http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52102
Bug #: 52102
Summary: [OOP] Wrong result with ALLOCATE w/ SOURCE= and
nonpoly. array constructor source-expr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-03
07:30:24 UTC ---
As postscript:
* A program which uses the CHARACTER* declaration is still perfectly valid
Fortran 95/2003/2008. - Thus, you do not have to react on the warning, you
should only avoid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-03 07:29:41 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Feb 3 07:29:31 2012
New Revision: 183864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183864
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2011-11-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
Daniel Wolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nephatrine at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47982
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47982
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-03
04:11:41 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Feb 3 04:11:31 2012
New Revision: 183862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183862
Log:
2012-02-02 Andrew Pinski
PR middle-en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43967
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-03
04:11:41 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Feb 3 04:11:31 2012
New Revision: 183862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183862
Log:
2012-02-02 Andrew Pinski
PR middle-en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33311
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45025
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-03
02:49:44 UTC ---
I almost think this has been fixed now on the trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47982
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47982
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #38 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-03
02:39:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #37)
Actually that above approach won't work because the pthread.h header on
darwin11 always sources...
#if (!defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && !defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52082
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #37 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-03
02:14:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> is there a Mac OS X version macro that libstdc++ can check to workaround the
> bug, or should we just assume it will be fixed and users will have a working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906
--- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-03
01:45:48 UTC ---
is there a Mac OS X version macro that libstdc++ can check to workaround the
bug, or should we just assume it will be fixed and users will have a working
version?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
Bug #: 52101
Summary: Obsolescence warning for non-obs. feature character
name*length
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52100
Bug #: 52100
Summary: CRTSTUFF_CFLAGS needs -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin 2012-02-02
23:11:00 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Feb 2 23:10:55 2012
New Revision: 183853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183853
Log:
2012-02-02 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/41587
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #35 from Mikael Morin 2012-02-02
23:11:01 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Feb 2 23:10:55 2012
New Revision: 183853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183853
Log:
2012-02-02 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/41587
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2012-02-02
23:11:01 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Feb 2 23:10:55 2012
New Revision: 183853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183853
Log:
2012-02-02 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/41587
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin 2012-02-02
23:11:01 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Feb 2 23:10:55 2012
New Revision: 183853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183853
Log:
2012-02-02 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/41587
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52099
Bug #: 52099
Summary: Incorrectly applying conversion when catching
pointer-to-members
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51508
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30645
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52012
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas 2012-02-02 21:20:19
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Feb 2 21:20:14 2012
New Revision: 183849
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183849
Log:
2012-02-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30645
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52093
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-02
21:01:41 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Feb 2 21:01:34 2012
New Revision: 183848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183848
Log:
2012-02-02 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@convergent-it.at
--- Comment #8 from Kai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50044
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50397
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] Blank |[4.6 Regression] Blank line
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45579
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-02
20:46:09 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 2 20:46:06 2012
New Revision: 183847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183847
Log:
PR middle-end/48071
* diagnostic.c (diagnos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43219
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39757
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-02
20:41:15 UTC ---
We have:
short last[3] = { 16,16,16 }, mul[3], buf[3][3][386];
for (i=0; i < sizeof(buf)/sizeof(short); i++)
buf[0][0][i] = 2048;
Obviously this where one of the warning happe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-02 20:41:07 UTC ---
On 2/2/2012 3:17 PM, bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>>> do the printers ever work, outside the testsuite?
>> >
>> > No.
> Well then, then need to be disabled.
At the mom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #29 from Benjamin Kos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52098
Bug #: 52098
Summary: All GCC "libtool" libraries need relinking during
installation on hppa*-*-hpux*
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38414
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43258
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44567
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46082
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52068
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Bug #: 52097
Summary: ICE: in get_bit_range, at expr.c:4535 with -O -flto
-fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions --param
allow-store-data-races=0
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52068
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-02
19:59:04 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Feb 2 19:58:59 2012
New Revision: 183846
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183846
Log:
2012-02-02 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-pc-mingw32 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-02
19:45:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 26555
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26555
small testcase (p.class)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-02-02
19:45:09 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Feb 2 19:45:04 2012
New Revision: 183843
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183843
Log:
2012-02-02 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26326
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2012-02-02
--- Comment #1 from John D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51522
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-02-02 19:08:19
UTC ---
Sorry, I'm unable to reproduce the ICE with today's trunk. I tried to testcase
in comment #4 with and without the fixes from #3 as well as the original
testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36294
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48512
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35696
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-02
18:37:07 UTC ---
The testcase in comment #1 works for me with 4.3 and 4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49800
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-02-02
18:33:34 UTC ---
I am working on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-02-02 18:11:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can you try after:
> 2011-12-19 Richard Sandiford
>
> PR rtl-optimization/42839
> * fwprop.c (forward_propagate_subreg): Skip the SIGN/ZERO_EXT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31279
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45356
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45364
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46119
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-02
17:26:40 UTC ---
This works for me on the trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27238
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52096
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-02
16:30:59 UTC ---
Also the dumpmachine does not work for things like x32 where just the ABI
changes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52096
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52096
Bug #: 52096
Summary: -dumpmachine does not respect -m32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52095
Bug #: 52095
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/sms-7.c: SEGV in
fprintf
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50077
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-02
16:06:05 UTC ---
> clang seems to support -mcmodel=large - at least at 3.1 - so any necessary
> ld64/dyld support is available.
The test compiles (using -c) with
Apple clang version 1.7 (tags/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen 2012-02-02 15:16:18 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > I think we should fail to vectorize D.2030_19 = prephitmp.17_21 & 65535, or
> > any
> > other non-phi/not vect_double_reduction_def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52088
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-02
13:41:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think we should fail to vectorize D.2030_19 = prephitmp.17_21 & 65535, or
> any
> other non-phi/not vect_double_reduction_def stmt with a double reduction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #22 from Andrew Church 2012-02-02
13:38:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 26553
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26553
Remove deprecation warning for -I- (gcc-4.6.2)
Patch against gcc-4.6.2 to remove the deprecation wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21386
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51998
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-02
13:29:34 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Feb 2 13:29:31 2012
New Revision: 183836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183836
Log:
PR middle-end/51998
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52091
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #5 from Ir
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo