http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628
Bug ID: 57628
Summary: spurious error: division by zero in if statement
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53184
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Ridge ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Because then the anonymous class has the name "Foo" for linkage purposes,
> > and
> > has external linkage. When Foo referes to the c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
jim at meyering dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jim at meyering dot net
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
Bud Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alipasha.celeris at gmail dot
com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56136
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56136
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Jun 15 21:20:29 2013
New Revision: 200128
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/49074
PR fortran/56136
* dependency.c (gfc_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin ---
Comment #14 removes an unnecessary packing/unpacking.
The bug remains fixed. :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Jun 15 21:20:29 2013
New Revision: 200128
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/49074
PR fortran/56136
* dependency.c (gfc_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I can't reproduce with FSF gcc 4.8.1 and 4.7.2 on Fedora 17 x86_64. Your
archlinux system compiler is presumably somewhat modified; can you try again
with an FSF 4.8.1? Also please make sure the 4.7.2 yo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57425
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30310|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57425
--- Comment #7 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Created attachment 30310
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30310&action=edit
patch for alias problem during cse pass
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Note that I only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57627
Bug ID: 57627
Summary: -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess should make an exception
for character types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57626
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53184
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
I guess this could be the right time to properly submit something to
gcc-patches (for 4.9)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56996
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57620
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57623
--- Comment #4 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com ---
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 05:10:57PM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> If both start and length are constants, then it will be folded by the
> compiler,
> similarly if you use it inside of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57623
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to sgunderson from comment #2)
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 04:33:14PM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > The fix for the compiler is easy, but at least the AVX2 spec documents that
> > _bextr_u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57626
Bug ID: 57626
Summary: [C++11] ICE with template alias and member function
pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57623
--- Comment #2 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com ---
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 04:33:14PM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The fix for the compiler is easy, but at least the AVX2 spec documents that
> _bextr_u{32,64} intrinsics actually take
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625
Bug ID: 57625
Summary: internal compiler error: seg fault when building gcc
4.7.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57623
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 30307
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30307&action=edit
gcc49-pr57623.patch
The fix for the compiler is easy, but at least the AVX2 spec documents that
_bextr_u{32,64} i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34574
Igor Pashev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pashev.igor at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51615
--- Comment #2 from Igor Pashev ---
See also #34574
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51615
Igor Pashev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pashev.igor at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57624
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57620
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57624
Bug ID: 57624
Summary: BZHI instrinsic is missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57623
Bug ID: 57623
Summary: BEXTR intrinsic has memory operands switched around
(fails to compile code)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57451
--- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson ---
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:19 PM, ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57451
>
> --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant ---
> The problem is a lexical block in main() th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45619
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45608
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52788
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #9 from Tomasz Gajewski ---
Following patch seems to solve this problem although I don't like it very much.
I think whole get_basic_type function should be moved to the beginning of
printers.py.
And additionally I'm not sure if this c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57619
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.8.1
Summary|std::unordered
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47915
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44978
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41827
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is this PR another WONTFIX?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56136
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57606
--- Comment #1 from Ellis N. Thomas
---
On further consideration of the Bug 57606 reported for host_gnatmake and
host_gnatchop produced in run_acats, the entire approach seems flawed.
It uses dirname to extract the directory name from the full n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56977
--- Comment #2 from Harald van Dijk ---
Inlining isn't relevant:
__attribute__((__error__("error"))) void error ();
void f (int i) {
if (__builtin_constant_p (i)) {
error ();
}
}
fails the same way. But it doesn't fail with all uses of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57620
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
There seems to be more issues in the raw string literal lexing. E.g.
const char *s = R"a??/(x)a??/";
should be I think handled the same as
const char *s = "x";
with -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 -trigraphs, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52347
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org|
Blocks|57622
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57622
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57622
Bug ID: 57622
Summary: -W -Wall -Werror -Wno-unused gives Wunused-parameter
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52347
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Simon Richter from comment #4)
> Testcase is simple:
>
> $ cat tt.cpp
>
> void bar(int baz) { }
>
> $ g++-4.7 -c -W -Wall -Werror -Wno-unused tt.cpp
>
> $ g++-4.8 -c -W -Wall -Werror -W
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57618
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
52 matches
Mail list logo