[Bug bootstrap/52644] [4.8 Regression] ICE in stage2: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have '0' (rtx reg) in ix86_decompose_address, at config/i386/i386.c:11522

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52644 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gcov-profile/52627] [4.8 Regression] Build of libgcc fails w/o __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT: error: 'mx' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/52648] remove string literal by preprocessor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52648 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/52648] New: remove string literal by preprocessor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52648 Bug #: 52648 Summary: remove string literal by preprocessor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/52647] Method from global namespace not selected in anonymous namespace when an overload of said method already exists in the anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52647 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52647] New: Method from global namespace not selected in anonymous namespace when an overload of said method already exists in the anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52647 Bug #: 52647 Summary: Method from global namespace not selected in anonymous namespace when an overload of said method already exists in the anonymous namespace Classification: Unc

[Bug other/52646] Clang LLVM's __attribute__((naked)) for GCC when compiling for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52646 --- Comment #4 from Tyler Hardin 2012-03-21 01:07:20 UTC --- If I care enough to implement them for x86, do you believe it would be included in GCC? If not, I won't waste my time with it (while it's worth my time to implement it, it's not worth m

[Bug other/52646] Clang LLVM's __attribute__((naked)) for GCC when compiling for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52646 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug other/52646] Clang LLVM's __attribute__((naked)) for GCC when compiling for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52646 --- Comment #2 from Tyler Hardin 2012-03-21 00:44:39 UTC --- While I admit my knowledge of interrupts on ARM, AVR, CR16, Epiphany, M32C, M32R/D, m68k, MeP, MIPS, RL78, RX and Xstormy16 is limited; I don't see why, if GCC supports interrupts on al

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/52646] Clang LLVM's __attribute__((naked)) for GCC when compiling for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52646 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/25967] Add attribute naked for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25967 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||th020394 at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug other/52646] New: Clang LLVM's __attribute__((naked)) for GCC when compiling for x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52646 Bug #: 52646 Summary: Clang LLVM's __attribute__((naked)) for GCC when compiling for x86 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/52631] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] VN does not use simplified expression for lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-21 00:14:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hmm, but then you'd pessimize the case where b_2 & 1 were available? Thus, > don't you need to do the lookup with the original expression anyway if the > lo

[Bug libgcj/52645] New: gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 Bug #: 52645 Summary: gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #1 from Jan Smets 2012-03-20 23:45:27 UTC --- I'd like to note that this code compiles in a few seconds in GCC 3.4. Thanks Neil for making this profile.

[Bug c++/52595] [DR 325] commas and non-static data member initializers don't mix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-20 23:00:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > So, what's going on? Was the commit for PR51666 incomplete, so to speak? Maybe it was incomplete but then again the Defect report is still open though there

[Bug middle-end/51893] Wrong subword index computation in store_bit_field_1 on BIG_ENDIAN targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26912|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/52644] RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have '0' (rtx reg) in ix86_decompose_address, at config/i386/i386.c:11522[4.8 Regression] ICE in stage2:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52644 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-03-20 21:42:26 UTC --- Created attachment 26937 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26937 preprocessed source $ /home/smatz/build-185559-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/sma

[Bug bootstrap/52644] New: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have '0' (rtx reg) in ix86_decompose_address, at config/i386/i386.c:11522[4.8 Regression] ICE in stage2:

-rtl-df/gcc/xgcc Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df --enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran --prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-185559-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/ --with-cloog --with-ppl --with-cloog-include=/usr/include/clo

[Bug target/5360] [SH] Useless address inc-dec sequence for DFmode access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5360 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2004-01-01 21:00:39 |2012-03-20 CC|

[Bug c++/52643] New: Stack overflow ICE in cc1plus when templates, exceptions, and continue out of try used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52643 Bug #: 52643 Summary: Stack overflow ICE in cc1plus when templates, exceptions, and continue out of try used Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug target/52642] SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #36 from Oleg Endo 2012-03-20 20:33:30 UTC --- I have created a new PR 52642 for the libstdc++ failures.

[Bug target/52642] New: SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642 Bug #: 52642 Summary: SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Stat

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-20 19:38:57 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Mar 20 19:38:51 2012 New Revision: 185588 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185588 Log: PR testsuite/52641 * gcc.dg/torture/pr4812

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/52641] New: Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 Bug #: 52641 Summary: Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug c++/52510] [4.8 regression] libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc doesn't compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52510 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-20 19:14:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 20 19:14:29 2012 New Revision: 185587 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185587 Log: PR c++/52510 * decl.c (reshape_init_class):

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20 19:09:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Not sure what kernel you are looking at, but in current kernel at least since > 2009-09 BUILD_BUG_ON is BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO and only MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON mac

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse 2012-03-20 19:05:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > If I am not mistaken, the V8SF shuffle 22022246 is doable by a vperm2f128 that > takes 01234567 to 01230123, followed by a vshufps (mask 138 maybe). Was your

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse 2012-03-20 19:00:32 UTC --- If I am not mistaken, the V8SF shuffle 22022246 is doable by a vperm2f128 that takes 01234567 to 01230123, followed by a vshufps (mask 138 maybe). Was your patch supposed to handle it?

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 dcb changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |c++ --- Comment #1 from dcb 2012-03-20 18:50:21 UT

[Bug tree-optimization/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-20 18:35:50 UTC --- The patch in comment #2 fixes the PR without side effect on the polyhedron test suite (AFAICT;-). Currently bootstrapping r185584, regtesting scheduled for tonight. Thanks for t

[Bug c/52640] New: performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Bug #: 52640 Summary: performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c/52639] New: ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 Bug #: 52639 Summary: ice in supportable_widening_operation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-20 18:06:33 UTC --- Not sure what kernel you are looking at, but in current kernel at least since 2009-09 BUILD_BUG_ON is BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO and only MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON macro is using this sizeof and from

[Bug c++/52638] New: ice in build_vector_from_val

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638 Bug #: 52638 Summary: ice in build_vector_from_val Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20 17:26:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Do you have an example not involving __builtin_constant_p? Unfortunately no. The example is just a cleaned up and reduced version of the one from PR526

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen 2012-03-20 17:21:21 UTC --- Adding -fno-common fixes the failures on powerpc64 also.

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-20 16:51:50 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 20 16:51:41 2012 New Revision: 185579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185579 Log: PR target/52607 * config/i386/i386.c (expa

[Bug lto/51663] LTO does not reclaim comdat-local statics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2012-03-20 16:49:44 UTC --- OK, the funny inconsistency comes from the fact that we always eliminate COMDAT variables, but we keep around static variables with -fno-toplevel-reorder. -O0 imply -fno-toplevel-reorder

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2012-03-20 16:37:04 UTC --- For the single testcase I've been using for the reghunt (gcc.dg/vect/vect-109.c), adding -fno-common fixes the failure. On SPARC, one probably also has to add -fno-common to gcc.target/

[Bug c/51206] Building Cross-Compiler for Linux/x86_64 multilibs fails due to FLAGS_FOR_TARGET

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51206 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com, ktietz

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-20 16:26:08 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 20 16:25:54 2012 New Revision: 185577 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185577 Log: PR target/52607 * config/i386/i386.md ("is

[Bug middle-end/51893] Wrong subword index computation in store_bit_field_1 on BIG_ENDIAN targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893 --- Comment #9 from Aurelien Buhrig 2012-03-20 16:22:52 UTC --- Do you need additional information about this bug? Any comment about the provided patch?

[Bug tree-optimization/51737] [4.6 Regression] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2012-03-20 16:19:55 UTC --- Created attachment 26932 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26932 patch in testing I am testing the attached patch. It basically delays removal of the clone until aft

[Bug c++/52625] Incorrect specialization semantics of friend class template declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #4 from Greta Yorsh 2012-03-20 16:01:02 UTC --- These tests pass on arm-none-eabi with the option -fno-common. Thank you, Greta

[Bug tree-optimization/52571] vectorizer changes alignment of common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-20 15:56:55 UTC --- > PR52603. Could you test the patch? Sorry, pr52614.

[Bug tree-optimization/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/52571] vectorizer changes alignment of common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-20 15:55:23 UTC --- > Unfortunately, the patch caused many testsuite failures on both > sparc-sun-solaris > and powerpc-apple-darwin, as can be seen e.g. at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresu

[Bug fortran/52622] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 --- Comment #2 from Adrian Prantl 2012-03-20 15:33:40 UTC --- I'm getting the error with both gcc 4.6.2 and 4.6.3 Below is the stack trace. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. resolve_symbol (sym=0x14091b0) at ../../gcc-4.6.2/gc

[Bug c++/52637] New: ICE producing debug info for c++11 code using templates/decltype/lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52637 Bug #: 52637 Summary: ICE producing debug info for c++11 code using templates/decltype/lambda Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/52571] vectorizer changes alignment of common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug middle-end/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-03-20 15:13:13 UTC --- On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote: > > cat bug.c > extern int bar; > void foo(void) > { > (void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * !__builtin_constant_p(bar)]); >

[Bug middle-end/52636] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 Bug #: 52636 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324 Classification: Unclassified Product:

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-20 14:55:42 UTC --- 2 t1.o 3 164 2f48a666878dc458 PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP main 169 2f48a666878dc458 UNDEF baz 173 2f48a666878dc458 RESOLVED_IR cfliteValueCallBacks t2.o 2 164 9f18e45b84a4baf8 PREVAIL

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 --- Comment #3 from Bin Tian 2012-03-20 14:16:49 UTC --- The bug is reproducable with -r -flto-partition=1to1, and not with -r -flto-partition=none. My project is hard to reduce because of complex dependencies. It seems that if the call graph is

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 --- Comment #2 from Bin Tian 2012-03-20 14:16:02 UTC --- Created attachment 26931 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26931 patch for make-3.82

[Bug bootstrap/52623] 4.7.0-RC-20120314: bootstrap failure on AIX due to multilib and using C++ in post-stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52487] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] ICE at cp/semantics.c:5613 with lambda capturing reference to incomplete type by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52487 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug go/52583] Several new go testsuite failues on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583 --- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-20 13:48:51 UTC --- > --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2012-03-16 09:55:26 UTC --- [...] > I'm now running into > > --- FAIL: net.TestMulticas

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20 13:18:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm not aware of such a bug. Please file a separate bug report in > Bugzilla with a testcase for this "erroneously omits the compile-time > error for

[Bug c/52635] New: gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 Bug #: 52635 Summary: gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto CC|

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-20 12:48:20 UTC --- In principle I have no problem with such zeroings, make sense, but it's been a while since the last time I looked into this code and I fear races. In any case, please try to fully run

[Bug c++/52596] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in lvalue_kind, at cp/tree.c:153

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-20 12:33:16 UTC --- Oops, sorry, mainline still ICEs, had checking disabled.

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #3 from Laurent Aflonsi 2012-03-20 12:31:31 UTC --- Well, in fact I am facing a runtime crash on another target (SH4). The crash is fixed by the patch proposed previously. On the other hand, I ve tried to reproduce on x86, to easily

[Bug lto/52634] New: multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Bug #: 52634 Summary: multiple definition error when using alias Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/52618] Explicit template specialization ignores access rights

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52618 --- Comment #2 from blobbyvolley at mailmetrash dot com 2012-03-20 11:53:29 UTC --- If it can be of any help, I noticed that for partial specializations everything works as intended (the compiler reports an error). class B { typedef double type

[Bug bootstrap/52601] Gcc build fails at "Making all in tools" with "find: bad option -path" and "find: path-list predicate-list"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52601 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-20 11:48:47 UTC --- > Is this correct or should i again compiled gcc-4.4.4 to get complete > successful compilation ? If you still have the build tree around, do rm -rf sparc-sun-solaris2.9/boehm-gc sp

[Bug target/49868] Implement named address space to place/access data in flash memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868 --- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-20 11:32:59 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Mar 20 11:32:54 2012 New Revision: 185570 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185570 Log: PR target/49868 * gcc.target/avr/torture/

[Bug c++/52595] [DR 325] commas and non-static data member initializers don't mix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #2 from Greta Yorsh 2012-03-20 11:24:41 UTC --- The tests reported in PR52603 are still failing on arm (last tested on trunk r185474).

[Bug fortran/51802] [OOP] Duplicate mangling for OOP symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-20 11:22:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I agree completely. However, once 4.7 is released, should we be excessively > pristine about ABI breakage in trunk? It is, after all, the development > ver

[Bug gcov-profile/52627] [4.8 Regression] Build of libgcc fails w/o __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT: error: 'mx' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52630] [4.7 regression] ICE when compiling ppl-0.12 testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52630 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guen

[Bug gcov-profile/52627] [4.8 Regression] Build of libgcc fails w/o __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT: error: 'mx' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-20 11:19:01 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 20 11:18:57 2012 New Revision: 185569 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185569 Log: 2012-03-20 Richard Guenther PR gcov-pr

[Bug tree-optimization/52631] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] VN does not use simplified expression for lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-20 11:13:57 UTC --- Hmm, but then you'd pessimize the case where b_2 & 1 were available? Thus, don't you need to do the lookup with the original expression anyway if the lookup for the simplified expr

[Bug c++/52613] [C++11] ICE with noexcept in lambda expression in member function of class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52613 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52633] [4.7 Regression] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1 (ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52633 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||armv7hl-*-gnueabi Known to work|

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-03-20 11:09:43 UTC --- On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote: > either a compile-time error or a link-time error (the latter because gcc > erroneously omits the compile-time error

[Bug c++/52596] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in lvalue_kind, at cp/tree.c:153

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-20 11:06:40 UTC --- No ICE anymore in mainline for the reduced testcase in Comment #1. Instead, with -std=c++11 only we reject it with: 52596.C: In member function ‘T* zone::allocate()’: 52596.C:14:35: e

[Bug c++/52619] ICE/segmentation fault in lambda function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52619 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-20 11:03:00 UTC --- The crash happens in lvalue_kind: an INDIRECT_REF with no TREE_TYPE.

[Bug fortran/52606] Confusing diagnostics for long identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-20 10:58:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already support > 1) long symbol names (I read somewhere that OpenOffice has symbols up to 4000

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20 10:55:49 UTC --- The test case, obviously based on the Linux kernel's BUILD_BUG_ON() macro, behaves exactly as intended: since `offset' is not in fact a constant it causes either a compile-time err

[Bug c++/52619] ICE/segmentation fault in lambda function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52619 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51802] [OOP] Duplicate mangling for OOP symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas 2012-03-20 10:52:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > That that changing this will break the ABI. Thus, it can only be done when we > have to break the ABI. That will happen for the new array descriptor. > > (Thi

[Bug fortran/52606] Confusing diagnostics for long identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-03-20 10:27:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Indeed, one can construct examples which exceed the length: Namely module > procedures or module variables. The problem is that GFC_MAX_MANGLED_SYMBOL_LEN

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-03-20 10:03:47 UTC --- Created attachment 26929 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26929 Test case

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "&a" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-03-20 09:51:00 UTC --- On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, liujiangning at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 > > --- Comment #6 from Jiangning Liu > 2012-03-20 02:32:

[Bug gcov-profile/52627] [4.8 Regression] Build of libgcc fails w/o __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT: error: 'mx' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >