[Bug middle-end/52306] ICE in CSE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 --- Comment #11 from Thorsten Glaser 2012-12-24 00:53:01 UTC --- Created attachment 29040 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29040 preprocessed source of festival occurrence Here's another one, from festival (some TTS engine th

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #25 from Jan Smets 2012-12-24 00:37:18 UTC --- 55793 may be a duplicate, but the testcase is really different.

[Bug tree-optimization/55802] Various missed optimizations for a simple function in GCC itself

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug tree-optimization/55802] New: Various missed optimizations for a simple function in GCC itself

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55802 Bug #: 55802 Summary: Various missed optimizations for a simple function in GCC itself Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug go/53679] Build failure in libgo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679 --- Comment #5 from Mike Frysinger 2012-12-23 23:32:35 UTC --- posted a patch here to add --disable-werror: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01379.html we need this for ChromiumOS ...

[Bug libgomp/32193] libgomp does not honor --disable-werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32193 --- Comment #8 from Mike Frysinger 2012-12-23 23:31:22 UTC --- posted a patch here to add --disable-werror: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01378.html

[Bug libgcc/55712] cpuinfo.c doesn't compile for x86-64 with medium memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55712 --- Comment #4 from Leif Ekblad 2012-12-23 22:50:51 UTC --- Created attachment 29039 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29039 Patch that uses other register than rbx for cpuid.

[Bug libgcc/55712] cpuinfo.c doesn't compile for x86-64 with medium memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55712 Leif Ekblad changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29038|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libgcc/55712] cpuinfo.c doesn't compile for x86-64 with medium memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55712 --- Comment #2 from Leif Ekblad 2012-12-23 22:47:13 UTC --- Comment on attachment 29038 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29038 Save rbx and use another file for ebx parameter to cpuid >diff -crNB gcc-4.8-20121216/gcc/config/i

[Bug libgcc/55712] cpuinfo.c doesn't compile for x86-64 with medium memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55712 --- Comment #1 from Leif Ekblad 2012-12-23 22:38:31 UTC --- Created attachment 29038 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29038 Save rbx and use another file for ebx parameter to cpuid

[Bug fortran/46991] [OOP] polymorphic assumed-size actual arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46991 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/46991] [OOP] polymorphic assumed-size actual arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46991 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Commen

[Bug fortran/47659] -Wconversion[-extra] should emit warning for constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47659 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Commen

[Bug c++/55801] New: ICE with thread_local after ill-formed forward declaration

Configured with: ../gcc_svn/configure --prefix=/home/lima/vanilla_installs/gcc_and_tools --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls --disable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20121223 (experimental) (GCC) ---

[Bug c++/55800] New: Link failure with thread_local in unnamed namespace

=c,c++ --disable-nls --disable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20121223 (experimental) (GCC) ---

[Bug c++/55798] suprious redeclaration error in for-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55798 --- Comment #4 from Frank Heckenbach 2012-12-23 20:12:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > A big note, C and C++ has different rules with respect of nameloop up with > declarations in the for/if/switch statements. That's what got me. S

[Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341 --- Comment #46 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-12-23 19:45:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #45) > >> The point of failure is not in the object, > >> but in a routine called after a routine from this object finishes. > > What if you remov

[Bug bootstrap/55784] [4.8 regression] declaration of C function 'const char* strsignal(int)' conflicts with /usr/include/string.h:112: error: previous declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug c++/55798] suprious redeclaration error in for-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55798 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-23 19:31:04 UTC --- A big note, C and C++ has different rules with respect of nameloop up with declarations in the for/if/switch statements.

[Bug fortran/54884] [4.8 Regression] Externally used PRIVATE module procedure wrongly marked as TREE_PUBLIC()=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54884] [4.8 Regression] Externally used PRIVATE module procedure wrongly marked as TREE_PUBLIC()=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54884 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-23 18:43:36 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Dec 23 18:43:32 2012 New Revision: 194706 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194706 Log: 2012-12-23 Tobias Burnus

[Bug target/53789] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin 2012-12-23 18:31:30 UTC --- I implemented a reload pattern to try to do the reload for the following TLS symbol reference: "(symbol_ref:SI ("__gmpfr_cache_const_pi") [flags 0x60] )" However, this a

[Bug target/41176] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands at postreload.c:396

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41176 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #14 from

[Bug c++/55663] [C++11] Alias template combined with constexpr function is considered non-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-12-23 17:18:27 UTC --- Created attachment 29037 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29037 Candidate patch that I have bootstrapped This is a candidate patch I'll send a little bit

[Bug c++/55766] template alias is not equivalent (const-ness is not recognized)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55766 --- Comment #6 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-12-23 17:01:11 UTC --- "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" a écrit: > Dodji, can you have a look to this? Sure, I am looking at it and will be posting comments to PR c++/55663 instead, as this

[Bug target/53789] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa*-*-* |hppa*-*-linux* --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #41 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2012-12-23 15:09:59 UTC --- Am 23.12.2012 15:16, schrieb dominiq at lps dot ens.fr: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 > > --- Comment #40 from Dominique d'Humieres >

[Bug c++/55798] suprious redeclaration error in for-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55798 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-23 15:06:30 UTC --- Sorry, wrong bug, it was Bug 2288

[Bug c++/55798] suprious redeclaration error in for-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55798 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug sanitizer/55799] New: AddressSanitizer with `-pg' option results in spurious errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Bug #: 55799 Summary: AddressSanitizer with `-pg' option results in spurious errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug bootstrap/55784] [4.8 regression] declaration of C function 'const char* strsignal(int)' conflicts with /usr/include/string.h:112: error: previous declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-12-23 14:18:58 UTC --- > regtest scheduled for tonight Finished without new failure. I won't have access to the net for the next ten days.

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #40 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-12-23 14:16:52 UTC --- > Unfortunately, I cannot really debug this without access to a machine > where it fails. Would it be possible to write a simple C test that can be run on the differen

[Bug c++/55798] New: suprious redeclaration error in for-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55798 Bug #: 55798 Summary: suprious redeclaration error in for-loop Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/55753] [C++11][4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE constexpr ctor, tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:14336

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753 --- Comment #3 from David Abdurachmanov 2012-12-23 12:31:40 UTC --- I tried reverting (on r194703): - r173680: Compiles. But still ICE'd as reported. - r173680 && r173679: Does not compile, xgcc ICE'd - r173680 && r173679 && r173678: Same

[Bug middle-end/55797] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge has no corresponding call_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55797 Bug #: 55797 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge has no corresponding call_stmt Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/55796] New: Comparison with a negated number vs sum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55796 Bug #: 55796 Summary: Comparison with a negated number vs sum Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimizati

[Bug ada/55795] New: GNAT User Guide mentions features-ada12; no such file exists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55795 Bug #: 55795 Summary: GNAT User Guide mentions features-ada12; no such file exists Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIR