http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57168
Bug #: 57168
Summary: [graphite] -fgraphite-identity breaks
app-office/libreoffice-3.6.6.2 OpenXML filter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57167
Bug #: 57167
Summary: [graphite] Virtualbox 4.2.2 and above wont work with
multiple CPUs.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
URL: h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57166
Bug #: 57166
Summary: Manual no longer documents -Wmissing-noreturn alias
for -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #15 from Alan Modra 2013-05-04 01:21:50
UTC ---
With this patch I'm still seeing odd trees in place_block_symbol(). In the
following, the type is the correct size (168 bytes), but the var_decl size too
small (48 bytes). place
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57163
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Link failure with |Link failure with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57165
Bug #: 57165
Summary: ICE when using -fprofile-use in cgraph.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vvnic.holas at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57164
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57164
--- Comment #1 from Nicholas 2013-05-03 21:24:03
UTC ---
(assuming 32-bit ints and two's complement)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57164
Bug #: 57164
Summary: enumerator value -1 is too large for underlying type
‘unsigned int’
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-05-03
20:32:51 UTC ---
I have a patch testing that fixes the items identified in the attachment of
Comment #4 by accepting them as extension.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57159
--- Comment #5 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03 20:05:19 UTC ---
Actually the last paragraph might not make sense -- insn 16/17's *operands* are
not available at the end of the BB, but only if the REG_EQUAL note contents are
substitu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57159
--- Comment #4 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03 19:56:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 30029
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30029
Before/after dumps
Here are some before/after dumps taken from the out-of-tree por
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner 2013-05-03
19:18:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 30028
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30028
Patch to use scalar modes for TF/TD caller saves.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57159
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt 2013-05-03
17:32:05 UTC ---
Teresa, thanks for the prompt fix!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57149
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8 Regression] wrong |[4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57149
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
17:00:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 30027
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30027
Build log1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
16:59:42 UTC ---
I attached build log where compilation is aborted after calling
add_symbol_to_partition_1 of FieldCacheImpl.o.
If it is not useful, please tell me how to provide more verbose details
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2013-05-03 16:48:41
UTC ---
> Hi,
>you are right, the symbol is also missing in FieldCacheImpl.o.
>
> Unlike FieldCacheImpl.o, propagg.o really contains symbol:
> _ZNSt11_Tuple_implILm0EJRKiEEC1Ev
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2013-05-03 16:37:34
UTC ---
I've checked in a patch to the trunk which should fix this problem. If you
could verify on ia64 it would be greatly appreciated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #12 from Teresa Johnson 2013-05-03
16:24:33 UTC ---
My powerpc bootstrap completed successfully. Sent patch out for review.
Teresa
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:03 AM, sje at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57163
Bug #: 57163
Summary: Link failure with thread_local
std::default_random_engine
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #11 from Steve Ellcey 2013-05-03 16:03:48
UTC ---
My mips build seems to be working with the patch. It has gotten past the point
where it died last night but the complete bootstrap isn't finished yet.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #10 from Teresa Johnson 2013-05-03
15:41:14 UTC ---
Hi Steve!
Can you confirm whether the patch I just sent also fixes the mips failure?
Thanks,
Teresa
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:40 AM, sje at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #9 from Teresa Johnson 2013-05-03
15:40:16 UTC ---
The problem is that with the rounding divide, an odd numbered
probability being propagated along a 50-50 branch will be rounded up
along both edges, resulting in 1 higher proba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
15:22:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 30025
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30025
Preprocessed propag.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57025
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin.liska at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57025
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
15:20:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 30024
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30024
Preprocessed propagg.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
15:19:08 UTC ---
Hi,
you are right, the symbol is also missing in FieldCacheImpl.o.
Unlike FieldCacheImpl.o, propagg.o really contains symbol:
_ZNSt11_Tuple_implILm0EJRKiEEC1Ev
I'm going to attac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #7 from Teresa Johnson 2013-05-03
15:10:50 UTC ---
Thanks for the test case - reproduced with my stage1 compiler on gcc110. Teresa
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:02 AM, dje at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-03
15:05:55 UTC ---
$ readelf -Ws obj627/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/.libs/*.so.* | grep
_atable_syms_gnu_classpath_tools_keytool_Main.ShutdownHook
9864: 00359ca824 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30010|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn 2013-05-03 15:02:18
UTC ---
Created attachment 30022
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30022
Testcase
Testcase from Anton Blanchard transferred from PR 57161
# gcc -O2 -c foo.c
fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson 2013-05-03
15:01:51 UTC ---
Couldn't reproduce on x86_64, so I am on gcc110 trying to get a
bootstrap compiler build going to reproduce. Also see the dup with
testcase (again doesn't reproduce on x86_64,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anton at samba dot org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57161
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2013-05-03 14:19:22 UTC
---
Hi,
I can not find any symbol
ZNSt11_Tuple_implILm0EJRKPN6lucene5index11IndexReaderEEEC1Ev in the
preprocessed file you added. Can you check if the symbol appears in LTO symbol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57156
Matthias Kretz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #7 from M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57106
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57051
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.1 |---
Summary|[4.8 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57051
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-03
13:57:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 3 13:16:13 2013
New Revision: 198580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198580&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57162
Bug #: 57162
Summary: Ofast does not make use of avx while O3 does
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57084
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2013-05-03
13:45:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > @@ -1993,6 +1994,18 @@ ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization (gi
> >token = OBJ_TYPE_REF_TOKEN (otr);
> >fndecl = gimple_get_virt_method_for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57161
--- Comment #2 from Anton Blanchard 2013-05-03
13:17:31 UTC ---
A bisect hit this commit:
2013-05-02 Teresa Johnson
* loop-unswitch.c (unswitch_loop): Use helper routines with rounding
divides.
* cf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
13:07:56 UTC ---
Flags:
g++ -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DLIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY -DLINUX -DNDEBUG -DOPTIMIZE
-DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DSOLAR_JAVA -DSUPD=410 -DUNIX -DUNX -DX86_64 -D_PTHREADS
-D_REENTRANT -DRTL_USING -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2013-05-03 13:03:32 UTC
---
Hmm, not weakref but really weak alias of external function. This seems even
more weird.
What are the flags used to compile the .o file?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57161
--- Comment #1 from Anton Blanchard 2013-05-03
12:53:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 30021
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30021
Testcase
4.9.0 20130503 (experimental) (GCC)
# gcc -O2 -c foo.c
foo.c: In function 'testcase':
foo.c:40:1: internal compiler error: in check_probability, at basic-block.h:941
}
^
0x105bb57b check_probability
../../gcc/gcc/basic-block.h:941
0x105bb57b check_probability
../../gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
12:44:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 30020
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30020
FieldCacheImpl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
12:43:56 UTC ---
Looks like the problem has many occurrences in CLucene:
_ZNSt11_Tuple_implILm0EJRKPN6lucene5index11IndexReaderEEEC1Ev/146876
(_ZNSt11_Tuple_implILm0EJRKPN6lucene5index11IndexReaderEEE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57160
Bug #: 57160
Summary: short-circuit IF only with -ffrontend-optimize
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancemen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54577
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stevenb.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57156
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-05-03
12:27:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > I wouldn't know how to counter this for the _mm_cmpeq_epi8 case
>
> Actually, I have yet to find something in the sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57158
--- Comment #3 from Matt Clarkson 2013-05-03
12:21:22 UTC ---
Thanks, glad it's been reported.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57084
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2013-05-03 12:17:20 UTC
---
> @@ -1993,6 +1994,18 @@ ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization (gi
>token = OBJ_TYPE_REF_TOKEN (otr);
>fndecl = gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo (tree_low_cst (token, 1),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2013-05-03 12:15:48 UTC
---
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
>
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
> 11:20:00 UTC ---
> lto-partition.c:265 (add_symbol_to_partition)
>
> c++filt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47769
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57159
--- Comment #1 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03 11:56:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 30019
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30019
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57159
Bug #: 57159
Summary: Latent bug in RTL GCSE/PRE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57106
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #4 from Uros B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57106
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47769
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Kretz 2013-05-03 11:45:49
UTC ---
Another ping.
The bug status is still WAITING...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt 2013-05-03
11:45:06 UTC ---
There is a powerpc64 pool machine available. I believe it's gcc110.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-05-03 11:27:33 UTC ---
On 3-May-13, at 6:11 AM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The preprocessed testcase from the first attachment fails needs a
> different
>
> sanity check in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška 2013-05-03
11:20:00 UTC ---
lto-partition.c:265 (add_symbol_to_partition)
c++filt:
std::_Tuple_impl<0ul, int const&>::_Tuple_impl()
dump_symtab_node:
_ZNSt11_Tuple_implILm0EJRKiEEC1Ev/281156 (_ZNSt11_Tuple_impl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-05-03
10:53:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 30016 [details]
> amended patch
>
> Using an i686-px-linux-gnu X hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 cross compiler, I've
> verified that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57155
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-05-03
10:51:10 UTC ---
Keep reading 5.4, you didn't get to the bit about type conversions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra 2013-05-03 10:47:22
UTC ---
Created attachment 30017
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30017
Use .org instead of padding in section anchor block
This one ensures that offsets of emitted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra 2013-05-03 10:42:12
UTC ---
No, of course that doesn't work. We make references into the section anchor
block as .LANCHORn+offset, so the items in the block must be exactly where
place_block_symbol() expect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57158
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-03
10:36:15 UTC ---
Matter of priorities. Note that unordered and associative containers and
forward_list are already fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54577
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mattyclarkson at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57158
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57155
--- Comment #2 from rockeet 2013-05-03 10:35:53 UTC
---
In this case, C++ shouldn't create a temporal object and bound the const ref to
it. The C++ standard (C++11) says:
5.2.1
Subscripting
[expr.sub]
1
A postfix expression followed by an expre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54941
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57158
Bug #: 57158
Summary: std::list.erase(const_iterator pos) not implemented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30004|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2013-05-03
09:58:20 UTC ---
After some discussion with Jakub and Richard - and after doing some code reads,
I think it is best do handle this in tree-ssa-math-opts.c (search for
gimple_expand_builtin_powi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57147
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-05-03
09:57:17 UTC ---
A similar testcase is for not 'const' but 'noreturn' discovery which should
end up purging the fallthru edge.
struct __jmp_buf_tag {};
typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag jmp_buf[1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57156
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Kretz 2013-05-03 09:56:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I wouldn't know how to counter this for the _mm_cmpeq_epi8 case
Actually, I have yet to find something in the standard that says using an
uninitia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul at preney dot ca
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53846
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-03
09:47:02 UTC ---
It would be nice to either track down which patch fixed it (I vaguely remember
something but I'm not sure) or have a testcase failing quickly and sharply.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57147
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-05-03
09:46:45 UTC ---
It's fixup_cfg that removes the abnormal edge after ipa-pure-const figures
that SetNaClSwitchExpectations () is const. And it's
gimple_purge_dead_abnormal_call_edges that
rem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57156
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz 2013-05-03 09:37:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think this is undefined code as you use a uninitialized.
I wouldn't know how to counter this for the _mm_cmpeq_epi8 case, but for
_mm_comtrue_ep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54318
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57147
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-05-03
09:24:45 UTC ---
Reduced testcase, miscompiles at -O.
struct __jmp_buf_tag {};
typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag jmp_buf[1];
extern int _setjmp (struct __jmp_buf_tag __env[1]);
jmp_buf g_retur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085
synergye at codefi dot re changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54318
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-03
09:20:10 UTC ---
Too late for 4.7.x, but let me add the testcase to the testsuite, to be safe.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57157
Bug #: 57157
Summary: Poor optimization of portable rotate idiom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57156
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2013-05-03
09:16:20 UTC ---
I think this is undefined code as you use a uninitialized.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57156
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Kretz 2013-05-03 09:15:33
UTC ---
The failure disappears with -fno-tree-ccp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57044
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
