[Bug c++/53545] g++ 4.70 --std=c++11 generates no object file, issues no errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53545 --- Comment #3 from Anthony Hall 2012-06-01 04:29:26 UTC --- For what it's worth, I discovered the file will successfully compile (with the same compilation command as in original report) if I move the FirstStep, SecondStep, Yes, and No utility t

[Bug c/53548] New: allow flexible array members in unions like zero-length arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548 Bug #: 53548 Summary: allow flexible array members in unions like zero-length arrays Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50134] -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-01 00:38:41 UTC --- Updated patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg1.html

[Bug gcov-profile/53547] Changing the source file between -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use can lead to performance degradation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53547 --- Comment #1 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01 00:22:06 UTC --- Created attachment 27537 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27537 Proposed fix.

[Bug gcov-profile/53547] New: Changing the source file between -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use can lead to performance degradation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53547 Bug #: 53547 Summary: Changing the source file between -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use can lead to performance degradation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug gcov-profile/53546] New: gcc ICEs when using -fripa at varpool.c:45

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53546 Bug #: 53546 Summary: gcc ICEs when using -fripa at varpool.c:45 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug libstdc++/53543] [unordered_map] conflict with __is_convertible clang intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53543 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52667] sh_reorg segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52667 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-31 23:04:08 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu May 31 23:04:02 2012 New Revision: 188089 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188089 Log: Backport from mainline 2012-03-27 Chung-Lin

[Bug libstdc++/53543] [unordered_map] conflict with __is_convertible clang intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53543 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-31 23:02:24 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Thu May 31 23:02:18 2012 New Revision: 188088 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188088 Log: 2012-05-31 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc++/53

[Bug target/52642] SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-31 23:01:22 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu May 31 23:01:13 2012 New Revision: 188087 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188087 Log: Backport from mainline 2012-03-21 Kaz Kojim

[Bug c++/53545] g++ 4.70 --std=c++11 generates no object file, issues no errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53545 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC|glisse at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-05-3

[Bug libstdc++/53543] [unordered_map] conflict with __is_convertible clang intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53543 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/53545] g++ 4.70 --std=c++11 generates no object file, issues no errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53545 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug bootstrap/52700] lib* configure fails on --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52637] [4.7 regression] ICE producing debug info for c++11 code using local class as template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52637 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on|

[Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524 --- Comment #19 from Paul Pluzhnikov 2012-05-31 21:33:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > In any case I recommend not mixing together here different issues: I don't believe there are separate issues here. > the first > one, subject of this r

[Bug target/52971] gcc ICE with an sh64 cross-compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52971 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c++/53137] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at oracle dot |unassigned at gcc dot |

[Bug libstdc++/53543] [unordered_map] conflict with __is_convertible clang intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53543 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524 --- Comment #17 from Lawrence Crowl 2012-05-31 21:08:51 UTC --- > In any case I recommend not mixing together here different issues: > the first one, subject of this report, is overeager warning in open > enum context with conditional operators (

[Bug fortran/53544] Derived-type components in namelist group declaration produces error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53544 --- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf 2012-05-31 20:27:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > It is my understanding that the variables in a namelist group declaration must > not be a dummy array with non-constant bound, a variable with non-constant >

[Bug tree-optimization/52558] write introduction incorrect wrt the C++11 memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558 --- Comment #20 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-31 20:23:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Fixed on mainline. I doubt this will be fixed on 4.7, as this is too > intrusive-- unless one of the RMs really wants it on 4.7. OTOH, it woul

[Bug c++/53545] New: g++ 4.70 --std=c++11 generates no object file, issues no errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53545 Bug #: 53545 Summary: g++ 4.70 --std=c++11 generates no object file, issues no errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/53544] Derived-type components in namelist group declaration produces error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53544 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/52558] write introduction incorrect wrt the C++11 memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/52558] write introduction incorrect wrt the C++11 memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558 --- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-05-31 19:46:49 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Thu May 31 19:46:43 2012 New Revision: 188081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188081 Log: PR tree-optimization/52558 * cfg.

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.7/4.8 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #8 from Harald Anlauf 2012-05-31 19:46:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > The latter error is generated by a call to runtime_error_at in > the compiled program, while the former error in open must be > generated somewhere in st_ope

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.7/4.8 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf 2012-05-31 19:41:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > FWIW, if it is decided to change this, one could also consider changing > runtime_error() and internal_error() in the same way, though one would need to > au

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.7/4.8 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf 2012-05-31 19:39:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > FWIW, if it is decided to change this, one could also consider changing > runtime_error() and internal_error() in the same way, though one would need to > au

[Bug bootstrap/52007] configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52007 --- Comment #14 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-31 19:01:01 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Thu May 31 19:00:58 2012 New Revision: 188079 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188079 Log: 2012-05-31 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc

[Bug bootstrap/52007] configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52007 --- Comment #13 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-31 18:59:38 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Thu May 31 18:59:34 2012 New Revision: 188078 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188078 Log: 2012-05-31 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc

[Bug bootstrap/52007] configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52007 --- Comment #12 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-31 18:58:06 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Thu May 31 18:57:56 2012 New Revision: 188077 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188077 Log: 2012-05-31 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc

[Bug target/51007] [4.7 Regression] Quadmath I/O doesn't work on MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007 --- Comment #10 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-31 18:51:34 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Thu May 31 18:51:27 2012 New Revision: 188076 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188076 Log: 2012-05-31 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc

[Bug fortran/53544] New: Derived-type components in namelist group declaration produces error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53544 Bug #: 53544 Summary: Derived-type components in namelist group declaration produces error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug libstdc++/53543] [unordered_map] conflict with __is_convertible clang intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53543 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-31 17:48:06 UTC --- In any case I recommend not mixing together here different issues: the first one, subject of this report, is overeager warning in open enum context with conditional operators (I under

[Bug libstdc++/53543] New: [unordered_map] conflict with __is_convertible clang intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53543 Bug #: 53543 Summary: [unordered_map] conflict with __is_convertible clang intrinsic Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53540] C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONF

[Bug target/51345] [avr] Devices with 8-bit SP need their own multilib(s)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51345 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-31 17:32:48 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu May 31 17:32:42 2012 New Revision: 188070 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188070 Log: PR target/51345 * config/avr/avr.opt (-msp

[Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524 --- Comment #15 from Lawrence Crowl 2012-05-31 17:18:49 UTC --- > When we emit the warning, arg2_type and arg3_type are the types > of arg2 and arg3, thus, post PR16603, exactly the types of the > two initializing expressions, because we are stil

[Bug libstdc++/21334] Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #47 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-31 16:42:27 UTC --- 21.4.1 [string.require] says that the non-const forms of operator[], at, front, back, begin, rbegin, end and rend may not invalidate references, pointers and iterators (so must not

[Bug fortran/53537] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Explicit IMPORT of renamed USE-associated symbol fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53537 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-31 16:30:53 UTC --- The patch of comment 1 fails for testsuite/gfortran.dg/import7.f90: TYPE(T3) X 1 Error: The type of 'x' at (1) has not been declared within the i

[Bug target/53538] Compile error with ARM NEON intrinsics and certain compile flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53538 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug target/53538] Compile error with ARM NEON intrinsics and certain compile flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53538 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/21334] Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #46 from tlknv at yandex dot ru 2012-05-31 16:13:15 UTC --- Thanks Jonathan. I didn't know about the new 23.2.2 requirements. > but then a COW string is non-conforming in other ways too Which ways? I know that I should read the standard

[Bug libstdc++/21334] Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #45 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-31 15:54:05 UTC --- Thanks for the patch, I'll take a look asap. Just to answer this older comment ... (In reply to comment #35) > Who said that calling begin() on a non const std::string should be t

[Bug c++/53484] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [c++11] Wrong auto in lambdas in function templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53484 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/53537] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Explicit IMPORT of renamed USE-associated symbol fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53537 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-31 15:22:37 UTC --- Side effect of that patch: In error messages, the original instead of the renamed symbol name appears. That's independent of this PR and due to the way USE handles renames. I have now

[Bug fortran/53542] New: Diagnostic of USE-associated variables shows original instead of renamed symbol name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53542 Bug #: 53542 Summary: Diagnostic of USE-associated variables shows original instead of renamed symbol name Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 St

[Bug fortran/53537] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Explicit IMPORT of renamed USE-associated symbol fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53537 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53541] gcc-4.6.2 segfaults on dumping tree information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53541 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53541] gcc-4.6.2 segfaults on dumping tree information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53541 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53541] gcc-4.6.2 segfaults on dumping tree information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53541 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-31 15:03:44 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu May 31 15:03:37 2012 New Revision: 188066 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188066 Log: 2012-05-31 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug middle-end/53541] gcc-4.6.2 segfaults on dumping tree information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53541 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-31 15:02:00 UTC --- Hm, we dump from remove_bb - such BB can obviously contain invalid stmts. The 4.7 branch has /* Released SSA_NAMES have no TREE_TYPE. */ && TR

[Bug middle-end/53541] gcc-4.6.2 segfaults on dumping tree information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53541 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/53541] New: gcc-4.6.2 segfaults on dumping tree information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53541 Bug #: 53541 Summary: gcc-4.6.2 segfaults on dumping tree information Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Pri

[Bug libstdc++/21334] Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #44 from tlknv at yandex dot ru 2012-05-31 14:43:14 UTC --- Thanks Marc. I have posted my patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg02086.html This is essentially a couple of line change so I hope I don't need to find and si

[Bug c++/53540] New: C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 Bug #: 53540 Summary: C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/52905] [C++0x] ice on invalid brace-enclosed initializer of vector of enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52905 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.1 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/53500] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error in joust()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52905] [C++0x] ice on invalid brace-enclosed initializer of vector of enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52905 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-05-31 14:28:46 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 31 14:28:41 2012 New Revision: 188063 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188063 Log: PR c++/53500 PR c++/52905 * call.c (jou

[Bug c++/53500] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error in joust()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2012-05-31 14:28:45 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 31 14:28:41 2012 New Revision: 188063 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188063 Log: PR c++/53500 PR c++/52905 * call.c (jo

[Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-31 14:28:46 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu May 31 14:28:41 2012 New Revision: 188062 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188062 Log: 2012-05-31 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/53

[Bug libstdc++/43852] Embedded systems friendly libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|redi at gcc dot

[Bug c++/53500] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error in joust()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-31 13:15:39 UTC --- Created attachment 27531 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27531 pr53500.ii Somewhat reduced testcase for -std=c++11, though not really small.

[Bug target/53539] New: Different __WCHAR_TYPE__/wchar_t for gcc -m32 on Linux/i386 and Linux/x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53539 Bug #: 53539 Summary: Different __WCHAR_TYPE__/wchar_t for gcc -m32 on Linux/i386 and Linux/x86-64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UN

[Bug c++/53500] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error in joust()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2012-05-27 00:00:0

[Bug tree-optimization/53336] [4.8 Regression] invalid types in nop conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53336 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/53510] [4.8 Regression] OOM while compile some code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53510 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/53532] function call ignored when called with argument of incompatible, undefined structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53532 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/53538] New: Compile error with ARM NEON intrinsics and certain compile flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53538 Bug #: 53538 Summary: Compile error with ARM NEON intrinsics and certain compile flags Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/48493] [4.6 Regression] ice in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 with complex types and mem_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.1 Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr

[Bug middle-end/48493] [4.6 Regression] ice in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 with complex types and mem_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.1 Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr

[Bug middle-end/48493] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ice in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 with complex types and mem_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 --- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-31 11:06:39 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu May 31 11:06:35 2012 New Revision: 188058 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188058 Log: 2012-05-31 Richard Guenther PR middle

[Bug middle-end/48493] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ice in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 with complex types and mem_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 --- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-31 11:02:32 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu May 31 11:02:29 2012 New Revision: 188056 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188056 Log: 2012-05-31 Richard Guenther PR middle

[Bug fortran/53537] New: Abstract interface with import interferes with only-clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53537 Bug #: 53537 Summary: Abstract interface with import interferes with only-clause Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-31 10:48:19 UTC --- On Thu, 31 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-31 > 10:42:10 UT

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-31 10:42:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > On Thu, 31 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > > > --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcaz

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-31 10:36:10 UTC --- > I'll test it on i?85-linux as well. I don't have access to a > strict-alignment platform - but the patch is essentially the same > as on trunk. Can you give it a shot on sparc or

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-31 10:36:10 UTC --- > I'll test it on i?85-linux as well. I don't have access to a > strict-alignment platform - but the patch is essentially the same > as on trunk. Can you give it a shot on sparc or

[Bug middle-end/53093] [4.8 Regression]: tls/alias-1.c ICE, emutls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53093 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53533] [4.7 regression] loop unrolling as measured by Adobe's C++Benchmark is twice as slow versus 4.4-4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-31 08:41:00 UTC --- On Wed, 30 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-30 > 15:28:1

[Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-31 08:19:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > That is clearly a bug in the Fortran FE. > > D.1888 = __builtin_realloc (atmp.0.data, D.1887); > ... > > if (D.1887

[Bug c++/33661] template methods forget explicit local reg vars

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661 --- Comment #10 from Aleksandrs Saveljevs 2012-05-31 08:16:41 UTC --- Confirming that the bug still exists on ARM, x86 and x86_64 as of GCC 4.6.3.

[Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug java/53527] 4.7.0 release can't enable java language

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53527 licheng.1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #3 from liche

[Bug middle-end/48493] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ice in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 with complex types and mem_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493 --- Comment #14 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-05-31 07:08:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Can somebody test ... > on arm? Testing 4.7 + proposed fix on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi right now, expect results in about 30 hours.