http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55016
Bug #: 55016
Summary: request for specific builtins for rcp and rsqrt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhanceme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55015
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble-failure
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55015
Robert Xiao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spam_hole at shaw dot ca
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55015
--- Comment #1 from Julien Nitard 2012-10-22
02:13:43 UTC ---
Somebody noted in S.O. that declaring the inline function "static" (or using an
anonymous namespace which I guess as same effect) hides (or solves ;) the
problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55015
Bug #: 55015
Summary: Lambda functions not found at link time when declared
in an inline function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55014
--- Comment #1 from coolypf 2012-10-22 01:09:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 28501
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28501
preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55014
Bug #: 55014
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault while compiling complex_io.cc
on x86_64-w64-mingw32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55009
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-10-21 23:41:28 UTC ---
The C standard requirements that certain source code has certain semantics
(such as, in this case, overflows making something not an integer constant
expressio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54984
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno-gcc at defraine dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51847
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54859
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54912
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54912
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkeir at outlook dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55013
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55013
Bug #: 55013
Summary: variadic sizeof non-constant with alias template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55012
--- Comment #1 from Rich Felker 2012-10-21 22:06:39
UTC ---
I'm not sure whether the fix should be in gcc/varasm.c,
default_binds_local_p_1(), or in the config/i386/predicates.md,
local_symbolic_operand predicate.
In the former, all non
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
--- Comment #11 from Steve Ward 2012-10-21 22:05:35
UTC ---
This problem still exists in g++ 4.7.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52798
Ryan Hill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||55012
Summary|protected fun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54280
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47675
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Kip.Hicit at gmail dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47644
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||earnie at users dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55007
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54888
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55008
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55007
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-21
19:09:17 UTC ---
I think this is a dup of another bug where __x86_64__ is not declared as
currently the target defines are only done for C/C++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55012
Bug #: 55012
Summary: Protected visibility wrongly uses GOT-relative
addresses
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRME
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
GCC 4.8.0 as of 20121021 seems to be stuck in an infinite loop while compiling
the following testcase at -O2 (works at -O1 and -O3) :
$ cat infloop.c
char a
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: mer...@savhon.org
Hi !
With GCC 4.8.0 as of 20121021, at -O2 and higher :
$ cat consistency.c
#include
int64_t a;
uint64_t b;
void f(void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55009
Bug #: 55009
Summary: compile-time assertions no longer usable: error:
variably modified ‘ari_sign_32_bit_and_wrap’ at file
scope
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: mer...@savhon.org
Hello !
The following testcase makes GCC 4.8.0 20121021 crash on my x86_64 machine (at
-O2 and higher) :
$ cat verify_ssa.c
#include
void f(void)
{
int a, *p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55007
--- Comment #2 from Earnie 2012-10-21
17:05:05 UTC ---
Sorry, yes -cpp is needed.
gcc -cpp -E -dM nul.f | grep -i win
Produces an empty result
Expected:
#define _WIN32 1
#define __WINT_MAX__ 65535
#define __WINT_MIN__ 0
#define
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55007
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55007
Bug #: 55007
Summary: WIN32, _WIN32, etc not defined in fortran
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55005
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-10-21 16:14:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=192538
Thanks for bisecting. The testcase from comment #1 was failing even before that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55005
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54797
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54997
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-21 13:48:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The following removes the warning for s3:
>
> [...]
>
> but it also removes the warning on procedures which are really unused :(
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2012-10-21
13:43:40 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 21 13:43:32 2012
New Revision: 192653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192653
Log:
2012-10-21 Thomas König
PR libfortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55003
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #49 from Eric Botcazou 2012-10-21
12:36:21 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Oct 21 12:36:16 2012
New Revision: 192651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192651
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/44194
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-21
12:24:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28499
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28499
Compressed archive for aermod
The attachment contains the files needed to compile an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55005
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-10-21 12:14:59
UTC ---
This isn't the only testcase that started failing recently.
One interesting flag combination:
$ gcc -O2 -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce testcase.c && ./a.out
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
Bug #: 55006
Summary: [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64
-O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54901
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54465
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-10-21
10:51:30 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Oct 21 10:51:26 2012
New Revision: 192650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192650
Log:
gcc/
2012-10-21 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54465
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-10-21
10:32:05 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 21 10:32:02 2012
New Revision: 192649
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192649
Log:
2012-10-21 Thomas Koenig
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47389
--- Comment #8 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-10-21 10:16:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I have done several tests and it seems -fno-combine-stack-adjustments doesn't
> cause any ICEs as it used to. However, 4.7.3 still crashes, even though
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47389
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Known to fail|
58 matches
Mail list logo
