http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53870
--- Comment #1 from brag 2012-07-06 06:17:19 UTC
---
*** Bug 53869 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53869
brag changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53869
--- Comment #1 from brag 2012-07-06 06:16:05 UTC
---
class test{
public:
void remove();
private:
test *next;
test *prev;
};
void test::remove(){
next->prev=prev;
prev->next=next;
}
arm-none-eabi-gcc++ -mcpu=cortex-m3 -mthumb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53870
Bug #: 53870
Summary: Redundant memory load
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53869
Bug #: 53869
Summary: Redundant memory load
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53864
--- Comment #3 from cpap 2012-07-06 05:55:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Have you tried a newer GCC? Since 4.2.0 is no longer supported.
No. Should I go to newer version of gcc/g++ or an older one?
Can you please suggest me a couple of of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53868
Bug #: 53868
Summary: Temporary for indirect binding is not destroyed when
destructor from initializer temp throws
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53447
Carrot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7 Regression] including
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53867
Bug #: 53867
Summary: Probably a bogus warning on types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
--- Comment #17 from JTappin 2012-07-05 23:03:00 UTC
---
Created attachment 27748
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27748
Testcase for List-directed read
By default gtk_init calls setlocale, so if the locale is set to one that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-05
21:24:43 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 5 21:24:33 2012
New Revision: 189305
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189305
Log:
PR c++/53039
* pt.c (arg_from_parm_pack_p)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53864
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
Severity|critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-05
19:39:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 5 19:39:01 2012
New Revision: 189298
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189298
Log:
PR c++/50852
PR c++/53039
* tree.c (str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-05
19:39:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 5 19:39:01 2012
New Revision: 189298
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189298
Log:
PR c++/50852
PR c++/53039
* tree.c (st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53833
--- Comment #1 from Larry Baker 2012-07-05 18:07:48 UTC
---
I didn't try to figure out why the code in libgcc/config/m68k/linux-atomic.c is
causing the GCC 4.7.1 xgcc cross compiler to fail. I just patched
libgcc/config.host to disable atomic bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dodji at gcc dot gnu.org|jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8 Regression]|[4.8 Regression]
|lto-bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53865
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-05 17:
ase cc1.ltrans6 -mfpmath=sse -mtune=generic -march=x86-64
-m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip
cc1.ltrans6.ltrans.o -O3 -version -funroll-loops -ffast-math -fwhole-program
-fuse-linker-plugin -fltrans cc1.ltrans6.o -o cc1.ltrans6.s
GNU GIMPLE (GCC) version 4.8.0 20120
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-07-05 16:56:23 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:56:15 2012
New Revision: 189295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189295
Log:
Correct bug number to PR target/48941
F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05
16:45:32 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:45:18 2012
New Revision: 189294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189294
Log:
2012-07-05 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05
16:45:29 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:45:18 2012
New Revision: 189294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189294
Log:
2012-07-05 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818
--- Comment #5 from johnjohn 2012-07-05 16:32:44 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > But when I integrate '-fno-automatic' option, I obtain this error message :
> > function testing(date1, date2) result(test)
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-05
15:21:31 UTC ---
Or IIRC build with --disable-threads
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin 2012-07-05
15:18:30 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Jul 5 15:18:26 2012
New Revision: 189292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189292
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/53732
* trans-array.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-05
15:12:02 UTC ---
You can use trunk or the tip of the 4.7 branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre 2012-07-05
14:55:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please try with a version of GCC that is still maintained.
This is currently not possible due to bug 53270.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-05 14:43:48
UTC ---
The problem seems LTO + O3, which leads many
-Werror=maybe-uninitialized error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45089
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-05 14:10:28
UTC ---
Also
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/bitmap.c:576:8: error: \u2018in_ready.indx\u2019
may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
else if (head->indx / 2 < in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-07-05
14:07:00 UTC ---
The patch in comment #3 fixes the PR. Full regstrapping scheduled for tonight.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35292
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-05 13:53:42
UTC ---
GCC was configured with
BOOT_CFLAGS="-O3 -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -funroll-loops -ffast-math"
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix'" /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/configure
--enable-clocale=gnu --wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|[4.8 Regressi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866
Bug #: 53866
Summary: [4.8 Regression] c/c-parser.c:6891:16: error:
\u2018origtypes\u2019 may be used uninitialized in
this function
Classification: Unclassified
Product
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53865
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53865
Bug #: 53865
Summary: [4.8 Regression] 176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to
build with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53864
--- Comment #1 from cpap 2012-07-05 11:44:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27745
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27745
the preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53864
Bug #: 53864
Summary: g++ internal compiler error: Illegal instruction at
AIX.5.3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53863
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2012-07-05
10:30:09 UTC ---
> Oh, and you can disable cunrolli already via -fdisable-tree-cunrolli.
Indeed, I always forget that we have it in 4.7 and above.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53863
Bug #: 53863
Summary: misleading error message for redefinitions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-05
10:11:55 UTC ---
Oh, and you can disable cunrolli already via -fdisable-tree-cunrolli.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-05
10:10:28 UTC ---
I have a few patches that try to estimate CSE opportunities exposed by
complete unrolling. In this case the CSE opportunity is the reduction
into C(i,j) (possibly also detected by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41958
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-11-05 22:41:18 |2012-07-05
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862
--- Comment #2 from Ke Liu 2012-07-05
09:10:04 UTC ---
Any work around is welcome.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862
--- Comment #1 from Ke Liu 2012-07-05
09:08:44 UTC ---
BTW: this piece of code can be compiled successfully by clang++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[GCC 4.7.1] sorry, |[C++11] sorry,
|unimple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862
Ke Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-07-05
08:48:24 UTC ---
> It's a pass ordering issue, cunrolli also can tremendously help vectorization
> because it enables vectorization of the loop that is then the innermost loop
> after unrolling. It al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862
Bug #: 53862
Summary: [GCC 4.7.1] sorry, unimplemented: use of
'type_pack_expansion' in template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53861
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-05
08:44:02 UTC ---
You should be able to use index mode for expanding
MEM[(unsigned char *)&a + 1B]
as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53855
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-05
08:38:05 UTC ---
It's a pass ordering issue, cunrolli also can tremendously help vectorization
because it enables vectorization of the loop that is then the innermost loop
after unrolling. It also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53861
Bug #: 53861
Summary: Assignment of an array element from pointer is not
taken as ARRAY_TYPE when expand_assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860
Bug #: 53860
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in should_move_die_to_comdat, at
dwarf2out.c:6254 with -fkeep-inline-functions
-fdebug-types-section -g
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53449
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53449
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-05 07:22:25 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jul 5 07:22:17 2012
New Revision: 189281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189281
Log:
* expmed.c (expand_mult): Initialize coe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859
Bug #: 53859
Summary: ICE when calculate insn latency for armv7e-m arch in
O2 level
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
73 matches
Mail list logo