[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28065|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug go/53679] Build failure in libgo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679 --- Comment #6 from Mike Frysinger 2013-01-26 03:20:51 UTC --- Ian has pushed the patch to trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=195482

[Bug lto/56115] Internal compiler error / unable to generate a relocatable output with object file(which is with lto info).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Compo

[Bug c/56115] Internal compiler error / unable to generate a relocatable output with object file(which is with lto info).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115 --- Comment #1 from William 2013-01-26 02:41:14 UTC --- oops!I make a mistake,actually I test the crash.c like this: >armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc crash.c -c -flto -O2 -o crash.out >armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc -r -nostdlib -flto crash.out -o a.ou

[Bug c/56115] New: Internal compiler error / unable to generate a relocatable output with object file(which is with lto info).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115 Bug #: 56115 Summary: Internal compiler error / unable to generate a relocatable output with object file(which is with lto info). Classification: Unclassified P

[Bug middle-end/56098] [4.6/4.7 Regression] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 --- Comment #7 from werner at almesberger dot net 2013-01-26 02:09:33 UTC --- I'm happy to confirm that trunk (for x86-64) now passes all variations of this theme I tried with flying colors. Thanks again !

[Bug libstdc++/37522] [4.4 regression] Incorrect vswprintf prototype breaks __to_xstring

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522 --- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-25 23:53:37 UTC --- Issue was fixed on trunk. As far as I know should rawhide Fedora have fixed that issue already. Nevertheless we could define the broken-vsprintf macro based on header-version. I

[Bug middle-end/56108] Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Version|trans-mem

[Bug other/56076] [4.8 regression] Several 64-bit libgo tests FAIL in read_line_header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/56076] [4.8 regression] Several 64-bit libgo tests FAIL in read_line_header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 23:43:27 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Jan 25 23:43:23 2013 New Revision: 195479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195479 Log: PR other/56076 runtime: Supp

[Bug other/56076] [4.8 regression] Several 64-bit libgo tests FAIL in read_line_header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2013-01-25 23:10:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Sorry, an error in the test case. This has the same error: program gar_nichts use ISO_C_BINDING type(c_ptr) nada call foo(transfer(C_NU

[Bug target/56114] x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc generate wrong asm instruction MOVABS for intel syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56114 Alexander Kobets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akobets at mail dot ru --- C

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2013-01-25 22:56:43 UTC --- This also fails in the same place (without renaming): program gar_nichts use ISO_C_BINDING, only :: C_PTR, C_NULL_PTR type(c_ptr) nada call foo(transfer(C_NULL_PTR,

[Bug target/56114] New: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc generate wrong asm instruction MOVABS for intel syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56114 Bug #: 56114 Summary: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc generate wrong asm instruction MOVABS for intel syntax Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 S

[Bug middle-end/56098] [4.6/4.7 Regression] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 --- Comment #6 from werner at almesberger dot net 2013-01-25 22:46:17 UTC --- Thanks for the analysis and the fixes ! I'll try them soonish. Regarding work-arounds, the ones I mentioned for my original code snippet (i.e., -O1 or -fno-stric

[Bug other/56076] [4.8 regression] Several 64-bit libgo tests FAIL in read_line_header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 22:36:16 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Jan 25 22:36:11 2013 New Revision: 195478 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195478 Log: PR other/56076 * dwarf.c

[Bug libstdc++/37522] [4.4 regression] Incorrect vswprintf prototype breaks __to_xstring

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/55905] [OOP] [F008] ICE for polymorphic dummy argument with an allocatable coarray component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55905 --- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson 2013-01-25 21:32:40 UTC --- Hi Janus, I've added Karla Morris to the cc list for this bug. She discovered it independently so I guess this one is now stumbling block for two projects. Any thoughts abo

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-25 20:58:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Here is an updated version of Mikael's patch, which is free of testsuite > regressions. Indeed, it was not that difficult after all. :-) Are proc

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Known to work|

[Bug c/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 --- Comment #1 from Kangkook 2013-01-25 20:39:06 UTC --- Created attachment 29276 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29276 a script to generates the code that reproduces the bug

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXE

[Bug c/56113] New: out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 Bug #: 56113 Summary: out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > ) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/53518] [4.8 regression] testsuite_abi_check.cc doesn't compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/56104] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|AS

[Bug c++/56104] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-25 20:26:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 25 20:26:46 2013 New Revision: 195476 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195476 Log: PR c++/56104 * typeck.c (get_me

[Bug c++/56095] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Crash casting function pointer as non-type template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56095 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/56098] [4.6/4.7 Regression] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression]

[Bug c++/56095] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Crash casting function pointer as non-type template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56095 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] Crash

[Bug middle-end/56098] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-25 20:04:01 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 25 20:03:54 2013 New Revision: 195475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195475 Log: PR tree-optimization/56098 * tr

[Bug c++/56095] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Crash casting function pointer as non-type template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56095 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-25 20:01:35 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 25 20:01:29 2013 New Revision: 195474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195474 Log: PR c++/56095 * pt.c (convert_no

[Bug debug/54410] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] doubled DW_TAG_template_type_param

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54410 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com

[Bug libstdc++/56112] New: [4.8 Regression] cannot create unordered_map from range of types convertible to value_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112 Bug #: 56112 Summary: [4.8 Regression] cannot create unordered_map from range of types convertible to value_type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/56111] {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 --- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-25 18:32:39 UTC --- I do have a caller of the clone (in the WPA dump): init_.constprop.2/71 (init_.constprop.2) @0x7f10180f06f0 Type: function ... Clone of init_/41 ... Called by:

[Bug tree-optimization/56034] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (invalid PHI argument) with -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56034 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-01-25 18:16:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > So, we replace > # a.0_26 = PHI > with > # a.0_26 = PHI <.MEM_10(5)> > This happens when we call rewrite_into_loop_closed_ssa in case we're actua

[Bug c++/56104] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-25 17:55:22 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 25 17:55:09 2013 New Revision: 195470 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195470 Log: PR c++/56104 * typeck.c (get_me

[Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Bug #: 56111 Summary: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/56107] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/55907] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -fno-automatic -finit-local-zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55907] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -fno-automatic -finit-local-zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-01-25 17:12:52 UTC --- Revision 183136 (2012-01-12) is OK; revision 183306 (2012-01-19) gives the ICE. This is due to a change made on 4.7 and backported to 4.6.

[Bug target/56110] New: Sub-optimal code: unnecessary CMP after AND

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56110 Bug #: 56110 Summary: Sub-optimal code: unnecessary CMP after AND Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/55907] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with -fno-automatic -finit-local-zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords

[Bug middle-end/56098] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug tree-optimization/56034] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (invalid PHI argument) with -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56034 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-01-25 15:33:57 UTC --- So, we replace # a.0_26 = PHI with # a.0_26 = PHI <.MEM_10(5)> This happens when we call rewrite_into_loop_closed_ssa in case we're actually performing some loop distributio

[Bug c++/56104] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/56104] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-25 15:05:48 UTC --- Given the /* If the object is not dynamic the access invokes undefined behavior. As it is not executed in this case silence the spurious warnings it may provoke. */ co

[Bug c++/56104] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/56109] New: Add light-weight ABI-compatible debug checks to standard containers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56109 Bug #: 56109 Summary: Add light-weight ABI-compatible debug checks to standard containers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/56097] [4.7 Regression] Segmentation fault with -01 -ftree-vrp -ftree-loop-distribution -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56097 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Known to work|

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 14:43:51 UTC --- Created attachment 29274 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29274 patch v2 Here is an updated version of Mikael's patch, which is free of testsuite

[Bug middle-end/56098] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 14:36:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Maybe we could remove gfc_copy_formal_args{,_ppc} completely. After all, we > keep a pointer to the interface, so the dummy arguments remai

[Bug c++/56104] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56107] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/56107] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 14:27:10 UTC --- This is probably a duplicate of PR 55978 (which, however, was claimed to be due to r195125, which does not match the interval in comment 0).

[Bug c/56108] New: Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108 Bug #: 56108 Summary: Asm statement in transaction_relaxed crashes compiler. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56107] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56107 Bug #: 56107 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 -O2 execution test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #42 from Jack Howarth 2013-01-25 13:23:12 UTC --- Full regression testing on x86_64-apple-darwin12 of proposed patch to supply dummy functions as a static archive shows no regressions in any tm tests... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/

[Bug c++/56104] Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug libgcc/56101] pthread program abort

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56101 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56106] New: complex pow improvements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56106 Bug #: 56106 Summary: complex pow improvements Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/56094] Invalid line number info generated with tree-level ivopts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56094 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-25 12:04:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > You are explaining how it works right now. What I am asking is how we want it > to work, that is, why the gimplifier needs to care about input_location a

[Bug libmudflap/56105] New: Simple ANSI C 89 code -> Mudflap false violation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56105 Bug #: 56105 Summary: Simple ANSI C 89 code -> Mudflap false violation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/56094] Invalid line number info generated with tree-level ivopts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56094 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-25 11:43:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Created attachment 29272 [details] > gcc48-pr56094.patch > > input_location is used heavily in the gimplifier, gimplify_expr sets it from > the exp

[Bug libstdc++/56103] Overwrite classes on destruction for debug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56103 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56094] Invalid line number info generated with tree-level ivopts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56094 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-25 11:29:13 UTC --- Created attachment 29272 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29272 gcc48-pr56094.patch input_location is used heavily in the gimplifier, gimplify_expr sets i

[Bug c++/56104] New: Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56104 Bug #: 56104 Summary: Wrong "dereferencing type-punned pointer" warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/56103] New: Overwrite classes on destruction for debug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56103 Bug #: 56103 Summary: Overwrite classes on destruction for debug Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug middle-end/55308] /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/sparc64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6: Undefined symbol "__emutls_v._ThreadRuneLocale"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308 --- Comment #5 from Anton Shterenlikht 2013-01-25 09:37:38 UTC --- I'm building gcc-4.8-20130113. I tried your patch, although my line numbers are different: # diff -u10 configure.ac.orig configure.ac --- configure.ac.orig 2013-01-11

[Bug debug/54793] the location of a formal_parameter is not started from a function entry with -mfentry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54793 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-25 09:35:17 UTC --- Created attachment 29271 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29271 gcc48-pr54793.patch So, e.g. this seems to work for me from quick testing. The insn chain

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-25 09:28:14 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Jan 25 09:28:09 2013 New Revision: 195464 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195464 Log: gcc/ PR target/54222 * confi

[Bug debug/54793] the location of a formal_parameter is not started from a function entry with -mfentry

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54793 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-25 09:08:14 UTC --- Well, we can also just use the first NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK resp. NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG, whichever comes first. The bigger problem with that ia64, pa and a few other targets use

[Bug tree-optimization/56035] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1581 (loop n’s header does not belong directly to it !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56035] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1581 (loop n’s header does not belong directly to it !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek 2013-01-25 08:52:33 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Jan 25 08:52:02 2013 New Revision: 195462 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195462 Log: Fix PR56035. Added: trunk/gcc

[Bug middle-end/56098] conditional write through volatile pointer produces unintended read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- C