[Bug tree-optimization/58121] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: cc1224a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58121 Bug ID: 58121 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: cc1224a Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug target/58105] wrong code generation for multiversioned functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58105 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- OK, this seems seems to be a possible fix: --- i386.c.jj 2013-07-23 17:56:37.0 +0200 +++ i386.c 2013-08-11 01:41:38.0 +0200 @@ -29830,7 +29830,7 @@ DECL_IGNORED_P (decl) = 0; /*

[Bug c++/51488] ICE on infinite template recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51488 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58059] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58059 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56163] Template instantiation limit not kicking in

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56163 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/57777] [4.7 Regression] Python module fails compilation with "-march=core-avx2 -O3"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Piotr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lbbsome9 at gmail dot com --- Comment #11 from Pi

[Bug c++/58119] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Invalid ambiguous default type conversion with only a single invalid conversion listed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/56824] pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop regression for GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dehao at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libgcc/58120] New: libgcc.a and libgcc_eh.a have incorrect symbol visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58120 Bug ID: 58120 Summary: libgcc.a and libgcc_eh.a have incorrect symbol visibility Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/44978] derived types are resolved more than once

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44978 --- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin --- Created attachment 30630 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30630&action=edit Janus' patch with void functions (In reply to janus from comment #11) > IMHO it is probably not worth the hassle.

[Bug fortran/58099] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [F03] over-zealous procedure-pointer error checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #12) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #10) > > (In reply to janus from comment #7) > > > The following patch makes the error go away, but (as expected) cause

[Bug c++/58119] New: Invalid ambiguous default type conversion with only a single invalid conversion listed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 Bug ID: 58119 Summary: Invalid ambiguous default type conversion with only a single invalid conversion listed. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c++/58118] New: Local variables specified with asm("reg") may not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58118 Bug ID: 58118 Summary: Local variables specified with asm("reg") may not work Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug fortran/51945] Diagnose wrong default initialization of DTs in a DT declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51945 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #6) > Btw, here is a variant which triggers an internal error similar to comment > 3, but already with a clean trunk: I guess one could just get rid of the internal e

[Bug target/58105] wrong code generation for multiversioned functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58105 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686*-*-* Component|c++

[Bug fortran/44978] derived types are resolved more than once

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44978 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #10) > > Do you have a simple idea how to improve the patch in this regard? > The first one that comes to mind (beyond changing the return type to void) > is c