http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700
Ryan Hill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dirtyepic at gentoo dot org |
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Hill 2012-06-17 00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700
Ryan Hill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- |
|bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
Bug #: 53701
Summary: ICE on ia64 (when building Allegro 4.4)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=67214
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700
Kacper Kowalik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org
Known t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700
Bug #: 53700
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands,
at postreload.c:403
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53697
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #39 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-16
18:28:31 UTC ---
The issue of comment 24 is now fixed (comment 38). Thus, only the following
issues remain, which are all covered in other bugs (see dependency list):
* PR 50221: Allocatable string l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53642
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #38 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-16
18:13:42 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jun 16 18:13:38 2012
New Revision: 188692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188692
Log:
2012-06-16 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53642
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-16
18:13:43 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jun 16 18:13:38 2012
New Revision: 188692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188692
Log:
2012-06-16 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/53
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53696
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672
--- Comment #7 from John Forrest 2012-06-16
16:08:09 UTC ---
Sorry to say that when I was backing out some of my previous
work-arounds I got a segfault again.
John
On 15/06/12 20:46, bviyer at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53695
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53693
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
Niall Douglas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #8 from Niall Dougl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53699
Bug #: 53699
Summary: Missing "restrict" qualifier for OPTIONAL dummy
arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53698
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53675
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Zouzou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||internet at 123gen dot com
--- Comment #18 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53698
Bug #: 53698
Summary: ICE: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88 with -O -mx32
-maddress-mode=long -fno-tree-dominator-opts
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53697
Bug #: 53697
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in get_expr_operands, at
tree-ssa-operands.c:990 with lambda function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53696
Bug #: 53696
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
gimplify_decl_expr (gimplify.c:1454) with
-fkeep-inline-functions on invalid use of lambda
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53695
Bug #: 53695
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in dfs_enumerate_from, at
cfganal.c:1221 with -O2 -ftracer and labels/gotos
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-16
11:05:48 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Jun 16 11:05:43 2012
New Revision: 188691
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188691
Log:
PR middle-end/53590
* tree-inline.c (i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-16
10:50:48 UTC ---
That patch of comment 2 fails for:
testsuite/gfortran.dg/string_3.f90:16.15:
print *, len(s(2_8**32_8+3_8:1))
1
Error: Result of LEN overflows its kind at (1)
It als
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694
Bug #: 53694
Summary: [OOP] GENERIC type-bound procs should be available
without part-ref syntax
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52941
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-16
08:30:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Probably, you should update libjava/sysdep/sh/locks.h as well.
Just for the record, this was fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00971.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672
--- Comment #6 from John Forrest 2012-06-16
08:13:02 UTC ---
Balaji,
Thanks - seems to fix bug - now I can simplify my coding in various places.
John
On 15/06/12 20:46, bviyer at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
29 matches
Mail list logo