[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-01-04 07:29:09 UTC --- > Does this work now? Nope! -(r194872).

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2013-01-04 06:40:44 UTC --- The test fails corei7-avx also. I build a simple reproducer. - #include #define N 100 double foo (

[Bug target/53789] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 --- Comment #16 from John David Anglin 2013-01-04 04:03:30 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Fri Jan 4 04:03:18 2013 New Revision: 194880 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194880 Log: PR target/53789 * config

[Bug target/53789] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 --- Comment #15 from John David Anglin 2013-01-04 03:55:47 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Fri Jan 4 03:55:43 2013 New Revision: 194879 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194879 Log: PR target/53789 * config

[Bug rtl-optimization/55829] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3069 with -msse3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/55022] [4.8 Regression] air.f90 is miscompliled with -m64 -O2 -fgraphite-identity after revision 190619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/52555] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE unrecognizable insn with -ffast-math and __attribute__((optimize(xx)))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52555 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug fortran/55117] Programs fails to read namelist (contains derived types objects)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117 Walter Spector changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net ---

[Bug middle-end/55859] Mention -Og/-Ofast in "error: argument to '-O' should be a non-negative integer"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55859 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 23:51:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) The patch has been submitted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-01/msg00017.html (In reply to comment #13) > C512 (R506) The function-referen

[Bug testsuite/55780] effective targets arm_arch_v*_multilib are not strict enough

ry --with-headers=yes --with-sysroot=/opt/codesourcery/arm-none-eabi --with-build-sysroot=/scratch/janisjo/build6/fsf-arm-eabi/install/arm-none-eabi --disable-libgomp --disable-libitm Thread model: single gcc version 4.8.0 20130103 (experimental) (GCC) For this compiler, none of the links fa

[Bug target/52061] compiler internal error in extract_insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52061 --- Comment #2 from Jean-Pierre Flori 2013-01-03 22:50:50 UTC --- This is fixed with FSF GCC 4.7.2.

[Bug c++/55870] New: Compiler crash when template includes sizeof of something that shouldn't be dereferenced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55870 Bug #: 55870 Summary: Compiler crash when template includes sizeof of something that shouldn't be dereferenced Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3

[Bug c++/55842] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55842 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55753] [C++11][4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE constexpr ctor, tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:14336

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55753] [C++11][4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE constexpr ctor, tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:14336

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 20:37:49 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 20:37:28 2013 New Revision: 194872 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194872 Log: PR c++/55419 PR c++/55753

[Bug c++/55419] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_init_ctor_preeval, at gimplify.c:3587

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55419 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 20:37:50 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 20:37:28 2013 New Revision: 194872 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194872 Log: PR c++/55419 PR c++/55753

[Bug c++/55842] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55842 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 20:37:31 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 20:37:10 2013 New Revision: 194871 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194871 Log: PR c++/55842 * semantics.c (tra

[Bug c++/55753] [C++11][4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE constexpr ctor, tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:14336

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 20:37:08 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 20:36:49 2013 New Revision: 194870 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194870 Log: PR c++/55419 PR c++/55753

[Bug c++/55419] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_init_ctor_preeval, at gimplify.c:3587

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55419 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 20:37:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 20:36:49 2013 New Revision: 194870 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194870 Log: PR c++/55419 PR c++/55753

[Bug c++/55842] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55842 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 20:36:32 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 20:36:14 2013 New Revision: 194869 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194869 Log: PR c++/55842 * semantics.c (tra

[Bug tree-optimization/55869] different bit shift/or optimization.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55869 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-03 20:25:27 UTC --- The question I think comes down to this is shifting faster than testb/cmove ?

[Bug fortran/55855] [OOP] incorrect warning with procedure pointer component on pointer-valued base object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resol

[Bug bootstrap/50177] libcpp reallocator a C or C++ function?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50177 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/55869] New: different bit shift/or optimization.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55869 Bug #: 55869 Summary: different bit shift/or optimization. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug bootstrap/50167] gmp memory functions are extern "C" (graphite)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50167 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50167] gmp memory functions are extern "C" (graphite)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50167 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-03 20:06:56 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Thu Jan 3 20:06:49 2013 New Revision: 194868 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194868 Log: 2013-01-03 Marc Glisse PR boots

[Bug bootstrap/50177] libcpp reallocator a C or C++ function?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50177 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-03 20:06:57 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Thu Jan 3 20:06:49 2013 New Revision: 194868 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194868 Log: 2013-01-03 Marc Glisse PR boots

[Bug c++/55842] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 ICE with boost multi-precision and boost variant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55842 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug preprocessor/54694] internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:2387

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694 --- Comment #6 from Toralf Förster 2013-01-03 19:35:16 UTC --- As long as no fixed gcc version is released - in Gentoo land we do have this work around for now : https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434908#c11 (Workaround: Append -mno-avx t

[Bug debug/55059] [4.8 Regression] DWARF missing concrete class definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55059 --- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey 2013-01-03 19:29:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > So, where do we stand with this? Can GDB be changed to cope with this, or do > you think it isn't valid DWARF? It seems strange at least. I don't ha

[Bug fortran/55854] ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854 --- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson 2013-01-03 19:12:09 UTC --- Awesome -- thanks! Please let me know once this hits the trunk so I can request an update of the macports build and try it out. Damian (In reply to comment #5) > (In repl

[Bug libstdc++/55728] std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot | |com, redi at

[Bug bootstrap/55792] Bad memory access with profiledbootstrap and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-03 19:03:25 UTC --- I got ==23584== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7f03d1089238 at pc 0xb9284a bp 0x7fffbd507b60 sp 0x7fffbd507b58 READ of size 1 at 0x7f03d1089238 thread T

[Bug fortran/55854] ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug libstdc++/55847] mistake bad_weak_ptr::what() message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55847 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/55728] std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug c++/55856] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on tuple with rvalue ref member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55856] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on tuple with rvalue ref member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 18:34:55 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 18:34:48 2013 New Revision: 194866 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194866 Log: PR c++/55856 * g++.dg/init/arra

[Bug c++/55856] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on tuple with rvalue ref member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 18:31:29 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 18:31:23 2013 New Revision: 194865 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194865 Log: PR c++/55856 * semantics.c (bui

[Bug c++/55856] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on tuple with rvalue ref member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 18:31:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 18:30:58 2013 New Revision: 194864 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194864 Log: PR c++/55856 * semantics.c (bui

[Bug fortran/55854] ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854 --- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson 2013-01-03 18:11:56 UTC --- Apparently an ICE also occurs if the argument intent is removed but "type" is replaced by "class." See below. Is this fixed by the patch in comment 3? Damian $ cat ice_on

[Bug fortran/55867] Segmentation fault on DEALLOCATION of type with ALLOCATABLE components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55867 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfi

[Bug fortran/55868] New: gfortran generates for CLASS(*) __m_MOD___vtab__$tar on NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55868 Bug #: 55868 Summary: gfortran generates for CLASS(*) __m_MOD___vtab__$tar on NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL systems Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/55712] cpuinfo.c doesn't compile for x86-64 with medium memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55712 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 17:16:30 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jan 3 17:16:08 2013 New Revision: 194862 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194862 Log: PR target/55712 * config

[Bug libstdc++/55866] [4.8 Regression] #include in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55867] New: Segmentation fault on DEALLOCATION of type with ALLOCATABLE components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55867 Bug #: 55867 Summary: Segmentation fault on DEALLOCATION of type with ALLOCATABLE components Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status

[Bug libstdc++/55866] [4.8 Regression] #include in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-03 17:01:12 UTC --- The header even says so, and has done so for years: /** @file backward/auto_ptr.h * This is an internal header file, included by other library headers. * Do not attempt

[Bug c++/55856] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on tuple with rvalue ref member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/55728] std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-03 16:59:38 UTC --- Eh, eh, indeed. Are you willing to take care of it over the next couple of weeks? Otherwise let me know, I can, but not now, I'm trying to catch up about too many things at once

[Bug libstdc++/55866] [4.8 Regression] #include in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-03 16:55:04 UTC --- It's an error in the package and only worked "by accident" because $PREFIX/include/c++/4.x.y/backward is in the include path, to allow to be found. The only supported way

[Bug lto/55466] [4.8 Regression] Revision 191466 destroyed DWARF debug info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466 --- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 16:54:07 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Jan 3 16:53:54 2013 New Revision: 194861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194861 Log: Fix ChangeLog entry for PR lto/5

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 16:54:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > type(t), target :: x > class(*), pointer :: ptr2 => x TODO: Check whether that would be also valid if "x" is not SAVE (here it is as "x"

[Bug c++/53650] [4.7 Regression] large array causes huge memory use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] large |[4.7 Regression] large

[Bug c++/53650] [4.7/4.8 Regression] large array causes huge memory use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-03 16:51:51 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 3 16:51:41 2013 New Revision: 194860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194860 Log: PR c++/53650 * call.c (type_has

[Bug bootstrap/55707] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails in gcc/graphite-dependences.c error cast loses precision

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/55707] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails in gcc/graphite-dependences.c error cast loses precision

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707 --- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-03 16:47:48 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Thu Jan 3 16:47:37 2013 New Revision: 194859 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194859 Log: 2013-01-02 Rainer Emrich PR b

[Bug lto/48065] LTO: assertion failed in optimize_inline_calls, at tree-inline.c:4246

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener 2013-01-03 16:40:48 UTC --- We definitely should be able to make it work. We can simply inline abort () ;)

[Bug libstdc++/55866] New: [4.8 Regression] #include in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55866 Bug #: 55866 Summary: [4.8 Regression] #include in C++11 mode Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/48065] LTO: assertion failed in optimize_inline_calls, at tree-inline.c:4246

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-03 16:37:00 UTC --- Hmm, rejecting inlines late at ltrans stage really is problem as discussed earlier - we make assumptions on the optimizations of constant parameters and we won't export offline co

[Bug libstdc++/55728] std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-03 16:35:46 UTC --- Yes, I would have done it already but was taking a break from writing any code over xmas! This one needs a new export from the lib, but that's OK, I bumped the version to 6

[Bug lto/48065] LTO: assertion failed in optimize_inline_calls, at tree-inline.c:4246

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-03 16:33:29 UTC --- Hmm, rejecting inlines late at ltrans stage really is problem as discussed earlier - we make assumptions on the optimizations of constant parameters and we won't export offline fu

[Bug inline-asm/55864] Optimization cause asm code to wrong behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864 --- Comment #3 from beldmit at nm dot ru 2013-01-03 16:33:02 UTC --- If this case is better to reproduce the problem or I completely do not understand the asm usage? The mmx registers and operations are used to speedup the 64-bit xor. v

[Bug middle-end/55851] [4.8 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2013-01-03 16:32:04 UTC --- Ehm. (In reply to comment #8) > Created attachment 29078 [details] > gcc48-pr55851.patch > > Untested patch (which I don't like very much, but we can't even use something

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-03 16:29:49 UTC --- Martin, I guess this is "yours". I have no idea here ;)

[Bug libstdc++/55728] std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug tree-optimization/55823] [4.8 Regression] ice in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:270

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55823 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-03 16:26:16 UTC --- The following patch to devirtualize before updating jump functions solves the testcase but I am not at all sure it is correct. Index: ipa-prop.c =

[Bug c++/55856] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on tuple with rvalue ref member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55856 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/55823] [4.8 Regression] ice in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:270

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55823 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/55348] Problem in tree-ssa-pre.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53137] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyle.t.konrad at gmail dot

[Bug c++/55853] [C++11] ICE calling member function of templated class in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55853 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/55862] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2495

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55862 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/43961] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [ARM thumb] "branch out of range" with thumb1_output_casesi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[ARM thumb] "branch out of |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/55860] Turn segmented iteration into nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55855] [OOP] incorrect warning with procedure pointer component on pointer-valued base object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03 16:15:07 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Thu Jan 3 16:14:54 2013 New Revision: 194857 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194857 Log: 2013-01-03 Janus Weil

[Bug fortran/55855] [OOP] incorrect warning with procedure pointer component on pointer-valued base object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/55865] [4.8 Regression] vect-outer-fir-big-array.c vectorizer failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55865 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/55857] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55857 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-01-03 15:57:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 3 15:57:15 2013 New Revision: 194856 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194856 Log: 2013-01-03 Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 15:44:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > + c->ts.type = ts->type = BT_VOID; Ups. The "ts->type =" has to be deleted to fix the failure of comment 13. * * * The followin

[Bug tree-optimization/55865] [4.8 Regression] vect-outer-fir-big-array.c vectorizer failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55865 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-* Status

[Bug tree-optimization/55865] New: [4.8 Regression] vect-outer-fir-big-array.c vectorizer failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55865 Bug #: 55865 Summary: [4.8 Regression] vect-outer-fir-big-array.c vectorizer failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug fortran/55855] [OOP] incorrect warning with procedure pointer component on pointer-valued base object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55855 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assig

[Bug middle-end/55851] [4.8 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug inline-asm/55864] Optimization cause asm code to wrong behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug inline-asm/55864] Optimization cause asm code to wrong behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864 --- Comment #1 from beldmit at nm dot ru 2013-01-03 15:10:07 UTC --- Created attachment 29077 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29077 The bug representation code

[Bug inline-asm/55864] New: Optimization cause asm code to wrong behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55864 Bug #: 55864 Summary: Optimization cause asm code to wrong behaviour Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/55851] [4.8 Regression] ICE in size_binop_loc, at fold-const.c:1385

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55854] ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 14:46:54 UTC --- The problem seems to be the "gfc_class_null_initializer", where "ts" is unlimited polymorphic and "init_expr" is of type "__class__$tar_a" (and EXPR_NULL). The latter leads to t

[Bug middle-end/55863] Fails to fold (i + 2) - (i + 1) to 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/55863] New: Fails to fold (i + 2) - (i + 1) to 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863 Bug #: 55863 Summary: Fails to fold (i + 2) - (i + 1) to 1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug libstdc++/55861] [C++11] `std::shared_future::get' is not const-qualified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55861 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/55862] New: ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2495

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com Hi ! The following testcase makes GCC 4.8.0 as of 20130103 crash at -O2. It may be related to PR55348 (which was probably a dup anyway). $ cat antic.c int g

[Bug libstdc++/55861] New: [C++11] `std::shared_future::get' is not const-qualified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55861 Bug #: 55861 Summary: [C++11] `std::shared_future::get' is not const-qualified Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/55860] New: Turn segmented iteration into nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860 Bug #: 55860 Summary: Turn segmented iteration into nested loops Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimiz

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Emrich 2013-01-03 13:28:51 UTC --- Patch posted to the ML http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00114.html

[Bug fortran/55854] ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 13:03:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think it's the same as PR55763 comment 10. Seemingly not - at least with the patch from PR55763 comment 12, this example crashes in: #0 build

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 13:03:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Proposed patch: Which fails with gfc_typename(): Undefined type for contains subroutine foo type t end type t class(*), allocatable

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-03 12:55:23 UTC --- For another failure, see PR 55854. (In reply to comment #10) > I have a simple case where CLASS(*) leads to an ICE. > If it doesn't fit here, please feel free to move it els

[Bug middle-end/55859] Mention -Og/-Ofast in "error: argument to '-O' should be a non-negative integer"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >