[Bug c++/58054] 11.3 Friends, example from standard not compiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58054 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/58053] Bogus "error ... is private ... within this context"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58053 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58053] Bogus "error ... is private ... within this context"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58053 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/58083] New: ICE with lambda as default parameter of a template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58083 Bug ID: 58083 Summary: ICE with lambda as default parameter of a template function Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/58083] ICE with lambda as default parameter of a template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58083 --- Comment #1 from Alex Turbov --- Created attachment 30615 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30615&action=edit original source code

[Bug other/58082] New: avr-gcc vector table relocation truncation error with -mrelax option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58082 Bug ID: 58082 Summary: avr-gcc vector table relocation truncation error with -mrelax option Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug rtl-optimization/58079] internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58079 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini --- By the way, with my patch installed, all the new testcases seem fine, consistent with clang.

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini --- The ICE is of course wrong, I already sent a patch for it. If there are other issues, let's handle one at a time, in different bugs, after having checked that mainline GCC is still affected and that there are

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 Evgeny Panasyuk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||evgeny.panasyuk at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug c++/57850] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gdr at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/57885] unordered_map find slower in 4.8.1 than 4.7.3 with integer key

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57885 --- Comment #10 from François Dumont --- Created attachment 30611 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30611&action=edit hashtable.h File to replace the one in include/bits

[Bug libstdc++/57885] unordered_map find slower in 4.8.1 than 4.7.3 with integer key

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57885 --- Comment #9 from François Dumont --- Created attachment 30610 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30610&action=edit hashtable_policy.h File to replace the one in include/bits folder

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Current clang++, for example, simply errors out, no warning.

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 --- Comment #4 from Nickolay Merkin --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #3) > I meant something else: I meant that on a different compiler, your code > could be hardly rejected, you should not use arithmetic on void * in the > first place.

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- I meant something else: I meant that on a different compiler, your code could be hardly rejected, you should not use arithmetic on void * in the first place.

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 --- Comment #2 from Nickolay Merkin --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1) > Note that strictly speaking arithmetic on a pointer to void would be even > invalid. Yes of course, and the compiler has notified that... and then it crashed.

[Bug c++/58080] internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- Note that strictly speaking arithmetic on a pointer to void would be even invalid.

[Bug c++/58080] New: internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58080 Bug ID: 58080 Summary: internal compiler error, decltype in function declaration (for SFINAE purposes) Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug go/58075] Unable to build go on ia64-hp-hpux11.31

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58075 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- That compilation error means that a configure test detected that the setcontext call modified TLS variables, which should not happen. That does happen on some older versions of Solaris and NetBSD, and the

[Bug c++/57850] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850 --- Comment #5 from Dima --- Why is this bug is still marked unconfirmed? Is there something I can do to confirm it?

[Bug c++/57532] [4.8/4.9 regression] operator& broken when used on rvalues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57532 --- Comment #7 from Salamanderrake --- What I should have asked is what revision is gcc 4.8.1 and what revision was the fix put into trunk?

[Bug c++/57532] [4.8/4.9 regression] operator& broken when used on rvalues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57532 --- Comment #6 from Salamanderrake --- I will have to patch it up to that point from gcc 4.8.1 to Comment #3, is the main repo git or subversion?

[Bug target/57293] [4.8/4.9 Regression] not needed frame pointers on IA-32 (performance regression?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- I've started this work. But unfortunately, i have too many things on my plate now. I was too optimistic. Now I can say only that I am planning to fix it on stage1 (so the fix should be in gcc4.9).

[Bug c/58079] New: internal compiler error: in do_SUBST, at combine.c:711

reate a small test case, but changing the source code and keeping the error is difficult. I stripped the source code as far as possible and attached the preprocessor output. mips64r5900el-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20130804 (experimental) I didn't changed the GCC source code, even if the

[Bug target/57293] [4.8/4.9 Regression] not needed frame pointers on IA-32 (performance regression?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293 --- Comment #4 from Fanael --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #1) > But I am planning to fix it until end of June. Any progress on this one? Patching GCC to use Satan^H^H^H^H^Hreload is a workaround, but one I'd rather avoid if at all

[Bug middle-end/57134] [4.9 Regression] ICE with -mstrict-align and inline assembly on ppc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57134 --- Comment #3 from Anton Blanchard --- Created attachment 30607 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30607&action=edit Compilation failure with -mstrict-align on ppc64 The original testcase isn't failing, but this test fails to co

[Bug c++/58063] default arguments evaluated twice per call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58063 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug c++/58063] default arguments evaluated twice per call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58063 Fanael changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fanael4 at gmail dot com --- Comment #10 from Fa

[Bug c++/58078] explicitly-defaulted template class methods are not instantiated by explicit template instantiation definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58078 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57728] Explicit template instantiation with defaulted method causes missing symbol

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57728 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||edward.hades at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/58078] New: explicitly-defaulted template class methods are not instantiated by explicit template instantiation definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58078 Bug ID: 58078 Summary: explicitly-defaulted template class methods are not instantiated by explicit template instantiation definition Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1

[Bug libstdc++/50703] std::stringstream not thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50703 peter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liuxiaopi349 at hotmail dot com --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/58069] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tree_ssa_unswitch_loops at -O3 in 32 bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58069 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eraman at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/58077] Crash on matching template with bool type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58077 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/58077] New: Crash on matching template with bool type instead

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58077 Bug ID: 58077 Summary: Crash on matching template with bool type instead Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/58076] internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in get_narrower, at tree.c:8500

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58076 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/58069] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tree_ssa_unswitch_loops at -O3 in 32 bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58069 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Slightly reduced int b, c; static *d = &c; void foo (void) { int f, i, j, *g; int h[] = { 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 }; for (i = 0; i < 1; i++) { int *k = &b; if (*g) fn3 (); el

[Bug c++/58076] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in get_narrower, at tree.c:8500

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58076 Bug ID: 58076 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in get_narrower, at tree.c:8500 Produc

[Bug tree-optimization/58069] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tree_ssa_unswitch_loops at -O3 in 32 bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58069 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- t.c: In function ‘main’: t.c:43:5: error: definition in block 13 follows the use int main () ^ for SSA_NAME: _117 in statement: _49 = _117 | _57; t.c:43:5: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed 0xaa

[Bug tree-optimization/58069] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tree_ssa_unswitch_loops at -O3 in 32 bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58069 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|