[Bug c++/59248] New: [4.8 regression] pointless -Wconversion warning with sizeof, take 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59248 Bug ID: 59248 Summary: [4.8 regression] pointless -Wconversion warning with sizeof, take 2 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/59246] GCC should issue runtime error for calling pure virtual function with definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59246 --- Comment #1 from Ryou Ezoe --- According to the de facto standard C++ ABI: http://mentorembedded.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#pure-virtual __cxa_pure_virtual will be called: > if the user calls a non-overridden pure virtual function, which has u

[Bug libstdc++/59247] New: Bootstrap fails due to errors in libstdc++ sources with `--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59247 Bug ID: 59247 Summary: Bootstrap fails due to errors in libstdc++ sources with `--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace' Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/59246] New: GCC should issue runtime error for calling pure virtual function with definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59246 Bug ID: 59246 Summary: GCC should issue runtime error for calling pure virtual function with definition Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/59245] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:443

--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20131121 (experimental) [trunk revision 205234] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c $ gcc-4.8.2 -O3 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn2’: small.c:18:1: internal compiler

[Bug c++/59244] New: [c++11] can't specialize template on ref-qualified member function pointer type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59244 Bug ID: 59244 Summary: [c++11] can't specialize template on ref-qualified member function pointer type Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/21718] real.c rounding not perfect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 --- Comment #30 from Rick Regan --- I was running with the unfixed glibc, so that mislead me into thinking that, since it matched David Gay's output, it was right. But the fixed gcc and fixed glibc both get it right (0x0.1p-1022), and

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on *-apple-darwin* with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 --- Comment #8 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tejohnson Date: Fri Nov 22 04:16:47 2013 New Revision: 205243 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205243&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-21 Teresa Johnson PR target/59233 * cf

[Bug c++/59208] [4.9 Regression] ice in initialize_flags_in_bb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59208 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kilobyte at angband dot pl --- Comment #5 from

[Bug tree-optimization/59241] ICE in initialize_flags_in_bb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59241 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/59243] New: [SH] Build fails during compiling libjava/interpret.cc with segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59243 Bug ID: 59243 Summary: [SH] Build fails during compiling libjava/interpret.cc with segfault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build

[Bug other/59242] Ensure correct FLAGS are used at various stages of the build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59242 --- Comment #1 from Michael Forney --- Created attachment 31269 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31269&action=edit Fixes issue 1

[Bug other/59242] New: Ensure correct FLAGS are used at various stages of the build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59242 Bug ID: 59242 Summary: Ensure correct FLAGS are used at various stages of the build Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/19430] taking address of a var causes missing uninitialized warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430 --- Comment #27 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #26) > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #25) > > I don't see any reason for -Wuninitialized to not enable > > -Wmaybe-uninitialized. > > I can see

[Bug bootstrap/55915] fails to build lto-compress.c, zlib.h not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915 --- Comment #5 from Yves Caniou --- Le mardi 19 novembre 2013 02:36:30 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org a écrit : > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915 > > Andrew Pinski changed: > >What|Removed |Adde

[Bug tree-optimization/59241] New: ICE in initialize_flags_in_bb

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kilobyte at angband dot pl Created attachment 31267 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31267&action=edit deltaed test case When running g++ -O2, in a trunk snapshot 20131121-1 (from Debian) on attached

[Bug target/58314] SH4 error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58314 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 fro

[Bug middle-end/19430] taking address of a var causes missing uninitialized warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430 --- Comment #26 from Vincent Lefèvre --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #25) > I don't see any reason for -Wuninitialized to not enable > -Wmaybe-uninitialized. I can see 3 kinds of use: 1. Users who are interested in neither: the

[Bug rtl-optimization/59138] [4.8/4.9 Regression] possible packed struct miscompile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59138 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug middle-end/21718] real.c rounding not perfect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 --- Comment #29 from Joseph S. Myers --- GCC supports lots of different floating-point formats, not all IEEE, including variants such as "no subnormals" or "no infinities". Using round to zero/stickiness allows the existing GCC code that knows ab

[Bug tree-optimization/59221] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/59240] New: ICE in varpool_get_node

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kilobyte at angband dot pl Created attachment 31266 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31266&action=edit deltaed test case With gcc-snapshot 20131121-1, running g++ on the attached code fails with: cc1plus: internal compile

[Bug middle-end/21718] real.c rounding not perfect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 --- Comment #28 from Rick Regan --- Yes, that makes sense. I originally (mistakingly) thought that SIGNIFICAND_BITS was the intermediate precision for mpfr_strtofr(), like it was for gcc's original algorithm. Then I talked myself out of the "needs

[Bug target/59239] [SH] Improve decrement-and-test insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59239 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #0) > Created attachment 31264 [details] > Possible cleanup patch After applying the patch and replacing the "doloop_end" expander with (define_expand "doloop_end" [(use (ma

[Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ada/59234] New: Legal program rejected, a generic package having intricate formal package parameters could not be instantiated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59234 Bug ID: 59234 Summary: Legal program rejected, a generic package having intricate formal package parameters could not be instantiated Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1

[Bug target/59239] [SH] Improve decrement-and-test insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59239 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo --- Created attachment 31265 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31265&action=edit Reduced test case > There is one weird case in CSiBE in > linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatform/fs/iobuf.c (alloc_kiobuf_bhs

[Bug target/59239] New: [SH] Improve decrement-and-test insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59239 Bug ID: 59239 Summary: [SH] Improve decrement-and-test insn Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/59238] New: Dynamic allocating a list-initialized object of a type with private destructor fails.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59238 Bug ID: 59238 Summary: Dynamic allocating a list-initialized object of a type with private destructor fails. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug bootstrap/59235] [4.9 regression] SEGV in sparc_output_scratch_registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/57748] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE when expanding assignment to unaligned zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748 --- Comment #46 from Bernd Edlinger --- Note: a) the patch will should be OK for 4.8 but not for 4.7. b) the read-side does not ICE but will likely generate invalid code. => a patch for the read-side is sill pending for review: http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug rtl-optimization/59133] [4.9 regression] ICE after r204219 on SPEC2006 435.gromacs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59133 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/21718] real.c rounding not perfect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 --- Comment #27 from Joseph S. Myers --- No, it was lack of precision. MPFR may need to use many more than SIGNIFICAND_BITS internally in order to compute a result that is correctly rounded towards zero to SIGNIFICAND_BITS (plus the ternary value

[Bug rtl-optimization/55950] Invalid sqrt constant propagation with -frounding-mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55950 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on *-apple-darwin* with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin13 |*-apple-darwin* Host

[Bug tree-optimization/59221] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59229] [4.9 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_set_or_movmem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59229 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- It is caused by r204926.

[Bug bootstrap/59235] New: [4.9 regression] SEGV in sparc_output_scratch_registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235 Bug ID: 59235 Summary: [4.9 regression] SEGV in sparc_output_scratch_registers Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug target/59233] New: [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on x86_64-apple-darwin13 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 Bug ID: 59233 Summary: [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on x86_64-apple-darwin13 with -m32 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug sanitizer/59215] tsan: warning in shared_ptr_base.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59215 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug c++/59232] New: gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59232 Bug ID: 59232 Summary: gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug libgomp/59194] tsan detects race for real variables in an OMP reduction clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59194 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/59232] gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59232 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59231] New: gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59231 Bug ID: 59231 Summary: gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/59231] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59231 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 59232 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/59229] [4.9 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_set_or_movmem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59229 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug middle-end/59150] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in expand_one_var, at cfgexpand.c:1242 with -fopenmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59150 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/59221] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Nov 21 19:45:16 2013 New Revision: 205229 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205229&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/59221 * tree-ssa-threadedge.c (thread_across_edg

[Bug bootstrap/59235] [4.9 regression] SEGV in sparc_output_scratch_registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c++/59231] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/59211] init_priority doesn't work with constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug tree-optimization/59221] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 --- Comment #7 from Zhendong Su --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6) > Fixed on trunk. Again, sorry for the breakage. Thanks Jeff. That was quick!

[Bug target/58158] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with conditional moves on GPRs with a floating point conditional on mipsel with loongson2f

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/59221] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/59235] [4.9 regression] SEGV in sparc_output_scratch_registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on *-apple-darwin* with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/59231] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc misses [-Werror=sign-compare] when inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug bootstrap/59235] [4.9 regression] SEGV in sparc_output_scratch_registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Ranier, The only sparc box in the farm is the painfully slow gcc54 which someone else is hammering so bad there's no way I can reasonably test if the fix for 59221 also fixes this bug. Can you update your l

[Bug fortran/58410] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus uninitialized variable warning for allocatable derived type array function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58410 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Priority|P3

[Bug target/59229] [4.9 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_set_or_movmem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59229 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Priority|

[Bug target/59216] [4.9 Regression] ARM negdi*extendsidi regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59216 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Summary|[[4.9 Regression]

[Bug c++/59236] New: Mixing -O0 and -O2 object causes link error because of corrupted comadts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59236 Bug ID: 59236 Summary: Mixing -O0 and -O2 object causes link error because of corrupted comadts Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/57748] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE when expanding assignment to unaligned zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748 --- Comment #45 from Paulo J. Matos --- Can we backport Bernd's patch of the 20th of September to 4.8? I just met this ICE in 4.8 and I guess we should still try to fix them in 4.8 since it's still maintained.

[Bug sanitizer/59188] [4.9 Regression] lib64/libtsan.so: undefined reference to `sigsetjmp'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59188 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/59237] New: FAIL: ext/random/hypergeometric_distribution/operators/values.cc (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59237 Bug ID: 59237 Summary: FAIL: ext/random/hypergeometric_distribution/operators/value s.cc (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: U

[Bug middle-end/21718] real.c rounding not perfect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718 --- Comment #26 from Rick Regan --- So the problem was never lack of precision -- just lack of stickiness. We were seeing higher precision making more conversions work (e.g., more worked with 192 bits than 160), but ultimately, stickiness was requ

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on *-apple-darwin* with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59221] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Patch testing now.

[Bug target/58630] [4.9 Regression] Revision 203171 breaks several MS-ABI tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|REOPENED

[Bug rtl-optimization/59179] [4.9 Regression] Wrong code generated with -Og

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59179 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59025] [4.9 Regression] Revision 203979 causes failure in CPU2006 benchmark 435.gromacs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59025 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/58826] [4.9 Regression] Runfail on CPU2006 436.cactusADM with after r203377 for core-avx2 target.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58826 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on *-apple-darwin* with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 --- Comment #3 from Teresa Johnson --- On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:10 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 > > --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The ICE with -freorder-blocks-and-par

[Bug middle-end/57748] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE when expanding assignment to unaligned zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748 --- Comment #47 from Paulo J. Matos --- Would like to add that I backported the patch locally and all the testsuite is passing until now. The ICE I initially got is not gone as well. So I can confirm that as far as I know, the patch is indeed fine

[Bug rtl-optimization/59137] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Miscompilation at -O1 on mips/mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59137 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/59111] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE on invalid usage of auto in return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59111 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/59110] [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE using auto in cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59110 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/59236] Mixing -O0 and -O2 object causes link error because of corrupted comadts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59236 --- Comment #2 from Rafael Avila de Espindola --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Works on Linux/x86-64. Yes, it is a COFF only issue (tested on mingw).

[Bug rtl-optimization/59138] [4.8/4.9 Regression] possible packed struct miscompile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59138 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou at

[Bug fortran/59228] ICE with assume type and ASYNCHRONOUS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59228 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|una

[Bug fortran/59228] ICE with assume type and ASYNCHRONOUS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59228 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The trivial fix is: Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c === --- gcc/fortran/interface.c(revision 204922) +++ gcc/fortran/interface.c

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on *-apple-darwin* with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Thanks for the patch. It fixes the ICEs. I am currently regtesting.

[Bug gcov-profile/48361] gcov freezes when using --all-blocks (-a) flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48361 Tim Besard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tim.besard at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 f

[Bug fortran/59228] ICE with assume type and ASYNCHRONOUS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59228 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/51635] LTO should not merge (type) decls with different locations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/59188] [4.9 Regression] lib64/libtsan.so: undefined reference to `sigsetjmp'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59188 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on *-apple-darwin* with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 --- Comment #6 from Teresa Johnson --- On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:10 AM, tejohnson at google dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 > > --- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson --- > Reproduced with cross compiler: > > $ > /

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on *-apple-darwin* with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 --- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson --- Reproduced with cross compiler: $ /usr/local/google/home/tejohnson/gcc_trunk_9_x86_64-apple-darwin10/bld-gcc/./gcc/xg++ -B/usr/local/google/home/tejohnson/gcc_trunk_9_x86_64-apple-darwin10/bld-gcc/./gcc/ -B/

[Bug c/59219] ____builtin___memcpy_chk and -fno-builtin-memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59219 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I'm suggesting that when -fno-builtin is used, __builtin___memcpy_chk (and other __bultin_xxx_chk) invocations that are determined not to exceed the size of the buffer boundaries expand to a call to memcpy inst

[Bug c++/59236] Mixing -O0 and -O2 object causes link error because of corrupted comadts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59236 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Works on Linux/x86-64.

[Bug tree-optimization/59221] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59221 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- It is caused by r205074.

[Bug fortran/59228] ICE with assume type and ASYNCHRONOUS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59228 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug target/59233] [4.9 Regression] C++ failures after revision 205058 on x86_64-apple-darwin13 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c++/59224] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::uncaught_exception returns true while constructing exception.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59224 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/59215] tsan: warning in shared_ptr_base.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59215 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59163] [4.8/4.9 Regression] program compiled with g++ -O3 segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/59152] [4.9 Regression] ICE: loop 2's latch does not have an edge to its header with -fopenmp -fipa-pure-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/59154] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/59139] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_val_for, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:2267

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59139 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

  1   2   >