http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55907
Bug #: 55907
Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:1418
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-08 06:14:01
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jan 8 06:13:52 2013
New Revision: 195004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195004
Log:
2013-01-08 Paul Thomas
PR fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55906
Bug #: 55906
Summary: suboptimal code generated for post-inc on Thumb1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55905
Bug #: 55905
Summary: ICE for polymorphic dummy argument with an allocatable
coarray component
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-08 03:34:15 UTC ---
With the patch, the tests are unresolved with r194997:
UNSUPPORTED: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0
UNSUPPORTED: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O1
UNSUPPORT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55627
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-08 01:19:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> For the testcase at
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/documents/jc1.ltrans23.o.xz?attredirects=0&d=1
>
> [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ ./lto1 -quiet -dumpd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41176
--- Comment #15 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2013-01-08 00:49:30 UTC ---
I can't build today's mainline:
libtool: compile: /homes/lucier/programs/gcc/objdirs/mainline/./gcc/xgcc
-shared-libgcc -B/homes/lucier/programs/gcc/objdirs/ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55904
Bug #: 55904
Summary: g++.dg/torture/vshuf-v8hi.C fails on MIPS with -O3
-mel -mips16
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55903
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |c
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55903
Bug #: 55903
Summary: [Patch] cleanup redundant assignment of pointer in
gcc/c-family/c-ada-spec.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-01-07
23:41:41 UTC ---
The code in comment #2 is correctly compiled by revision 158253 (2010-04-13),
but it is not by revision 159105 (2010-05-06).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl
2013-01-07 23:36:50 UTC ---
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:16:13PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Or extremely complicated:
> >
> > integer, pointer :: ptr
> > allo
eric -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip
jc1.ltrans23.ltrans.o -g -O2 -Wextra -Wpedantic -version -frandom-seed=1
-fprofile-use -fno-exceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-common -fltrans
~/tmp/jc1.ltrans23.o -o x.s
GNU GIMPLE (GCC) version 4.8.0 20130107 (experime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714
--- Comment #8 from Thorsten Glaser 2013-01-07 23:19:01
UTC ---
OK, this helped. Wonderful, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55828
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48655
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-07
22:40:22 UTC ---
This is a bug that only appears with --enable-checking; I don't see how that
merits P1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47136
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42661
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2013-01-07 22:16:53
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Mon Jan 7 22:16:45 2013
New Revision: 194998
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194998
Log:
2013-01-07 Steve Ellcey
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50148
--- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett 2013-01-07 22:14:21 UTC
---
This appears to be resolved for me, as of r194995. If someone with permissions
can mark as RESOLVED, I'll VERIFY.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-07 22:13:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 29085 [details]
> A patch to move lto_global_var_decls to lto/lto.c
>
> With this patch, I got
>
> lto1: internal compiler error:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881
--- Comment #4 from David Greene 2013-01-07
21:50:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well - confirmed. Unlikely to be fixed.
That's _very_ unfortunate. It makes the pragma almost useless in practice.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881
--- Comment #3 from David Greene 2013-01-07
21:49:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What is the output of GCC?
warning.cpp: In function 'int main(int, char**)':
warning.cpp:5:19: warning: 'n' may be used uninitialized in this functi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #32 from Joost VandeVondele
2013-01-07 21:35:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> The formatting in the patch is wrong (multiple issues).
I've tried to fix them in the version below.
It would be really cool to have -fope
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 21:23:20 UTC ---
Apparently comment #0 has been fixed by
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193568
which applied the patch of comment #5. However, the test case in co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55902
--- Comment #2 from Václav Zeman 2013-01-07
20:19:11 UTC ---
HTH:
amber2::wilx:~/log4cplus-bzr/work-trunk/objdir-mingw64-w32/bug> gdb
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/4.6/lto1
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.5-ubuntu
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-07 20:17:15
UTC ---
Two more versions:
__m128d f(){
union { long long t[2]; __m128d d; } a
= {{ 0x7fff, 0x7fff }};
return a.d;
}
_Z1fv:
.LFB537:
.cfi_sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55902
--- Comment #1 from Václav Zeman 2013-01-07
19:53:51 UTC ---
Attachment upload did not work. The following link should work:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-WkLJEfYmSEVHVmUzR3NDAxTFE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55902
Bug #: 55902
Summary: lto1 SIGSEGV
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
Bug #: 55901
Summary: [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as
array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-07
19:11:13 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 7 19:11:04 2013
New Revision: 194995
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194995
Log:
2013-01-07 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54990
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-07 19:10:41
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 7 19:10:32 2013
New Revision: 194994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194994
Log:
2013-01-07 Paul Thomas
PR fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-07 19:10:39
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 7 19:10:32 2013
New Revision: 194994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194994
Log:
2013-01-07 Paul Thomas
PR fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54992
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-07 19:10:40
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 7 19:10:32 2013
New Revision: 194994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194994
Log:
2013-01-07 Paul Thomas
PR fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55898
Ruben Van Boxem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||addr-space
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-07
18:51:38 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 7 18:51:33 2013
New Revision: 194993
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194993
Log:
Backport from 2013-01-07 trunk r194
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55898
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #2 from Andr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-07
18:37:57 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 7 18:37:47 2013
New Revision: 194992
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194992
Log:
PR target/55897
* doc/extend.t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-07
18:34:50 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 7 18:34:40 2013
New Revision: 194991
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194991
Log:
PR target/55897
* config/avr/a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #23 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-07
18:30:25 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 7 18:30:11 2013
New Revision: 194990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194990
Log:
2013-01-07 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-07
18:18:12 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Revision: 194987
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Mon Jan 7 18:18:03 2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-07
18:16:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Author: mikael
> Date: Mon Jan 7 18:10:46 2013
> New Revision: 194987
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194987
> Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-07
18:10:52 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Jan 7 18:10:46 2013
New Revision: 194987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194987
Log:
2013-01-07 Steven G. Kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-07 18:09:29 UTC ---
On 1/7/2013 12:27 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I'd say after with r194800 or later you shouldn't get this failure.
Yes, the failure is gone. So, PR can be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-07
18:00:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 7 18:00:18 2013
New Revision: 194986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194986
Log:
PR c++/55753
* tree.c (build_a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-07
17:56:58 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Jan 7 17:56:53 2013
New Revision: 194985
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194985
Log:
2013-01-07 Steven G. Kargl
M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #11 from Diego Novillo 2013-01-07
17:54:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Eh. Diego, how does GTY((user)) work here? It smells like a bug in vec.h
> to me.
>
> /* Garbage collection support for vec. */
>
> template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2013-01-07 17:39:59
UTC ---
I don't see where att.h or bsd.h is being included. I grep'ed gcc/*.h in the
build tree and source tree and don't see any includes for them. Is it possible
that tm_file is being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-07
17:27:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 29100
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29100
gcc48-pr54120.patch
So, I wrote a fix against r189366, only to find out that Richard Sandi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55470
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55720
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||splinterofchaos at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55834
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-07
17:07:57 UTC ---
OK, I understnad the issue now. It is bug caused by my patch indeed.
The problem is logic in scev_probably_wraps_p that is trying to prove that
given IV at given STMT is not wrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2013-01-07 17:07:05
UTC ---
The gcc dependencies are reminding me of the pre-egcs days. I hope we don't
return there. :(
Anyway.. These are the sources I have linked into today's gcc-svn. This is what
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55898
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55470
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07
16:54:39 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 7 16:54:33 2013
New Revision: 194983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194983
Log:
Support -fuse-ld=bfd and -fuse-ld
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-07
16:34:14 UTC ---
Ah, ok, seems indeed to be HWI size related and also (due to an earlier bug)
related to the revision you've mentioned.
So, with an i686-linux -> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 cross thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-07 16:32:04
UTC ---
I re-ran a patched version of configure on AIX and it correctly does not define
HWCAP_FLAGS as -nH, so the configure patch seems to work as intended on AIX.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-07
16:23:13 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 7 16:22:59 2013
New Revision: 194981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194981
Log:
Backport from 2013-01-07 trunk r194
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882
--- Comment #4 from Jan Smets 2013-01-07
16:22:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 29099
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29099
testcase-pr55882.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets 2013-01-07
16:20:32 UTC ---
: :
...
20: 03c21021 adduv0,s8,v0 20: 03c21021 adduv0,s8,v0
24: 8c44000c lw a0,12(v0) | 24:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-07 16:09:14 UTC ---
On 1/7/2013 7:50 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Guess related to -fintrinsic-module-path.
Have being doing a regression search and it seems to be
pointing to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|Bad memor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #1 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55797
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55900
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
15:41:18 UTC ---
Reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55900
Bug #: 55900
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-07 15:40:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> It's a global, why should it get collected?
Because it is empty when ggc_collect is called.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Summary|[4.7/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55718
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
15:34:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 7 15:34:43 2013
New Revision: 194975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194975
Log:
2013-01-07 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55885
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-01-07 15:34:34 UTC ---
INT_MIN % -1 and INT_MIN / -1 *should* be made defined by -fwrapv; that's
bug 30484.
Without -fwrapv, C11 made explicit the intent that the modulo operation i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
