[Bug c++/58708] string literal operator templates broken

2013-11-01 Thread emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58708 --- Comment #9 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Fri Nov 1 23:00:48 2013 New Revision: 204305 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204305&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/cp: 2013-11-01 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2013-11-01 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- This somehow got worse. Now we only warn with -O1 or -Os but not with -O2 or -O3.

[Bug target/48326] Target attribute leaks from function pointers

2013-11-01 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, michael at talamasca dot ocis.net wrote: > Do I have to file a separate bug report in order to fix the problem that > current GCC releases can't be expected to bootstrap u

[Bug tree-optimization/44781] unjustified warning about uninitialized variable

2013-11-01 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44781 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/43736] Invalid uninitialized variable warning at -O3 -Wall

2013-11-01 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43736 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/55252] Caret diagnostic doesn't show useful location when macro clashes with name in system header

2013-11-01 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252 --- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- PR52962 is another case where it would make more sense to give the error on the macro expansion location rather than on the macro definition.

[Bug c++/58969] New: bogus error: the value of 'kName' is not usable in a constant expression

2013-11-01 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58969 Bug ID: 58969 Summary: bogus error: the value of 'kName' is not usable in a constant expression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug rtl-optimization/58968] New: Powerpc -mlra cannot compile ormas1.f in gamess Spec 2006 with -m32 -mcpu=power7 -O3 -mlra -w -ffast-math -funroll-loops

2013-11-01 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968 Bug ID: 58968 Summary: Powerpc -mlra cannot compile ormas1.f in gamess Spec 2006 with -m32 -mcpu=power7 -O3 -mlra -w -ffast-math -funroll-loops Product: gcc Versio

[Bug rtl-optimization/58967] New: Powerpc -mlra cannot compile quadrature_lib.cc in Spec2006 with -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -m32

2013-11-01 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58967 Bug ID: 58967 Summary: Powerpc -mlra cannot compile quadrature_lib.cc in Spec2006 with -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -m32 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58966] New: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with wrong usage of constexpr

2013-11-01 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58966 Bug ID: 58966 Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with wrong usage of constexpr Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/58965] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union

2013-11-01 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/58965] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union

2013-11-01 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work|

[Bug c++/58965] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union

2013-11-01 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965 Bug ID: 58965 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/58115] testcase gcc.target/i386/intrinsics_4.c failure

2013-11-01 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 31137 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31137&action=edit untested patch targetm.set_current_function modifies this_fn_optabs->pat_enable[654] to enable/disable CODE_FOR_

[Bug c++/58845] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Operator || and && broken for vectors

2013-11-01 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845 --- Comment #4 from Volker Reichelt --- Btw, clang 3.2 accepts the first code snippet and rejects the second one. I.e. it accepts && and || for vectors and returns a vector of the same size. IMHO GCC should also go for this route. Not because of

[Bug c++/58845] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Operator || and && broken for vectors

2013-11-01 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de --- Comment #3 f

[Bug target/58964] New: [4.9 Regression] Bogus message: error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=0 is not between 2 and 12

2013-11-01 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58964 Bug ID: 58964 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bogus message: error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=0 is not between 2 and 12 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58963] New: Does C++ need flag_complex_method = 2?

2013-11-01 Thread congh at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58963 Bug ID: 58963 Summary: Does C++ need flag_complex_method = 2? Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/58948] c++0x support for enums in namespaces

2013-11-01 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to sshannin from comment #2) > I wonder if there's any way to declare it such that the namespaces/types are > unambiguous that will parse correctly in both the c++11 and c++03 modes. The following

[Bug ipa/58862] [4.9 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure: lto1: ICE in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1008

2013-11-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak --- Untar the file from the link [1] to a temp dir, go to the gcc directory in the temp dir and type: /gcc/lto1 @ccBysEru.args Reading object files: build/genmddeps.o build/read-md.o build/errors.o .././libiberty

[Bug ipa/58862] [4.9 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure: lto1: ICE in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1008

2013-11-01 Thread tejohnson at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 --- Comment #11 from Teresa Johnson --- On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:01 AM, pa...@matos-sorge.com > wrote: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 >> >> --- Comment #9 from Paulo

[Bug ipa/58862] [4.9 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure: lto1: ICE in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1008

2013-11-01 Thread tejohnson at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 --- Comment #10 from Teresa Johnson --- On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:01 AM, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 > > --- Comment #9 from Paulo J. Matos --- > I didn't manage to reproduce the bug yet. With

[Bug ipa/58862] [4.9 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure: lto1: ICE in edge_badness, at ipa-inline.c:1008

2013-11-01 Thread pa...@matos-sorge.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862 --- Comment #9 from Paulo J. Matos --- I didn't manage to reproduce the bug yet. With the git sha before my commit 4bc0f16, I get the following on a profiledbootstrap on x64: insn-opinit.c: In function 'void init_all_optabs(target_optabs*)': insn

[Bug target/58115] testcase gcc.target/i386/intrinsics_4.c failure

2013-11-01 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 31136 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31136&action=edit reduced test case apparently this is not yet fixed... reduced test case attached.

[Bug c++/58845] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Operator || and && broken for vectors

2013-11-01 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code, | |rejects-valid

[Bug c++/58948] c++0x support for enums in namespaces

2013-11-01 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58948] c++0x support for enums in namespaces

2013-11-01 Thread sshannin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948 --- Comment #2 from sshannin at gmail dot com --- Ahh, good call. I forgot that it would parse like that. I wonder if there's any way to declare it such that the namespaces/types are unambiguous that will parse correctly in both the c++11 and c++0

[Bug c++/55252] Caret diagnostic doesn't show useful location when macro clashes with name in system header

2013-11-01 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55252 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael at talamasca dot ocis.net

[Bug c/58953] Unhelpful error message in conflict between enum and #define

2013-11-01 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58953 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/58834] [4.9 Regression] ICE on __builtin_shuffle within template function

2013-11-01 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58834 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58834] [4.9 Regression] ICE on __builtin_shuffle within template function

2013-11-01 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58834 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Fri Nov 1 15:23:24 2013 New Revision: 204296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204296&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-01 Marc Glisse PR c++/58834 gcc/cp/ * pt.c (type_dependen

[Bug c/58961] missing " may be used uninitialized in this function"

2013-11-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58961 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Well this is most likely a dup of another bug. >test.c:22:8: warning: ‘a’ is used uninitialized in this function >[-Wuninitialized] maybe used is closer to what it should be.

[Bug libstdc++/58962] Pretty printers use obsolete Python syntax

2013-11-01 Thread bmerry at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58962 --- Comment #1 from Bruce Merry --- I've now realised that this is actually just the tip of the iceberg - I suspect that libstdc++'s pretty printers aren't Python 3 ready, while Ubuntu is shipping a gdb linked to libython 3.3. Feel free to close i

[Bug fortran/58947] [OOP] ICE on select type with non-polymorphic selector

2013-11-01 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58947 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/58962] New: Pretty printers use obsolete Python syntax

2013-11-01 Thread bmerry at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58962 Bug ID: 58962 Summary: Pretty printers use obsolete Python syntax Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc

[Bug fortran/58904] ICE: accessing a component field of an unavailable type results in a seg fault

2013-11-01 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58904 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/57636] cr16: ICE while building libgcc

2013-11-01 Thread gcc at mag32 dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57636 --- Comment #4 from gcc at mag32 dot net --- Created attachment 31134 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31134&action=edit -save-temps file This is the -save-temps file generated when I run the offending command.

[Bug target/57636] cr16: ICE while building libgcc

2013-11-01 Thread gcc at mag32 dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57636 gcc at mag32 dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at mag32 dot net --- Comment #3

[Bug c/58961] missing " may be used uninitialized in this function"

2013-11-01 Thread afenkart at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58961 afenkart at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||afenkart at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/58961] New: missing " may be used uninitialized in this function"

2013-11-01 Thread afenkart at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58961 Bug ID: 58961 Summary: missing " may be used uninitialized in this function" Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug rtl-optimization/58960] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in bmp_iter_set_init

2013-11-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960 Bug ID: 58960 Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in bmp_iter_set_init Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-opti

[Bug c++/58954] [4.8/4.9 Regression] accessing a private member function in decltype of a friend class causes access control error

2013-11-01 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58954 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/58954] [4.8/4.9 Regression] accessing a private member function in decltype of a friend class causes access control error

2013-11-01 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58954 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/58952] Construct "std::getchar()" rejected when getchar is macro in C library

2013-11-01 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/58952] Construct "std::getchar()" rejected when getchar is macro in C library

2013-11-01 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Nov 1 11:16:56 2013 New Revision: 204292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204292&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-01 Paolo Carlini PR libstdc++/58952 * include

[Bug libstdc++/58952] Construct "std::getchar()" rejected when getchar is macro in C library

2013-11-01 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Nov 1 11:10:55 2013 New Revision: 204291 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204291&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-01 Paolo Carlini PR libstdc++/58952 * include

[Bug libstdc++/58952] Construct "std::getchar()" rejected when getchar is macro in C library

2013-11-01 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/52015] std::to_string does not work under MinGW

2013-11-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015 --- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely --- See comment 15 - it's only fixed if you use mingw-w64, and is not possible to fix for mingw

[Bug libstdc++/58952] Construct "std::getchar()" rejected when getchar is macro in C library

2013-11-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Oh sorry, I didn't read your report properly - so we're missing the #undef that would fix it

[Bug libstdc++/58952] Construct "std::getchar()" rejected when getchar is macro in C library

2013-11-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58952 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- That's a bug in uclibc, it should be a function (not a macro) in C++

[Bug c/58959] Add warning when format specifiers refers to wrong signess

2013-11-01 Thread lotharlutz at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58959 --- Comment #2 from Markus Mayer --- Created attachment 31132 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31132&action=edit output of 'gcc -v -save-temps -Wall -Wextra test.c'

[Bug c/58959] Add warning when format specifiers refers to wrong signess

2013-11-01 Thread lotharlutz at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58959 --- Comment #1 from Markus Mayer --- Created attachment 31131 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31131&action=edit preprocessed test file

[Bug c/58959] New: Add warning when format specifiers refers to wrong signess

2013-11-01 Thread lotharlutz at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58959 Bug ID: 58959 Summary: Add warning when format specifiers refers to wrong signess Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/58958] New: [4.9 Regression] Wrong aliasing info for variable index

2013-11-01 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58958 Bug ID: 58958 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Wrong aliasing info for variable index Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Sev

[Bug rtl-optimization/58384] [4.9 regression] Runfail on spec2000/253.perlbmk if lto and pre-reload scheduler is used on x86 after r200133.

2013-11-01 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58384 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- I checked that the fix for PR58831 does not cure the issue, but we cab close this bug since 253.perlbmk is passed now with pre-reload scheduler.

[Bug libstdc++/52015] std::to_string does not work under MinGW

2013-11-01 Thread matanshukry at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015 Matan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matanshukry at gmail dot com --- Comment #24 from

[Bug tree-optimization/58956] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

2013-11-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/58384] [4.9 regression] Runfail on spec2000/253.perlbmk if lto and pre-reload scheduler is used on x86 after r200133.

2013-11-01 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58384 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/58925] --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs breaks libcilk install

2013-11-01 Thread octoploid at yandex dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925 octoploid at yandex dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/58955] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58955 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/58957] [4.8 Regression] compilation hangs at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

2013-11-01 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58957 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58948] c++0x support for enums in namespaces

2013-11-01 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.