http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57125
Ryan Hill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
Conrad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||conradsand.arma at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
--- Comment #4 from Ian Pilcher ---
Created attachment 30990
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30990&action=edit
Assembler file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
--- Comment #3 from Ian Pilcher ---
Created attachment 30989
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30989&action=edit
Preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
--- Comment #2 from Ian Pilcher ---
Created attachment 30988
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30988&action=edit
Header file (required to compile C source)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
Bug ID: 58698
Summary: Spurious "may be used unitialized" warning when
compiling with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58698
--- Comment #1 from Ian Pilcher ---
Created attachment 30987
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30987&action=edit
C source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58697
Bug ID: 58697
Summary: wrong code (segfaults) at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #8 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #7)
> Fixed on trunk.
Verified (also against the original).
Thanks Jeff.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58695
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Travis Snoozy from comment #2)
> I don't see how the linker script can be the problem here -- perhaps I'm
> missing a point? Looking at my output, .bss and its variables *are*
> allocated in memor
--with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131011 (experimental) [trunk revision 203458] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
0
$ gcc-4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57518
Brooks Moses changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brooks at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58686
--- Comment #2 from Cong Hou ---
I think this issue is more like a missed optimization.
If the iteration number can be calculated as a constant value at compile time,
then the function assert_loop_rolls_lt() won't be called due to an early exit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58695
--- Comment #2 from Travis Snoozy ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think you should do either -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss or even better use
> a linker script which forces the bss to be allocated in memory.
Thanks; I didn't kn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
sable-shared --disable-libatomic
--disable-threads --without-headers --disable-bootstrap --with-newlib
--with-bugurl=http://bugs.gentoo.org/ --with-pkgversion='Gentoo SVN'
Thread model: single
gcc version 20131011 (experimental) rev. 203465 (Gentoo SVN)
Command line that triggers the bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58691
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58694
Bug ID: 58694
Summary: Support intrinsic functions for ARMv8 Crypto extension
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58693
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Lennox ---
Note: I have also filed the equivalent bug with Apple.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58693
Bug ID: 58693
Summary: GCC aarch64 arm_neon.h inconsistent with Apple clang
arm64 arm_neon.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58692
Bug ID: 58692
Summary: aarch64 arm_neon.h functions are not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58587
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner ---
This patch caused a regression in power8 support. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58673.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Oct 11 20:31:25 2013
New Revision: 203463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203463&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58640
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (mark_threaded_b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58691
Bug ID: 58691
Summary: OpenMP 4: Surprising results with OMP_PLACES=
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58673
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30978|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Well, guess the warning could have many false positives.
Not more than the other -Wsuggest-attribute= warnings, no? I don't see how it
could be wrong. Sure you may
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58690
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 30982
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30982&action=edit
A patch
In x32, when TLS address is in DImode and Pmode is SImode.
copy_addr_to_reg will fail. This patch adds ix86_cop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57742
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 30981
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30981&action=edit
basic patch
This is a very limited version of this optimization. It is in
simplify_builtin_call, so only triggers i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
5) A warning that suggests adding the attribute to a function, when gcc can
detect that the return value is != 0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58690
Bug ID: 58690
Summary: internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at
explow.c:641
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
--- Comment #2 from Balaji V. Iyer ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Doesn't compile on trunk.
Yes, this shouldn't compile in trunk because this feature is not implemented in
it yet. It is an issue in Cilk Plus branch and I am on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58633
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]|[4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58633
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 11 14:35:23 2013
New Revision: 203448
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203448&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58633
* parser.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31671
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31671
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 11 14:18:42 2013
New Revision: 203444
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203444&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-11 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/31671
* pt.c (con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
Bug ID: 58689
Summary: Enhance returns_nonnull
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24242
Bug 24242 depends on bug 20318, which changed state.
Bug 20318 Summary: RFE: add attribute to specify that a function never returns
NULL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20318
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19476
Bug 19476 depends on bug 20318, which changed state.
Bug 20318 Summary: RFE: add attribute to specify that a function never returns
NULL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20318
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21856
Bug 21856 depends on bug 20318, which changed state.
Bug 20318 Summary: RFE: add attribute to specify that a function never returns
NULL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20318
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20318
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24825
Bug 24825 depends on bug 20318, which changed state.
Bug 20318 Summary: RFE: add attribute to specify that a function never returns
NULL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20318
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58626
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I have updated my do-proper-partition-dependencies patch and verified it fixes
this issue. We now generate
:
__builtin_memmove (&MEM[(void *)&a + 24B], &MEM[(void *)&a + 48B], 8);
:
# b.0_10 = PHI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58685
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58355
Feng Gao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fgao7 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58529
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus ---
I wonder whether the approach of Teresa's patch might help with this issue, cf.
(first email) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00123.html
(latest patch) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org |
Assignee|unassigned at
54 matches
Mail list logo
