[Bug tree-optimization/51877] [4.7 Regression] XEmacs miscompilation due to tail merging

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51877 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-17 07:49:33 UTC --- Created attachment 26346 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26346 gcc47-pr51877.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/51877] New: [4.7 Regression] XEmacs miscompilation due to tail merging

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51877 Bug #: 51877 Summary: [4.7 Regression] XEmacs miscompilation due to tail merging Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/33512] Simple bitwise simplification missed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33512 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-17 01:35:56 UTC --- I will be submitting a patch for 4.8.0 to fix this on the tree level in fold-const.c.

hello，i'm a newer here，just a “hello”，sorry if i troubled you

hello，i'm a newer here，just a “hello”，sorry if i troubled you

[Bug target/51876] [4.7 regression] Recent extra neon related testsuite regressions on arm-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51876] New: [4.7 regression] Recent extra neon related testsuite regressions on arm-linux-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876 Bug #: 51876 Summary: [4.7 regression] Recent extra neon related testsuite regressions on arm-linux-gnueabi Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug c++/51832] [4.7 regression] Rev.182970 causes LTO link errors (multiple definitions of allocator_traits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832 --- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-16 22:52:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > This wasn't fixed by my patch for PR 51827, was it? No, unfortunately not.

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 --- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-16 22:20:52 UTC --- > Please avoid the first hunk in #c29 patch though, it has wrong formatting and > it isn't clear why is that line being changed at all. Yes, this hunk is to be dropped.

[Bug c++/51832] [4.7 regression] Rev.182970 causes LTO link errors (multiple definitions of allocator_traits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 22:17:42 UTC --- This wasn't fixed by my patch for PR 51827, was it?

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #33

[Bug ada/46192] renaming of a volatile variable generates wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192 --- Comment #4 from Rolf Ebert 2012-01-16 22:04:39 UTC --- The problem is still present in gcc-4.7 snapshot as of 2012-01-14 (tested on Linux Debian)

[Bug c++/51854] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in mangle.c with literal of complex floating type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51854 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 --- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-16 21:53:42 UTC --- > For the record, I'm still a little uncomfortable with this. > It feels too much like a hack to me. Eric knows this stuff > much better than I do though, so if he's happy, I'll cede

[Bug c++/51854] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in mangle.c with literal of complex floating type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51854 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 21:50:02 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 16 21:49:58 2012 New Revision: 183224 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183224 Log: PR c++/51854 * mangle.c (write_template_arg

[Bug c++/51868] [4.6 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51827] [4.7 regression] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51868] [4.6 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 21:34:30 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 16 21:34:26 2012 New Revision: 183223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183223 Log: PR c++/51868 * typeck.c (build_static_cast_

[Bug c++/51854] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in mangle.c with literal of complex floating type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51854 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 21:32:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 16 21:32:14 2012 New Revision: 183222 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183222 Log: PR c++/51854 * mangle.c (write_template_arg

[Bug c++/51827] [4.7 regression] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 21:32:08 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 16 21:32:05 2012 New Revision: 183221 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183221 Log: PR c++/51827 * mangle.c (mangle_decl): Don'

[Bug c++/51868] [4.6 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 --- Comment #31 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-16 21:07:50 UTC --- For the record, I'm still a little uncomfortable with this. It feels too much like a hack to me. Eric knows this stuff much better than I do though, so if he's happy, I

[Bug testsuite/51875] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/guality/pr41558.f90 -O0 line 7 s == 'foo'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51875 Bug #: 51875 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/guality/pr41558.f90 -O0 line 7 s == 'foo' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51854] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in mangle.c with literal of complex floating type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51854 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/51809] [4.7 Regression][OOP] ICE (segfault) depending on USE statements order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51809 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-16 19:51:48 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jan 16 19:51:44 2012 New Revision: 183220 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183220 Log: 2012-01-16 Mikael Morin Tobias Bur

[Bug fortran/51809] [4.7 Regression][OOP] ICE (segfault) depending on USE statements order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51809 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-16 19:50:16 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jan 16 19:50:11 2012 New Revision: 183219 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183219 Log: 2012-01-16 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/51

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-16 19:36:49 UTC --- C++11 requires that std::mutex::mutex() is constexpr, so that a global std::mutex will be statically initialized. If that constructor is constexpr it can't call pthread_mutex_init()

[Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-16 18:58:20 UTC --- > --- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-13 > 10:37:52 UTC --- > Nice digging. POSIX does say the INIT macro is for use when the mutex is > statically-all

[Bug c++/51868] [4.7 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-16 18:57:59 UTC --- Jason, does it happen with 4.6.3 too? I couldn't test that

[Bug debug/51873] stringstream is opaque with g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51873 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/10499] Debug information for some C++ headers is missing classes (template specific?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10499 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nikolay at totalviewtech

[Bug target/51872] [4.7 Regression] Shrink-wrapping with -mminimal-toc causes bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26342|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/51868] [4.7 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51827] [4.7 regression] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/51868] [4.7 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 18:40:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 16 18:40:26 2012 New Revision: 183218 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183218 Log: PR c++/51868 * typeck.c (build_static_cast_

[Bug bootstrap/51872] [4.7 Regression] Shrink-wrapping with -mminimal-toc causes bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51872 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51854] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in mangle.c with literal of complex floating type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51854 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/51827] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-01-16 18:28:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > What's confusing about it, I don't understand. There are two errors and notes, all pointing to the same source location -- isn't that odd? > And, by th

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #18 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-16 18:22:20 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Jan 16 18:22:16 2012 New Revision: 183217 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183217 Log: 2012-01-16 Zydrunas Gimbutas A

[Bug c++/51827] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51827] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 18:12:10 UTC --- This should work without -fabi-version=6.

[Bug c++/51786] [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51786 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-16 18:10:46 UTC --- I'm still not sure an error message should be triggered in the first place.

[Bug c++/51868] [4.7 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug go/51874] New: Many libgo testsuite failures on Solaris, IRIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874 Bug #: 51874 Summary: Many libgo testsuite failures on Solaris, IRIX Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Prio

[Bug debug/51873] stringstream is opaque with g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51873 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-16 17:46:53 UTC --- Works for me if I ensure the right libstdc++.so is found, via RPATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (gdb) p msg $1 = { >> = { ... lots of output ... }}

[Bug lto/51859] Linker option effects not reflected in symbol resolution file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51859 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-01-16 17:40:24 UTC --- Created attachment 26344 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26344 Testcase #2 (mingw32 target) `_bar' referenced in section `.text' of libfoobar.a(foo.o): defined

[Bug lto/51859] Linker option effects not reflected in symbol resolution file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51859 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-01-16 17:39:13 UTC --- Created attachment 26343 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26343 Testcase I also experienced this bug. `_Unwind_Resume' referenced in section `.text' of /tmp/ccs

[Bug libitm/51822] libitm.c++/eh-1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51822 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug bootstrap/51872] [4.7 Regression] Shrink-wrapping with -mminimal-toc causes bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51872 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-16 17:07:48 UTC --- Created attachment 26342 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26342 gcc47-pr51872.patch Untested fix.

[Bug debug/51873] New: stringstream is opaque with g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51873 Bug #: 51873 Summary: stringstream is opaque with g++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/51827] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-16 17:05:03 UTC --- What's confusing about it, I don't understand. Doesn't '-fabi-version=6' fix it for you?!? And, by the way, *closing* doesn't mean disintegrating it, would remain in Bugzilla, for sure

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 --- Comment #30 from David Edelsohn 2012-01-16 16:58:14 UTC --- I tested the attachment patch on AIX. The results are in the testresults posted this morning. No regressions.

[Bug c++/51827] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2012-01-16 16:54:43 UTC --- > Thus I don't see where is the issue. The issue is a rather confusing error message. It looks as if there was a compiler bug. > shall we close this? Somebody can report it again

[Bug c/12245] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Uses lots of memory when compiling large initialized arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12245 --- Comment #51 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 16:40:48 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 16 16:40:38 2012 New Revision: 183214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183214 Log: PR c/12245 PR c++/14179 * convert.c (c

[Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179 --- Comment #66 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 16:40:49 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 16 16:40:38 2012 New Revision: 183214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183214 Log: PR c/12245 PR c++/14179 * convert.c (c

[Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179 --- Comment #65 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-16 16:40:36 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 16 16:40:26 2012 New Revision: 183213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183213 Log: PR c++/14179 * vec.c (vec_gc_o_reserve_1):

[Bug tree-optimization/39612] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] LIM inserts loads from uninitialized local memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 --- Comment #12 from Zdenek Dvorak 2012-01-16 16:25:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Re-confirmed on trunk with the testcase in comment #4 and -Os: > > > ./cc1 -quiet t.c -Os -Wall -fdump-tree-all > t.c: In function 'f2': > t.c:4:11: warni

[Bug c++/51763] SEVERE ERROR: Symbol C_BSTAT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51763 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/51872] New: [4.7 Regression] Shrink-wrapping with -mminimal-toc causes bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51872 Bug #: 51872 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Shrink-wrapping with -mminimal-toc causes bootstrap failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UN

[Bug bootstrap/51872] [4.7 Regression] Shrink-wrapping with -mminimal-toc causes bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Ridge 2012-01-16 16:12:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > >The message "Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3" stands out > > > That just means the versi

[Bug middle-end/51871] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51871 Bug #: 51871 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51777] Errors message show unsigned long template parameters as signed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51777 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/51870] New: [OOP] ICE with ALLOCATE and SOURCE-expr function returning BT_CLASS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51870 Bug #: 51870 Summary: [OOP] ICE with ALLOCATE and SOURCE-expr function returning BT_CLASS Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50444] [4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-sra ignores alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 --- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-16 15:41:50 UTC --- Or, transfering the alignment: Index: tree-sra.c === --- tree-sra.c (revision 183205) +++ tree-sra.c (working cop

[Bug c++/51827] Error: 'FOO' conflicts with a previous declaration, with PCH/LTO/C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51827 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug tree-optimization/50444] [4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-sra ignores alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-16 15:25:06 UTC --- Testcase w/o includes that fails with 4.6 and 4.7: typedef long long __m128i __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16), __may_alias__)); typedef int __v4si __attribute__ ((__vector_siz

[Bug fortran/51869] New: Realloc on assignment wrongly assumes that MALLOC returnes '\0'-set memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51869 Bug #: 51869 Summary: Realloc on assignment wrongly assumes that MALLOC returnes '\0'-set memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug target/19520] protected function pointer doesn't work right

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520 --- Comment #23 from Thiago Macieira 2012-01-16 14:56:50 UTC --- I've changed my opinion on this matter. I think GCC is generating the proper code (most efficient). It's ld that should accept this decision.

[Bug c++/51868] [4.7 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-16 14:45:33 UTC --- on trunk: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. fold_convert_loc (loc=0, type=0x2ac5da80, arg=0x0) at /home/redi/src/gcc/gcc-4.7-20120114/gcc/fold-const.c:1856 18

[Bug c++/51868] [4.7 Regression] Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/51867] GCC generates inconsistent code for same sources calling builtin calls, like sqrtf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51867 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/40735] memory hog compiling big functions with -fPIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40735 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||47344 Target Milestone|4.4.7

[Bug rtl-optimization/40761] IRA memory hog for insanely nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40761 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||47344 Target Milestone|4.5.4

[Bug c++/51868] New: Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51868 Bug #: 51868 Summary: Crash when generating the move constructor for a class with a bit field Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCON

[Bug target/40735] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] memory hog compiling big functions with -fPIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40735 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.6.2, 4.7.0 --- Comment #14 from Rich

[Bug bootstrap/51860] [4.7 regression] s390 esa mode bootstrap comparison failure since transactional memory branch merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/51860] [4.7 regression] s390 esa mode bootstrap comparison failure since transactional memory branch merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-16 14:05:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 16 14:05:54 2012 New Revision: 183210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183210 Log: PR bootstrap/51860 * config/s390/s390.c (s

[Bug target/43814] gcc failed to inline memcpy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/40060] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] casts loose alignment info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40060 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carrot at google dot com --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/40060] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] casts loose alignment info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40060 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-16 14:01:18 UTC --- Since 4.6 "For the middle-end the case to char* is not useless, ..." is no longer true. /* We rely on TER to compute accurate alignment information. */ if (!(optimize && fl

[Bug middle-end/39838] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] unoptimal code for two simple loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39838 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.0 --- Comment #11 from Richard Gue

[Bug driver/47249] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in common_handle_option, at opts.c:1695 with unknown option passed to cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-16 13:51:32 UTC --- Created attachment 26340 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26340 gcc47-pr47249-2.patch Or this one (or something else)? Having driver display_help use *.opt stuff i

[Bug driver/47249] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in common_handle_option, at opts.c:1695 with unknown option passed to cc1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47249 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-16 13:50:11 UTC --- Created attachment 26339 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26339 gcc47-pr47249.patch Joseph, for 4.7, do you prefer this version

[Bug tree-optimization/39799] [4.4/4.5 Regression] missing 'may be used uninitialized' warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39799 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0, 4.7.0 Summary|[4.4/4

[Bug classpath/39747] Installation documentation should suggest building libgmp as PIC for building with libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39747 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libgcj |classpath Version|4.4.0

[Bug middle-end/38999] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Extra overflow warning in 32-bit HWI compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38999 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7

[Bug tree-optimization/39612] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] LIM inserts loads from uninitialized local memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.0 --- Comment #11 from Richard Gue

[Bug middle-end/38999] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Extra overflow warning in 32-bit HWI compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38999 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Known to fail|

[Bug bootstrap/51860] [4.7 regression] s390 esa mode bootstrap comparison failure since transactional memory branch merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-16 13:21:09 UTC --- The second patch bootstrapped with CC='gcc -m31' CXX='g++ -m31' s390 ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-mode=esa Running make check now.

[Bug lto/51280] ICE when lto1 does not have -fgnu-tm and object file uses TM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51280 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-01-16 13:20:56 UTC --- Ok, reproduced as below. -flto was missing from the link line. houston:/build/t2/gcc$ ./xgcc -B./ -c -fgnu-tm -flto -c a.c -o a.ohouston:/build/t2/gcc$ ./xgcc -B./ a.o -flto -L ..

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #6 from gee 2012-01-16 13:17:09 UTC --- Created attachment 26338 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26338 proposed patch for handling thiscall adopted from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552533 without a

[Bug tree-optimization/38785] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785 --- Comment #28 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-16 13:14:22 UTC --- Re-confirmed. Regular PRE has got some kind of a cost-model (restricting insertion to the case where we eliminate a redundancy on a fast path). Partial-insertion has not been upda

[Bug fortran/51809] [4.7 Regression][OOP] ICE (segfault) depending on USE statements order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51809 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-16 12:54:31 UTC --- I have not quite found why it works in one order and not the other. There is some reading/fixup oddness. In particular, when reading in 'bar', in module_read's fixup setup, one already

[Bug middle-end/38671] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] selecting one IV instead of three

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38671 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/51866] [c++0x][4.7 Regression] unordered_multiset compares moved-out values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-16 12:41:04 UTC --- P.S. it looks as though the python pretty printers need to be updated to support the new hashtable code

[Bug libstdc++/51866] [c++0x][4.7 Regression] unordered_multiset compares moved-out values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-16 12:38:56 UTC --- the fix is to move the declaration of __k later, initializing it from the value in the new node, where it's been moved to: this->_M_extract()(__new_node->_M_v) computing the has

[Bug target/38306] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] 15% slowdown w.r.t. 4.3 of computational kernel on some architectures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   >