[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #140 from Jan Hubicka 2012-08-19 05:55:26 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Aug 19 05:55:20 2012 New Revision: 190509 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190509 Log: PR lto/45375 * ipa-inline.c (want_inline

[Bug c++/54319] New: Assignment to rvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54319 Bug #: 54319 Summary: Assignment to rvalue Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/28896] -fstack-limit-symbol and m68k and non 68020

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896 Larry Baker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28024|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/54318] New: [C++11] Bogus "template instantiation depth exceeds maximum" error + segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54318 Bug #: 54318 Summary: [C++11] Bogus "template instantiation depth exceeds maximum" error + segfault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: U

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #17 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-19 00:54:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > I'm sorry. That is my falut and the problem was that I overflowed variables > size causing undefined behaviour. Now I kwon what it is. sorry for my bad e

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27972|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #15 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-19 00:45:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > This line contains a bug: > > strcpy(SQL1,"select id, ' ', regexp_replace(str_last_name,' ','') as lastname, > ' ', regexp_replace(str_first_name,' ','')

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug middle-end/53420] [4.8 Regression] ICE in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:7039

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53420 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-18 23:50:21 UTC --- On 15-Aug-12, at 4:16 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Can you still reproduce it? My HP-UX 11.00 box had a disk failure a couple of weeks ago, so I can't reproduce

[Bug tree-optimization/54317] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: c45532m c45532n c45532o c45532p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54317 Bug #: 54317 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: c45532m c45532n c45532o c45532p Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51501] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 --- Comment #6 from Dave Abrahams 2012-08-18 23:18:21 UTC --- Jason, are you submitting (or is there already) an issue for this?

[Bug middle-end/53823] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823 --- Comment #24 from John David Anglin 2012-08-18 23:16:57 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Aug 18 23:16:53 2012 New Revision: 190505 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190505 Log: PR middle-end/53823 * expmed.c (expa

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-18 22:18:28 UTC --- *** Bug 54214 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #12 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-18 22:15:40 UTC --- > > What exactly is your question and why do you think it's anything to do with > > GCC? that is one of my questions. Whether it is a GCC bug or PstgreSQL. Or even againg my errors

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #19 from Denis Koles

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 --- Comment #18 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-18 22:07:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Your bug report is useless, you have not provided the information requested at > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ so it cannot be compiled or verified, and your >

[Bug fortran/39290] Subroutine/function ambiguity in generics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39290 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2012-08-18 22:00:20 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Sat Aug 18 22:00:10 2012 New Revision: 190504 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190504 Log: Add the working testcase from PR fortran/39290. te

[Bug fortran/39290] Subroutine/function ambiguity in generics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39290 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2012-08-18 21:56:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thus, I concur that it seems to be fixed. However, one could consider to > include the two test cases of the IR in the testsuite - besides the invalid > one

[Bug c++/54316] [C++11] move constructor for string_stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-18 21:43:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > It's known. And documented http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2011

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #9 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-18 21:41:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Why is this marked "enhancement" ? > > Is this the same issue as PR 54213 ? If so please close that one. > > What exactly is your question and why do you

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #8 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-18 21:19:51 UTC --- my command line for compile: c++ -I"D:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.1\include" -L"D:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.1\lib" -lpq -o %application_file% %application_file%.cpp -Wl,--subsystem

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/54316] [C++11] move constructor for string_stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|lundberj at gmail dot com | --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-

[Bug c++/20313] in diagnostic is confusing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20313 Johan Lundberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lundberj at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 --- Comment #6 from Paul H. Hargrove 2012-08-18 19:05:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5 by Gary Funck) [...] > FYI, the failing system has Redhat Release 8 (circa 2002). Fedocra Core 8 > didn't come out until circa 2007. Thus, it would be surp

[Bug c++/39813] improve __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for templated methos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 Johan Lundberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lundberj at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/54316] [C++11] move constructor for string_stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316 Johan Lundberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lundberj at gmail dot com Depend

[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 --- Comment #5 from Gary Funck 2012-08-18 18:39:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > (Note, apparent s/4.2.1/4.1.2/g in initial description.) > > I'd suggest updating to just a later gcc build, if you can find *only slightly > newer* rpm:s; as

[Bug c++/54316] New: [C++11] move constructor for string_stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316 Bug #: 54316 Summary: [C++11] move constructor for string_stream Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug middle-end/54315] Unnecessary copy of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-18 17:45:43 UTC --- The difference between -m32 and -m64 is - struct S160 D.1692; + struct S160 D.1719; ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0 ;;pred: ENTRY - D.1692 = check160 (); [return slot optim

[Bug middle-end/54315] Unnecessary copy of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-18 17:42:58 UTC --- -m32 also causes extra copy: [hjl@gnu-6 pr54315]$ gcc -S -O2 -m32 y.i [hjl@gnu-6 pr54315]$ cat y.s .file"y.i" .text .p2align 4,,15 .globltest160 .typetest160

[Bug middle-end/54315] New: Unnecessary copy of return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315 Bug #: 54315 Summary: Unnecessary copy of return value Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/28831] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Aggregate copy not elided when using a return value as a pass-by-value parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831 --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-18 16:10:43 UTC --- With -maccumulate-outgoing-args, GCC 3.4 will also make a copy.

[Bug middle-end/28831] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Aggregate copy not elided when using a return value as a pass-by-value parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com, |

[Bug regression/54314] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #1 from gee 2012-08-18 14:53:53 UTC --- bug 53518 also has this problem. reference type in method argument causes symbol reference of construction vtable for ***. so, construction vtable for * symbol must not be marked as weak in PE ta

[Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 Ruben Van Boxem changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/54313] [4.8 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with MALLOC_PERTURB – Segfault in bitmap_obstack_free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54313 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/54313] [4.8 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with MALLOC_PERTURB – Segfault in bitmap_obstack_free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54313 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2012-08-18 10:35:41 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Sat Aug 18 10:35:36 2012 New Revision: 190502 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190502 Log: PR middle-end/54313 * dse.c (dse_step7):

[Bug regression/54314] New: undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 Bug #: 54314 Summary: undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Versi

[Bug middle-end/54313] [4.8 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with MALLOC_PERTURB – Segfault in bitmap_obstack_free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54313 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/52991] attribute packed broken on mingw32?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/54313] New: [4.8 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with MALLOC_PERTURB – Segfault in bitmap_obstack_free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54313 Bug #: 54313 Summary: [4.8 Regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with MALLOC_PERTURB – Segfault in bitmap_obstack_free Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug lto/54312] New: uniquify_nodes takes 12% of Mozilla LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54312 Bug #: 54312 Summary: uniquify_nodes takes 12% of Mozilla LTO build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/54309] [C++11] type alias accessing class template typename

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #139 from Jan Hubicka 2012-08-18 09:36:55 UTC --- oprofile of WPA: 649295 18.2243 lto1 lto1 lto_main() 3412569.5783 lto1 lto1 htab_find_slot_with_

[Bug c++/54311] New: Info about default template arguments in instantiation backtrace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54311 Bug #: 54311 Summary: Info about default template arguments in instantiation backtrace Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/54305] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/m68k/pr36134.c scan-assembler lea

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54305 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/54300] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Erroneous optimization causes wrong Neon data management

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54310] New: Order of operations during overload resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54310 Bug #: 54310 Summary: Order of operations during overload resolution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug other/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|