[Bug debug/54177] [4.8 Regression]: Segfault in cselib_lookup due to NULL_RTX passed from vt_add_function_parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54177 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-08-05 06:46:03 UTC --- Following patch fixes the failure: --cut here-- Index: var-tracking.c === --- var-tracking.c (revision 190140) +++ v

[Bug debug/54177] [4.8 Regression]: Segfault in cselib_lookup due to NULL_RTX passed from vt_add_function_parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54177 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mileston

[Bug debug/54177] New: [4.8 Regression]: Segfault in cselib_lookup due to NULL_RTX passed from vt_add_function_parameter

at all. [1] Compiler version: 4.8.0 20120804 (experimental) [trunk revision 190144] (GCC) Platform: alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug target/54176] lm32-elf-gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54176 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug c/54176] lm32-elf-gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54176 --- Comment #2 from Tommy Thorn 2012-08-05 03:26:16 UTC --- Forget the attached example, lm32-elf-gcc breaks as soon as any static or extern variable is used in a function. Fx: int x; int foo() { return x; }

[Bug c/54176] lm32-elf-gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54176 --- Comment #1 from Tommy Thorn 2012-08-05 03:14:30 UTC --- Looks like the front end is looping (recursively): gdb --args /home/opt/lm32/bin/../lib/gcc/lm32-elf/4.7.1/cc1 -quiet -v -iprefix /home/opt/lm32/bin/../lib64/gcc/lm32-elf/4.7.1/ sieve.c

[Bug c/54176] New: lm32-elf-gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54176 Bug #: 54176 Summary: lm32-elf-gcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/54165] Cast to "void" should not implicitly call conversion functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54165 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlin

[Bug fortran/54033] gfortran: Passing file as include directory - add diagnostic and ICE with -cpp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54033 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-04 18:27:04 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Aug 4 18:26:56 2012 New Revision: 190144 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190144 Log: Fix PR 54033, problems with -I, with test ca

[Bug fortran/54166] ICE rank-1 assignment to rank-2 array section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54166 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/54175] [4.8 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54175 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54175] New: [4.8 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54175 Bug #: 54175 Summary: [4.8 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/54174] New: Missed optimization: Unnecessary vmovaps generated for __builtin_ia32_vextractf128_ps256(v, 0)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54174 Bug #: 54174 Summary: Missed optimization: Unnecessary vmovaps generated for __builtin_ia32_vextractf128_ps256(v, 0) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libstdc++/54172] [4.7/4.8 Regression] __cxa_guard_acquire thread-safety issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2 Summary|[4.7 Regressi

[Bug libstdc++/54173] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG breaks string::_Rep::_S_empty_rep_storage weak binding.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54173 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-04 16:49:36 UTC --- Well, whatever it is, if the problem is so old, I think we have a WONTFIX at this point, because std::string will be completely different in C++11.

[Bug libstdc++/54173] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG breaks string::_Rep::_S_empty_rep_storage weak binding.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54173 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora 2012-08-04 16:13:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > For sure, nothing changed in this area for years and years, thus must be a > compiler issue. Please try to figure when it started... i have similar effects f

[Bug libstdc++/54173] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG breaks string::_Rep::_S_empty_rep_storage weak binding.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54173 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/54173] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG breaks string::_Rep::_S_empty_rep_storage weak binding.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54173 Bug #: 54173 Summary: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG breaks string::_Rep::_S_empty_rep_storage weak binding. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/54161] sizeof(void) expressions are accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54161 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug debug/52983] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in df_uses_record, at df-scan.c:3243

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52983 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|debug --- Comment #16 from Alexandre Ol

[Bug c++/54165] Cast to "void" should not implicitly call conversion functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54165 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/54172] New: [4.7 Regression] __cxa_guard_acquire thread-safety issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172 Bug #: 54172 Summary: [4.7 Regression] __cxa_guard_acquire thread-safety issue Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-04 11:37:12 UTC --- If submitter can try current 4_7-branch or mainline, it would be easy for him to double check.

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-04 11:35:34 UTC --- Indeed, I suspected that immediately. But without a self contained testcase not requiring inspection of the assembly personally I'm not 100% sure (and I'm in the middle of 2-3 other th

[Bug c++/54170] Call to lambda elided

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-04 10:47:49 UTC --- Dup of PR 52988?