http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
--- Comment #11 from Petr.Salinger at seznam dot cz 2012-07-16 06:48:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 27800
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27800
testcase
Another failing testcase - reduced from xserver-xorg-input-mouse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jermar 2012-07-16 06:28:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ah, of course the "move branch register" instruction faults if the NaT bit of
> the source register is set. So the recovery code is irrelevant, and this could
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jermar 2012-07-16 06:18:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Without a test case on a platform that is supported in GCC, there isn't much
> anyone can do to help. Can you reproduce this on linux or hpux?
>
> BTW, are t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-07-16
00:18:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
You are right. Our sh_option_override has code like this:
if (flag_finite_math_only == 2)
flag_finite_math_only
= !flag_signaling_nans && TARGE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-15
22:52:31 UTC ---
Ah, of course the "move branch register" instruction faults if the NaT bit of
the source register is set. So the recovery code is irrelevant, and this could
be a GCC bug. Need a test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49220
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-15
21:17:34 UTC ---
What does the recovery code at 4404710 look like?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-15
21:08:30 UTC ---
FWIW, as far as I understand the ia64 data speculation semantics, it is OK to
use a speculated load, but the check must then be done on the use, i.e. in t
his case chk.s b6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976
Bug #: 53976
Summary: [SH] Unnecessary clrt after bt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53832
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-15
20:29:06 UTC ---
I closed it as invalid simply because I found the (approximate) reason for the
failure, and it was caused by me doing something which I don't /believe/ is
required to work, though I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
Bug #: 53975
Summary: [ia64] Target register of a speculative load moved to
a branch register prior to the chk.s instruction
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29969
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53832
Gary Funck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gary at intrepid dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53970
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Nearly all tests fail with |[4.8 Regression] Nearly all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974
Bug #: 53974
Summary: Nearlyt all tests fail with ADA.CALENDAR.TIME_ERROR :
a-calend.adb:603
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-15
15:07:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Can one of you please add a note to gcc-4.7/changes.html to reflect
> the ABI changes between 4.7.1 and 4.7.2? Thanks.
Done: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53962
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53973
Bug #: 53973
Summary: [x32] libjava failures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964
--- Comment #4 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-07-15
13:58:11 UTC ---
I don't use /etc/src.conf (i.e. I don't have this file).
# cat /etc/make.conf
SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2
SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib
SENDMAIL_LDAD
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hayim at post dot tau.ac.il
--- Comment #10 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53970
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53972
Bug #: 53972
Summary: array constant expression expression not valid as
template argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53971
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53949
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-15 12:11:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 27799
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27799
Proof of concept patch
This is a proof of concept patch just to probe around.
The idea is to allow the R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-07-15
11:00:31 UTC ---
And gcc48:
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/libcpp'
/usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/./prev-gcc/g++
-B/usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/./prev-gcc/
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52983
Anton Shterenlikht changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mexas at bristol dot ac.uk
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964
--- Comment #1 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-07-15
10:49:55 UTC ---
And the same error with gcc47:
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc47/work/build/libcpp'
/usr/ports/lang/gcc47/work/build/./prev-gcc/g++
-B/usr/ports/lang/gcc47/work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53969
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53965
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53971
Bug #: 53971
Summary: [OOP] Class container - reverse order of _vtab and
_data
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53970
Bug #: 53970
Summary: -ftree-vectorization does not handle well unaligned
data
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53110
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-15 08:13:57 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jul 15 08:13:47 2012
New Revision: 189491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189491
Log:
PR target/53961
Backport from main
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-15 08:13:57 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jul 15 08:13:47 2012
New Revision: 189491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189491
Log:
PR target/53961
Backport from main
43 matches
Mail list logo
