http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54964
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-18 06:57:50
UTC ---
The dependency file is created by the preprocessor, which isn't even run for a
.s file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966
Bug #: 54966
Summary: Does LTO requires a larger inline-unit-growth?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54952
DJ Delorie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dj at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54951
DJ Delorie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dj at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54965
--- Comment #1 from Siarhei Siamashka
2012-10-18 01:56:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 28476
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28476
pixman-combine-float.i.gz - the original full preprocessed source
Applying the changes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #8 from Pat Haugen 2012-10-18
01:51:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 28475
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28475
sched2 dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54950
--- Comment #1 from dj at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-18
01:50:35 UTC ---
Author: dj
Date: Thu Oct 18 01:50:24 2012
New Revision: 192553
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192553
Log:
PR target/54950
* config/m32c/pred
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54965
Bug #: 54965
Summary: [4.6] sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to
'foo': function not considered for inlining
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #7 from Pat Haugen 2012-10-18
01:50:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 28473
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28473
sched1 dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen 2012-10-18
01:44:35 UTC ---
> The sched1 dump correctly lists forward dependencies of the initial store(s)
> to
> p1[i] to the subsequent loads of p1[i], but those dependencies are gone in the
> .sched2 pass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-18
00:29:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 28472
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28472
diff of preprocessed sources for const-str-10.m against 10.7 and 10.8 SDK
000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121017/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O0 -fnext-runtime -mno-constant-cfstrings
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1
8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121017/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.m
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O0 -fnext-runtime -mno-constant-cfstrings
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-18
00:15:58 UTC ---
The darwin12 specific non-linker failures are suppressed if...
-isysroot `xcode-select
--print-path`/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.7.sdk
is added to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54964
--- Comment #2 from Ami Fischman 2012-10-18 00:14:30
UTC ---
It would still be nice to not act differently for .s files than for
.{S,cc,cpp,c} files...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54964
Bug #: 54964
Summary: -MMD is silently ignored with -x assembler (or
inferred language from .s extension)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-17
23:58:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Note the the string1.m/string1.mm failures are from warnings and the resulting
> binaries run fine.
These linker warnings are http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54963
Bug #: 54963
Summary: Wrong code generated for
libgfortran/generated/eoshift3_8.c on SH
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen 2012-10-17
23:38:16 UTC ---
I'm seeing the same thing on cpu2006 benchmark 44.namd on PowerPC64. A load is
being moved above a store to the same location, starting with revision 191493.
Reduced testcase and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-17
23:15:28 UTC ---
Note the the string1.m/string1.mm failures are from warnings and the resulting
binaries run fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-17
23:06:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> I don't see these errors on darwin10. Could you look at the errors in the log
> files and try to sort them by categories.
Only the errors...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54949
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-17 22:03:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Preliminary patch:
Unfortunately, this does not help for the variant, where the POINTER
declaration comes before the interface body:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54893
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-10-17
21:18:21 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Oct 17 21:18:16 2012
New Revision: 192549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192549
Log:
PR middle-end/54893
* tran
/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121017/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/strings/const-cfstring-5.m
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fnext-runtime -mconstant-cfstrings
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/./libobjc
/testsuite/obj-c++/../../g++
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121017/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.mm
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -nostdinc++
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54900
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-10-17
20:59:43 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Oct 17 20:59:40 2012
New Revision: 192548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192548
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54900
* if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54950
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Severity|critic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54955
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-17
20:45:37 UTC ---
> ... On darwin12 at least, this still leaves the failures in...
>
> obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/const-str-10.mm
> obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/const-str-11.mm
> obj-c++.d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54962
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #12 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-10-17
20:38:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Created attachment 28467 [details]
> > emit_case_dispatch_table testcase
> >
> > Here's a csmith generated testca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #11 from Easwaran Raman 2012-10-17
20:31:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 28467 [details]
> emit_case_dispatch_table testcase
>
> Here's a csmith generated testcase that crashes with -O0 -fexceptions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54962
Bug #: 54962
Summary: Strange-looking diagnostics from
diagnostic_report_current_module() from warnings
emitted during LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54961
Bug #: 54961
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr48757.f -O
(internal compiler error) after revision 192440
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54959
--- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm 2012-10-17
20:00:05 UTC ---
The impl_gate is implemented in C, the gate functions in Python.
If I need multiple impl_gate functions, I somehow need to generate machine code
at runtime that curry the relev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54955
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54959
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-17
19:48:07 UTC ---
> I have a single impl_gate() handler that's shared by all such user-created
> passes, which I then dispatch to appropriate python code.
I think this is bad coding. You shoul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #10 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-10-17
19:47:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 28467
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28467
emit_case_dispatch_table testcase
Here's a csmith generated testcase that crashes with -O
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54946
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54959
Bug #: 54959
Summary: current_pass == NULL during invocation of pass->gate
within execute_ipa_summary_passes()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54940
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl
2012-10-17 19:21:22 UTC ---
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 06:51:08PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > The Standard does not define 'incremented' and
> > 'incrementation', and in particular, these wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54958
Bug #: 54958
Summary: Wrongly rejects ac-implied-DO variables which also
occur with INTENT(IN)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #9 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-10-17
19:05:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created attachment 28466 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Handle the possibility that stmt_bb may be NULL in emit_case_dispatch_table.
> Untested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
Easwaran Raman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28465|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-10-17
18:51:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> but you'll see that at least one person disagrees with both
> former J3 members.
The only way to get a definite answer is to fill an interpretation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #7 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-10-17
18:29:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Created attachment 28465 [details]
> > Proposed patch
>
> I haven't tested the patch. Ryan, could you please confirm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #6 from Easwaran Raman 2012-10-17
18:26:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 28465 [details]
> Proposed patch
I haven't tested the patch. Ryan, could you please confirm this patch fixes the
crashes?
T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #5 from Easwaran Raman 2012-10-17
18:24:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 28465
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28465
Proposed patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-10-17
18:10:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > arm-unknown-linux-gnu (not EABI)
> I thought that support was removed.
I have a local patch re-enabling it, but I don't think it's specific to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #3 from Easwaran Raman 2012-10-17
18:08:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=192488
>
>
> sh4-unknown-linux-gnu no longer builds libgcc.
>
> 0x7df7df emit_cmp_and_jump_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-10-17
18:04:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 28464
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28464
preprocessed src (not reduced)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-17
18:04:16 UTC ---
> arm-unknown-linux-gnu (not EABI)
I thought that support was removed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
Bug #: 54957
Summary: Two crashes introduced by rev192488
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54945
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54955
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-17
17:21:58 UTC ---
I *think* the example is valid, so it's a compiler bug ... but I'm not sure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40205
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54956
Bug #: 54956
Summary: GCC 4.7.2: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn,
at expr.c:3435
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54955
--- Comment #1 from mib.bugzilla at gmail dot com 2012-10-17 16:21:56 UTC ---
p.s.
This example is given here: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/alignas
char alignas(128) cacheline[128];
but g++ complains similarly to the root r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54955
Bug #: 54955
Summary: alignas example in gcc 4.8 changes.html won't compile
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
--- Comment #2 from swalter at lexmark dot com 2012-10-17 16:14:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28463
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28463
malloc implementation for test.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54945
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2012-10-17
16:11:08 UTC ---
In .ccp1 we have:
i_6 = (intptr_t) &MEM[(void *)&x + 4B];
j_7 = (intptr_t) &y;
_8 = i_6 == j_7;
_9 = (int) _8;
but in .forwprop1:
_8 = 0;
_9 = (int)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
--- Comment #1 from swalter at lexmark dot com 2012-10-17 16:10:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 28462
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28462
Bug testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54954
Bug #: 54954
Summary: malloc optimizations not disabled by -fno-builtin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54953
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54953
Bug #: 54953
Summary: [4.8 Regression] New sra-1.c FAILs on powerpc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54949
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-17 15:46:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Preliminary patch:
... regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54952
Bug #: 54952
Summary: Program crash on M32C when stack frame is more then
128 bytes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54951
Bug #: 54951
Summary: Incorrect pointer handling on 32K boundary
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54950
Bug #: 54950
Summary: Incorrect 32-bit moltiplication on m32c target
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-10-17 14:05:51 UTC ---
> I also see many failures for the gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-* tests: slsr-2.c to
> slsr-11.c, slsr-14.c to slsr-20.c, slsr-24.c, and slsr-25.c, and for
> gfortran.dg/vect/ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54949
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54949
Bug #: 54949
Summary: [F03] abstract procedure pointers not rejected
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-inv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54943
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-10-17
13:30:09 UTC ---
Yes the EABI changes things, but I think the user error is that:
1. your sprintf uses homegrown varargs-parsing code, which won't work with
EABI; you should use as suppli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54948
Bug #: 54948
Summary: template unnecessarily displayed as "A<
template-parameter-1-1 >" not "A"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-10-17 13:13:24 UTC ---
Summary for the polyhedron tests (pb05):
(a) revision 192449 unpatched
(b) revision 192516 with patch in comment #20
options: -fprotect-parens -Ofast -funroll-loops -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54947
Bug #: 54947
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] lambda cannot
capture-by-copy inside braced-init-list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54943
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54945
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #3 from Marek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54945
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54501
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-17
12:27:15 UTC ---
It is just that though, a workaround, it doesn't workaround say:
void bar (char *);
int baz ();
int
foo ()
{
{
char buf[64];
bar (buf);
}
return baz ();
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54946
--- Comment #1 from Joel Yliluoma 2012-10-17 12:10:21
UTC ---
Please excuse the "conts" typo in the post; naturally it meant to say "const"
there. The typo is not relevant to the bug report.
I changed the code a few times trying to figur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54945
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54946
Bug #: 54946
Summary: ICE on template parameter from cast char-pointer in
C++11 constexpr struct
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54944
--- Comment #2 from GGanesh
2012-10-17 11:57:49 UTC ---
Yes occurs with revision r192219.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54943
--- Comment #2 from Santhosh Kumar Selvaraj 2012-10-17 11:41:00 UTC ---
int main()
{
float floatValue = 100.0;
char buffer[32];
sprintf (buffer, 32, "%f", floatValue);
printf ("The string is : %s\n", buffer);
ret
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54944
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54945
Bug #: 54945
Summary: Too strong non-aliasing analysis?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54943
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-10-17
11:25:07 UTC ---
Please provide a test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54944
Bug #: 54944
Summary: 400.perlbench fails with segmentation fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-10-17
10:41:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> "7.1.5.2.4 Evaluation of numeric intrinsic operations"
> "The execution of any numeric operation whose result is not defined by the
> arithmetic used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54943
Bug #: 54943
Summary: ARM - EABI - varargs floating point issue
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2012-10-17
09:22:41 UTC ---
"7.1.5.2.4 Evaluation of numeric intrinsic operations"
"The execution of any numeric operation whose result is not defined by the
arithmetic used by the processor is prohibited
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
