[Bug middle-end/58970] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_bit_range, at expr.c:4562

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 6 07:48:50 2013 New Revision: 20 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/58970 * expr.c (get_bit_range): Handle *offset == NUL

[Bug middle-end/58970] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_bit_range, at expr.c:4562

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970 --- Comment #26 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #25) > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #24) > > Created attachment 31169 [details] > > Another (better) attempt at fixing this ICE. > > > > This avoids any n

[Bug c/58988] -Werror=missing-include-dirs does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58988 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug regression/58985] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/pr57518.c scan-rtl-dump-not ira REG_EQUIV...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58985 --- Comment #5 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wmi Date: Wed Nov 6 02:46:17 2013 New Revision: 204438 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204438&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-05 Wei Mi PR regression/58985 * testsuite/

[Bug lto/59000] lto can't merge user-defined weak builtin functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59000 --- Comment #3 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > This works on trunk, but of course symtab merging is pre-empted here by tree > merging I think. The error can be reproduced on trunk with t1.i

[Bug other/58944] [4.9 Regression] bogus -Wunused-macros warnings when compiling Libreoffice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58944 Sriraman Tallam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davidxl at google dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/59012] alignas does not support parameter pack expansions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59012 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/58776] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-32.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58776 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter N

[Bug middle-end/57625] internal compiler error: seg fault when building gcc 4.7.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625 Anton Arapov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arapov at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug c++/59005] Having designated inits in C++ with -std=c++11 does not cause any errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59005 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- To get diagnostics for GNU extensions you need to use -pedantic, NOT -std=c++11, see the manual.

[Bug c++/59005] Having designated inits in C++ with -std=c++11 does not cause any errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59005 --- Comment #4 from p.micolet at gmail dot com --- Hi Daniel, I think it's a gcc extension, but it's not part of the C++11 standard, so surely adding the -std=c++11 should cause this code to not compile or am I misunderstanding something ? Thanks

[Bug c++/59005] Having designated inits in C++ with -std=c++11 does not cause any errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59005 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, but that means it should be possible to get a diagnostic with -pedantic

[Bug fortran/58989] [Regression] internal compiler error when using reshape function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58989 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/58989] [Regression] internal compiler error when using reshape function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58989 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Nov 5 22:44:42 2013 New Revision: 204425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204425&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-05 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/58989 * check.c (

[Bug c++/59005] Having designated inits in C++ with -std=c++11 does not cause any errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59005 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug c++/59013] alignas rejects valid constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59013 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Oops, yes it's the same, thanks

[Bug c++/58601] [meta-bug] alignas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58601 Bug 58601 depends on bug 59013, which changed state. Bug 59013 Summary: alignas rejects valid constant expressions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59013 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/58109] alignas() fails to compile with constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58109 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug c++/59013] alignas rejects valid constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59013 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/47488] sorry, unimplemented: string literal in function template signature

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488 Jeremiah Willcock changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jewillco at osl dot iu.edu --- Commen

[Bug fortran/59015] New: I/O of derived type with private component is forbidden

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59015 Bug ID: 59015 Summary: I/O of derived type with private component is forbidden Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c/59010] ICE in make_Decl_

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/58966] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with wrong usage of constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58966 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58868] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in count_type_elements, at expr.c:5495 with -std=gnu++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58868 --- Comment #11 from Volker Reichelt --- *** Bug 58966 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/20319] -fkeep-static-consts with -O asserted doesn't keep consts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20319 Pablo Alvarez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||palvarez at palvarez dot net --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/58809] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with complex variable in OpenMP reduction clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58809 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.9.0 | Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] New: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20131105 (experimental) [trunk revision 204388] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; a.out 2 $ gcc-4.8.2 -Os

[Bug fortran/58989] [Regression] internal compiler error when using reshape function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58989 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Nov 5 20:02:43 2013 New Revision: 204419 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204419&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-05 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/58989 * check.c (

[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug middle-end/58970] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_bit_range, at expr.c:4562

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #24) > Created attachment 31169 [details] > Another (better) attempt at fixing this ICE. > > This avoids any negative bitpos from get_inner_reference. > These negativ

[Bug fortran/58471] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid with missing type constructor and -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug c++/59012] alignas does not support parameter pack expansions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59012 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug c++/59013] New: alignas rejects valid constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59013 Bug ID: 59013 Summary: alignas rejects valid constant expressions Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priori

[Bug rtl-optimization/58997] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting gcc trunk and 4.8.2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58997 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 5 19:37:51 2013 New Revision: 204413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204413&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/58997 * loop-iv.c (iv_subreg): For IV_UNKNOWN_EX

[Bug middle-end/58970] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_bit_range, at expr.c:4562

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31145|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/59012] New: alignas does not support parameter pack expansions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59012 Bug ID: 59012 Summary: alignas does not support parameter pack expansions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #8 from octoploid at yandex dot com --- The following patch seems to fix the issue: diff --git a/gcc/ipa-inline.c b/gcc/ipa-inline.c index f4cb72a9c2b0..b69d4d96176a 100644 --- a/gcc/ipa-inline.c +++ b/gcc/ipa-inline.c @@ -698,7 +698,7

[Bug sanitizer/58718] Invalid check in libsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 --- Comment #7 from Yuri Gribov --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #6) > Can we keep this bug in one place, please? > Let https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=239 be the > primary one Ok, will do. I'm a littl

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/59011] New: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59011 Bug ID: 59011 Summary: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/59010] New: ICE in make_Decl_

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59010 Bug ID: 59010 Summary: ICE in make_Decl_ Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/59009] New: libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 Bug ID: 59009 Summary: libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blo

[Bug target/58630] [4.9 Regression] Revision 203171 breaks several MS-ABI tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Dominique

[Bug c++/58868] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in count_type_elements, at expr.c:5495 with -std=gnu++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58868 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58868] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in count_type_elements, at expr.c:5495 with -std=gnu++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58868 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 5 18:03:03 2013 New Revision: 204406 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204406&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/58868 * decl.c (check_initializer): Don't use build_vec_init

[Bug ipa/59008] [4.9 Regression] ICEs in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call / propagate_controlled_uses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59008 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev --- Created attachment 31168 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31168&action=edit Testcases GCC 20130728 /rev. 201294/ - works. GCC 20130908 /rev. 202372/ - fails. GCC 20130818 - fails with "i

[Bug ipa/59008] New: [4.9 Regression] ICEs in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call / propagate_controlled_uses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59008 Bug ID: 59008 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICEs in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call / propagate_controlled_uses Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug fortran/59007] Newbug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59007 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug fortran/59007] Newbug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59007 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #22 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:03:25PM +, richard.koolhans at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 > > --- Comment #21 from richard.koolhans at gmail dot com --- > > I'm no

[Bug fortran/59007] New: New Bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59007 Bug ID: 59007 Summary: http://www.new.com";>New Bug Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran A

[Bug sanitizer/58718] Invalid check in libsanitizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 --- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany --- Can we keep this bug in one place, please? Let https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=239 be the primary one

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #21 from richard.koolhans at gmail dot com --- I'm not really an expert on any architecture. But there is an important point that I think should not be missed. According to Van Snyder, a long-time member of the Fortran standards comm

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:10:00PM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 > > --- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier Coudert > --- > (In reply to Francoi

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #20 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #19) > (10) a reference to any other standard intrinsic function where each > argument is a restricted expression Yes, but the procedures of the intrinsic

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 octoploid at yandex dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30920|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/58990] G++ generates duplicate labels for linux 32-bit when optimization+LFS is enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58990 --- Comment #4 from Caleb Sunstrum --- Created attachment 31161 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31161&action=edit Preprocessed source with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

[Bug c++/58990] G++ generates duplicate labels for linux 32-bit when optimization+LFS is enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58990 --- Comment #3 from Caleb Sunstrum --- Created attachment 31160 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31160&action=edit Preprocessed source with -O1 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

[Bug c++/58990] G++ generates duplicate labels for linux 32-bit when optimization+LFS is enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58990 --- Comment #5 from Caleb Sunstrum --- I've attached preprocessed source with and without -O1 on the command line. The latter compiles, the former does not.

[Bug c++/58990] G++ generates duplicate labels for linux 32-bit when optimization+LFS is enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58990 --- Comment #6 from Caleb Sunstrum --- glibc on the system looks to be 2.9.2

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #17) > IEEE_SUPPORT_* functions are allowed in specification expressions On second thought, I think we can handle these on the library side (PURE f

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #17 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #16) > I want to mention that there is now some additional support for IEEE in > libgfortran/config. Yes, I see that this has grown since I first introduced

[Bug c++/58868] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in count_type_elements, at expr.c:5495 with -std=gnu++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58868 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16

[Bug tree-optimization/58697] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58697 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod --- Really? Trunk fails for me this morning. Works fine at -O2, but I get a segfault at -O3 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Andrew

[Bug c++/58724] ICE with attribute [[gnu::visibility("default")]] on namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58724 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58724] ICE with attribute [[gnu::visibility("default")]] on namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58724 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Nov 5 15:22:36 2013 New Revision: 204401 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204401&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-05 Paolo Carlini PR c++/58724 * doc/extend.te

[Bug tree-optimization/58653] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, looks like a very old patch in my dev tree fixes this (though reverting it doesn't make it reproduce on trunk): Index: tree-predcom.c ===

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 octoploid at yandex dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resoluti

[Bug ipa/58492] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58492 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Nov 5 15:09:40 2013 New Revision: 204399 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204399&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-05 Richard Biener PR ipa/58492 * passes.def (all_pass

[Bug tree-optimization/58955] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58955 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/58712] [4.9 Regression] issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/58555] [4.9 Regression] Floating point exception in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58555 --- Comment #6 from octoploid at yandex dot com --- Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. [Switching to process 21235] 0x0052531d in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p (edge=0x774412d8, outer_node=0x77442260, peeling=

[Bug other/58712] [4.9 Regression] issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712 --- Comment #7 from octoploid at yandex dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Any issues remaining? Yes. The second one.

[Bug ipa/58492] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58492 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/58955] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58955 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Nov 5 15:08:43 2013 New Revision: 204398 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204398&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-05 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/58955 * tree-l

[Bug tree-optimization/58698] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Spurious "may be used unitialized" warning when compiling with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/58811] [4.9 Regression] ICE with member variable of invalid type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58811 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug middle-end/58809] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with complex variable in OpenMP reduction clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58809 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/58775] [4.9 Regression] reassoc1 causes an ICE with some bool arithmetic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58775 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/58776] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-32.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/58759] [4.9 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58759 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/58733] [4.9 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:827

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58733 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/58726] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting trunk/4.7/4.6, but not 4.8)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58726 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug other/58712] [4.9 Regression] issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/58721] [4.9 Regression] The subroutine perdida is no longer inlined in fatigue.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58721 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Priority|P

[Bug c++/58701] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code, |

[Bug c++/58700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE declaring static bit-field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58700 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/58697] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58697 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/58653] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/58651] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58651 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58639] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on self-referential struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/46936] turn __attribute__ ((nonnull (x))) into assert in debug mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46936 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c++/58632] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE reusing template parameter name as class name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58632 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/58630] [4.9 Regression] Revision 203171 breaks several MS-ABI tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Richard Bien

[Bug c++/58613] [4.9 Regression] [c++1y] ICE with invalid lambda capture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58613 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/58627] [4.9 Regression] crash during compilation of boost testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|unknown

[Bug c++/58607] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with undeclared variable in constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58607 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug c++/58609] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with uninitialized variable in constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58609 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug bootstrap/58572] [4.9 regression] make bootstrap-lean leads to installation failure (doing extra rebuilds and invoking system compiler)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener -

  1   2   >