[Bug c/54559] [4.7/4.8 Regression], ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7592

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53661] [gcc-4.7/4.8 regression] Wrong narrowing conversion warning with -std=c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-09-14 06:05:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Manuel, what do you think about this? I see the warning happening because the > underlying type of Code is unsigned int. Isn't this a warning mandated

[Bug fortran/54556] [4.8 Regression] Marking implicitly pure variables as DECL_PURE_P leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54556 --- Comment #16 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-09-14 05:57:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > FIXED on the trunk - and on the 4.6/4.7 branch. Sorry for the breakage! Thank you and other gcc experts for regularly fixing issues quickly and profe

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-09-14 01:30:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Sorry, but bugzilla just didn't find this for me when doing due diligence. Update: now it does. Weird. I guess the database wasn't updated or somethi

[Bug libstdc++/54577] New: deque::erase() still takes iterator instead of const_iterator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54577 Bug #: 54577 Summary: deque::erase() still takes iterator instead of const_iterator Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-09-14 01:03:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > *** Bug 54573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Sorry, but bugzilla just didn't find this for me when doing due diligence. Putting "built

[Bug libstdc++/54576] New: [4.8 Regression] random_device isn't protected by _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54576 Bug #: 54576 Summary: [4.8 Regression] random_device isn't protected by _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: U

[Bug c++/54575] New: ICE with std::vector::insert and -std=c++11

l: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120913 (experimental) [trunk revision 183295] (GCC) >>>> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-mainline/bin/gcc -c -std=c++11 x.cc In file included from /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-mainline/include/c++/4.8.0/vector:65:0, from dofs/dof_tools.cc:1: /home/b

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/54573] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54573 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/54574] New: G++ accepts parameters with wrong types in parent constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54574 Bug #: 54574 Summary: G++ accepts parameters with wrong types in parent constructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53661] [gcc-4.7/4.8 regression] Wrong narrowing conversion warning with -std=c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug c++/53661] [gcc-4.7/4.8 regression] Wrong narrowing conversion warning with -std=c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-13 23:40:22 UTC --- Manuel, what do you think about this? I see the warning happening because the underlying type of Code is unsigned int.

[Bug c++/53210] warning for data member initialized with itself should be in -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53210 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53210] warning for data member initialized with itself should be in -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53210 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-13 23:04:12 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 13 23:04:04 2012 New Revision: 191284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191284 Log: 2012-09-13 Paolo Carlini Manu

[Bug debug/54567] Incomplete PT_GNU_EH_FRAME support for Android

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54567 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-13 22:58:38 UTC --- This is not a real problem for Android since Android doesn't use crt* files from GCC. However it will be nicer to define USE_PT_GNU_EH_FRAME in a single place.

[Bug middle-end/54573] New: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54573 Bug #: 54573 Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/54572] New: Use libbacktrace library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 Bug #: 54572 Summary: Use libbacktrace library Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug debug/54568] --eh-frame-hdr should also be enabled for static executable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54568 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unused codes in |--eh-frame-hdr should also |u

[Bug libstdc++/52015] std::to_string does not work under MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-13 22:14:32 UTC --- Patch should be sent to the gcc-patches (and libstdc++) mailing list (any contributor must have a Copyright assignment on file, of course)

[Bug middle-end/54571] Missed optimization converting between bit sets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54571 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severit

[Bug target/43168] internal compiler error for xgcc when building gcc for pdp11-unknown-aout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43168 Paul Koning changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/54571] New: Missed optimization converting between bit sets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54571 Bug #: 54571 Summary: Missed optimization converting between bit sets Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/54508] Wrong debug information emitted if data members not referenced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54508 --- Comment #1 from Paul Koning 2012-09-13 21:21:58 UTC --- I spent some time trying to figure this out. The offending code seems to be the prune_unused_types machinery. If there is a reference to a static method, but no other references to p

[Bug debug/49459] attribute((mode(byte))) in a typedef produces wrong debug information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459 --- Comment #4 from Paul Koning 2012-09-13 21:18:17 UTC --- Sorry, please disregard the previous comment, I put it on the wrong bug.

[Bug bootstrap/38607] AIX error messages about TOC during build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/54389] [F2003/F2008 difference] PURE functions and pointer dummy arguments / DECL_PURE_P issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54389 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-13 19:49:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > This revision causes CP2K to produce wrong results at -O1 and above. That bug has been analysed and fixed, see PR 54556. (In reply to comment #4) > Dick H

[Bug fortran/53306] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on invalid 'array(*) =' statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53306 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54225] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] fortran compiler segfault processing ' print *, A(1,*) '

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54225 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54556] [4.8 Regression] Marking implicitly pure variables as DECL_PURE_P leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54556 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/49459] attribute((mode(byte))) in a typedef produces wrong debug information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459 --- Comment #3 from Paul Koning 2012-09-13 18:52:51 UTC --- I spent some time trying to figure this out. The offending code seems to be the prune_unused_types machinery. If there is a reference to a static method, but no other references to p

[Bug fortran/54225] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] fortran compiler segfault processing ' print *, A(1,*) '

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54225 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-13 18:19:28 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Sep 13 18:19:22 2012 New Revision: 191277 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191277 Log: 2012-09-13 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54

[Bug fortran/53306] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE on invalid 'array(*) =' statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53306 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-13 18:19:29 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Sep 13 18:19:22 2012 New Revision: 191277 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191277 Log: 2012-09-13 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54

[Bug fortran/54556] [4.8 Regression] Marking implicitly pure variables as DECL_PURE_P leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54556 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-13 18:16:01 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Sep 13 18:15:52 2012 New Revision: 191276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191276 Log: 2012-09-13 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/5

[Bug fortran/54556] [4.8 Regression] Marking implicitly pure variables as DECL_PURE_P leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54556 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-13 18:10:13 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Sep 13 18:10:04 2012 New Revision: 191275 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191275 Log: 2012-09-13 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/5

[Bug libstdc++/52015] std::to_string does not work under MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015 --- Comment #9 from Lukas Dürrenberger 2012-09-13 17:33:51 UTC --- Created attachment 28191 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28191 Enabling string conversion functions in MinGW Patch from: http://tehsausage.com/mingw-to-string

[Bug libstdc++/52015] std::to_string does not work under MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015 Lukas Dürrenberger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||expl0i...@my-gate.net --- Comment #8

[Bug c/54559] [4.7/4.8 Regression], ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7592

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-13 17:04:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 13 17:04:44 2012 New Revision: 191271 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191271 Log: PR c/54559 * c-typeck.c (c_finish_return):

[Bug c/54559] [4.7/4.8 Regression], ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7592

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-13 16:57:31 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 13 16:57:15 2012 New Revision: 191270 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191270 Log: PR c/54559 * c-typeck.c (c_finish_return):

[Bug debug/54568] Unused codes in unwind-dw2-fde.c on PT_GNU_EH_FRAME targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54568 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-13 16:18:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Think about libraries built with older GCC versions or built with older > binutils. Those would still call the register routines instead of building > .eh_frame_h

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #31

[Bug debug/54568] Unused codes in unwind-dw2-fde.c on PT_GNU_EH_FRAME targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug debug/54568] Unused codes in unwind-dw2-fde.c on PT_GNU_EH_FRAME targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54568 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from H.J

[Bug c++/53836] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind template_parm_index

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53836 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/54511] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54511 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-13 15:14:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 13 15:14:08 2012 New Revision: 191263 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191263 Log: PR c++/53839 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_indire

[Bug c++/53836] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind template_parm_index

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53836 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-13 15:13:40 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 13 15:13:24 2012 New Revision: 191261 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191261 Log: PR c++/53836 * pt.c (value_dependent_expres

[Bug c++/54511] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54511 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-13 15:14:03 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 13 15:13:45 2012 New Revision: 191262 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191262 Log: PR c++/54511 * pt.c (tsubst_decl) [VAR_DECL

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-13 15:14:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 13 15:14:08 2012 New Revision: 191263 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191263 Log: PR c++/53839 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_indire

[Bug c++/54511] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54511 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-13 15:13:23 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 13 15:13:08 2012 New Revision: 191260 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191260 Log: PR c++/54511 * pt.c (tsubst_decl) [VAR_DECL

[Bug c++/53836] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind template_parm_index

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53836 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-13 15:13:40 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 13 15:13:24 2012 New Revision: 191261 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191261 Log: PR c++/53836 * pt.c (value_dependent_expres

[Bug c++/54511] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54511 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-13 15:13:23 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 13 15:13:08 2012 New Revision: 191260 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191260 Log: PR c++/54511 * pt.c (tsubst_decl) [VAR_DECL

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 Bug #: 54570 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/54556] [4.8 Regression] Marking implicitly pure variables as DECL_PURE_P leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54556 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-13 14:57:45 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Sep 13 14:57:38 2012 New Revision: 191259 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191259 Log: 2012-09-13 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/5

[Bug c++/51662] Temporary objects gets garbage collected in cc1plus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51662 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-13 14:52:42 UTC --- Have you had a chance to test the fix?

[Bug c++/54569] New: Compiling code with -O3 results to segfault in MAME/MESS binary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54569 Bug #: 54569 Summary: Compiling code with -O3 results to segfault in MAME/MESS binary Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/54568] New: Unused codes in unwind-dw2-fde.c on PT_GNU_EH_FRAME targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54568 Bug #: 54568 Summary: Unused codes in unwind-dw2-fde.c on PT_GNU_EH_FRAME targets Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/54567] New: Incomplete PT_GNU_EH_FRAME support for Android

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54567 Bug #: 54567 Summary: Incomplete PT_GNU_EH_FRAME support for Android Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug other/24724] _Unwind_Backtrace() calls malloc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24724 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/24724] _Unwind_Backtrace() calls malloc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24724 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #15 fr

[Bug other/24724] _Unwind_Backtrace() calls malloc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24724 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 --- Comment #30 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-13 13:32:45 UTC --- Author: tejohnson Date: Thu Sep 13 13:32:31 2012 New Revision: 191254 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191254 Log: 2012-09-12 Teresa Johnson

[Bug tree-optimization/54565] pass_update_address_taken before forwprop1 for vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug c++/53210] warning for data member initialized with itself should be in -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53210 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/54565] pass_update_address_taken before forwprop1 for vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54566] __builtin_shuffle: use psrldq+pslldq+por for rotations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54566 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54566] New: __builtin_shuffle: use psrldq+pslldq+por for rotations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54566 Bug #: 54566 Summary: __builtin_shuffle: use psrldq+pslldq+por for rotations Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/50025] [DR 1288] C++0x initialization syntax doesn't work for class members of reference type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025 --- Comment #9 from Uenal Mutlu 2012-09-13 12:44:44 UTC --- Created attachment 28188 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28188 Testcase for Bug "error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type ‘std::istream&" Mysteri

[Bug middle-end/54563] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2215

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/54556] [4.8 Regression] Marking implicitly pure variables as DECL_PURE_P leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54556 --- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-09-13 12:31:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Draft patch (replaces the one in comment 9): > > --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c > @@ -13567,6 +13572,5 @@ gfc_impure_varia

[Bug target/54564] [4.8 Regression] Broken __builtin_ia32_vfmadds[sd]3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/53210] warning for data member initialized with itself should be in -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53210 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-09-13 12:05:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thus, Manuel, I suppose you still consider your patchlet pretty obvious? I > would be willing to test and tweak the testsuite and submit and resolve th

[Bug target/54564] [4.8 Regression] Broken __builtin_ia32_vfmadds[sd]3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564 --- Comment #3 from Yukhin Kirill 2012-09-13 11:57:35 UTC --- Fails also occur on real HW.

[Bug tree-optimization/54565] New: pass_update_address_taken before forwprop1 for vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54565 Bug #: 54565 Summary: pass_update_address_taken before forwprop1 for vectors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/54564] [4.8 Regression] Broken __builtin_ia32_vfmadds[sd]3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54564] [4.8 Regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-13 11:12:40 UTC --- Seems that starting with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190492 some fma tests fail: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fma-fmaddXX.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fma-fmsub

[Bug target/54564] [4.8 Regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52806] "zero as null pointer constant" in C++98 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52806 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/54564] New: [4.8 Regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564 Bug #: 54564 Summary: [4.8 Regression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug libmudflap/16454] [meta-bug] tracking bug for libmudflap build problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16454 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libmudflap/16454] [meta-bug] tracking bug for libmudflap build problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16454 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libmudflap/14118] h8300-elf, avr-elf, m68k-elf ports cannot build libmudflap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14118 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libmudflap/12310] [tree-ssa] libmudflap fails to build on mips-sgi-IRIX6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12310 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/53210] warning for data member initialized with itself should be in -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53210 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-13 10:37:30 UTC --- Thus, Manuel, I suppose you still consider your patchlet pretty obvious? I would be willing to test and tweak the testsuite and submit and resolve this.

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7 Regression] including breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 --- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-13 10:31:18 UTC --- Jason, are we still considering backporting something? It would be great - I find the issue pretty annoying - but it's your call.

[Bug middle-end/54563] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2215

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P

[Bug c/54559] [4.7/4.8 Regression], ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7592

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work|4.8.0

[Bug c/54559] [4.7 Regression], ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7592

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug driver/54563] [4.7][C++11] MacOS 10.8, ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2215

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54445] TLS array lookup with negative constant is not combined into a single instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54445 --- Comment #8 from Adam Warner 2012-09-13 09:01:44 UTC --- Awesome! Thanks Uros Bizjak and H.J. Lu for locating and fixing the bug.

[Bug driver/54563] New: [4.7][C++11] MacOS 10.8, ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2215

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563 Bug #: 54563 Summary: [4.7][C++11] MacOS 10.8, ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2215 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRM