[Bug c++/56014] New: [C++1y] Return type deduction for member functions does not work when -g is enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56014 Bug #: 56014 Summary: [C++1y] Return type deduction for member functions does not work when -g is enabled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/56013] ICE in lambda in a for-each in templated class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56013 --- Comment #1 from cool.pepyaka at yandex dot ru 2013-01-17 06:48:24 UTC --- On gcc 4.8.0 the bug reproduces too. edit: "it works on any other container" meant "the bug reproduces on any other container". Sorry for possible misunderstandi

[Bug c++/56013] New: ICE in lambda in a for-each in templated class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56013 Bug #: 56013 Summary: ICE in lambda in a for-each in templated class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/52887] Bootstrap on AIX failure: Undefined symbol: .std::function::function(std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/52887] Bootstrap on AIX failure: Undefined symbol: .std::function::function(std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-17 01:39:52 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jan 17 01:39:46 2013 New Revision: 195258 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195258 Log: PR libstdc++/52887 * src/c++1

[Bug tree-optimization/42172] inefficient bit fields assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42172 Janis Johnson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/42371] dead code not eliminated during folding with whole-program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371 Matt Hargett changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 --- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-16 23:58:41 UTC --- I hope this fix is more acceptable :) Thanks, Daniel and Marc, for the comments and ideas, and pushing me to do a better job of it!

[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-16 23:56:07 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jan 16 23:56:00 2013 New Revision: 195253 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195253 Log: PR libstdc++/55043 (again) *

[Bug rtl-optimization/48181] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fgcse --param ira-max-conflict-table-size=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 23:07:19 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192719 fixed this (so, most likely reproduceable by disabling LRA).

[Bug target/27855] [4.5/4.7/4.8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 --- Comment #45 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-16 23:04:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #44) Is there any improvement if you use -fschedule-insns1 -fsched-pressure?

[Bug fortran/53957] Polyhedron 11 benchmark: MP_PROP_DESIGN twice as long as other compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48181] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fgcse --param ira-max-conflict-table-size=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug libstdc++/56012] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56012 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56012] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56012 Bug #: 56012 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Narrowing conversion in atomic_flag Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-16 22:27:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > PR fortran/52865 > * trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_do): Put countm1-- before conditional > and use value of countm1 before the decrement in

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-16 22:06:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I'll take this one on - see today's posting to the list. Approved patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-01/msg00102.html

[Bug inline-asm/55934] [4.8 Regression] LRA inline asm error recovery

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55934 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2013-01-16 20:59:17 UTC --- I had expected the following patch to fix the issue: * lra-assigns.c (assign_by_spills): Throw away the pattern of asms that have operands with impossible co

[Bug libstdc++/56011] New: [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011 Bug #: 56011 Summary: [C++11] std::atomic and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-16 20:46:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Mikael -- can you try adding -fno-rename-registers to the cflags used to > compile gmp and see if that changes anything? It'd be greatly apprecia

[Bug rtl-optimization/52573] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for output operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab 2013-01-16 20:39:40 UTC --- I had locally added the patch in and totally forgot about that, so comment#8 is completely bogus.

[Bug c/56010] New: Powerpc, -mcpu=native and -mtune=native use the wrong name for target 7450

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56010 Bug #: 56010 Summary: Powerpc, -mcpu=native and -mtune=native use the wrong name for target 7450 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UN

[Bug c++/55663] [C++11] Alias template combined with constexpr function is considered non-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m-ou...@m-ou.se --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/55998] [4.8 Regression] [C++11] 'integral expression .. is not constant' when instantiating template alias in a template using a parameter of an encapsulating template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55998 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #29 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-16 20:03:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > Anyway, with target("any") attribute, what would happen for > void foo () __attribute__((target ("avx"))); > void foo () __attribute__((target ("an

[Bug c++/56009] New: Nested global destruction semantics not working (mingw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009 Bug #: 56009 Summary: Nested global destruction semantics not working (mingw) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 19:52:15 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed Jan 16 19:52:10 2013 New Revision: 195251 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195251 Log: 2013-01-16 Janus Weil

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comm

[Bug bootstrap/56001] [4.7 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-01-16 19:47:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is your toolchain using BSS PLT? I don't know, it's fairly vanilla. Do you have some test I could run?

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] lhs-allocation invoking the array-constructor on DDTs causes memory error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 --- Comment #2 from stefan.mauerberger at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 19:38:45 UTC --- Created attachment 29185 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29185 valgrind -v --track-origins=yes ./a.out

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] lhs-allocation invoking the array-constructor on DDTs causes memory error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 --- Comment #1 from stefan.mauerberger at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 19:37:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29184 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29184 gfortran -v -Wall -Wextra -g test.f90

[Bug fortran/56008] New: [F03] lhs-allocation invoking the array-constructor on DDTs causes memory error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 Bug #: 56008 Summary: [F03] lhs-allocation invoking the array-constructor on DDTs causes memory error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab 2013-01-16 19:12:01 UTC --- -FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test, is ==9876== AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_thread.cc:74 "((Ad

[Bug debug/56006] [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 19:06:09 UTC --- The second patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00822.html (which is waiting for Uros' bootstrap/regtest on alpha AFAIK) seems to fix these regressions.

[Bug bootstrap/56001] [4.7 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2013-01-16 19:04:34 UTC --- Is your toolchain using BSS PLT?

[Bug target/41557] gcc.exe: Internal error: (null) (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557 --- Comment #3 from Andris Pavenis 2013-01-16 18:57:42 UTC --- I also verified that I have already mostly applied a patch sent to gcc-bugs recently (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-01/msg01142.html) already for my builds, except of cou

[Bug testsuite/55994] multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994 --- Comment #5 from Janis Johnson 2013-01-16 18:52:56 UTC --- Author: janis Date: Wed Jan 16 18:52:51 2013 New Revision: 195250 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195250 Log: PR testsuite/55994 * gcc.c-tort

[Bug testsuite/54622] gcc.dg/vect test failures for arm big-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622 --- Comment #8 from Janis Johnson 2013-01-16 18:50:06 UTC --- Author: janis Date: Wed Jan 16 18:49:57 2013 New Revision: 195249 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195249 Log: PR testsuite/54622 * lib/target

[Bug target/55433] [4.8 Regression][LRA] ICE on excessive reloads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55433 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-01-16 18:44:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > This bug is still present and "biting me" as of r195176. > Is there anything I can do to help make some progress on this? > I managed to reproduc

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/41557] gcc.exe: Internal error: (null) (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557 Andris Pavenis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andris.pavenis at iki dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-01-16 18:28:04 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Jan 16 18:27:58 2013 New Revision: 195247 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195247 Log: 2013-01-16 Vladimir Makarov

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 --- Comment #4 from David Irvine 2013-01-16 18:16:58 UTC --- I see In my case in a simpler version than posted this compiles fine template class Synchronised { public: Synchronised(T t = T{}) : t_{t} {} t

[Bug lto/55493] [4.8 Regression] LTO always ICEs on i686-mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493 --- Comment #6 from Fanael 2013-01-16 18:15:25 UTC --- Oh right. Works for me too. I should've tested it more thoroughly first. Sorry for bothering you guys.

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Commen

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-16 17:30:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > As was explained on stackoverflow, this has nothing t odo with access > > modifiers, as you can easily demonstrate by

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #171 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-16 17:25:04 UTC --- Created attachment 29182 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29182 Patch to compress line info This patch removes column information from LTO (so we lose carr

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #28 from Sriraman Tallam 2013-01-16 17:25:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > The actual merging of target attribute isn't that important, what would be > more > important is that other attributes are merged together in tha

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #27 from Sriraman Tallam 2013-01-16 17:20:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:02 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 > > > > --- Comm

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56007] New: Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 Bug #: 56007 Summary: Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55995 Sharad Singhai changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 --- Comment #2 from David Irvine 2013-01-16 16:40:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > As was explained on stackoverflow, this has nothing t odo with access > modifiers, as you can easily demonstrate by making everything public. > > _t

[Bug target/27855] [4.5/4.7/4.8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

, ||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #44 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-16 16:40:36 UTC --- Still the same old story... Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu gcc version 4.8.0 20130116 (experimental) [trunk revision

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-01-16 16:39:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153#c4 > Let's close PR55153 as fixed and keep this PR to track the regression the fix > caused.

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55995 --- Comment #2 from Janis Johnson 2013-01-16 16:38:24 UTC --- Interesting, it causes the compiler to segfault on both arm-none-eabi and powerpc-none-eabi: /scratch/janisjo/build6/fsf-arm-eabi/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/al

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/56006] [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 16:31:10 UTC --- Ah, hjl opened PR56006 to track #c11.

[Bug debug/56006] New: [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 Bug #: 56006 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-16 16:24:47 UTC --- On 1/16/2013 3:08 AM, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 > > --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2013-01-16 > 08:08:3

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-16 16:19:42 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Jan 16 16:19:32 2013 New Revision: 195242 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195242 Log: gcc/fortran/ 2013-01-16 Jakub Jeline

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-16 16:19:33 UTC --- As was explained on stackoverflow, this has nothing t odo with access modifiers, as you can easily demonstrate by making everything public. _t has not been declared at the p

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 16:05:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 16 16:05:27 2013 New Revision: 195241 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195241 Log: PR fortran/52865 * trans-stmt.

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #26 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 16:05:01 UTC --- On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:02 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 > > --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jel

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 16:02:35 UTC --- The actual merging of target attribute isn't that important, what would be more important is that other attributes are merged together in that case and the decls treated as the

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #24 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-16 15:53:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > Merging of target attribute is what gcc/g++ did though, the function would get > then both target attributes (seems later decl's target wins), and t

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-* i686-*-* |x86_64-*-* i686-*-*

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/56005] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Bug #: 56005 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 St

[Bug bootstrap/56001] [4.7 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/54767] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code generated with "-O2 -fcheck=bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0 Summary|[4.7/4

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56004] New: Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 Bug #: 56004 Summary: Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/55964] [4.7 Regression] Segmentation fault with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55964 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #31 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-16 14:20:46 UTC --- Well, after early optimizations we get: int main() () { struct Foo x; void Foo:: (const struct Foo *) * iftmp.0; long int _3; long int _4; int (*__vtbl_ptr_type) ()

[Bug tree-optimization/55964] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55964 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-01-16 14:07:03 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 16 14:06:58 2013 New Revision: 195239 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195239 Log: 2013-01-16 Richard Biener P

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener 2013-01-16 13:57:54 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 16 13:57:48 2013 New Revision: 195238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195238 Log: 2013-01-16 Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/54767] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code generated with "-O2 -fcheck=bounds"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener 2013-01-16 13:57:53 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 16 13:57:48 2013 New Revision: 195238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195238 Log: 2013-01-16 Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/56003] New: SCEV should thread flags ^= 0x80000000 as an addition to discover an IV var.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56003 Bug #: 56003 Summary: SCEV should thread flags ^= 0x8000 as an addition to discover an IV var. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 13:30:42 UTC --- Further reduced test case: type :: mpdata_t class(bcd_t), pointer :: bcx, bcy end type type(mpdata_t) :: this call this%bcx%fill_halos() end

[Bug lto/54095] Unnecessary static variable renaming

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-16 13:18:51 UTC --- Well, we slipped the 4.8 window :( But I will make the patch soon so it goes into early 4.9 at least.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55273] [4.8 Regression] ICE in iv_number_of_iterations, at loop-iv.c:2819

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-16 13:17:30 UTC --- OK, the problem is that the "induction" variable here is not normal induction variable but handed by xor. PPC target seems to be only that translates (flags & 0x8000) into

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Michael van der Kolff changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mvanderkolff at gmail dot

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #29 from Michael van der Kolff 2013-01-16 12:38:41 UTC --- Created attachment 29180 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29180 testcase for member function pointer that isn't inlined

[Bug tree-optimization/42108] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] 50% performance regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108 --- Comment #54 from Richard Biener 2013-01-16 12:36:52 UTC --- Re-confirmed on trunk. The initial GFortran IL is still ... awkward. Apart from the issue of using a canonicalized IV at all we have D.1910 = i

[Bug libstdc++/56002] [mutex] allow generic classes to be used without requiring plattform support for threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56002] New: [mutex] allow generic classes to be used without requiring plattform support for threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 Bug #: 56002 Summary: [mutex] allow generic classes to be used without requiring plattform support for threads Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 11:59:29 UTC --- Created attachment 29178 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29178 gcc48-pr52865.patch This untested patch makes the loop vectorizable. Not sure if it is be

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #8 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-16 11:54:36 UTC --- Sounds good for both. Andreas, could you please try replacing kHighMemEnd = 0x0fffUL with kHighMemEnd = 0x3fffUL and see if it helps?

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 11:50:47 UTC --- I think for 44->46 bits we can still make it constant. But generally, the constructors of libasan are usually run from the stack of the initial thread, so it should be enough t

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 Kostya Serebryany changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: |asan does not work with 46

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 11:31:51 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Jan 15 16:47:36 2013 New Revision: 195211 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195211 Log: 2013-01-15 Vladimir Makarov

[Bug rtl-optimization/50176] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char->int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-16 11:22:23 UTC --- Created attachment 29177 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29177 gcc48-pr50176.patch Are you sure about it? For me on the http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/att

  1   2   >