[Bug ada/52110] s-osinte.ads:447:09: "clockid_t" conflicts with declaration at line 194

2012-03-11 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-12 06:46:41 UTC --- > Build is successful with pragma Volatile in lieu of the Atomic. > However, test results appear similar: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01197.html OK, let's use p

[Bug target/52488] avr-*: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-03-11 Thread ralf_corsepius at rtems dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52488 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2012-03-12 06:21:42 UTC --- Created attachment 26876 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26876 *.i of the file triggering the ICE This *.i was created from today's (ca. 2012-03-12 05:00 UTC) gc

[Bug libitm/52482] libitm INVALID MNEMONIC in .S (powerpc asm)

2012-03-11 Thread fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482 --- Comment #5 from David Fang 2012-03-12 02:28:49 UTC --- Reran using entire set of odcctools-20090808 (passed through configure), looks like same failures: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01296.html

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

2012-03-11 Thread fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 --- Comment #15 from David Fang 2012-03-12 02:26:40 UTC --- I see this test failing on powerpc-apple-darwin8 (32b G4, ppc7400): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01296.html Is this specific to 64b, or should it also work for 32b pp

[Bug ada/52110] s-osinte.ads:447:09: "clockid_t" conflicts with declaration at line 194

2012-03-11 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2012-03-12 00:04:35 UTC --- Build is successful with pragma Volatile in lieu of the Atomic. However, test results appear similar: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg01197.html

[Bug middle-end/52450] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O1 and above

2012-03-11 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end --- Comment #6 from John D

[Bug fortran/38199] missed optimization: I/O performance

2012-03-11 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/51239] ICE with variadic template alias

2012-03-11 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51239 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED --- Comment #3 from Dodji Seke

[Bug target/52488] avr-*: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

2012-03-11 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52488 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/52474] Regression: AVR-GCC: arithmetics produce completely wrong result

2012-03-11 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52474 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/52218] [4.7/4.8 Regression] libgo ftbfs on arm-linux-gnueabi (unknown case for SETCONTEXT_CLOBBERS_TLS)

2012-03-11 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52218 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/52557] Timex undefined on arm-linux-gnueabi

2012-03-11 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52557 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2012-03-11 20:35:42 UTC --- with the following hack, I'm able to build on arm, and run the tests. --- libgo/mksysinfo.sh~ 2012-03-11 00:36:59.0 + +++ libgo/mksysinfo.sh 2012-03-11 19:17:15.

[Bug libstdc++/52540] std::use_facet throws bad_cast when compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2012-03-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52540 --- Comment #11 from Pawel Sikora 2012-03-11 19:49:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Then this is a very old issue, isn't it? Why nobody noticed it before? To be > clear, in debug-mode we don't use extern templates only for basic_string > (be

[Bug target/52530] [4.8 regression] Many 64-bit execution failures on Solaris 10/11 with Sun as

2012-03-11 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52530 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-11 19:48:02 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Sun Mar 11 19:47:58 2012 New Revision: 185201 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185201 Log: PR target/52530 * gcc.dg/torture/pr

[Bug libstdc++/52540] std::use_facet throws bad_cast when compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2012-03-11 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52540 --- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2012-03-11 18:35:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Then this is a very old issue, isn't it? Why nobody noticed it before? To be > clear, in debug-mode we don't use extern templates only for basic_string > (becau

[Bug go/52557] New: Timex undefined on arm-linux-gnueabi

2012-03-11 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52557 Bug #: 52557 Summary: Timex undefined on arm-linux-gnueabi Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libfortran/52537] slow trim function

2012-03-11 Thread talebi.hossein at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537 --- Comment #3 from Hossein Talebi 2012-03-11 17:27:42 UTC --- Hello, Hummm, a self contained example... That will be possible when I go back to the office. I can also check it myself with a simpler example. For now, maybe you can figure out som

[Bug libfortran/52537] slow trim function

2012-03-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/52556] Ability to change GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER

2012-03-11 Thread christer.solskogen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52556 --- Comment #3 from Christer Solskogen 2012-03-11 15:50:57 UTC --- I could, but is not a sexy(*) as --with-runtime-root-prefix :-) *) http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/80538/

[Bug driver/52556] Ability to change GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER

2012-03-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52556 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

2012-03-11 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #32 from Oleg Endo 2012-03-11 13:18:12 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Mar 11 13:18:08 2012 New Revision: 185192 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185192 Log: PR target/51244 * config/sh/sh.md (movnegt)

[Bug driver/52556] Ability to change GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER

2012-03-11 Thread christer.solskogen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52556 --- Comment #1 from Christer Solskogen 2012-03-11 12:54:45 UTC --- I see now that the google gcc branch is having this kind of ability. Any plans of integrating them?

[Bug driver/52556] New: Ability to change GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER

2012-03-11 Thread christer.solskogen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52556 Bug #: 52556 Summary: Ability to change GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Prio

[Bug libstdc++/52540] std::use_facet throws bad_cast when compiled with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

2012-03-11 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52540 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-11 11:20:40 UTC --- Then this is a very old issue, isn't it? Why nobody noticed it before? To be clear, in debug-mode we don't use extern templates only for basic_string (because _GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE