[Bug c++/57301] bit rotation is optimized in c but not c++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57301 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > How old is your gcc build? (please fill in the version field when reporting > bugs) Oups, sorry, you mention it (4.7 and 4.8) in the text. > This was fixed by Jakub

[Bug c++/57301] bit rotation is optimized in c but not c++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57301 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- How old is your gcc build? (please fill in the version field when reporting bugs) This was fixed by Jakub recently, so if you could check with current trunk...

[Bug middle-end/57286] [4.9 regression] infinite recursion in fold-const.c:10037

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57286 --- Comment #6 from gee --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3) > Intuitively, I'd say: > > @@ -10041,7 +10041,7 @@ > >if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == COND_EXPR > || TREE_CODE (arg1) == VEC_COND_EXPR > - || COMPARISON_CLASS_

[Bug middle-end/57286] [4.9 regression] infinite recursion in fold-const.c:10037

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57286 --- Comment #5 from gee --- Created attachment 30129 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30129&action=edit proposed patch

[Bug c++/57301] New: bit rotation is not optimized in c but not c++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57301 Bug ID: 57301 Summary: bit rotation is not optimized in c but not c++ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Oh without optimization 6 registers will be used rather than the 4 that GCC can do with optimizations turned on.

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 --- Comment #8 from Chris Mihelich --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > Actually it only needs 4 (and not 6) due to holding of the pointer of y and > x can happen with only 2 registers. That's not what GCC is doing, actually. When I

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57296] Infinite loop in do while when using -O2

s not have that option. > > I'll try to compile gfortran from the source and see if the bug goes away. Ok, the code works after I compiled gfortran from sources. My current version is GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.8.1 20130515 (prerelease) I'm changing the status to resolved.

[Bug tree-optimization/57294] [4.9 Regression] ice in remove_described_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at suse dot cz --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug rtl-optimization/57300] New: statement in expression miscompiled at -O3 in 32-bit mode

lower optimization, or with gcc 4.7 and earlier it works correctly. $ gcc-trunk -v Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu ... gcc version 4.9.0 20130515 (experimental) [trunk revision 198926] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O2 -m32 small.c $ ./a.out 1 $ gcc-trunk -O3 -m64 small.c $ ./a.out 1 $ gcc-4.7 -O3 -m32

[Bug middle-end/57278] -fno-if-conversion and -fno-if-conversion2 do not work as intended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57278 --- Comment #3 from Shiwen Hu --- Thanks for the explanations regarding predicated instructions! How about the sign extension instructions that can be moved out of the loop? Shiwen

[Bug target/57260] Generated R_MIPS_GOT_MIPS relocation for direct function call while compiling with -O2 on MIPS N64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 --- Comment #6 from Chris Mihelich --- Ah, but "=m" and "m" operands shouldn't need any register at all: their purpose is just to declare that a specific piece of memory is written or read in the assembly code, a declaration that helps the optimiz

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Chris Mihelich from comment #4) > Yes indeed, x is loaded from the stack into edi, and y is loaded from the > stack into esi, as the register variable declarations specified. That's two > registe

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 --- Comment #4 from Chris Mihelich --- Yes indeed, x is loaded from the stack into edi, and y is loaded from the stack into esi, as the register variable declarations specified. That's two registers. Where are the other two?

[Bug fortran/57296] Infinite loop in do while when using -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57296 --- Comment #2 from Antti-Pekka Hynninen --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Works for me on x86_64-apple-darwin10 (OSX 10.6.8) for both 4.8.0 and trunk. > Where did you get your gfortran? Does -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizati

[Bug fortran/57297] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Chris Mihelich from comment #2) > The asm statement uses only two registers. Of the six inputs and outputs, > only "r" (p) and "r" (q) are registers; the four "=m" and "m" entries only > declare

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 --- Comment #2 from Chris Mihelich --- The asm statement uses only two registers. Of the six inputs and outputs, only "r" (p) and "r" (q) are registers; the four "=m" and "m" entries only declare that memory is read or written in the assembly cod

[Bug fortran/57296] Infinite loop in do while when using -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57296 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Works for me on x86_64-apple-darwin10 (OSX 10.6.8) for both 4.8.0 and trunk. Where did you get your gfortran? Does -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations help?

[Bug inline-asm/57299] Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think you are wrong in how many registers that inline-asm uses. It uses 4 registers, two each to hold y and x which have to be loaded into a register from the stack.

[Bug middle-end/57287] GCC 4.9.0 fails to build GDB on Ubuntu 12.04

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Severity|blocker

[Bug inline-asm/57299] New: Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57299 Bug ID: 57299 Summary: Inline assembly memory dependencies produce spurious loads, register pressure, compilation failures Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/57295] target c6x-elf // internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57295 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Severity|blocker

[Bug target/49146] segv from libgcc_s when raising an exception, or unwinding stack with backtrace with ms_abi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49146 --- Comment #5 from Ben Woodard --- Ariel, In talking to the engineers regarding this, they would like _builtin_expect hints to tell the compiler to generate code saying that hitting this is unlikely. http://blog.man7.org/2012/10/how-much-do-bu

[Bug libgomp/57298] GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY will not work when system has >1024 cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57298 --- Comment #1 from Steffen Persvold --- Created attachment 30128 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30128&action=edit Proposed patch to fix >1024 processor system support This patch modifies libgomp/config/linux/affinity.c libg

[Bug libgomp/57298] New: GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY will not work when system has >1024 cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57298 Bug ID: 57298 Summary: GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY will not work when system has >1024 cores Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/49146] segv from libgcc_s when raising an exception, or unwinding stack with backtrace with ms_abi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49146 --- Comment #4 from Ben Woodard --- Created attachment 30127 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30127&action=edit Patch from Ariel that prevents the segv

[Bug fortran/57297] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297 Bug ID: 57297 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 -O2 execution test Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug lto/57290] [4.9 Regression] After r198333 the aermod runtime is ~10% slower when compiled with -fprotect-parens and -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57290 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- There is a lot of noise in these numbers(?) Well, AFAICT aermod.f90 has a "non-monotonic" behavior for the different optimizations: when playing with --param max-inline-insns-auto=xx, the execution ti

[Bug fortran/57296] New: Infinite loop in do while when using -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57296 Bug ID: 57296 Summary: Infinite loop in do while when using -O2 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/57294] [4.9 Regression] ice in remove_described_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c/57295] New: target c6x-elf // internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57295 Bug ID: 57295 Summary: target c6x-elf // internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: bloc

[Bug c/57294] New: ice in remove_described_reference

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Created attachment 30123 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30123&action=edit C source code I just tried to compile the package plymouth-0.8.9-0.2013.03.26.0 on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 2013051

[Bug c++/31952] parameters may be redeclared in a function try-block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31952 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jason at gcc

[Bug target/57293] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] not needed frame pointers on IA-32 (performance regression?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293 Bug ID: 57293 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] not needed frame pointers on IA-32 (performance regression?) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug middle-end/57286] [4.9 regression] infinite recurison in fold-const.c:10037

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57286 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- Shorter testcase: typedef long vec __attribute__((vector_size(16))); vec f(vec x){ return (x<0)|1; }

[Bug fortran/56919] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result for SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libffi/56033] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c on powerpc-*-* and sparc-sun-solaris2* with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I just suggested that you post it since > it's almost completely your work, but am fine with doing it myself. Well, my work has been only to test the recipe in comment #5 for the trivial cases. The

[Bug tree-optimization/57124] 254.gap@spec2000 got miscompare after r198413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57124 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/57276] Waste work in cgraph_edge_brings_all_agg_vals_for_node()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57276 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug bootstrap/57292] New: Failure in build after stage 3, concerning libitm.la

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57292 Bug ID: 57292 Summary: Failure in build after stage 3, concerning libitm.la Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug bootstrap/57291] New: Failure in build stages 2 and 3 concerning pseudo-op: .balign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57291 Bug ID: 57291 Summary: Failure in build stages 2 and 3 concerning pseudo-op: .balign Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug rtl-optimization/56833] [4.9 Regression] Valid register is over written by postreload pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56833 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Jorn W

[Bug c++/56782] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Regression with empty pack expansions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56782 --- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli --- A candidate patch was sent to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00841.html for this.

[Bug tree-optimization/57289] [4.9 Regression] ICE during 454.calculix compilation with -O3 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57289 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/57290] [4.9 Regression] After r198333 the aermod runtime is ~10% slower when compiled with -fprotect-parens and -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libffi/56033] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c on powerpc-*-* and sparc-sun-solaris2* with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug c++/56976] using braces to initialize a reference forces copy construction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56976 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug fortran/57285] [OOP] ICE on invalid: "gfc_array_dimen_size(): Bad dimension" due to SIZE intrinsic with invalid dim on CLASS dummy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57285 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/57290] [4.9 Regression] After r198333 the aermod runtime is ~10% slower when compiled with -fprotect-parens and -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57290 --- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 15 May 2013, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57290 > > Bug ID: 57290 >Summary: [4.9 Regression] After r198333 the aer

[Bug rtl-optimization/56776] [4.8/4.9 Regression] valgrind errors within ira

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56776 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/57290] New: [4.9 Regression] After r198333 the aermod runtime is ~10% slower when compiled with -fprotect-parens and -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57290 Bug ID: 57290 Summary: [4.9 Regression] After r198333 the aermod runtime is ~10% slower when compiled with -fprotect-parens and -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/57289] [4.9 Regression] ICE during 454.calculix compilation with -O3 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57289 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Component|lto

[Bug c++/56976] using braces to initialize a reference forces copy construction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56976 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Akim Demaille from comment #2) You are right, I misread your code example in the haste. I agree that this is not related to CWG 1604 (we have no mixed case) and I think it is clear that both init

[Bug c++/56966] [4.7 Regression] wrong warning with -Werror (wrong code without Werror?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56966 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libffi/56033] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c on powerpc-*-* and sparc-sun-solaris2* with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- [...] >> I've included the complete patch in i386-pc-solaris2.* bootstraps, too, >> and saw no regressions, so I suggest you post the compl

[Bug c++/56971] [4.9 Regression] GCC claims a friend function to be overloaded, but it isn't

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56971 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug lto/57289] New: ICE during 454.calculix compilation with -O3 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57289 Bug ID: 57289 Summary: ICE during 454.calculix compilation with -O3 -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libgcc/57221] [4.8/4.9 regression] libgcc symbol visibility changes break Android blobs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57221 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-bionic-eabi Target Milestone|---

[Bug libffi/56033] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c on powerpc-*-* and sparc-sun-solaris2* with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The following snippet fixes the > cls_unit_va.c failure for me: ... Confirmed on powerpc-apple-darwin9. Thanks for the fix. > I've included the complete patch in i386-pc-solaris2.* bootstraps, too,

[Bug fortran/57217] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression][OOP] Accepts invalid TBP overriding - lacking arguments check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57217 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/57199] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus warning: iteration NNNN invokes undefined behavior -Waggressive-loop-optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1

[Bug fortran/57129] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_extended_derived_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/57101] [4.8/4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57101 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1

[Bug fortran/57042] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE/Segfault with -fdump-parse-tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/57019] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Compiler crashes (and make wrong assignments) at some combinations of pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57019 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/56939] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Derived type is being used before it is defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56939 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/56919] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong result for SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/56852] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid: "Bad array reference" for an undeclared loop variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56852 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/56782] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Regression with empty pack expansions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56782 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1

[Bug rtl-optimization/56776] [4.8/4.9 Regression] valgrind errors within ira

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with "find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug c/57287] GCC 4.9.0 fails to build GDB on Ubuntu 12.04

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/57286] [4.9 regression] infinite recurison in fold-const.c:10037

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57286 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Intuitively, I'd say: @@ -10041,7 +10041,7 @@ if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == COND_EXPR || TREE_CODE (arg1) == VEC_COND_EXPR - || COMPARISON_CLASS_P (arg1)) + || (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (arg1) && !

[Bug c/57287] GCC 4.9.0 fails to build GDB on Ubuntu 12.04

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287 Pedro Alves changed: What|Removed |Added CC||palves at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug target/57288] New: cfi_restore should precede cfi_def_cfa_offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57288 Bug ID: 57288 Summary: cfi_restore should precede cfi_def_cfa_offset Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: tar

[Bug c/57287] GCC 4.9.0 fails to build GDB on Ubuntu 12.04

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287 hmb changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug libstdc++/57283] missing typedefs in specialized std::mem_fn for member variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57283 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- N.B. you can also do it with a nested std::bind expression and std::logical_not std::bind(std::logical_not(), std::bind(std::mem_fn(&cls::value), std::placeholders::_1)) in C++14 that means you c

[Bug c/57287] New: GCC 4.9.0 fails to build GDB on Ubuntu 12.04

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287 Bug ID: 57287 Summary: GCC 4.9.0 fails to build GDB on Ubuntu 12.04 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/56807] mingw32: Conflict between stack realignment and stack probe destroys function argument in EAX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56807 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/57286] [4.9 regression] infinite recurison in fold-const.c:10037

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57286 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/57286] [4.9 regression] infinite recurison in fold-const.c:10037

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57286 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org Compo

[Bug web/55237] Linkify r123456 in comments to point to SVN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 --- Comment #15 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com --- > --- Comment #14 from Frédéric Buclin --- > On the other hand, you are free to not click on a register name which is > linkified. That is true, but it's a bit distracting. Let's not bike she

[Bug libstdc++/57283] missing typedefs in specialized std::mem_fn for member variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57283 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Lin Yi-Li from comment #2) > Sorry I missed that 'pm is a pointer to member function...'. > > I know that C++11 has lambda, but using std::mem_fn is sometimes much clear. You can still use std

[Bug c/57286] New: [4.9 regression] infinite recurison in fold-const.c:10037

frename-registers -fno-strict-overflow -o /tmp/ccEheGnn.s [New Thread 16040.0x374c] [New Thread 16040.0x1e20] GNU C (GCC) version 4.9.0 20130515 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin) compiled by GNU C version 4.9.0 20130515 (experimental), GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.2.0-dev, MPC version

[Bug web/55237] Linkify r123456 in comments to point to SVN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 --- Comment #14 from Frédéric Buclin --- On the other hand, you are free to not click on a register name which is linkified.

[Bug web/55237] Linkify r123456 in comments to point to SVN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/57281] [4.9 Regression] x86_64-linux loop fails to terminate at -O3 -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57281 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > Which means that split has to do that? Presumably, yes. peephole2 already does it.

[Bug rtl-optimization/57281] [4.9 Regression] x86_64-linux loop fails to terminate at -O3 -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57281 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5) > > postreload leaves a REG_DEAD note on the > > > > (insn 19 78 21 4 (parallel [ > > (set (mem:DI (reg/f:SI 3 bx [orig:68 D.1736 ] [68]) [4 *_18+0 S8

[Bug web/55237] Linkify r123456 in comments to point to SVN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug rtl-optimization/57281] [4.9 Regression] x86_64-linux loop fails to terminate at -O3 -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57281 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug web/55237] Linkify r123456 in comments to point to SVN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 --- Comment #11 from Frédéric Buclin --- What's the max value of a register name? r31?

[Bug tree-optimization/56265] [4.8 Regression] ICE in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- Redirecting to builtin_unreachable committed as revision 198926.

[Bug libstdc++/57283] missing typedefs in specialized std::mem_fn for member variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57283 --- Comment #2 from Lin Yi-Li --- Sorry I missed that 'pm is a pointer to member function...'. I know that C++11 has lambda, but using std::mem_fn is sometimes much clear. But according to standard, value from std::mem_fn for variable will not be

[Bug fortran/57284] ICE with "find_array_spec: unused as (1)" in conjunction with size() intrinsic on class dummy parameter shape

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #1 from Lorenz Hüdepohl --- Might be related to Bug #57285

[Bug fortran/57285] ICe on invalid: "gfc_array_dimen_size(): Bad dimension" due to size() intrinsic with invalid dim on class() dummy argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57285 --- Comment #1 from Lorenz Hüdepohl --- Created attachment 30120 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30120&action=edit Minimal test case

[Bug fortran/57285] New: ICe on invalid: "gfc_array_dimen_size(): Bad dimension" due to size() intrinsic with invalid dim on class() dummy argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57285 Bug ID: 57285 Summary: ICe on invalid: "gfc_array_dimen_size(): Bad dimension" due to size() intrinsic with invalid dim on class() dummy argument Product: gcc Vers

  1   2   >