[Bug other/53285] libibiberty's md5.c builds with warnings with 4.7 and trunk

2012-05-27 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53285 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose 2012-05-28 06:42:37 UTC --- the patch is incomplete. the patch from glibc is found at http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=patch;h=7dc6bd90c569c49807462b0740b18e32fab4d8b7 using anonymous unions which cann

[Bug libstdc++/53504] New: configure script of platform TLS support.

2012-05-27 Thread lyricconch at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53504 Bug #: 53504 Summary: configure script of platform TLS support. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug other/53285] libibiberty's md5.c builds with warnings with 4.7 and trunk

2012-05-27 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53285 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2012-05-28 04:38:50 UTC --- Created attachment 27511 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27511 patch taken from glibc the md5.c copy in glibc was fixed with the attached patch

[Bug c++/53503] New: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

2012-05-27 Thread liling at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 Bug #: 53503 Summary: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/53502] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

2012-05-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-27 23:42:17 UTC --- The warning is correct, the typedef is unused. The enum is not but the typedef to the enum is unused.

[Bug c/53502] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

2012-05-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Known to work|

[Bug c/53502] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

2012-05-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
g25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Boot> gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/ig25/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/ig25 --enable-languages=c,fortran Thread model: posix gcc

[Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 due to expand's temp slot goo

2012-05-27 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug middle-end/51389] GCC uses up to 75GB of virtual memory

2012-05-27 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-27 23:14:03 UTC --- If this is fixed for GCC 4.7, why leave the bug report open? Do you plan to back-port a similar fix to older release branches?

[Bug tree-optimization/18687] >200% compile time regression compared to gcc-3.4

2012-05-27 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/53343] [4.8 regression] options.c:9944:1: error: no previous prototype for 'common_handle_option_auto' breaks bootstrap

2012-05-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53343 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/53501] New: incorrect loop optimization with -O2

2012-05-27 Thread misof at gcc dot ksp.sk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53501 Bug #: 53501 Summary: incorrect loop optimization with -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/53343] [4.8 regression] options.c:9944:1: error: no previous prototype for 'common_handle_option_auto' breaks bootstrap

2012-05-27 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53343 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-05-27 21:05:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > >--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx > > Is there a reason why you are using this option? Yes, 1. It's a valid option, and it doesn't disable any func

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread pogonyshev at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #6 from Paul Pogonyshev 2012-05-27 20:03:40 UTC --- Created attachment 27508 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27508 much reduced testcase not using any libraries other than libstdc++ gcc-4.7 -std=c++11 -save-temps

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-27 19:57:45 UTC --- Though with -ftime-report I get an internal error: /usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/alloc_traits.h:48:11: internal compiler error: in timevar_start, at timevar.c:344

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-27 19:56:43 UTC --- It compiles on the trunk. Though takes a long time.

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-27 19:49:56 UTC --- Please do your best to reduce the testcase, normally less than ~100 lines are enough: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction In any case a preprocessed .ii must be

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread pogonyshev at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #2 from Paul Pogonyshev 2012-05-27 19:33:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't see it being attached. Apparently it got eaten as too large. Please see http://rghost.net/38322304

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-27 19:11:41 UTC --- > I attached the /tmp/... file. I don't see it being attached.

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug c++/53500] New: internal compiler error in joust()

2012-05-27 Thread pogonyshev at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 Bug #: 53500 Summary: internal compiler error in joust() Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug c/53467] xgcc:Internal error: Bus error (program cc1)

2012-05-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-27 16:45:29 UTC --- The core file was not generated by gcc, as gdb says it came from cc1

[Bug c++/53498] Compiler crashes during C++11 template magic compilation

2012-05-27 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler 2012-05-27 16:09:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > As you mention it, you don't accidently know, how a correct version would > look? This request would be off-topic here, but I responded off-list to you.

[Bug c/53467] xgcc:Internal error: Bus error (program cc1)

2012-05-27 Thread dokumentarfilme at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467 --- Comment #5 from martin 2012-05-27 16:06:59 UTC --- Comment on attachment 27506 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27506 core - debug for gdb gdb $(which gcc) ./core GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation,

[Bug c/53467] xgcc:Internal error: Bus error (program cc1)

2012-05-27 Thread dokumentarfilme at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467 --- Comment #4 from martin 2012-05-27 16:03:35 UTC --- Created attachment 27507 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27507 df-core.o debug for gdb

[Bug c/53467] xgcc:Internal error: Bus error (program cc1)

2012-05-27 Thread dokumentarfilme at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467 --- Comment #3 from martin 2012-05-27 16:01:23 UTC --- Created attachment 27506 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27506 debug for gdb created with ulimit -c unlimited & make --debug CFLAGS='-g -O0'

[Bug c++/53498] Compiler crashes during C++11 template magic compilation

2012-05-27 Thread o.mangold at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498 --- Comment #2 from o.mangold at googlemail dot com 2012-05-27 15:33:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > While the test code is somewhat broken, Yes, I'm not surprised, this template stuff is a complete nightmare to me. As you mention it, you d

[Bug c++/53498] Compiler crashes during C++11 template magic compilation

2012-05-27 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug c++/53499] Incorrect partial ordering result with member vs non-member

2012-05-27 Thread schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53499 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub 2012-05-27 14:00:20 UTC --- Sorry, GCC picks the same function (non-member) disregarding of the C++ Standards mode. The comments were a left-over from a clang bug report.

[Bug c++/53499] New: Incorrect partial ordering result with member vs non-member

2012-05-27 Thread schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53499 Bug #: 53499 Summary: Incorrect partial ordering result with member vs non-member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53498] New: Compiler crashes during C++11 template magic compilation

2012-05-27 Thread o.mangold at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498 Bug #: 53498 Summary: Compiler crashes during C++11 template magic compilation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53439] g++ generates buggy code with optimisation flags

2012-05-27 Thread christophe.prudhomme at feelpp dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53439 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Prud'homme 2012-05-27 11:59:46 UTC --- the preprocessed sources files are here (about 3MB) http://feelpp.googlecode.com/files/feel-gcc-ifiles.tar.gz see initial email

[Bug c++/53497] New: Partial ordering of function templates does not order lvalue/rvalue references correctly

2012-05-27 Thread vlukas at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53497 Bug #: 53497 Summary: Partial ordering of function templates does not order lvalue/rvalue references correctly Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug ada/50934] Attribute Max_Size_In_Storage_Elements is wrong for controlled types

2012-05-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50934 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug ada/50934] Attribute Max_Size_In_Storage_Elements is wrong for controlled types

2012-05-27 Thread simon at pushface dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50934 --- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org 2012-05-27 10:22:42 UTC --- This problem has been fixed in the released 4.7.0.