http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.1 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49561
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #29 from Larry Baker 2012-09-15 05:41:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 28196
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28196
Patches for Sourcery (Mentor Graphics) CodeBench Lite GCC 4.6-2011.09-23
Patches to fix stack limit c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584
--- Comment #1 from Larry Baker 2012-09-15 00:39:14 UTC
---
I found that the -msep-data link would succeed if program section
.tm_clone_table has a non-zero length.
I changed __JCR_LIST__[] and __TMC_LIST__[] to __JCR_LIST__[1] and
__TMC_LIST__[
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.2
--- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Mye
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE at |[4.7 Regression] ICE at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-09-15
00:29:31 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Sep 15 00:29:28 2012
New Revision: 191337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191337
Log:
PR c/54552
* c-typeck.c (c_cast_expr): Wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-09-15
00:28:08 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Sat Sep 15 00:28:05 2012
New Revision: 191336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191336
Log:
PR c/54103
* c-typeck.c (build_unary_op):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
Bug #: 54586
Summary: Help diagnosing error: Link tests are not allowed
after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607
--- Comment #20 from David Edelsohn 2012-09-14
23:23:45 UTC ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri Sep 14 23:23:41 2012
New Revision: 191316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191316
Log:
PR target/38607
Merge upstream chan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-14
21:20:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28195
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28195
reduced testcase
Further reduced testcase that triggers on either C/C++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] Cast
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54552
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-09-14
21:17:00 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Sep 14 21:16:56 2012
New Revision: 191313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191313
Log:
c:
PR c/54552
* c-typeck.c (c_cast_expr):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54585
Bug #: 54585
Summary: stack space allocated but never used when calling
functions that return structs in registers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487
--- Comment #32 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 21:06:54 UTC ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Fri Sep 14 21:06:49 2012
New Revision: 191312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191312
Log:
Backport from trunk r190952 to ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #28 from Larry Baker 2012-09-14 20:52:14
UTC ---
Created attachment 28194
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28194
Patch for trunk version 2012-09-09 of gcc/config/m68k/uclinux.h
To fix the same bug reported for GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584
Bug #: 54584
Summary: m68k-uclinux error: Link tests are not allowed after
GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54583
Bug #: 54583
Summary: Spurious warning: value computed is not used with
variable-size array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
Bug #: 54582
Summary: gap in FORTIFY checking of buffer lengths
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-14
18:30:18 UTC ---
Seems the C++ FE ignores the nothrow attribute from builtins and instead just
uses its own cfns.gperf. pow is in there, but powf/powl is not (as C++03 is
based in C90). Even in C++11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-09-14
18:25:52 UTC ---
I tend to agree; this isn't the only place in the middle-end this could cause
trouble. The handling of pow/powf in reassociation comes to mind as another
place where this could c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-14
18:22:17 UTC ---
Ah, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54581
Bug #: 54581
Summary: decltype and opaque vector types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-14 17:38:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Would this do? ;-)
> ..
> template
> struct is_convertible { static const bool value = true; };
>
> template struct enable_if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #48 from Chip Salzenberg 2012-09-14
17:23:08 UTC ---
May Shub-Internet not see you as you pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-14 17:22:24
UTC ---
Progress :-)
Documentation update is needed.
Next useful one would be ?: so we can generate vec_cond_expr. See the OpenCL
specification for a list of what's missing.
Another useful th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-14 17:17:08
UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:17:01 2012
New Revision: 191308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191308
Log:
2012-09-14 Marc Glisse
PR c++/54427
gcc/Chan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-09-14
17:10:53 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:10:45 2012
New Revision: 191307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191307
Log:
PR target/54516
PR rtl-optimization/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54516
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-09-14
17:10:53 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Fri Sep 14 17:10:45 2012
New Revision: 191307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191307
Log:
PR target/54516
PR rtl-optimization/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54580
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-14
17:07:50 UTC ---
C++ is not C.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
--- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-09-14
16:59:21 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Sep 14 16:59:10 2012
New Revision: 191304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191304
Log:
c:
PR c/54103
* c-typeck.c (build_unary_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54580
Bug #: 54580
Summary: 64-bit pointer to int cast fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #38 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-09-14 14:43:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> I've no idea why gmp 4.3.x or 5.x works for you: both fail make check
> for me if built with gcc 4.4.2. I've not yet tried newer versions.
probably sligh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-09-14
14:07:21 UTC ---
Wconversion does not warn either, but it also does not warn for:
enum Code {
SUCCESS=-1
};
Code a;
void foo(void)
{
unsigned int r;
r = a;
}
Perhaps the code for handlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor 2012-09-14
13:55:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> Martin,
> Have you done any more digging on this? I just discovered that cpu2006
> benchmark 471.omnetpp suffers the same problem (8 byte loads turned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #37 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:54:42 UTC ---
> --- Comment #32 from Hin-Tak Leung
> 2012-09-01 11:22:55 UTC ---
> Went back to 4.5.0 and commenting out '#STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle' in
> config/bootstrap-debu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #36 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:51:58 UTC ---
> --- Comment #30 from Hin-Tak Leung
> 2012-09-01 08:18:06 UTC ---
> I commented out gcc-4.7.1/config/bootstrap-debug.mk :
>
> #STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle
>
> and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #35 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:49:28 UTC ---
> --- Comment #28 from Hin-Tak Leung
> 2012-08-30 17:32:35 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #22)
>
>> > There are two curious things:
>> > 1. why does the 2nd stage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org|
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #34 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:44:22 UTC ---
> --- Comment #27 from Hin-Tak Leung
> 2012-08-30 14:56:46 UTC ---
> FWIW, I just filed the MFPR 3.1.x "make check" issue:
>
> https://gforge.inria.fr/tracker/ind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-14 13:42:44 UTC ---
> --- Comment #26 from Hin-Tak Leung
> 2012-08-30 14:19:16 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #22)
>
>> The sentence about newer versions is there for a reason. In
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579
Bug #: 54579
Summary: missed optimization: ASR idiom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #46 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-14
13:28:52 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Sep 14 13:28:44 2012
New Revision: 191302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191302
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/44194
* calls.c (e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54546
--- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14 13:22:34 UTC ---
Author: chrbr
Date: Fri Sep 14 13:22:29 2012
New Revision: 191301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191301
Log:
PR target/54546
* config/sh/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-14 12:44:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fixed
Thank you.
> (in case you have a testcase feel free to add it).
Mostly I could tweak the last forwprop-xx.c tests to dump an earlier tree than
forwpro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-14
12:40:37 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk, backport also tested on the 4.7 branch, but as 4.7.2-rc1 is in
the works, I'll defer it for after 4.7.2 is released.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-14
12:37:32 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:37:16 2012
New Revision: 191298
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191298
Log:
PR target/54564
* config/i386/sse.md (fmai_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-14
12:36:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:36:33 2012
New Revision: 191297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191297
Log:
PR target/54564
* config/i386/sse.md (fmai_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-14
12:36:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:36:33 2012
New Revision: 191297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191297
Log:
PR target/54564
* config/i386/sse.md (fmai_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-14
12:22:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 14 12:22:27 2012
New Revision: 191295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191295
Log:
2012-09-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-14
12:16:59 UTC ---
H.J., could you please review the fmaintrin.h changes of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00921.html
(Uros wanted your feedback on that). Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-14
12:00:21 UTC ---
Fantastic, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #4 from Wolfgang Bangerth 2012-09-14
11:48:56 UTC ---
Would this do? ;-)
..
template
struct is_convertible { static const bool value = true; };
template struct enable_if { };
template<> s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54576
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-14
11:42:00 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Sep 14 11:41:53 2012
New Revision: 191294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191294
Log:
Check _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1 in random.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54576
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54577
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54571
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-14
08:34:52 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54578
Bug #: 54578
Summary: [OOP] -Wunused-function warnings for __copy functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887
--- Comment #22 from Jörg Richter 2012-09-14 07:58:16
UTC ---
I have reduced a real live case. But still using .
$ cat t.cc
#include
struct ClassicUpdate
{
ClassicUpdate();
};
typedef std::vector ClassicUpdates;
struct UpdateData
{
Clas
76 matches
Mail list logo
