[Bug c++/54383] Internal compiler error for lamba function using this-> with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/56354] [4.8 Regression] -O2 creates incorrect for loop code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56354] New: [4.8 Regression] -O2 creates incorrect for loop code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56354 Bug #: 56354 Summary: [4.8 Regression] -O2 creates incorrect for loop code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: majo

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3

[Bug c++/54532] [C++0x][constexpr] internal error when initializing static constexpr with pointer to non-static member variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54532 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-16 03:00:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > For mingw-w64 isn't the triplet supposed to be 'x86_64-w64-mingw32'? The other point is that the Windows API are still called win32 on x64 Windows

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-16 02:08:00 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Feb 16 02:07:55 2013 New Revision: 196101 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196101 Log: PR c++/54276 * semantics.c (fin

[Bug sanitizer/55938] g++.dg/asan/deep-stack-uaf-1.C fails at r195092 on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55938 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51242] [C++11] Unable to use strongly typed enums as bit fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242 --- Comment #25 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-16 01:07:16 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Feb 16 01:07:11 2013 New Revision: 196100 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196100 Log: /cp 2013-02-15 Jonathan Wa

[Bug libgcj/56353] libgcj should be listed on command line for libjava.jni/invocation/PR16923.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56353 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2013-02-15 23:59:30 UTC --- The command line is /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc -B/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-intel64/bld/gcc/ /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-intel64/src-trunk/libjav

[Bug libgcj/56353] libgcj should be listed on command line for libjava.jni/invocation/PR16923.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56353 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-15 23:52:34 UTC --- > Since libgcj.so isn't > on the linker command line, gold resolves _Jv_RegisterClasses to 0 and > ld silently resolves it to _Jv_RegisterClasses in libgcj.so: How is it link

[Bug libgcj/56353] New: libgcj should be listed on command line for libjava.jni/invocation/PR16923.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56353 Bug #: 56353 Summary: libgcj should be listed on command line for libjava.jni/invocation/PR16923.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/56351] ARM Big-Endian: storing local double to packed variable causes corruption

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56351 Seth LaForge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sethml at google dot com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/56352] New: Simplify testing of related conditions in for loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56352 Bug #: 56352 Summary: Simplify testing of related conditions in for loop Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target --- Comment #5 from

[Bug middle-end/54685] [SH] Improve unsigned int comparison with 0x7FFFFFFF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685 --- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2013-02-15 21:33:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > FAIL: gcc.target/sh/pr54685.c scan-assembler-not not > > > > I'm curious why this fails. On my sh-elf / newlib config it

[Bug middle-end/54685] [SH] Improve unsigned int comparison with 0x7FFFFFFF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo 2013-02-15 21:28:32 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Fri Feb 15 21:28:26 2013 New Revision: 196092 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196092 Log: PR target/54685 * gcc.target/sh/

[Bug c++/54835] [C++11] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/56351] ARM Big-Endian: storing local double to packed variable causes corruption

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56351 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-15 20:20:28 UTC --- I think this was fixed on the trunk with: 2012-10-22 Julian Brown * config/arm/arm.h (CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS): Avoid subreg'ing VFP D registers in big-en

[Bug target/56351] ARM Big-Endian: storing local double to packed variable causes corruption

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56351 --- Comment #1 from Seth LaForge 2013-02-15 20:16:43 UTC --- Ugh, my attachment was a bit mangled. Here's the source to stimulate the issue - gcc_bug.c: #include void PrintDouble(double v) __attribute__((noinline)); void PrintDoubl

[Bug target/56351] New: ARM Big-Endian: storing local double to packed variable causes corruption

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56351 Bug #: 56351 Summary: ARM Big-Endian: storing local double to packed variable causes corruption Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCO

[Bug tree-optimization/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2013-02-15 20:07:47 UTC --- > Wrong assembly code is here: > >0x30f4 :fsub,sgl fr17,fr17,fr22 >0x30f8 :fabs,sgl fr22,fr22 >0x30fc :fcmp,sgl,!< fr13R,fr22 >0x

[Bug c++/54946] ICE on template parameter from cast char-pointer in C++11 constexpr struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54946 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/56330] ICE: verify_gimple failed: gimple_bb (stmt) is set to a wrong basic block with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56330 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-15 19:57:39 UTC --- This is ok for trunk if it passes bootstrap/regtest. Please post it to gcc-patches anyway though.

[Bug tree-optimization/56350] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4731

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56350 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/56330] ICE: verify_gimple failed: gimple_bb (stmt) is set to a wrong basic block with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56330 --- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2013-02-15 19:46:44 UTC --- Created attachment 29477 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29477 Updated patch with cleanups explained in the ChangeLog Thanks! I have updated the patch

[Bug middle-end/56140] GCC inlines incorrect function in __transaction_relaxed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56140 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/56108] Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/56349] ICE in create_preheader at cfgloopmanip.c:1525

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56349 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56350] New: ICE in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4731

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com Using GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130215 : $ cat vect.c int a, b, c; void f(void) { for(; c; c++) for(b = 0; b < 2

[Bug c++/54768] ICE when struct with anon union has constexpr ctor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54768 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomasmckee5 at gmail dot

[Bug c++/55017] [DR 1051] [C++11] Rvalue-reference member should cause copy constructor to be deleted, but still declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/55240] [c++0x] ICE on non-static data member initialization using 'auto' variable from containing function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/55241] [C++11] diagnostics show sizeof...(T) as sizeof(T...)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55241 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55879] [C++11] nested constexpr Initialisation raises internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status

[Bug c++/55670] [C++11] This isn't a pure virtual method.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55670 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/55993] [C++11] derived-to-base conversion fails in constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56155] [C++11] enumeration with fixed underlying type - enumerators have wrong type within enumerator-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56155 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/54277] Template class member referred to with implicit this inside lambda is incorrectly const-qualified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54277 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 19:22:23 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 19:22:14 2013 New Revision: 196091 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196091 Log: PR c++/54276 * semantics.c (fin

[Bug rtl-optimization/56348] internal compiler error in assign_by_spills with -m32 -fPIC -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348 --- Comment #3 from dnovillo at google dot com 2013-02-15 19:19:22 UTC --- Thanks for the quick fix, Vlad! Diego.

[Bug tree-optimization/56349] New: ICE in create_preheader at cfgloopmanip.c:1525

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com Hello ! Using GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130215 : $ cat preh.c int a, b; short c; void f(void) { int *k = a = 0; for(; a < 2; a++); if(!!(b |= a

[Bug rtl-optimization/56348] internal compiler error in assign_by_spills with -m32 -fPIC -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-02-15 19:17:16 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Feb 15 19:17:02 2013 New Revision: 196090 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196090 Log: 2013-02-15 Vladimir Makarov

[Bug tree-optimization/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2013-02-15 19:07:29 UTC --- In final: (note 135 134 137 [bb 11] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (insn:TI 137 135 138 (set (reg:SF 68 %fr22 [orig:303 D.1185 ] [303]) (minus:SF (reg:SF 58 %fr17 [orig:1

[Bug rtl-optimization/56348] internal compiler error in assign_by_spills with -m32 -fPIC -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/52026] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2013-02-15 18:37:58 UTC --- Created attachment 29471 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29471 Slightly reduced testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2013-02-15 18:35:58 UTC --- Wrong assembly code is here: 0x30f4 :fsub,sgl fr17,fr17,fr22 0x30f8 :fabs,sgl fr22,fr22 0x30fc :fcmp,sgl,!< fr13R,fr22 0x3100 :

[Bug c++/56135] [c++11] this incorrectly captured as null in template member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3 --- Comment #5 from Paolo

[Bug target/52187] armeb-unknown-eabi not recognized as big-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52187 Seth LaForge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sethml at google dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/52026] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 18:32:25 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 18:32:12 2013 New Revision: 196087 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196087 Log: PR c++/52026 * semantics.c (fi

[Bug c++/55710] [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 18:32:05 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 18:31:52 2013 New Revision: 196086 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196086 Log: PR c++/55710 * semantics.c (ma

[Bug c++/56135] [c++11] this incorrectly captured as null in template member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 18:31:41 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 18:31:28 2013 New Revision: 196085 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196085 Log: PR c++/56135 * pt.c (tsubst_cop

[Bug c++/56343] [4.8 regression] [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56343] [4.8 regression] [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 17:19:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 17:19:45 2013 New Revision: 196082 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196082 Log: PR c++/56343 * class.c (check_b

[Bug c++/55783] Warnings instead of compiler errors for narrowing conversions within list-initializations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55783 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/55987] Redundant constant emitted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55987 --- Comment #2 from Tilman Sauerbeck 2013-02-15 16:50:52 UTC --- Created attachment 29470 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29470 dejagnu testcase Simplified dejagnu test case.

[Bug rtl-optimization/56348] New: internal compiler error in assign_by_spills with -m32 -fPIC -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56348 Bug #: 56348 Summary: internal compiler error in assign_by_spills with -m32 -fPIC -msse2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UN

[Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-02-15 16:48:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Perhaps for regmove IRA classes should be set up unconditionally: > > Index: regmove.c > ===

[Bug tree-optimization/56347] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 Bug #: 56347 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52026] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15 16:17:31 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 15 16:17:25 2013 New Revision: 196081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196081 Log: PR c++/52026 * semantics.c (fi

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #31 from David Edelsohn 2013-02-15 16:15:19 UTC --- With the patch, the testcase no longer ICEs when compiled on powerpc-aix.

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-15 16:00:43 UTC --- Created attachment 29469 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29469 Reduced testcase Testcase reduced by multidelta that fails with -c -O2 -fno-ipa-sra -fno-e

[Bug c++/56346] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-15 15:55:07 UTC --- On 2013-02-15 9:44 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Target doesn't use crtstuff.c. > Why? That looks like the bug to me. It only supports ELF and COFF file

[Bug tree-optimization/56321] [4.8 Regression] ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321 --- Comment #11 from William J. Schmidt 2013-02-15 15:49:03 UTC --- OK, got it. I was on the right track, there were just several locations where it could happen and I missed one.

[Bug c/56335] Optimization assumes __attribute__((aligned(N))) always works.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56335 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-02-15 15:47:00 UTC --- See , where I discuss what I think would be the appropriate checks for supported alignment (which I de

[Bug c++/56346] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56333] cannot use typedef name in inheriting constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56333 --- Comment #2 from David Krauss 2013-02-15 15:43:07 UTC --- Also fixed within a day of updating my sources. Thanks guys!

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 15:40:33 UTC --- Ah, ah, I was staring at the file *already* using __builtin_abort and was *really* puzzled.

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56346] New: FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 Bug #: 56346 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-15 15:30:31 UTC --- This is a lot puzzling by the way. I have on idea what the specific issue being tested may have to do with the error: compiling in C++11 mode a file only including or even only

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm*-*-* Component|c

[Bug testsuite/56345] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/56345] New: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56345 Bug #: 56345 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this8.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c/56344] ICE for program with larger automatic structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344 Georg changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29467|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/56321] [4.8 Regression] ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt 2013-02-15 15:13:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > I see. The problem is a memory VUSE on the return statement that no longer > > has > > a def. The VDEF was asso

[Bug c++/56343] [4.8 regression] [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/56344] New: ICE for program with larger automatic structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56344 Bug #: 56344 Summary: ICE for program with larger automatic structs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger 2013-02-15 14:46:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > The test case causes alignment exceptions for me on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi, > when compiled with any one of gcc 4.8, 4.7, or 4.6. Was Sandra's patch

[Bug c++/56340] Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/56340] Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/56343] New: [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343 Bug #: 56343 Summary: [C++11] Destructor defaulted on first declaration has wrong implicit exception specification Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8

[Bug fortran/56318] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result with MATMUL of PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56342] New: MATMUL with PARAMETER: Simplification usually doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56342 Bug #: 56342 Summary: MATMUL with PARAMETER: Simplification usually doesn't work Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/56318] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result with MATMUL of PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-15 14:20:58 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Feb 15 14:20:49 2013 New Revision: 196079 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196079 Log: 2013-02-15 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/56318] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result with MATMUL of PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56318 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-15 14:20:30 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Feb 15 14:20:22 2013 New Revision: 196078 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196078 Log: 2013-02-15 Tobias Burnus

[Bug c/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- C

[Bug libstdc++/56332] libstdc++-v3 does not support x86_64-pc-mingw64: No support for this host/target combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56332 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-02-15 14:09:35 UTC --- Confusing or not, the triplet is as I stated, see e.g.: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/Answer%20Multilib%20Toolchain And the 32-bit target is 'i686-w64-mi

[Bug target/55431] Invalid auxv search in ppc linux-unwind code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/55431] Invalid auxv search in ppc linux-unwind code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/55431] Invalid auxv search in ppc linux-unwind code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55431 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra 2013-02-15 13:53:47 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Feb 15 13:53:40 2013 New Revision: 196077 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196077 Log: PR target/55431 * config/rs6000/l

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29146|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/56340] Wrong error from exception specifications of defaulted destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56340 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   >