http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54783
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54783
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-03
04:02:43 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 3 04:02:38 2012
New Revision: 192021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192021
Log:
PR debug/53135
* dwarf2out.c (value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54787
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-10-03
03:31:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> ...need to turn it off per-file (by adding "-Wno-error=type-limits" to
> compilations using the common idiom of -Werror together with warnings th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54786
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-03
00:56:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I can confirm that it is fixed in 4.7.0, after the move to __atomic builtins,
> at least on x86_64. It would be nice to have it fixed in currently
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54784
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54784
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02 22:45:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> allocate(d%L(2)%B,source=b1)
>
The code generated for this line has two parts: The allocation and the copying
from the source. Whi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54784
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02 22:35:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> So there is actually two different bugs
Or the two different errors you are seeing are really due to the same
underlying problem. I'm not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Bug #: 54789
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining
GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54784
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Kozdon 2012-10-02
22:14:57 UTC ---
So there is actually two different bugs, one is the invalid memory reference
which happens when you don't allocate in order.
There is a second, the one I was really trying to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54786
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Zabluda 2012-10-02
22:04:37 UTC ---
I can confirm that it is fixed in 4.7.0, after the move to __atomic builtins,
at least on x86_64. It would be nice to have it fixed in currently hypothetical
4.6.4, especially fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54784
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54788
Bug #: 54788
Summary: ICE on pointer-array element assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54785
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54785
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02
21:24:51 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 2 21:24:45 2012
New Revision: 192009
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192009
Log:
Document -mprefer-avx128
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54785
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02
21:12:55 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 2 21:12:50 2012
New Revision: 192008
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192008
Log:
Document -mprefer-avx128
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54785
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02
21:11:24 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 2 21:11:21 2012
New Revision: 192007
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192007
Log:
Document -mprefer-avx128
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54778
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54778
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02 21:02:20 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Oct 2 21:02:16 2012
New Revision: 192005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192005
Log:
2012-10-02 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54787
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-10-02
20:47:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 28336
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28336
test-case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54787
Bug #: 54787
Summary: Inconsistent -Wtype-limits warning for different-sized
bitfields
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54786
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54786
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54786
Bug #: 54786
Summary: Missing fence in std::atomic::store() triggers
wrong reordering.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #15 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02
20:31:43 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:31:40 2012
New Revision: 192004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192004
Log:
Check SSE and YMM state support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
Bernhard Rosenkränzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28332|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02
20:25:13 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:25:04 2012
New Revision: 192003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192003
Log:
Check SSE and YMM state support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53889
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-02
20:23:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 28333
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28333
bzipped tar archive of a reduced test
The tar archive contains the files
cptrf2_inl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53889
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-02
20:22:40 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:22:32 2012
New Revision: 192002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192002
Log:
libgcc:
PR other/53889
* gt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54785
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target Mile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54785
Bug #: 54785
Summary: -mprefer-avx128 is undocumented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
20:17:53 UTC ---
The work around is installed in the trunk, and will soon be in the branch as
well, but this should ideally be left open until we figure out a better way to
avoid all the dupl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
20:16:33 UTC ---
Fixed in the trunk. Backporting to 4.7...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54784
Bug #: 54784
Summary: [oop] allocation of extended types with polymorphic
allocatable members
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
20:06:13 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:06:08 2012
New Revision: 192001
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192001
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/54551
* Mak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
20:05:29 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:05:24 2012
New Revision: 192000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192000
Log:
PR debug/53135
* dwarf2out.c (value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
--- Comment #10 from Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2012-10-02 20:00:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 28332
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28332
Shorter, plain C, test case extracted from iptables, not yet reduced
Adding shorter, plain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54177
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
19:58:41 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 2 19:58:37 2012
New Revision: 191999
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191999
Log:
PR debug/54177
* var-tracking.c (vt_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54783
Bug #: 54783
Summary: [4.8 Regression] valgrind reports using uninitialised
data in mark_pseudo_regno_live and make_object_born on
basic code
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
--- Comment #9 from Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2012-10-02 19:52:31 UTC ---
This also happens when building iptables with gcc trunk, so it's not C++
related
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02
19:49:05 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 2 19:49:01 2012
New Revision: 191998
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191998
Log:
Check SSE and YMM state support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54782
Bug #: 54782
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in change_scope, at final.c:1543
with -O -ffast-math -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -g
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54778
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02 19:31:40 UTC ---
Btw, here is a slightly simpler version of the test case with the same
symptoms:
implicit none
type :: arr_t
real :: at
end type
type(arr_t) :: this
clas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54778
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02 19:00:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Regtesting now ...
Finished successfully. Will commit as obvious.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54772
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl
2012-10-02 18:48:12 UTC ---
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:25:46PM +, singhai at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #4 from Sharad Singhai 2012-10-02
> 17:25:46 UTC ---
> Should be fixed with r191991
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2012-10-02 18:35:03 UTC ---
$ /opt/android-toolchain-trunk/bin/arm-linux-androideabi-g++ -c
-mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon -O2 bug54781.c bug54781.c: In function 'void
bug54781(short unsigned int*, int, i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Bernhard Rosenkränzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28328|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #11 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-02 18:21:50 UTC ---
I've tried to split it up as I think Bruce wanted; if you check the thread,
those patches should all be ready.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Bug #: 54781
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at
tree-ssa-alias.c:1124
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54772
Sharad Singhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54772
--- Comment #3 from Sharad Singhai 2012-10-02
17:19:14 UTC ---
Author: singhai
Date: Tue Oct 2 17:19:09 2012
New Revision: 191991
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191991
Log:
2012-10-02 Sharad Singhai
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #12 from M.S. Babaei 2012-10-02
17:00:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 28327
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28327
After applying patch - gcc4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #11 from M.S. Babaei 2012-10-02
16:58:57 UTC ---
Well well, something happened here!! This bug does not affect me anymore; Now
with or without your patch the above example code works just fine! I even tried
crypto++ which I had
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54649
Dehao Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54778
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Key
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #5 from Andy Jost 2012-10-02
15:25:46 UTC ---
Most of the technical discussion is over my head, I'm afraid. Is there a
simple workaround? What if the body of H contains only a call to a
non-inlineable function to do its work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54780
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-02
13:53:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Next the script copies common.h to the main directory and compiles the sources
> again using the exact same compiler switches. What happens is that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-02
13:43:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 2 13:43:09 2012
New Revision: 191983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191983
Log:
PR tree-optimization/54713
* ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54457
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-02
13:31:24 UTC ---
Right now we only have control flow insensitive points to ESCAPED set, so I'm
afraid this is unfixable, unless we change that. Only with control flow
sensitive ESCAPED we'd be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54761
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54780
Bug #: 54780
Summary: G++ does not find precompiled headers in some cases
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54761
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-02 13:14:29 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Oct 2 13:14:25 2012
New Revision: 191981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191981
Log:
PR other/54761
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-02
13:03:07 UTC ---
Actually that just papers over the real issue. The issue is that
cfg-cleanup runs before update-ssa and that removes a basic-block (9)
because we have
:
D.2778 ={v} {CL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-02 12:08:09 UTC ---
It's the same bug. The only difference is that I use --enable-checking=release.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor 2012-10-02
11:58:58 UTC ---
I get the SSA verification failure even on the PR 54146 testcase (as opposed to
the reduced one). Please re-assign to me if fixing that will cause the
originally reported segf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Steve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50457
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-02
10:57:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Created attachment 28321 [details]
> > cleanup libgcc/config/sh/linux-atomic
>
> Works fine for me.
>
> > (three le
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54774
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54751
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-10-02 10:39:41 UTC ---
More reasonable with -enable-checking=release
4.8(checking=yes):~10min
4.8(checking=release): 1min28s.
4.7 : 0min58s
maybe some of the ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-02
10:37:08 UTC ---
It seems that SSA form is not up-to-date:
> ./cc1plus -quiet t.ii -O2
t.ii: In function 'void check_() [with NT = M; int s = 3]':
t.ii:163:16: error: no immediate_use lis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2012-10-02
10:12:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 28324
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28324
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54779
Bug #: 54779
Summary: split FRAME variables back into pieces
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-02 09:59:39
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 28312 [details]
> A patch with fixed ChangeLog
The patch looks OK, but please introduce some #defines:
#define XCR_XFEATURE_EN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54769
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54771
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.0
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54751
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54772
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54778
Bug #: 54778
Summary: an ICE on invalid OO code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-02
09:18:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 28322
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28322
gcc48-pr54713.patch
Updated version of the verifier. This one doesn't pass regtest, e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54777
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54777
Bug #: 54777
Summary: [C++11] Comma operator in constexpr environment can
cause ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
Bug #: 54776
Summary: [4.8 Regression] tramp3d-v4: 20% performance
regression using -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #9 from M.S. Babaei 2012-10-02
07:18:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 28312 [details]
> A patch with fixed ChangeLog
Now I'm at work. I'll try your patch to build GCC and post later.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #8 from M.S. Babaei 2012-10-02
07:14:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> use disassemble from inside gdb and look for the faulting instruction.
Sorry I'm not very familiar with GDB, but I assume you need this:
(gdb) di
97 matches
Mail list logo
