http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56435
Bug #: 56435
Summary: Wrong 'ld' version detected during configuring libjava
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #13 from Tilo Schwarz 2013-02-24 00:27:49
UTC ---
If in
gfortran.dg/namelist_64.f90
instead of
curve(1)%symbol%typee = 1234
any other array index > 1 is set and tested, e.g.
curve(2)%symbol%typee = 1234
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243
--- Comment #6 from Paul Pluzhnikov 2013-02-23
23:06:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think the testcase is invalid
Looks like you are right, and it's been over-reduced.
> Shouldn't the below line be diagnosed, even if it is in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56429
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243
--- Comment #5 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 22:02:16 UTC ---
reduced testcase:
class A
{
virtual int String ();
};
class F: public A { };
template < typename V > class G
{
V value;
};
class D
{
temp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243
--- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 22:00:44 UTC ---
I think the testcase is invalid
Shouldn't the below line be diagnosed, even if it is in a template ?
F& name = x->value;
We fail to return early, and the compiler i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377
Paul Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44281
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
--- Comment #14 from Steve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56385
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56385
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 14:40:57 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Feb 23 14:40:49 2013
New Revision: 196237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196237
Log:
2013-02-23 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-23
11:50:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 29529
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29529
Another unrelated issue
Irrespective of ho we decide to deal with the first issue, there i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-23
11:37:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 29528
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29528
A simpler patch to fix issue in comment 7
The patch from comment #8 had problems of its own
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243
--- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 10:42:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Any news on this bug? It's one of only a few P1 regressions left.
This bug triggers with --enable-checking on the constexpr stuff. I was
13 matches
Mail list logo
