http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59358
Bug ID: 59358
Summary: Infinite loop generated with >=O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59357
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59357
Bug ID: 59357
Summary: no documentation of #pragma once
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-03-31 20:40:20 |2013-12-1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59356
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #14)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #13)
> > Will -fsanitize=undefined catch these? If so, perhaps the message shown
> > before reporting a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59356
Bug ID: 59356
Summary: ACATS tests C52102A and C52102C fail on
i686-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58410
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
> What I meant was, there are many places in the front-end that do:
>
> if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (op0)) op0 = save_expr (op0);
>
> and I'd like to replace it with
>
> op0 = maybe_save_expr (op0);
>
> that wou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5)
> > For __builtin_shuffle, the issue is that we now call save_expr, which always
> > sets TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS to 1. I don't know if it would make sense to
> > introduce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 31342
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31342&action=edit
patch
The __builtin_shuffle part of the patch seems fine.
For (i+i), I first tried not setting TREE_NOWARNING on t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59321
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 31341
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31341&action=edit
A patch with ChangeLog
Add ChangeLog.
df/
--without-cloog --without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131130 (experimental) (GCC)
Tested revisions:
r205547 - crash
4.8 r204890 - OK
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
Bug ID: 59354
Summary: Unexpected result in g++ when casting int to char from
an stl vector to an array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59321
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31336|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59321
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-fuse-ld has no effect on |-fuse-ld has no effect on
|-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59353
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59353
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
And looking at
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/ExampleUseAfterReturn - it
seems as if the options is called -fsanitize=use-after-return with Clang.
Having different names for the same feature
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59353
Bug ID: 59353
Summary: -fsanitize=return is not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57445
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57445
--- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Nov 30 10:58:42 2013
New Revision: 205549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205549&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-30 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/57445
* trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17)
> Perhaps add new attribute ssememalign, with default 0, which would be
> (maximum for all alternatives) required alignment for memory operands in the
> instruction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59352
Bug ID: 59352
Summary: Internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59275
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59275
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Nov 30 09:11:13 2013
New Revision: 205548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205548&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-30 Tobias Burnus
PR sanitizer/59275
* doc/invok
25 matches
Mail list logo
