213&action=edit
avoid quadratic behavior for the removal of useless values
This is the first of the two patches; it extends the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60280
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60339
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60071
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60339
Bug ID: 60339
Summary: gnat weird DW_AT_abstract_origin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60311
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60065
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 25 21:19:06 2014
New Revision: 208157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208157&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/55877
* decl2.c (no_linkage_error): Handle C++98 semantics.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60328
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60317
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Feb 25 20:34:44 2014
New Revision: 208155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208155&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-25 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/60317
* pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #12)
Wrong! That doesn't do it at all.
Paul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59195
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 25 18:54:48 2014
New Revision: 208153
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/53808
* class.c (clone_function_decl): Call note_vague_linkag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60328
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 25 18:53:45 2014
New Revision: 208152
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DR 1286
PR c++/60328
* pt.c (get_underlying_template): Fix equiv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6)
> I just tried to reproduce the bug before checking my patch in for 4.9, and
> couldn't; my patch seems to make no difference to the cgraph output for
> def.cpp.
..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60328
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60338
Bug ID: 60338
Summary: Segfault when compiling with many non-existing
includes under 32 bit arch
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60327
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
The dealII ICE is
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x005c9ef7 in vec::operator[] (
this=0x0, ix=7796) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/vec.h:735
735 gcc_checking_as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
--- Comment #12 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Dear Tobias,
I think that I have see the light! In a particularly uninteresting
part of our Board Meeting, I took a look at the Doxygen documentation
of the compiler. I was trying to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|rguenth at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
--- Comment #14 from David Kredba ---
For me it is fixed too, tested it by reveision 207938, cp compiles fine with
-flto=4 -fuse-linker-plugin. It crashes later at link time but that is
something completely different.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #12)
> Created attachment 32210 [details]
> Unreduced testcase
>
> Here's the unreduced testcase:
>
> markus@x4 coreutils % gcc -std=gnu99 -flto -O2 cp.i copy.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60276
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 25 12:42:59 2014
New Revision: 208119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208119&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-25 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-02-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Jmaescraig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||margaretnemon at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60337
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt ---
> It's the same on x86 I suppose
Well, the test program works fine on my amd64 box i.e. the alignment is
correct in all three functions (I guess foo() needs more int args to force
"a" onto the stack), and from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 32210
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32210&action=edit
Unreduced testcase
Here's the unreduced testcase:
markus@x4 coreutils % gcc -std=gnu99 -flto -O2 cp.i cop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard ---
Note that if we add:
const foo g(x);
It comes out with just one const_type added:
[60]variable
name (string) "g"
decl_file(data1) 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56740
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60071
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
Sorry, not yet, but it's on my desk/mind. I'll try to come up with something
this week. In the worst case we'll have to remove the problematic patterns, I
guess.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57369
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57936
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57936
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43053
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
Same inconsistency with current g++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20140219 (experimental)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to David Kredba from comment #10)
> There is preprocessed source in closed as duplicate of this error:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088.
>
> I will attach one from program cp.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60071
--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Oleg, any news on this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60183
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 25 10:47:21 2014
New Revision: 208118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-25 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-02-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60183
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 25 10:47:21 2014
New Revision: 208118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-25 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-02-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60221
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 25 10:47:21 2014
New Revision: 208118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-25 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-02-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
--- Comment #10 from David Kredba ---
There is preprocessed source in closed as duplicate of this error:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56088.
I will attach one from program cp.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Status now the same as 4.7 on the 4.8 branch (thus only the long-term
regression
against 4.4 remains).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55426
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55426
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Feb 25 10:25:26 2014
New Revision: 208117
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208117&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/55426
* config/arm/arm.h (CANNOT_CHANGE_MO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55426
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Feb 25 10:20:40 2014
New Revision: 208116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208116&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/55426
* config/arm/arm.h (CANNOT_CHANGE_MO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60337
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI, diagnostic
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60337
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---
(libffi does not honour the alignment either.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55426
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60337
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 32209
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32209&action=edit
test program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60337
Bug ID: 60337
Summary: s390: Function arguments are not aligned
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60314
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
Bug ID: 60336
Summary: va_start corrupts 6-th argument in case of empty type
used before the format string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
A correct version of the patch of comment#6 to varasm.c is:
Index: gcc/varasm.c
===
*** gcc/varasm.c(revision 208048)
--- gcc/varasm.c(wor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Feb 25 09:27:25 2014
New Revision: 208114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Skip gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 and gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 on Solaris 9 (PR
libfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Feb 25 09:27:25 2014
New Revision: 208114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Skip gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 and gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 on Solaris 9 (PR
libfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46476
Stefan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefan at schweter dot it
--- Comment #3 from St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60319
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60319
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 25 08:57:42 2014
New Revision: 208112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208112&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-25 Richard Biener
PR lto/60319
* lto-opts.c (lto_writ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #35 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
>
> --- Comment #34 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
> OK. Then I suggest two immediate things to do
96 matches
Mail list logo
