[Bug tree-optimization/53870] Redundant memory load

2012-07-05 Thread unixoid2003 at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53870 --- Comment #1 from brag 2012-07-06 06:17:19 UTC --- *** Bug 53869 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/53869] Redundant memory load

2012-07-05 Thread unixoid2003 at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53869 brag changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53869] Redundant memory load

2012-07-05 Thread unixoid2003 at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53869 --- Comment #1 from brag 2012-07-06 06:16:05 UTC --- class test{ public: void remove(); private: test *next; test *prev; }; void test::remove(){ next->prev=prev; prev->next=next; } arm-none-eabi-gcc++ -mcpu=cortex-m3 -mthumb

[Bug tree-optimization/53870] New: Redundant memory load

2012-07-05 Thread unixoid2003 at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53870 Bug #: 53870 Summary: Redundant memory load Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/53869] New: Redundant memory load

2012-07-05 Thread unixoid2003 at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53869 Bug #: 53869 Summary: Redundant memory load Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug middle-end/53864] g++ internal compiler error: Illegal instruction at AIX.5.3

2012-07-05 Thread cpapaluk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53864 --- Comment #3 from cpap 2012-07-06 05:55:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Have you tried a newer GCC? Since 4.2.0 is no longer supported. No. Should I go to newer version of gcc/g++ or an older one? Can you please suggest me a couple of of

[Bug c++/53868] New: Temporary for indirect binding is not destroyed when destructor from initializer temp throws

2012-07-05 Thread hstong at ca dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53868 Bug #: 53868 Summary: Temporary for indirect binding is not destroyed when destructor from initializer temp throws Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug target/53447] missed optimization of 64bit ALU operation with small constant

2012-07-05 Thread carrot at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53447 Carrot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7 Regression] including breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

2012-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7 Regression] including

[Bug fortran/53867] New: Probably a bogus warning on types

2012-07-05 Thread fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53867 Bug #: 53867 Summary: Probably a bogus warning on types Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/47007] Values from namelist file should not depend on locale settings

2012-07-05 Thread jtappin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007 --- Comment #17 from JTappin 2012-07-05 23:03:00 UTC --- Created attachment 27748 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27748 Testcase for List-directed read By default gtk_init calls setlocale, so if the locale is set to one that

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7/4.8 Regression] including breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

2012-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-05 21:24:43 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jul 5 21:24:33 2012 New Revision: 189305 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189305 Log: PR c++/53039 * pt.c (arg_from_parm_pack_p)

[Bug middle-end/53864] g++ internal compiler error: Illegal instruction at AIX.5.3

2012-07-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53864 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Severity|critical

[Bug c++/50852] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11030

2012-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c++/50852] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11030

2012-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-05 19:39:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jul 5 19:39:01 2012 New Revision: 189298 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189298 Log: PR c++/50852 PR c++/53039 * tree.c (str

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7/4.8 Regression] including breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

2012-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-05 19:39:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jul 5 19:39:01 2012 New Revision: 189298 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189298 Log: PR c++/50852 PR c++/53039 * tree.c (st

[Bug target/53833] m68k-uclinux xgcc ICE when compiling libgcc (linux-atomic.c:203:1: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4146)

2012-07-05 Thread baker at usgs dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53833 --- Comment #1 from Larry Baker 2012-07-05 18:07:48 UTC --- I didn't try to figure out why the code in libgcc/config/m68k/linux-atomic.c is causing the GCC 4.7.1 xgcc cross compiler to fail. I just patched libgcc/config.host to disable atomic bu

[Bug c++/50852] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:11030

2012-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dodji at gcc dot gnu.org|jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug bootstrap/53866] [4.8 Regression] lto-bootstrap failed at -O3

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression]|[4.8 Regression] |lto-bootstr

[Bug middle-end/53865] [4.8 Regression] 176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53865 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-05 17:

[Bug middle-end/53865] [4.8 Regression] 176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
ase cc1.ltrans6 -mfpmath=sse -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip cc1.ltrans6.ltrans.o -O3 -version -funroll-loops -ffast-math -fwhole-program -fuse-linker-plugin -fltrans cc1.ltrans6.o -o cc1.ltrans6.s GNU GIMPLE (GCC) version 4.8.0 20120

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7/4.8 Regression] including breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

2012-07-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug target/48941] [arm gcc] NEON: Stack pointer operations performed even tho stack is not accessed at all in function.

2012-07-05 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49891] [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump_1

2012-07-05 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/48941] [arm gcc] NEON: Stack pointer operations performed even tho stack is not accessed at all in function.

2012-07-05 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941 --- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05 16:56:23 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Thu Jul 5 16:56:15 2012 New Revision: 189295 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189295 Log: Correct bug number to PR target/48941 F

[Bug target/51980] ARM - Neon code polluted by useless stores to the stack with vuzpq / vzipq / vtrnq

2012-07-05 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980 --- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05 16:45:32 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Thu Jul 5 16:45:18 2012 New Revision: 189294 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189294 Log: 2012-07-05 Ramana Radhakrishnan

[Bug rtl-optimization/49891] [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump_1

2012-07-05 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891 --- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05 16:45:29 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Thu Jul 5 16:45:18 2012 New Revision: 189294 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189294 Log: 2012-07-05 Ramana Radhakrishnan

[Bug fortran/53818] -finit-local-zero -fno-automatic: Function result cannot have initializer

2012-07-05 Thread j.moyard at voila dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 --- Comment #5 from johnjohn 2012-07-05 16:32:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #0) > > But when I integrate '-fno-automatic' option, I obtain this error message : > > function testing(date1, date2) result(test) > >

[Bug target/53789] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

2012-07-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-05 15:21:31 UTC --- Or IIRC build with --disable-threads

[Bug fortran/53732] [4.7/4.8 Regression] "mismatching comparison operand types" on compile

2012-07-05 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin 2012-07-05 15:18:30 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Thu Jul 5 15:18:26 2012 New Revision: 189292 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189292 Log: fortran/ PR fortran/53732 * trans-array.c (

[Bug target/53789] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

2012-07-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-05 15:12:02 UTC --- You can use trunk or the tip of the 4.7 branch.

[Bug target/53789] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:864/865 when compiling GNU MPFR on parisc

2012-07-05 Thread vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789 --- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre 2012-07-05 14:55:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please try with a version of GCC that is still maintained. This is currently not possible due to bug 53270.

[Bug middle-end/50708] Infinite loop between rshift_double and lshift_double if count is LONG_MIN

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53866] [4.8 Regression] lto-bootstrap: c/c-parser.c:6891:16: error: origtypes may be used uninitialized in this function

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-05 14:43:48 UTC --- The problem seems LTO + O3, which leads many -Werror=maybe-uninitialized error.

[Bug lto/45089] -Os -g -fwhopr dwarf2out ICE

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45089 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53866] [4.8 Regression] lto-bootstrap: c/c-parser.c:6891:16: error: origtypes may be used uninitialized in this function

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-05 14:10:28 UTC --- Also /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/bitmap.c:576:8: error: \u2018in_ready.indx\u2019 may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] else if (head->indx / 2 < in

[Bug target/53853] FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr53811.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error)

2012-07-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-07-05 14:07:00 UTC --- The patch in comment #3 fixes the PR. Full regstrapping scheduled for tonight.

[Bug tree-optimization/35292] Missing Const Prop -- union fields

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35292 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/53860] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6254 with -fkeep-inline-functions -fdebug-types-section -g

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/53866] [4.8 Regression] lto-bootstrap: c/c-parser.c:6891:16: error: origtypes may be used uninitialized in this function

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-05 13:53:42 UTC --- GCC was configured with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O3 -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -funroll-loops -ffast-math" RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix'" /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/configure --enable-clocale=gnu --wit

[Bug bootstrap/53866] [4.8 Regression] lto-bootstrap: c/c-parser.c:6891:16: error: origtypes may be used uninitialized in this function

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|[4.8 Regressi

[Bug bootstrap/53866] New: [4.8 Regression] c/c-parser.c:6891:16: error: \u2018origtypes\u2019 may be used uninitialized in this function

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866 Bug #: 53866 Summary: [4.8 Regression] c/c-parser.c:6891:16: error: \u2018origtypes\u2019 may be used uninitialized in this function Classification: Unclassified Product

[Bug middle-end/53865] [4.8 Regression] 176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53865 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53865] New: [4.8 Regression] 176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

2012-07-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53865 Bug #: 53865 Summary: [4.8 Regression] 176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/53853] FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr53811.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error)

2012-07-05 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug target/53853] FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr53811.C -std=gnu++* (internal compiler error)

2012-07-05 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug c++/53864] g++ internal compiler error: Illegal instruction at AIX.5.3

2012-07-05 Thread cpapaluk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53864 --- Comment #1 from cpap 2012-07-05 11:44:50 UTC --- Created attachment 27745 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27745 the preprocessed file

[Bug bootstrap/52947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails due to wrong include search path composition

2012-07-05 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53864] New: g++ internal compiler error: Illegal instruction at AIX.5.3

2012-07-05 Thread cpapaluk at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53864 Bug #: 53864 Summary: g++ internal compiler error: Illegal instruction at AIX.5.3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53863] misleading error message for redefinitions

2012-07-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53863 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Jonathan

[Bug middle-end/47298] -O3 destroys beautifully vectorized code obtained at -O2

2012-07-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2012-07-05 10:30:09 UTC --- > Oh, and you can disable cunrolli already via -fdisable-tree-cunrolli. Indeed, I always forget that we have it in 4.7 and above.

[Bug c++/53863] New: misleading error message for redefinitions

2012-07-05 Thread akim.demaille at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53863 Bug #: 53863 Summary: misleading error message for redefinitions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Pr

[Bug middle-end/47298] -O3 destroys beautifully vectorized code obtained at -O2

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-05 10:11:55 UTC --- Oh, and you can disable cunrolli already via -fdisable-tree-cunrolli.

[Bug middle-end/47298] -O3 destroys beautifully vectorized code obtained at -O2

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-05 10:10:28 UTC --- I have a few patches that try to estimate CSE opportunities exposed by complete unrolling. In this case the CSE opportunity is the reduction into C(i,j) (possibly also detected by

[Bug c++/41958] [c++0x] bogus variadic partial ordering code

2012-07-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41958 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-11-05 22:41:18 |2012-07-05 CC|

[Bug c++/53862] [C++11] sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template

2012-07-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53862] [C++11] sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template

2012-07-05 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug c++/53862] [C++11] sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template

2012-07-05 Thread likan_999.student at sina dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862 --- Comment #2 from Ke Liu 2012-07-05 09:10:04 UTC --- Any work around is welcome.

[Bug c++/53862] [C++11] sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template

2012-07-05 Thread likan_999.student at sina dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862 --- Comment #1 from Ke Liu 2012-07-05 09:08:44 UTC --- BTW: this piece of code can be compiled successfully by clang++

[Bug c++/53862] [C++11] sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template

2012-07-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[GCC 4.7.1] sorry, |[C++11] sorry, |unimple

[Bug c++/53862] [GCC 4.7.1] sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template

2012-07-05 Thread likan_999.student at sina dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862 Ke Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical

[Bug middle-end/47298] -O3 destroys beautifully vectorized code obtained at -O2

2012-07-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-07-05 08:48:24 UTC --- > It's a pass ordering issue, cunrolli also can tremendously help vectorization > because it enables vectorization of the loop that is then the innermost loop > after unrolling. It al

[Bug c++/53862] New: [GCC 4.7.1] sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template

2012-07-05 Thread likan_999.student at sina dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53862 Bug #: 53862 Summary: [GCC 4.7.1] sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCO

[Bug rtl-optimization/53861] Assignment of an array element from pointer is not taken as ARRAY_TYPE when expand_assignment

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53861 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-05 08:44:02 UTC --- You should be able to use index mode for expanding MEM[(unsigned char *)&a + 1B] as well.

[Bug middle-end/53855] Emitting a warning for use after clobber

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53855 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/47298] -O3 destroys beautifully vectorized code obtained at -O2

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-05 08:38:05 UTC --- It's a pass ordering issue, cunrolli also can tremendously help vectorization because it enables vectorization of the loop that is then the innermost loop after unrolling. It also

[Bug debug/53860] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6254 with -fkeep-inline-functions -fdebug-types-section -g

2012-07-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/53861] New: Assignment of an array element from pointer is not taken as ARRAY_TYPE when expand_assignment

2012-07-05 Thread zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53861 Bug #: 53861 Summary: Assignment of an array element from pointer is not taken as ARRAY_TYPE when expand_assignment Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug debug/53860] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6254 with -fkeep-inline-functions -fdebug-types-section -g

2012-07-05 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860 Bug #: 53860 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6254 with -fkeep-inline-functions -fdebug-types-section -g Classification: Unclassified

[Bug middle-end/47298] -O3 destroys beautifully vectorized code obtained at -O2

2012-07-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug fortran/53449] [4.8 regression] fortran fails to build with LTO bootstrap

2012-07-05 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53449 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug fortran/53449] [4.8 regression] fortran fails to build with LTO bootstrap

2012-07-05 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53449 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-05 07:22:25 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jul 5 07:22:17 2012 New Revision: 189281 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189281 Log: * expmed.c (expand_mult): Initialize coe

[Bug c/53859] New: ICE when calculate insn latency for armv7e-m arch in O2 level

2012-07-05 Thread zhuolin.liu at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859 Bug #: 53859 Summary: ICE when calculate insn latency for armv7e-m arch in O2 level Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED