http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52364
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-02-24 05:00:55
UTC ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg01222.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52368
Bug #: 52368
Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at
expr.c:326
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52283
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-23
23:25:53 UTC ---
Maybe not fold but rather what I am working on, gimple_combine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52367
Bug #: 52367
Summary: Many incorrect thumb insn lengths
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52366
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52335
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52335
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-23
22:54:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Feb 23 22:54:26 2012
New Revision: 184535
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184535
Log:
2012-02-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52335
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-23
22:53:58 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Feb 23 22:53:54 2012
New Revision: 184534
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184534
Log:
2012-02-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52351
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-23
22:34:31 UTC ---
The issue seems to be in gfc_conv_array_parameter - or rather in the called
gfc_conv_expr_descriptor. There, one has:
full = gfc_full_array_ref_p (info->ref, NULL);
if (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-23
22:15:53 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Feb 23 22:15:44 2012
New Revision: 184531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184531
Log:
PR bootstrap/52287
* haifa-sched.c (ra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-23
22:15:05 UTC ---
> Maybe get away with these old-stylish names ('tree' and 'fold') and
> make it match reality, gimple-ssa-combine.c ;)
That sounds like a good idea. I have done that.
>
> Still ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52366
Bug #: 52366
Summary: [c++11] static constexpr function cant initialize
static constexpr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #26 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-23
21:55:57 UTC ---
Posted to gcc-patches as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg01209.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #25 from Mike Stump 2012-02-23
21:53:04 UTC ---
Ok.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52365
Bug #: 52365
Summary: Procedure interface wrongly imported into interface
without IMPORT
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-23 21:02:32
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Feb 23 21:02:27 2012
New Revision: 184526
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184526
Log:
PR libffi/52221
* src/x86/ffi.c (ffi_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #24 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-23
20:13:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 26739
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26739
fix both PR52179 and revert hack from PR49461
I propose the following patch which both fixes PR52179
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-23
19:26:06 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Feb 23 19:26:00 2012
New Revision: 184522
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184522
Log:
PR target/52261
* config/avr/lib1funcs.S (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52363
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52364
Bug #: 52364
Summary: The unnecessary second form in *movabs_[12]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #23 from Mike Stump 2012-02-23
18:56:31 UTC ---
I think the patch in 17 is Ok.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #22 from Patrick Marlier
2012-02-23 18:52:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> > > Where do you want the second change made?
> >
> > Let me repeat myself:
> >
> > the code is in boehm-gc/include/private
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-23
18:50:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> > Where do you want the second change made?
>
> Let me repeat myself:
>
> the code is in boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h, so the patch should change
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #20 from Mike Stump 2012-02-23
18:45:28 UTC ---
> Where do you want the second change made?
Let me repeat myself:
the code is in boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h, so the patch should change
the ifdef
DARWIN block there.
In the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52363
Bug #: 52363
Summary: Presence/absence of -pedantic compilation affects
run-time behavior
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-23
18:37:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I've not had time to investigate - but suspect it is related to operating
> close to stack limits -- if you try reducing the number of recursions (like
>
but
boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c execution test still hangs on occasion at -m64.
This appears as...
Leaked composite object at 0x10a908fe0
(/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-20120223/boehm-gc/testsuite/boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c:12,
sz=4, NORMAL)
Leaked composite object at 0x10a908ec0
(/sw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-23
18:24:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 26737
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26737
reduced patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52286
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-23
18:20:26 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 23 18:20:19 2012
New Revision: 184520
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184520
Log:
Backported from trunk
2012-02-20 Georg-Jo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
Bug #: 52362
Summary: gnat.dg/lto8.adb FAILs with gas/gld
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52290
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52290
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-23 18:03:47 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Feb 23 18:03:33 2012
New Revision: 184518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184518
Log:
PR c/52290
* c-decl.c (start_functio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52290
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-23 18:01:54 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Feb 23 18:01:45 2012
New Revision: 184517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184517
Log:
PR c/52290
* c-decl.c (start_functio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
Bug #: 52361
Summary: gcc.dg/pr48141.c times out
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-23
17:54:26 UTC ---
> This looks like a regression brought about by:
>
> +2012-02-13 Eric Botcazou
> +
> + * gcc.c (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Deal with -fgnu-tm.
> + (GTM_SELF_SPECS): Define if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52360
Bug #: 52360
Summary: time and net/http FAIL on Solaris 8 and 9
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52290
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-23 17:38:20 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Feb 23 17:38:13 2012
New Revision: 184514
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184514
Log:
PR c/52290
* c-decl.c (start_functio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52359
Bug #: 52359
Summary: time test is too load-sensitive
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-23
17:27:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 52352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52358
Bug #: 52358
Summary: math FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52357
Bug #: 52357
Summary: 64bit-out.go and go.test/test/cmplxdivide.go time out
on Solaris/SPARC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51905
Matt Ranostay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mranostay at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-23 16:47:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> H.J. probably needs to backport a patch or two from mainline.
BTW: Please report problems with non-FSF branches directly to their respective
authors. There i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52356
Bug #: 52356
Summary: expr.c:emit_move_multi_word() can overwrite address
register
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52290
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-23 16:34:15 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Feb 23 16:34:02 2012
New Revision: 184511
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184511
Log:
PR c/52290
* c-decl.c (start_functio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-23
16:00:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 26736
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26736
Tentative fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355
--- Comment #4 from Siarhei Siamashka
2012-02-23 15:56:24 UTC ---
Now I wonder if multidimensional array is still treated as the same array in
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the same
array object, or one past t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-23
15:52:23 UTC ---
I don't think INSN_UID is right for that, I think you want to preserve the
original order of debug insns in that case, and INSN_UID can jump up and down.
So what about
if (MAY_HAVE_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-23
15:49:06 UTC ---
I notice in boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h we are already setting...
# ifdef DARWIN
# define OS_TYPE "DARWIN"
# define DYNAMIC_LOADING
# if defined(__ppc64__)
#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #16 from Patrick Marlier
2012-02-23 15:49:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 26735
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26735
proposal fix
I have also started a patch (not tested at all) but I am more extreme in the
approac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-02-23
15:41:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> This reproduces only on Solaris 8 because the sort of the ready list isn't
> stable in the presence of debug insns, given that rank_for_schedule isn't
> anti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Marlier
2012-02-23 15:32:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
>
> This change bootstraps fine with current gcc trunk on x86_64-apple-darwin11.
> It
> almost fixes the failures in the boehm-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-23
15:23:44 UTC ---
This reproduces only on Solaris 8 because the sort of the ready list isn't
stable in the presence of debug insns, given that rank_for_schedule isn't
anti-symmetrical:
if (MAY_HAVE_D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52019
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-23
15:18:07 UTC ---
I think PR51730 is similar, but there it wasn't about inline asm. Perhaps we
want to fold harder for "i" or something.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-23
15:07:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Ah, the better way to do that would be to have:
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([pthread_get_stackaddr_np])
>
> in configure.ac, and then just have
>
> #ifdef HAVE_PT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52283
--- Comment #22 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-23 15:06:12 UTC ---
thanks, no regression with your patch on the 4.6 and trunk branches. OK to
commit on both ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52349
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52019
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-23
14:43:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 23 14:43:43 2012
New Revision: 184508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184508
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52019
* ipa-split.c (f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26684|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52349
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-23 14:16:41
UTC ---
Richi's patch is approved (I'm testing it myself, but go ahead and commit if it
looks fine to you).
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52349
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-23
14:13:40 UTC ---
The #c2 patch bootstrapped/regtested just fine on both x86_64-linux and
i686-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52349
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49748
Tim Ruehsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
lla/attachment.cgi?id=26733
test.c
gcc version 4.7.0 20120223 (experimental) (GCC)
$ cat test.c
void f(char a[16][16][16])
{
asm volatile ("" : : "i" (&a[1][0][0] - &a[0][0][0]));
}
int main(void)
{
char a[16][16][16];
f(a);
return 0;
}
$ gcc -O2 test.c
test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23286
--- Comment #40 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-02-23 13:34:37 UTC ---
The ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED of do_hoist_insertion can be removed.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
index 0f777b4..bfc7a92 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
+++
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: d...@gcc.gnu.org
seen with r184500 from the trunk, building libgo:
libtool: compile:
/home/packages/gcc/4.7/gcc-4.7-4.7-20120223/build/./gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52353
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-23
13:05:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 26732
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26732
patch
Patch that fixes my issue and works until rtl_dce, which still removes the
call,
even thoug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52353
Bug #: 52353
Summary: -ftrapv -fnon-call-exceptions does not work
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-23
12:47:33 UTC ---
Patch has been posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg01173.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43813
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #4 from Steffen Schmidt
2012-02-23 11:40:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26731
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26731
Generated -m64 -O1 assembler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #3 from Steffen Schmidt
2012-02-23 11:40:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 26730
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26730
Generated -m64 -O3 assembler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #2 from Steffen Schmidt
2012-02-23 11:39:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 26729
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26729
Generated -mx32 -O1 assembler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #1 from Steffen Schmidt
2012-02-23 11:38:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 26728
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26728
Generated -mx32 -O3 assembler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52019
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
Bug #: 52352
Summary: [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x8000 to
0x using registers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43813
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52351
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52351
Bug #: 52351
Summary: Wrong bounds when passing an array section to an
intent-in pointer dummy
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52348
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Dahl 2012-02-23
10:38:51 UTC ---
I am a bit short on time, so I cannot check on the OpenMP 2.5 related matter
but closing this bug is a bit premature imho. There is still the issue with the
OpenMP 3.0 part which has b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52348
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|2012-02-23 00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52349
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-23
10:31:59 UTC ---
Type built in
// Create a placeholder for a pointer type.
Btype*
Gcc_backend::placeholder_pointer_type(const std::string& name,
Location loca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52348
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Dahl 2012-02-23
10:21:53 UTC ---
The warning with gcc 4.3.x is correct because of the lack of support for OpenMP
3.0. Starting with 4.4, gcc supports OpenMP 3.0 which allows unsigned iteration
variables.
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
