[Bug regression/56751] Can not confugure stage 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56751 Максим Прохоренко changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56734] Even simple exceptions cause a segmentation fault in my build of gcc on Solaris 10.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56734 --- Comment #3 from Marc Girod 2013-03-27 06:52:14 UTC --- OK. Good to know. I configured with GNU, hence there is something in the tool chain which results in the problem. Under the debugger, I get the segfault stepping into the call to '

[Bug regression/56751] New: Can not confugure stage 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56751 Bug #: 56751 Summary: Can not confugure stage 2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/56750] New: static -lstdc++ logic bleeds into all subdirs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56750 Bug #: 56750 Summary: static -lstdc++ logic bleeds into all subdirs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/54659] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap with --disable-nls broken under Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1

[Bug c++/56692] [4.8 Regression] [C++11] Segmentation fault when calling static/non-static overloaded function from lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56692 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56699] [4.8/4.9 regression] Failed for sizeof (non-static member) in lambda expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56699 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/19165] (Natural) language independent error / warning classification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165 --- Comment #18 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-03-27 00:59:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > > > If you have some developer power to spare, it may be worthwhile to try to > > tackle this yourself. Otherwise I a

[Bug c++/56742] Optimization bug lead to uncaught throw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56742 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/56749] [4.8/4.9 Regression] weird interaction between scoped enum used as non-type template parameter and template lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56749 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56749] New: weird interaction between scoped enum used as non-type template parameter and template lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56749 Bug #: 56749 Summary: weird interaction between scoped enum used as non-type template parameter and template lookup Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.

[Bug target/54805] __gthread* on VxWorks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54805 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Kuvyrkov 2013-03-26 22:09:31 UTC --- Also backported to 4.8 branch.

[Bug bootstrap/54659] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap with --disable-nls broken under Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 --- Comment #19 from roland at gnu dot org 2013-03-26 22:03:44 UTC --- r190487 is the breaking change. I tested reverting that (relative to 4.8 branch) and it solved the problem. Note I'm more concerned with having this fixed on the 4.8 b

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug libstdc++/56170] Extension debug_allocator seems non-compliant w.r.t. rebind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56170 --- Comment #9 from Ami Tavory 2013-03-26 21:40:03 UTC --- Great, many thanks!

[Bug c++/56742] Optimization bug lead to uncaught throw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56742 --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2013-03-26 21:14:23 UTC --- Hmm, yes indeed it is the -freorder-blocks option. One solution is to disallow after reload for SEH-target to modify jumps. The following patch fixes the issue for me. Index:

[Bug lto/55102] The options -flto and -On do not behave as described in GCC docs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uran238 at web dot de --- Comme

[Bug lto/56700] Optimizing at compile and link result in different binary size than only optimizing at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56700 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.3

[Bug fortran/56748] New: STOP statement + array optional variable causes bogus uninitialized warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56748 Bug #: 56748 Summary: STOP statement + array optional variable causes bogus uninitialized warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UN

[Bug c++/51440] Improve message and add an option for warning for an unnamed struct member: TYPE has a field FIELD whose type uses the anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51440 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/56700] Optimizing at compile and link result in different binary size than only optimizing at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56700 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-03-26 20:12:42 UTC --- > It's not just me who concluded that wrong. Bug 55102.

[Bug c++/56747] throw segfaults on 64bit Cygwin if -O2 (-freorder-blocks) is used with g++ 4.8.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56747 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56742] Optimization bug lead to uncaught throw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56742 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||franke at computer dot org ---

[Bug c++/51440] C++ compiler produces warning for an unnamed struct member: TYPE has a field FIELD whose type uses the anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51440 Martin Richtarsky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at martinien dot de ---

[Bug c++/56747] New: throw segfaults on 64bit Cygwin if -O2 (-freorder-blocks) is used with g++ 4.8.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56747 Bug #: 56747 Summary: throw segfaults on 64bit Cygwin if -O2 (-freorder-blocks) is used with g++ 4.8.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug middle-end/56712] [4.6 Regression] constructor function is called twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56712 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29724|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/56731] [4.7 Regression] ICE on (wrongly) referencing polymorphic array in select type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56731 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-26 19:17:39 UTC --- > > AFAICT this has been fixed by revision 187192 (pr41600). I don't think this > > is > > a regression: I get the ICE for 4.5.3, 4.6.3, and 4.7.2 (CLASS is not part > >

[Bug fortran/56730] [Fortran 4.6, 4.7] ICE on (wrongly) referencing polymorphic array in allocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56730 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/56700] Optimizing at compile and link result in different binary size than only optimizing at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56700 uran238 at web dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resol

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn 2013-03-26 18:29:16 UTC --- The failure only occurs in 32 bit mode and would not have been seen by a default bootstrap on powerpc64-linux that did not run the testsuite in 32 bit mode. $ ./xgcc -B./ -O1 -m32 /

[Bug c++/51157] [C++0x] decltype/typeof of template member with default template argument confuses g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51157 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/16375] decltype in class definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16375 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/45282] wrong decltype result for .*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45282 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/56746] New: 4.8 regression: increased memory usage when compiling C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56746 Bug #: 56746 Summary: 4.8 regression: increased memory usage when compiling C++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56745] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in merge_if_block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56745 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-linux-gnueabi Target Miles

[Bug rtl-optimization/56745] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in merge_if_block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56745 Bug #: 56745 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in merge_if_block Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug fortran/56731] [4.7 Regression] ICE on (wrongly) referencing polymorphic array in select type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56731 --- Comment #4 from tiloschwarz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-26 17:05:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > AFAICT this has been fixed by revision 187192 (pr41600). I don't think this is > a regression: I get the ICE for 4.5.3, 4.6.3, and 4.7.

[Bug middle-end/56727] Recursive call goes through the PLT unnecessarily

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56727 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/56743] Namelist bug with comment and no blank

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-26 16:57:53 UTC --- Created attachment 29734 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29734 Draft patch (only for read_integer) Draft patch - fixes the issue of the test case, but one

[Bug c++/55951] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_array_designated_initializer, at cp/decl.c:4785

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55951 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1 --- Comment #7 from Paolo

[Bug fortran/56744] New: [meta-bug] Namelist bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56744 Bug #: 56744 Summary: [meta-bug] Namelist bugs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/56743] Namelist bug with comment and no blank

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56695] [4.9 Regression] ICE in expand_vec_cond_expr, at optabs.c:6751

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-26 16:20:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 29733 [details] > Untested patch > > I was thinking about something like this. In 4.8, I added vec_cond_expr > expansion when t

[Bug fortran/56743] New: Namelist bug with comment and no blank

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743 Bug #: 56743 Summary: Namelist bug with comment and no blank Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/56727] Recursive call goes through the PLT unnecessarily

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56727 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-26 16:12:27 UTC --- > Confirmed. We don't optimize callgraph cycles with one externally visible > entry that way. And I believe we currently have no way of annotating a > single call to resolve loc

[Bug target/55033] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] PowerPC section type conflict error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033 --- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-26 16:11:46 UTC --- Per http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00970.html would it be OK to get this committed to the 4.8 branch and head?

[Bug tree-optimization/56695] [4.9 Regression] ICE in expand_vec_cond_expr, at optabs.c:6751

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-26 16:03:04 UTC --- Created attachment 29733 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29733 Untested patch I was thinking about something like this. In 4.8, I added vec_cond_expr expan

[Bug c++/56742] Optimization bug lead to uncaught throw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56742 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONF

[Bug c++/56742] New: Optimization bug lead to uncaught throw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56742 Bug #: 56742 Summary: Optimization bug lead to uncaught throw Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/56695] [4.9 Regression] ICE in expand_vec_cond_expr, at optabs.c:6751

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-26 15:20:34 UTC --- vectorizable_condition gets this stmt: patt_10 = i.1_17 == 0 ? 1 : 0; We can't do just if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (vectype))) return false; which quashes the ICE be

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29731|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-26 15:14:30 UTC --- Created attachment 29731 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29731 patch to add clobbers This patch adds the clobber assignments as Jakub suggested, but the

[Bug bootstrap/56689] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:841

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56689 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #7 from An

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot g

[Bug fortran/56649] ICE gfc_conv_structure with MERGE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56649 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56649] ICE gfc_conv_structure with MERGE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56649 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/52748] [C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56617] c++ compiler error when trying to build SuperCollider with nova-simd extension on arm ubuntu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56617 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54359] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type when defined outside of class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56726] i386: MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT is too small (usually)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56726 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/56727] Recursive call goes through the PLT unnecessarily

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56727 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/56729] [4.9 Regression] ICE in df_insn_delete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/56732] ICE in advance_target_bb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56741] Epilogue loop not partly vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56741 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56741] New: Why not to perform 128-bit vector iteration when vectorizing loop by 256-bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56741 Bug #: 56741 Summary: Why not to perform 128-bit vector iteration when vectorizing loop by 256-bit Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug debug/56740] New: duplicat DW_TAG_const_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56740 Bug #: 56740 Summary: duplicat DW_TAG_const_type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug rtl-optimization/56732] ICE in advance_target_bb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56732 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-03-26 13:35:30 UTC --- Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/r188742 or http://gcc.gnu.org/r188743. With r188742 I get: In file included from ploaderhook.c:25:0: /home/rajiv/ndless/ndless/Ndless-SD

[Bug libstdc++/56739] New: FreeBSD ia64: gcc49/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3/include/mutex:781:41: internl compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56739 Bug #: 56739 Summary: FreeBSD ia64: gcc49/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3 /include/mutex:781:41: internl compiler error: Segmentation fault

[Bug regression/56738] [4.9 Regression] ICE in c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4di.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56738 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-none-eabi |arm-none-eabi powerpc-*-*

[Bug c++/56038] declarations in xmmintrin.h conflict with mingw-w64 intrin.h in c++ mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038 --- Comment #5 from Kai Koehne 2013-03-26 12:26:04 UTC --- Can confirm that the patch fixes the issue when applied locally.

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 --- Comment #5 from Adam Williams 2013-03-26 12:14:01 UTC --- Cheers Dominique, Unfortunately the code in question is ~25years old with an existing user base and the namelist is used to set a vast number of initial conditions for varying

[Bug regression/56738] ICE in c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4di.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56738 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-26 12:07:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I see a similar error on powerpc-*-* (see > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg02572.html ) for > c-c++-common/torture/vshu

[Bug regression/56738] ICE in c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4di.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56738 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-26 11:57:58 UTC --- I see a similar error on powerpc-*-* (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg02572.html ) for c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v2di.c and g++.dg/torture/vshuf-v2d

[Bug web/56736] Broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56736 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug regression/56738] ICE in c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4di.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56738 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/56738] New: ICE in c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4di.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56738 Bug #: 56738 Summary: ICE in c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4di.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/56737] New: Bizarre Hollerith edit descriptor errors (valgrind shows uninitialized value in libgfortran)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 Bug #: 56737 Summary: Bizarre Hollerith edit descriptor errors (valgrind shows uninitialized value in libgfortran) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unk

[Bug tree-optimization/56733] [4.9 regression] src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc:620:3: ICE tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_ty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56650] Odd error messages with C_SIZEOF for valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56650 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-26 11:22:54 UTC --- Probably due to not simplifying c_sizeof(), cf. PR 36437. Related PR46641 and PR45824

[Bug c++/55951] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_array_designated_initializer, at cp/decl.c:4785

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55951 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug tree-optimization/56733] [4.9 regression] src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc:620:3: ICE tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_ty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab 2013-03-26 11:10:50 UTC --- Probably fixed by: >From 96a1fa3ac96f6b9339091249b40fd72783532397 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: law Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 04:00:20 + Subject: [PATCH] * tree-

[Bug tree-optimization/56733] [4.9 regression] src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc:620:3: ICE tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_ty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa*-*-* | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55951] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_array_designated_initializer, at cp/decl.c:4785

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55951 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-26 10:56:53 UTC --- ce->index is a CONST_DECL in mainline and 4_8-branch, an Ok INTEGER_CST in 4_7-branch.

[Bug bootstrap/54659] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap with --disable-nls broken under Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 --- Comment #18 from Diego Novillo 2013-03-26 10:48:18 UTC --- Sure. But I'm not quite sure which change you are referring to. I see 2 related patches (well, 3 but one is the reversal of the first one). I suppose we are referring to rev

[Bug web/56736] Broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56736 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55951] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_array_designated_initializer, at cp/decl.c:4785

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55951 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in |[4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/56735] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/56735] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 --- Comment #2 from Adam Williams 2013-03-26 10:26:43 UTC --- Hi Dominique Cheers for the quick response. Here is my gfortran -v info: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gfortran/libexec/gcc/x86

[Bug libstdc++/56733] src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc:620:3: ICE tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have pointer_type in int_fits_type_p, at

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-26 10:26:04 UTC --- Note that essentially by definition an ICE per se cannot be a library issue.

[Bug c++/55951] ICE in check_array_designated_initializer, at cp/decl.c:4785

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55951 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose 2013-03-26 10:24:14 UTC --- Created attachment 29727 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29727 preprocessed source

[Bug middle-end/56712] [4.6 Regression] constructor function is called twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56712 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-03-26 10:24:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Created attachment 29724 [details] > backport of the above mentioned fix Don't base your backport on the original patch submission, base it on

[Bug c++/55951] ICE in check_array_designated_initializer, at cp/decl.c:4785

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55951 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconf

[Bug web/56736] New: Broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56736 Bug #: 56736 Summary: Broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #34 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-03-26 10:18:00 UTC --- Unfortunately, Andrew Pinski's patch from PR debug/51471 doesn't help this time.

[Bug fortran/56735] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-26 10:17:25 UTC --- It works for me (x86_64-apple-darwin10) from 4.4.6 up to the latest trunk (197095). On which platform do you see this problem (post the output of gfortran -v)?

[Bug tree-optimization/56608] [4.7 Regression] SLP seems to produce incorrect value with -ffast-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56608 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/56270] [4.6 Regression] loop over array of struct float causes compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3 Summary|[4.6/4

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 --- Comment #52 from Richard Biener 2013-03-26 10:09:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #51) > > (struct mem_ref): Replace mem member with ao_ref typed member. > > RTL gcse (-O2) suffers from the same slowness in its dependence tests.

  1   2   >