http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-12-12
07:34:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please provide preprocessed testcase and gcc options, so that this can be
> looked at from a cross-compiler.
> Very likely md reorg pass does somet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12
07:28:32 UTC ---
Please provide preprocessed testcase and gcc options, so that this can be
looked at from a cross-compiler.
Very likely md reorg pass does something wrong.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660
Bug #: 55660
Summary: ICE instead of some warning during lto build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55410
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659
Bug #: 55659
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [SH] Build failure with ICE in
dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20748
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658
Bug #: 55658
Summary: bitfields and __attribute__((packed)) generate
horrible code on x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-12
05:09:09 UTC ---
Another proposed patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00766.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin 2012-12-12
03:58:29 UTC ---
Introduced by the following commit:
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Oct 20 21:00:23 2012
New Revision: 192641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192641
--enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --build=hppa-linux-gnu --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-java-gc=boehm
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada,lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20121211 (experimental) [trunk revision 194379] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-12-12
01:00:59 UTC ---
Introduced between 192625 and 192884.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-12-12
00:12:13 UTC ---
Breakpoint 1, simplify_subreg (outermode=SImode, op=0x40660c70,
innermode=BLKmode, byte=0) at ../../gcc/gcc/simplify-rtx.c:5682
5682 gcc_assert (innermode != BLKmo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #156 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-12
00:00:17 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de
wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
>
> --- Comment #155 from Markus Trippelsdorf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-* (32-bit)
Hos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2012-12-11
23:40:34 UTC ---
Still see these on my arm box. glibc is now somewhat old.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-12/msg00871.html
Box has a Marvell processor.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55533
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Woehlke
2012-12-11 23:34:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Which symbols are hidden which you don't want to be?
ptr
> What do you mean "instantiation failed"? You get a warning but it works.
It fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #155 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-11 22:57:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #154)
> What was the size of the gcc lto/pgo binary before the change to use the
> histogram? Was it close to the gcc 4.7 lto/pgo size? In that case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-11
22:46:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 11 22:46:37 2012
New Revision: 194432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194432
Log:
PR c++/54883
* decl2.c (min_vis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-11
22:46:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 11 22:46:22 2012
New Revision: 194431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194431
Log:
PR c++/54883
* decl2.c (min_vis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-11
22:46:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 11 22:46:08 2012
New Revision: 194430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194430
Log:
PR c++/54883
* decl2.c (min_vis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539
--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf 2012-12-11 22:33:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I played a little bit with the code and found that the
following patch appears to fix my problem:
Index: libgfortran/io/write_float.def
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|c+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54416
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55631
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-11
22:28:06 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Dec 11 22:28:01 2012
New Revision: 194429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194429
Log:
PR libstdc++/55631
* include/e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55611
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-11 22:12:01
UTC ---
Created attachment 28931
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28931
Use tree code to determine the canonical order
In this patch, I remove the external calls to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513
Emil L changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||empann at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-11
21:49:13 UTC ---
Which symbols are hidden which you don't want to be?
What do you mean "instantiation failed"? You get a warning but it works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/proto-lossage-7.mm
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -nostdinc++
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/libstdc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55533
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
21:32:15 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Dec 11 21:32:11 2012
New Revision: 194424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194424
Log:
Add libstdc++-raw-cxx.m4 and use
/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/method-12.mm
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -nostdinc++
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64
::operator<< > (__out=@0xae180, __s=0x2b78 "Testing
objc_copyProtocolList ()...\n") at ostream:540
540}
(gdb)
main () at
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/gnu-api-2-objc.mm:106
106id my_protocol = @protocol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Woehlke
2012-12-11 21:06:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 28930
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28930
example code
Here's a simplified concrete example. Since we are talking about correct
vi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55657
Bug #: 55657
Summary: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin12
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55654
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-12-11
20:34:32 UTC ---
I don't see this with Xcode 3.2.6:
PASS: obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/string1.mm -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none
-fnext-runtime (test for excess errors)
PASS: obj-c++.d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Bug #: 55656
Summary: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-11
20:20:34 UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Dec 11 20:20:23 2012
New Revision: 194421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194421
Log:
2012-12-11 Marc Glisse
PR c++/
-apple-darwin10.8.0/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.8-20121211/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.8 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv
/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/string1.m
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime
-mno-constant-cfstrings -Wno-deprecated-declarations
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
Bug #: 55655
Summary: cannot export specialized template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/string1.mm
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -nostdinc++
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/i386/libstdc++-v3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55654
Bug #: 55654
Summary: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55653
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #23 from Rolf Ebert 2012-12-11
19:57:34 UTC ---
I see Eric's point in that the patch in comment #5 hides another bug in the
Makefile chemistry. There seems to be an unnecessary dependency from the
gnattools on multilibs. Remin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55624
--- Comment #4 from shawn.pringle at gmail dot com 2012-12-11 19:45:23 UTC ---
On 10/12/2012 6:44 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55624
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55653
Bug #: 55653
Summary: Unnecessary initialization of vector register
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #154 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-11
19:30:53 UTC ---
What was the size of the gcc lto/pgo binary before the change to use the
histogram? Was it close to the gcc 4.7 lto/pgo size? In that case that is a
very large increase, ~25%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Holbert 2012-12-11
19:20:34 UTC ---
Thanks for the quick turnaround!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55193
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652
Bug #: 55652
Summary: [C++11][4.8] ICE (segfault) with templates and structs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-11
19:06:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 19:06:19 2012
New Revision: 194416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194416
Log:
PR c++/55643
* expr.c (mark_exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-11
19:01:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 19:01:45 2012
New Revision: 194415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194415
Log:
PR c++/55643
* expr.c (mark_exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-11
18:46:30 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:46:20 2012
New Revision: 194413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194413
Log:
PR target/54121
* config/sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-11
18:45:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:45:45 2012
New Revision: 194412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194412
Log:
PR bootstrap/54926
* Makefile.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-11
18:44:57 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:44:48 2012
New Revision: 194411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194411
Log:
PR target/54121
* config/sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-11
18:42:37 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:42:31 2012
New Revision: 194410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194410
Log:
PR target/54121
* config/sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
--- Comment #15 from Zdenek Dvorak 2012-12-11
18:19:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 28928
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28928
A proposed patch
This patch fixes the error (and also makes the code more clearly match wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55651
Bug #: 55651
Summary: gcc hangs when "-Wp," is passed on the command line
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54416
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-11
18:17:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:16:50 2012
New Revision: 194408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194408
Log:
PR c++/54416
* pt.c (maybe_proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55193
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-11
18:01:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:01:09 2012
New Revision: 194405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194405
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/55193
* lra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54974
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-12-11
17:36:34 UTC ---
Matt,
Are you planning on backporting this to 4.7 ?
regards
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
Bug #: 55650
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Firefox profiledbuild: libxul.so:
cannot map zero-fill pages: Cannot allocate memory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-11
17:05:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28927
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28927
gcc48-pr52640.patch
Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest on the trunk. No point to #inclu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
Dave Simmonds changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #19 from Jan Smets 2012-12-11
16:55:30 UTC ---
Steven's example only contains 10 000 entries. I need to recompile a symbol
table of 270.000 entries a dozen times each day. (and so do a lot of other
people)
With the 'fix' it st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55619
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-11
16:51:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 16:51:16 2012
New Revision: 194404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194404
Log:
PR c++/55619
* semantics.c (fin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
--- Comment #3 from Dave Simmonds
2012-12-11 16:49:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > The Tr1UnorderedMapPrinter pretty printer, and other tr1 pretty printers
> > look
> > for variables starting with _M_,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-11
16:34:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The Tr1UnorderedMapPrinter pretty printer, and other tr1 pretty printers look
> for variables starting with _M_, the actual variable names start wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55623
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
--- Comment #1 from Dave Simmonds
2012-12-11 16:19:09 UTC ---
(gdb) print g_epicmap->m_Map
$1 = Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/gdb/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py", line 536, in to_string
return '%s with %d elem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
Bug #: 55649
Summary: libstdcxx gdb python pretty printer for tr1 not
working
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.4.0 |4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-12-11 15:52:40 UTC ---
> Actually we need one for post-darwin11 failures and another for those unique
> to
> post-darwin12.
Jack,
I don't have access to darwin11 or 12. Could you open th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55648
Bug #: 55648
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution
test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55482
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.9.0
Summary|[4.8 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-11
14:35:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 14:34:57 2012
New Revision: 194401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194401
Log:
PR tree-optimization/54570
* g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55645
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-12-11 14:34:45 UTC ---
in principle, one could add the movmsk unconditionally (well, if advantagious)
after the compare and evaluate only one one of legs of the branch in case the
result is 0 o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
--- Comment #5 from Kyrill Tkachov 2012-12-11
14:29:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Should be fixed in trunk now
Can you please check that it works for you now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=194398
Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
--- Comment #4 from Kyrill Tkachov 2012-12-11
14:20:57 UTC ---
Should be fixed in trunk now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11 14:17:33 UTC ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Dec 11 14:17:28 2012
New Revision: 194398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194398
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-12-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
--- Comment #6 from nightstrike 2012-12-11
14:14:47 UTC ---
Tobias, what is your full configure line alongside --disable-nls?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55646
--- Comment #1 from Alexander 2012-12-11 14:07:21
UTC ---
If write this:
> static const uint8_t qwe[] = {0xAA,0xBB,0xCC,0x0A};
> fwrite(qwe, 1, 4, stdout);
gcc put data in one piece, something like that:
> qwe.2230:
> .byte -86
> .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55646
Bug #: 55646
Summary: Array of data as argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo