http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with VTV merge: r201555.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58303
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58303
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58292
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58303
Bug ID: 58303
Summary: C99 union initializers new union members clobber
earlier data
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
Bug ID: 58302
Summary: compilation error :
std::negative_binomial_distribution::operator(e, p)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
rget=i686-w64-mingw32 --disable-multilib --disable-nls
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-arch=i686
--with-tune=generic
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.9.0 20130902 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 30743
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30743&action=edit
Yet another untested fix
Ok, this is somewhat similar to Martin's very first attempt
to fix this.
After starin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58301
Bug ID: 58301
Summary: [4.9 Regression] error: inlining failed in call to
always_inline 'set_mem_alias_set'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56519
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
ith: /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-202158-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/
--without-cloog --without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130902 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
--- Comment #6 from Jan Engelhardt ---
It seems to be ineffective.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #7 from Joshua Cogliati ---
I wrote the patch for 4.8.1 (which is the easy part), now I will see if I can
get approval to submit it through the bureaucracies (the hard part).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58106
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Sep 2 19:28:01 2013
New Revision: 202184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202184&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-02 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/58106
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_edge_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10541
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I cannot agree with you. You are interpreting the code that may access the
> array beyond declared bounds as invalid, which is simply not true.
6.5 Use of data objects
... The value of a subscript
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #16 from Krzysztof Strasburger ---
Dear Dominique,
I cannot agree with you. You are interpreting the code that may access the
array beyond declared bounds as invalid, which is simply not true.
As you pointed it out before, unnamed comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56382
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Sep 2 16:19:20 2013
New Revision: 202179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/56382
* expr.c (emit_move_complex): Do not move co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57708
--- Comment #6 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: clyon
Date: Mon Sep 2 14:59:09 2013
New Revision: 202176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202176&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-26 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
Backport from trunk r201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58299
Bug ID: 58299
Summary: Ada defines UNICODE and _UNICODE too late for
__MINGW32__
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58292
--- Comment #3 from Timo Sintonen ---
It seems gdc has a fix that does not produce this any more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58298
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222
blake.fumberger at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58298
Bug ID: 58298
Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in mentions_vars_p_field_decl, at
lto/lto.c:1392
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58298
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 2 13:24:30 2013
New Revision: 202168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202168&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-02 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/57511
* tree-scalar-e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57985
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed by r199422 - doesn't seem to be easily backportable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Krzysztof Strasburger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|IN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #4 from Winston Smith ---
I see. Is that the cause for the issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenther at suse dot de |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
--- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt ---
>you cannot include a precompiled header from inside another header.
Ok. So, this limitation was properly implemented in gcc 4.7, which simply
skipped over the indirectly-included .gch file as if it did not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58224
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58226
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58233
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
In practice, this would block the release of 4.9.0. Thus hope for sure, it's
only matter of when.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57910
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
--- Comment #2 from Jan Engelhardt ---
Oh, -DPRECOMP `wx-config --cflags` is a remnant and may be removed from the
Makefile. The issue continues to be reproducible. It appears on openSUSE
Factory's gcc 4.8.
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57985
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201
--- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Nice. Any hope?
Chromium is another project which we can't build with gcc trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58297
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58297
Bug ID: 58297
Summary: wrong DTOR call is generated when virtual base is
present
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51075
Bug 51075 depends on bug 45170, which changed state.
Bug 45170 Summary: [F2003] allocatable character lengths
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51394
Bug 51394 depends on bug 45170, which changed state.
Bug 45170 Summary: [F2003] allocatable character lengths
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 45170, which changed state.
Bug 45170 Summary: [F2003] allocatable character lengths
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55484
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
For a cross to mips-elf this works for me:
> ./cc1plus -quiet t.i -flto
t.i:36:5: warning: 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration [enabled by
default]
};
^
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58290
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot de
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58282
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tentative fix:
...
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index ee3503c..c8b328c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -5189,7 +5189,7 @@ finish_transaction_stmt (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21682
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26605
Bug 26605 depends on bug 21682, which changed state.
Bug 21682 Summary: Disallowed using declaration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21682
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21682
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 2 09:42:39 2013
New Revision: 202163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202163&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-09-02 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/21682, implement DR 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58296
Bug ID: 58296
Summary: ivopts is unable to handle some loops altered by the
loop header copying pass
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58242
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295
Bug ID: 58295
Summary: The combination pass doesn't eliminates some extra
zero extensions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> It looks like
>
> Index: gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.c
> ===
> --- gcc/tree-scalar-evolution.c (re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #12 from Krzysztof Strasburger ---
Created attachment 30740
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30740&action=edit
Example of failing FORTRAN code, with assembler output from gfortran 4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Krzysztof Strasburger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|IN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58294
Bug ID: 58294
Summary: ice in update_ssa_across_abnormal_edges, at
tree-inline.c:1892
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58289
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to James K. Lowden from comment #2)
> 1. This is not mentioned anywhere in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58289
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
77 matches
Mail list logo