[Bug fortran/46703] Wrong I/O output (only) when running under valgrind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46703 --- Comment #6 from Bud Davis --- It is a problem with Valgrind. One that is even mentioned in the (valgrind) manual. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197915 It has been open for about 4 years, not fixed yet. Short summary. Don't use valgr

[Bug fortran/51024] OpenMP: ICE with type(c_ptr) in private()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51024 --- Comment #2 from Brian Taylor --- This problem persists in gcc 4.8.0.

[Bug fortran/57328] New: Missed optimization: Unable to vectorize Fortran min and max intrinsics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57328 Bug ID: 57328 Summary: Missed optimization: Unable to vectorize Fortran min and max intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/46703] Wrong I/O output (only) when running under valgrind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46703 Bud Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c++/57327] New: 'derived' is an ambiguous base class of 'base' diagnostic is bacwards

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57327 Bug ID: 57327 Summary: 'derived' is an ambiguous base class of 'base' diagnostic is bacwards Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/57326] New: Piecewise folding of operations on PHI nodes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57326 Bug ID: 57326 Summary: Piecewise folding of operations on PHI nodes Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57325] New: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57325 Bug ID: 57325 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1306 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57314] [Core/1635] default template arguments for member template functions of class templates are instantiated before allowed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57314 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/57324] New: Undefined behavior issues found with clang's -fsanitize=undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57324 Bug ID: 57324 Summary: Undefined behavior issues found with clang's -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57323] Overloaded && operator evaluates operands in the wrong order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57323 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/57322] [4.9 Regression] Segfault at -O1 in build_and_add_sum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57322 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCONF

[Bug c++/57323] Overloaded && operator evaluates operands in the wrong order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57323 --- Comment #1 from calli911 at web dot de --- Created attachment 30144 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30144&action=edit The output of the command.

[Bug c++/57323] New: Overloaded && operator evaluates operands in the wrong order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57323 Bug ID: 57323 Summary: Overloaded && operator evaluates operands in the wrong order Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug libgcc/56101] pthread program abort

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56101 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 55779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libgcc/55779] Debug program abort on pthread_exit() while using -static-libgcc and -static-libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55779 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/56101] pthread program abort

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56101 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/57322] New: Segfault at -O1 in build_and_add_sum

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: antoine.balestrat at gmail dot com Using GCC 4.9.0 as of 20130518 : $ cat seg.c int a; void f(void) { char b; for (;; a++) { char *p = &b, *q; *q = b < 0 & !!*p; } } $ xgcc -

[Bug c++/57314] default template arguments for member template functions of class templates are instantiated before allowed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57314 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug libgcc/55779] Debug program abort on pthread_exit() while using -static-libgcc and -static-libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55779 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||siddhesh at redhat dot com --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/23684] Combine stores for non strict alignment targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684 --- Comment #12 from msharov at users dot sourceforge.net --- I'd like to add that this is not some corner case; this is a very common issue. In my own projects, the compiler's inability to combine stores is the single largest reason for using inli

[Bug libgcc/56101] pthread program abort

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56101 --- Comment #3 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- Here's the simplified non-preprocessed test, since it's not a problem with the compiler proper: $ cat > tmain.C #include #include #include extern "C" void *worker_thread(void *tap) { int j[1] = {

[Bug libgcc/56101] pthread program abort

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56101 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||siddhesh at redhat dot com --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/57321] static function call miscompiled at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57321 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson --- I can reproduce the wrong-code. It was fixed on 4.8 branch by r198737 aka PR56988.