http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54743
Bug #: 54743
Summary: Large loop runs endingless
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
--- Comment #2 from M.S. Babaei 2012-09-29
05:43:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What is the instruction it is causing an illegal instruction signal?
> Run the resulting program using gdb to find out.
As I mentiond above running t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-09-29
03:59:12 UTC ---
Confirmed, -g0 and the problem is not present, -g1 and yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Bug #: 54742
Summary: Switch elimination in FSM loop
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54741
Bug #: 54741
Summary: GCC 4.4, 4.5, 4.6 4.7 (probably 4.8) Generates
un-usable code on AVX supported CPUs (FreeBSD)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740
--- Comment #3 from Andy Venikov 2012-09-29
00:09:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > No they shouldn't. The standard requires this to pass:
> >
> > outer o;
> > assert( static_cast(&o) != &o.i_ );
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-29
00:01:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> No they shouldn't. The standard requires this to pass:
>
> outer o;
> assert( static_cast(&o) != &o.i_ );
Oops, that should be:
asse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54740
Bug #: 54740
Summary: Empty base optimization gets confused when a member
variable derives from the same empty base.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
Bug #: 54739
Summary: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c
scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54724
--- Comment #2 from Mike Frysinger 2012-09-28
23:20:09 UTC ---
i'm 50/50 on this. if the code doesn't utilize anything beyond the local code
base, and isn't compiled/processed by anything other than the local compiler,
then the -Werror sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54738
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
--- Comment #6 from Mike Frysinger 2012-09-28
23:12:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
that's half the equation. the other half is the build system support.
in gcc/Makefile.in, they do:
CFLAGS-c-family/c-opts.o += @TARGET_SYSTEM_R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54738
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54738
Bug #: 54738
Summary: [C++11][SFINAE] Hard errors for pointer-to-member
function expressions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-28 20:55:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> r191747 should not increase the memory consumption. Instead, it'll only
> speedup
> compilation.
>
> I tried to compile the testcase without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
Dehao Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at google dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54737
Bug #: 54737
Summary: ICE on PA-RISC with LTO and -ftrapv
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-28
20:33:00 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Sep 28 20:32:55 2012
New Revision: 191838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191838
Log:
PR bootstrap/54688
* sched-de
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-09/msg02363.html
Hi,
the gcc-bugs list is for automated mails from the GCC Bugzilla
database. Please use Bugzilla to report bugs, rather than mailing the
list directly, this ensures the mail will be read and the issue can be
tracked correctly.
The issue y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at gcc dot gnu.org,
Hello:
Building gcc-4.7.2 on Darwin 9.8.0 i386 with the options
Macintosh-85:gcc-build regular$ /usr/local/gcc-4.7.2/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/gcc-4.7.2/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-4.7.2/libexec/gcc/i386-apple-darwin9.8.0/4.7.2/lto-wrapper
Target: i38
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736
Bug #: 54736
Summary: GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several
platforms
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448
--- Comment #5 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-09-28 15:51:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> How is GCC configured?
Just "/where/source/is/configure" with no options. You can see it at the bottom
of :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54401
--- Comment #1 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-09-28 15:43:34 UTC ---
A candidate patch was sent to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01906.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-28
15:40:37 UTC ---
How is GCC configured?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-28
14:30:09 UTC ---
I forgot half of the patch - the second half is needed when no system root
exists. The patch is still untested.
--- a/gcc/fortran/cpp.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/cpp.c
@@ -40,2 +40,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54372
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54372
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-09-28
13:32:52 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Sep 28 13:32:41 2012
New Revision: 191830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191830
Log:
PR c++/54372 - unused attribute inactiv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-28 13:11:16 UTC ---
Note that the error goes away when replacing the generic intrinsic REAL by a
specific one, e.g. FLOAT:
implicit none
intrinsic :: float
real :: vec(1:2)
ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47799
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54345
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29028
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54735
Bug #: 54735
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in
walk_aliased_vdefs_1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29028
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-09-28
12:51:42 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Sep 28 12:51:30 2012
New Revision: 191829
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191829
Log:
PR c++/29028 - Missed unused warning on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-09-28
12:21:49 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Sep 28 12:21:33 2012
New Revision: 191828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191828
Log:
PR c++/53551 - -Wunused-local-typedefs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-28
12:21:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 28 12:20:54 2012
New Revision: 191827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191827
Log:
PR target/54716
* config/i386/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-28
12:19:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 28 12:18:57 2012
New Revision: 191826
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191826
Log:
PR tree-optimization/54713
* fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47799
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-28
11:07:22 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 28 11:07:17 2012
New Revision: 191824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191824
Log:
2012-09-28 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54733
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54734
Bug #: 54734
Summary: Debug info for C++ and LTO misses types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54724
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54733
Bug #: 54733
Summary: Missing opportunity to optimize endian independent
load/store
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54729
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54705
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-28 08:54:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The fix for PR bootstrap/54688 also fixed this one. I can't say if there's
> another unrelated issue here, though.
>
> There's one other problem (wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot com
Dep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-28
08:37:56 UTC ---
Ok, I give up ;) Honza, I think we should go with your patch to re-name
before LTO symtab merging as a first step, we can try improving later ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-28
08:36:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 28293 [details]
> gcc48-pr54713.patch
>
> Updated patch. I had to make the CONSTRUCTOR checking less strict, in
> particula
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54732
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-28
08:21:19 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Sep 28 08:21:06 2012
New Revision: 191820
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191820
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52543
* c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-28
07:55:19 UTC ---
> The offset range should not be an issue with the right constraints etc.; the
> port really ought to be changed.
Yes, in fact we already have the machinery to do it.
> In
65 matches
Mail list logo