http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41209
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
For ALIGN, we should consider following Intel's compiler by also using it for
ALLOCATE and not only for static arrays; cf.
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-alignment-to-assist-vectorization
(That
/local/libexec/gcc/h8300-gchen-elf/4.9.0/lto-wrapper
Target: h8300-gchen-elf
Configured with: ../gcc-4.9.0/configure --target=h8300-gchen-elf
--without-header --disable-nls --enable-language=c --disable-threads
--disable-shared --enable-werror=no
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.9.0 20130827
ang.
Fails using g++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20130827 (experimental):
g++ -c -std=c++11 /tmp/t1.cc -o /tmp/t.o
/tmp/t1.cc: In constructor 'A::A(int)':
/tmp/t1.cc:3:16: error: no matching function for call to 'A::A()'
A(int x) : A() { }
^
/tmp/t1.cc:3:16: note: candidates ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58254
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Doesn't look like a C++ front-end issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58254
Bug ID: 58254
Summary: ICE when using PGO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927
--- Comment #7 from Christian Widmer ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> (In reply to Christian Widmer from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 30703 [details]
> > Patch to add Ivy Bridge/Haswell detection
> >
> > Here is a short patch add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For testing bugs against trunk it is better to omit both --disable-checking and
--enable-checking=release and just use the default.
Because otherwise the compiler doesn't perform various verifications and you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
--- Comment #10 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> For testing bugs against trunk it is better to omit both --disable-checking
> and --enable-checking=release and just use the default.
> Because otherwise the compil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Now that Aldy's/Jakub's OMP_SIMD patch (backend only) is in, r202029, - we can
use it to annotate DO CONCURRENT loops. (The semantics should be the same - and
match vector length of infinity.)
For the usage,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
--- Comment #8 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Are you sure your gcc isn't configured with --enable-checking=release ?
Jakub, below is my gcc configure:
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure
--enable-languag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4)
> The test case
> gcc.dg/vect/pr56933.c fails on a pentium II,
> because of invalid
> instruction.
>
> A fairly obvi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994
--- Comment #15 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
If GCC intends to handle Bessel functions j0, j1, jn, y0, y1, yn (POSIX), there
may be differences with GNU MPFR. See my messages and bug report:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.standards.posix.aust
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58096
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at gmail dot
com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253
Bug ID: 58253
Summary: IPA-SRA creates aligned loads from unaligned memory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58252
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58252
Bug ID: 58252
Summary: ice in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Summary|Option
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57219
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58251
Bug ID: 58251
Summary: -flto causes ICE lto1: internal compiler error: in
splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4706
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58227
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13981
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin ---
Related bugs:
PR 50548, PR 33906
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48959
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49076
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53945
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19817
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org|
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
Patch committed:
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 25 22:55:12 2013
New Revision: 201981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-26 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/58146
* a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58250
Bug ID: 58250
Summary: -fprofile-use causes: "warning: -fprefetch-loop-arrays
is not supported with -Os"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57876
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013
New Revision: 202018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57860
PR rtl-optimization/57861
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57875
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013
New Revision: 202018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57860
PR rtl-optimization/57861
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57877
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013
New Revision: 202018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57860
PR rtl-optimization/57861
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57860
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013
New Revision: 202018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57860
PR rtl-optimization/57861
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57861
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013
New Revision: 202018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57860
PR rtl-optimization/57861
PR rtl-optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 57718 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57718
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57861
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57875
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57877
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57876
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #25 from Joost VandeVondele
---
*** Bug 58248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Steven, is there anything else you are expecting from me to solve this problem?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|janvidar at e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janvidar at extatic dot org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58249
Jan Vidar Krey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janvidar at extatic dot org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58249
Bug ID: 58249
Summary: [C++11] internal compiler error with std::vector and
deleted copy constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Are you sure your gcc isn't configured with --enable-checking=release ?
I really get:
pr58248.c: In function ‘main’:
pr58248.c:14:1: error: definition in block 2 follows the use
main ()
^
for SSA_NAME: _126
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
--- Comment #5 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> No, the only change I've made to this testcase was instead of using
> printf use if (c != 1) __builtin_abort ();.
I checked the modified test case below:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No, the only change I've made to this testcase was instead of using
printf use if (c != 1) __builtin_abort ();.
If you can, next time please try to adjust the testcases such that they abort
if miscompiled and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
--- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> I get ICE instead, starting with r199048 .
This means that 58247 is probably indeed a dup of 57592, which also started
with r199048 (according to the comment on 575
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
Jakub, perhaps you used the testcase from 58247, not the one below?
I double checked and still get wrong code on this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58247
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #24 from Joost VandeVondele
---
Also the other 'dup' PRs still fail (gcc -O3) . Collecting testcases here:
> cat PR58018.c
int a, b, c, d, e;
void bar (int p)
{
int f = b;
e &= p <= (f ^= 0);
}
void foo ()
{
for (; d; d++)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #23 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Easwaran Raman from comment #21)
> Created attachment 30690 [details]
> Proposed patch
I tested this patch on top of the one posted to the mailing list (comment #18),
and this fixes the te
67 matches
Mail list logo
