http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56507
Bug #: 56507
Summary: GCC -march=native for Core2Duo
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56506
Bug #: 56506
Summary: variadic class template specialization not selected as
best match
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56505
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-02
01:51:11 UTC ---
note to self, the follow-up patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/r193879 was also needed
on trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56505
Bug #: 56505
Summary: [4.7 Regression] cannot construct std::thread with
pointer to member and non-pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #12 from Matt Hargett 2013-03-01 23:38:51 UTC
---
Created attachment 29566
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29566
files generated during compilation where false positive happens with save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bootstrap-lto fails on |maybe-uninitialized false
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-01
23:23:40 UTC ---
Yes, it seems your own issue is a duplicate of PR54276, which luckily is
already fixed both in mainline and for 4.7.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
--- Comment #11 from jared.cantwell at gmail dot com 2013-03-01 23:18:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I just came across the same issue in the context of lambdas (for posterity,
> > since I spent time thin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #10 from Matt Hargett 2013-03-01 23:11:50 UTC
---
I'll file a new bug for each warning false positive that results in a bootstrap
failure. Feel free to close this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-01
23:08:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I just came across the same issue in the context of lambdas (for posterity,
> since I spent time thinking this was specific to lambdas).
>
> Consid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
22:56:34 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 22:56:18 2013
New Revision: 196398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196398
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
22:55:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 22:55:26 2013
New Revision: 196397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196397
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* ira-buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
22:54:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 22:54:39 2013
New Revision: 196396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196396
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56490
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56504
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-03-01
22:10:14 UTC ---
Ah, sorry. Just attached preprocessed sources now (which had to be compressed
to it in the 1K size limit).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-03-01
22:09:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 29565
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29565
Preprocessed test program source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56504
Bug #: 56504
Summary: -mveclibabi=... Support AMD's LibM 3.0 (sucessor of
ACML)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56503
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56503
Bug #: 56503
Summary: Wrong compiler error message when compiling with
default-real-8 option and using intrinsic dble
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56502
Bug #: 56502
Summary: entry-value: Missing DW_AT_linkage_name for C<->C++
calls
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
21:06:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 21:06:04 2013
New Revision: 196394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196394
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* files.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #20 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01
21:05:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Trading memory O(number of pseudos) with a large constant factor sounds
> like something waiting for trouble for other testcases ...
FWIW, for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
20:59:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 1 20:58:59 2013
New Revision: 196393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196393
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247
DS changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #7 from DS 2013-03-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
jared.cantwell at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jared.cantwell at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-01
19:33:47 UTC ---
On 03/01/13 13:23, ian at airs dot com wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
>
> --- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-03-01
> 19:23:00 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-03-01 19:23:00
UTC ---
How hard would it be to test whether the values are all constant or have the
same SSA_NAME_VAR as the value we are setting?
My only concern about richi's suggestion is tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-03-01
19:17:32 UTC ---
> --- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-03-01
> 14:52:53 UTC ---
> I suspect we can handle this case by observing that all the incoming values to
> the PHI node are con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #19 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01
19:13:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
I thought you had already done that, to handle attribute flatten for
bug 54146 (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR54146#c43). This test case doesn't use
the f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56501
Bug #: 56501
Summary: gcc 4.6 ICE on noreturn function at -Os and above
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
--- Comment #4 from Gary Barnes 2013-03-01
18:36:46 UTC ---
You are correct. I used tar 1.13. Updating the various gnu tools here is
basically why I'm building gcc in the first place.
Thank you, Gary
-Original Message-
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56498
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-01
18:17:35 UTC ---
There's nothing wrong with the tarball, it works for everyone else, so either
your copy is corrupted and you need to download it again or you didn't use a
recent version of GN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
Bug #: 56500
Summary: [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-vali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2013-03-01 18:06:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> and the combiner combines the r60 = flags >= 0 ? ax : r59 instruction with
> r59 = r60 into r59 = flags >= 0 ? ax : r59 instruction in the last spot,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56497
Mathieu Malaterre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
--- Comment #2 from Gary Barnes 2013-03-01
17:29:26 UTC ---
I did use gnu tar. Those are the only two files with incorrect names.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-01
17:23:02 UTC ---
>There are two Solaris 10 files named *.hp instead of *.hpp
Use gnu tar to extract the tar file otherwise you get the truncated names.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56497
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56499
Bug #: 56499
Summary: mpfr subdirectory path mismatch and misnamed files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56498
Bug #: 56498
Summary: invalid declaration of string iterator on comma
separated list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56491
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #32 from Jan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56312
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-01 16:19:47
UTC ---
> I will take care of the early inlining problem. I wonder, you don't have
> oprofile of that, by any chance?
Aha, callee walking in update_inline_summary. Perhaps I will real
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-01 16:14:08
UTC ---
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
>
> --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01
> 07:50:43 UTC ---
> Last night's compilation at -O1 with my hacks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56497
Bug #: 56497
Summary: comparison is always true due to limited range of data
type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56496
Bug #: 56496
Summary: [OOP] ICE with TYPE(*) coarray and SELECT TYPE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56495
--- Comment #1 from Florian Meyer
2013-03-01 14:47:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 29562
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29562
Zipped Preprocessed source
Preprocessed source in zipped form. The file is 3mb unpacked.
10 cases or so. The error message sometimes changed to "tree code '(some
garbage)' is not supported in LTO streams" but i could not reproduce that one.
GCC 4.8.0 20130301 fails while GCC 4.7.2 works.
Compiler output:
gcc -O2 -flto -g -s ppl.ii
ppl_c_Rational
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #16 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01
14:35:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > - Queue up to-be-removed EH regions, instead of removing them one-by-one.
> > Removing them one at a time results in walking the list of EH re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |middle-end
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2013-03-01
14:25:56 UTC ---
This happens because 0 - 1 overflows in sizetype:
#6 0x00ac3e3d in size_binop_loc (loc=0, code=MINUS_EXPR,
arg0=0x76d65d60, arg1=0x76d65f00)
at /hom
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
With GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130301 :
$ cat trunc.c
char a;
short b;
void f(void)
{
g((!!b ? : (a *= a / 0)) >= (a = b));
}
$ xgcc -w -O2 -ftra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3
--- Comment #21 from Ric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3
--- Comment #21 from Ric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
--- Comment #10 from Karlson2k 2013-03-01 13:29:40 UTC ---
Could you fix 4.7 branch too?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-03-01
13:12:41 UTC ---
I also see this same perf regression on trunk (as of r195725).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-03-01
13:11:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 29561
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29561
Sample program using dense hashmap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Bug #: 56493
Summary: Performance regression in google dense hashmap
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3, 4.8.0
Target Milestone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
12:46:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 1 12:46:12 2013
New Revision: 196378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196378
Log:
2013-03-01 Richard Biener
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
12:29:46 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 1 12:29:39 2013
New Revision: 196377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196377
Log:
2013-03-01 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56490
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56424
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |tree-optimization
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geza at bitquad dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
11:03:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 29560
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29560
patch
Patch, queued for 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56486
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56492
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
10:44:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 29557 [details]
> Collected hacks to make the test case compile in reasonable time with -O0
>
> Patch does 2 things:
>
> -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56492
Bug #: 56492
Summary: std::packaged_task requires CopyConstructible stored
task
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
10:32:34 UTC ---
No SSA_NAMEs should be created because of debug stmts.
SSA_NAME_VERSION must be identical in between -fvar-tracking-assignments and
-fno-var-tracking-assignments, DECL_UIDs mig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener 2013-03-01
10:27:50 UTC ---
A guess is that you end up creating SSA names during code transform in
different
order - which can result from walking a hashtable to do things (which might
be in different o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2013-03-01 10:23:28
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Mar 1 10:23:21 2013
New Revision: 196371
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196371
Log:
PR libstdc++/56475
* acinclude.m4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56486
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-01 10:05:53
UTC ---
You are right, of course. I remembered that gcc defined unsigned->signed
conversion, but I had forgotten that it defined all narrowing conversions as
well, sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-01
09:59:39 UTC ---
But e = e + 5 is avaluated as
e = (short) ((int) e + 5)
and thus I think it just falls down to implementation defined behavior
(assuming short is smaller than int of course), b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56491
Bug #: 56491
Summary: [OOP] Memory leak with vtab's type-bound-procedures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-01 09:53:20
UTC ---
Seems to me that 'e' is signed and the testcase relies on wrapping overflow
(-fwrapv helps).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-01
09:35:41 UTC ---
Thanks Steven for analyzing / fixing this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56489
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
