http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka 2012-08-21
06:54:09 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Aug 21 06:54:01 2012
New Revision: 190556
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190556
Log:
PR fortran/48636
* ipa-inline.c (want_inli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53609
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073
Venkataramanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||venkataramanan.kumar at amd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Krügler
2012-08-21 06:13:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > I agree with your analysis, but would like to point out that there is change
> > planned to essentially this part of the wording due to
> >
> > http://w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-21 02:59:15
UTC ---
It was introduced between revision 189101 and revision 189664
on cxx-conversion branch. Unfortunately, since branch was broken
between those 2 revisions, I can't bisect further.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54338
--- Comment #1 from Xinyu Qi 2012-08-21 01:38:57 UTC
---
Created attachment 28064
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28064
the preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54338
Bug #: 54338
Summary: internal compiler error: in find_costs_and_classes, at
ira-costs.c:1711
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Marek Vasut changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marek.vasut at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54337
nbhargava at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28062|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
--- Comment #20 from Matt Hargett 2012-08-20 23:52:31 UTC
---
Some additional information:
Compared to LLVM 3.1 with -O3, GCC 4.7 is twice as slow on these benchmarks.
LLVM even outperforms GCC 4.1, which previously had the best result. We are
ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54337
--- Comment #2 from nbhargava at google dot com 2012-08-20 23:21:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 28062
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28062
Linux-compatible test case
The original test case was timed and compiled on a Mac. This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54336
--- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski 2012-08-20 23:21:32
UTC ---
Fair enough. Here's a better example:
struct A { int method(); };
template auto func(T x) -> decltype(x.method())
{
bogus(x);
}
int main() { func(A()); }
The error is:
declty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54337
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-20
23:07:54 UTC ---
For me it does not even compile:
t1.cc:44:36: error: ‘numeric_limits’ is not a member of ‘std’
expected_ss << std::setprecision(std::numeric_limits::digits10);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54337
Bug #: 54337
Summary: Dramatic Compilation slow-down on higher Optimizaitons
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #8 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-20 22:52:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > — If E2 is a non-static data member and the type of E1 is “cq1 vq1 X”, and
> > the
> > type of E2 is “cq2 vq2
> > T”, the expres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12076
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54336
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-20
22:39:47 UTC ---
The issue is we decided that static_asserts which are dependent should be
resolved at definition time rather than instantiation time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54336
Bug #: 54336
Summary: [c++0x] diagnostics for functions with arg-dependent
return types have bad signatures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler
2012-08-20 22:17:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> — If E2 is a non-static data member and the type of E1 is “cq1 vq1 X”, and the
> type of E2 is “cq2 vq2
> T”, the expression designates the named member of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #6 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-20 21:56:39
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think there is a compiler bug. The ruling text seems to be the
> first bullet of 8.5.3/5 and its first sub-bullet:
>
> - If the reference is an lvalue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54335
Bug #: 54335
Summary: -dm doesn't work
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-20
21:29:26 UTC ---
For the record, I've committed the following under the wrong PR number by
accident.
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Aug 20 20:54:20 2012
New Revision: 190545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19351
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-20 21:18:00
UTC ---
Revision 190401 takes 512MB virtual memory to compile module_domain.fppized.f90
while revision 190402 takes 10GB. This is a 20x increase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19351
--- Comment #27 from Florian Weimer 2012-08-20 21:13:29
UTC ---
Author: fw
Date: Mon Aug 20 21:13:23 2012
New Revision: 190546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190546
Log:
Fix PR C++/19351: integer overflow in operator new[]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54334
Ryan Mansfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54333
--- Comment #2 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-20
21:01:54 UTC ---
thanks for the quick answer!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-20 20:54:25
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Aug 20 20:54:20 2012
New Revision: 190545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190545
Log:
PR target/50489
* config/sh/sh.md (rotcr, *r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at gmail
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #48 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-20
20:51:12 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Aug 20 20:51:06 2012
New Revision: 190544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190544
Log:
PR target/51244
* config/sh/sh.md (*cset_ze
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54334
Bug #: 54334
Summary: Unable to bootstrap using gcc 4.1.0 after
cxx-conversion merge
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54333
Bug #: 54333
Summary: sprinf and fprintf work not always equal
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54301
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-20
19:49:53 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Aug 20 19:49:46 2012
New Revision: 190542
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190542
Log:
2012-08-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54294
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54294
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-08-20
18:56:58 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 20 18:56:49 2012
New Revision: 190541
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190541
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54294
* fwprop.c (all_u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
crowl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crowl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332
Bug #: 54332
Summary: [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 takes > 10GB
memory to compile
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10416
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10416
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-20 17:39:00 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Aug 20 17:38:53 2012
New Revision: 190538
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190538
Log:
/cp
2012-08-20 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54257
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-20 16:27:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Looks good to me... HJ?
Looks good to me too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53992
--- Comment #2 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 16:25:34 UTC ---
Author: pmarlier
Date: Mon Aug 20 16:25:21 2012
New Revision: 190537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190537
Log:
gcc/
2012-08-20 Patrick Marlier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54257
--- Comment #3 from Mike Stump 2012-08-20
16:24:49 UTC ---
Looks good to me... HJ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54317
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-20 16:23:57 UTC ---
On 8/20/2012 11:46 AM, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54317
>
> --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-08-20
> 15:46:58 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53992
--- Comment #1 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 16:22:26 UTC ---
Author: pmarlier
Date: Mon Aug 20 16:22:17 2012
New Revision: 190536
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190536
Log:
gcc/
2012-08-20 Patrick Marlier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #4 from gee 2012-08-20 16:15:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> --export-all-symbols didn't work at all.
> pick-reverting just one commit failed with conflict.
>
>
> [966](sec 86)(fl 0x00)(ty 0)(scl 2) (nx 0) 0x
> Con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300
--- Comment #2 from Eric Batut 2012-08-20
16:11:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Hi Richard
Using "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing" generates the exact same (incorrect) code.
> Your testcase is quite convoluted but it looks you may be violating C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54317
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-08-20 15:46:58
UTC ---
Wow, I didn't expect that patch to break a multiplication test...
It sounds like you have before and after compilers. Do you have tree-vrp dumps
from both? (I would ask if a stage1 compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54331
Michael Richmond changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #3 from gee 2012-08-20 15:21:53 UTC ---
--export-all-symbols didn't work at all.
pick-reverting just one commit failed with conflict.
[966](sec 86)(fl 0x00)(ty 0)(scl 2) (nx 0) 0x
Contents of section .rdata$_ZNSt14numeri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213
--- Comment #7 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-20
15:12:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Have you tried to reduce the problem to a simple source file where you only
> call the PostgreSQL functions? Try that and see what happens. Right now your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54331
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-20
15:00:39 UTC ---
GCC now requires a C++ compiler to build.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54331
Bug #: 54331
Summary: configure: error: C++ compiler missing or
inoperational
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54162
Josh Triplett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54330
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-20
14:22:46 UTC ---
FYI, there is the fixed-point configuration output from
... -E -dM | egrep '(DQ)|(DA)|([^L]LACC)|(LLFRA)' | sort
DImode (long long) is 64 bits
#define __DA_FBIT__ 32
#define __DA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54330
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-20
14:15:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 28058
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28058
fixed-bit-bug.c.150r.expand: Wrong code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54295
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-08-20
14:13:40 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Mon Aug 20 14:13:16 2012
New Revision: 190534
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190534
Log:
PR tree-ssa/54295
* tree-ssa-math-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54330
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-20
14:11:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 28057
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28057
fixed-bit-bug.c.150r.expand: Correct code if DI used instead of DQ/DA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54330
Bug #: 54330
Summary: Wrong optimization for code from fixed-bit.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-08-20
14:03:39 UTC ---
Alex, the patch is ok for trunk and 4.7 branch. That said, with similar code
just appearing not in call site parameter, but in a .debug_loc section we'd ICE
anyway, as .debug_loc has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54209
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54295
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-08-20
12:49:55 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Mon Aug 20 12:49:47 2012
New Revision: 190533
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190533
Log:
PR tree-ssa/54295
* tree-ssa-math-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54230
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin12 |x86_64-apple-darwin*
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54251
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54255
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54257
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-20
12:12:44 UTC ---
Ah great, I suspected that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309
--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-08-20 12:10:27 UTC ---
I think this is the same problem as PR c++/53540 for which a candidate
patch was sent to the gcc-patches mailing list [1].
So unless I am mistaken, I am marking this bug a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54329
--- Comment #3 from wbrana 2012-08-20 12:04:05 UTC ---
configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.8.0-pre
--includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.8.0-pre/include
--datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10416
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54329
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
--- Comment #2 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54329
--- Comment #1 from wbrana 2012-08-20 11:20:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28055
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28055
build log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54329
Bug #: 54329
Summary: gcc/reginfo.o differs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10112
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9666
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8966
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6273
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31952
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cs at plesk dot com
--- Comment #7 from P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5605
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31952
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |janis at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-20
10:26:52 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 20 10:26:45 2012
New Revision: 190528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190528
Log:
2012-08-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-20
10:18:41 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Aug 20 10:18:36 2012
New Revision: 190527
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190527
Log:
Fix PR target/54212
2012-08-20 Ramana Rad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54195
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-20 09:45:15 UTC ---
A similar test case (also a regression) was reported by Andrew Benson at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-08/msg00101.html:
module gn
implicit none
type :: nc
con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54321
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54321
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-08-20
09:12:11 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 20 09:12:05 2012
New Revision: 190526
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190526
Log:
PR tree-optimization/54321
* tree-ssa-forwp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-20
09:07:26 UTC ---
That's a big problem if you are serious about contributing to gcc. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
In short, if you don't want to waste time, make sure to obtain, fill and r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #8 from Paul H. Hargrove 2012-08-20
08:57:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
[...]
> Ok, but see comment 4; try just removing the "inline" there. If necessary,
> the
> inline can be wrapped in some #ifdef construct. It depends on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-20
08:53:13 UTC ---
The issue is that we now merge two blocks we didn't merge before which
introduces SSA names into a STMT that are marked for update (thus, in
old_ssa_names):
:
# a_12 = PHI <0B(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54326
--- Comment #4 from Paul H. Hargrove 2012-08-20
08:22:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Fixed(?).
YES. I was the one to originally observe the failure.
Just svn-uped to revision 190524 and was able to build stage1 with g++-3.4.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54326
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54326
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-20
07:49:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 20 07:49:41 2012
New Revision: 190524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190524
Log:
2012-08-20 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54328
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54328
--- Comment #2 from yaoyuan1216 at gmail dot com 2012-08-20 07:38:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> 'a' isn't a pointer, it's an array, so the closure has a copy of the array and
> a[0] = 2 doesn't alter the closure's copy.
Thanks for your rep
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
