http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-16
07:17:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 26336
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26336
patch
I believe the problem is that INSN_ADDRESSES of the CALL_INSN is different from
INSN_ADDRESSES
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42523
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-16
04:44:59 UTC ---
Related to PR 16470 which mentions this is basically invalid.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|temporary hack to make |make dejagnu work in
|dejagnu wor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-pc-mingw32 |
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-16
01:52:47 UTC ---
If we are lucky, this issue is even the same as 51845. Thanks for the neat
testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866
--- Comment #2 from Roman Kononov 2012-01-16
01:50:37 UTC ---
it is been bisected...
r183180 is bad
r170936 is good
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
--- Comment #6 from niXman 2012-01-16 01:43:56 UTC
---
Replacing "%llx" to "%I64x" solves the problem.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3b2e7499(v=vs.80).aspx
Thanks, niXman.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51866
Bug #: 51866
Summary: [c++0x][4.7 Regression] unordered_set compares
moved-out values
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-16
00:06:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 26335
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26335
pr51860.ii
Partly reduced testcase.
g++ -O2 -mesa -fcompare-debug pr51860.ii
Unfortunately, delta is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51864
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-15
23:25:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> class(t), allocatable :: a(:), b(:), c(:)
> allocate(t2 :: a(3))
> allocate(t2 :: b(5))
> allocate(c(8), source=[ a, b ])
Actually, this part of the program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-15
23:18:49 UTC ---
I don't think we need a separate PR, for now.
And, on an unrelated note, I'm pretty sure something should show up relatively
easily under Valgrind too even on x86_64-Linux, even -m64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40127
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-15
23:16:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I'm not sure whether argument types can be bound from default arguments in the
> standard,
They can't.
> but if they can't then I should get a diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51678
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-15 21:46:37 UTC ---
Between revisions 183030 and 183181,
23_containers/unordered_multiset/erase/24061-multiset.cc has also started to
fail in a similar manner (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab 2012-01-15 21:23:06
UTC ---
The valgrind log refers to the latest version.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #13 from François Dumont 2012-01-15
21:13:59 UTC ---
I will have a try with Valgrin but line numbers in the comments here do not
seem to all match the latest hashtable code commited on trunk in revision
183164. This last commit really
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-15
21:01:23 UTC ---
Well, DEBUG_INSNs aren't in the stream during the reorg anymore, it is about
the NOTE_INSN_VAR_LOCATION and NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION (apparently the
latter in this testcase) in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
--- Comment #21 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-15 20:38:39 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jan 15 20:38:32 2012
New Revision: 183200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183200
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51821
* recog.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-01-15
20:37:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Reducing a -fcompare-debug failure on c-common.c with delta.
Thanks for working on this! I already had a quick look. The problem has to do
with the s390 r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
--- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-15 20:27:22 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jan 15 20:27:17 2012
New Revision: 183199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183199
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51821
* recog.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-15
20:25:20 UTC ---
Reducing a -fcompare-debug failure on c-common.c with delta.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40127
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
--- Comment #19 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-15 19:35:20 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jan 15 19:35:15 2012
New Revision: 183198
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183198
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51821
* recog.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #19 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:27:22 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #18 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:24:18 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #17 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:21:20 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47733
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kilobyte at angband dot pl
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41916
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #16 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:18:17 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #15 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:15:17 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #14 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:12:17 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #13 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:09:18 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #12 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:06:18 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #11 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:03:24 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #10 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 19:00:19 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #9 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 18:57:20 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been receiv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #8 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 18:51:20 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been receiv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #7 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 18:48:17 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been receiv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7853
--- Comment #6 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-01-15 18:45:25 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been receiv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51569
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from kar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821
--- Comment #18 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-15 18:03:51 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jan 15 18:03:46 2012
New Revision: 183194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183194
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51821
* recog.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51569
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-01-15
17:31:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183102
That is the patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00510.html
So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-15
17:22:03 UTC ---
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fipa-pta" } */
void fn (const char *, const char *) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
int var;
inline void
foo (void)
{
if (__builtin_ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-01-15
17:00:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> But ElectricFence should work even on s390 31-bit. Can you please try that?
I've linked libstdc++ against electric fence. The segfault appears to get
tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-15
16:09:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 26333
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26333
preprocessed testcase
> Please attach preprocessed testcase.
r183091 is OK
r183136 gives the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #53 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-15
14:54:16 UTC ---
Then I'm confused - the tests should depend on availability of the same
features as the code, and the code is now compiled on AIX (as we know because
it was failing to build previou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #52 from David Edelsohn 2012-01-15
14:29:28 UTC ---
I rebuilt with the libstdc++-v3 testsuite patch, but the 30_thread tests did
not run.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215
--- Comment #13 from patriciak784-gccmainling at yahoo dot de 2012-01-15
14:27:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> On inspecting this more closely, I agree with patriciak784. The issue isn't
> directly related to the fix of Richard for PR20239
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51706
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
Bug #: 51865
Summary: ICE in insert_vi_for_tree, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:2642
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab 2012-01-15 13:36:39
UTC ---
Created attachment 26332
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26332
valgrind log
$ valgrind --log-file=log ./24061-multimap.exe
24061-multimap.exe:
/daten/gcc/gcc-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25270|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51864
Bug #: 51864
Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE with polymorphic array constructor as
SOURCE=
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51706
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
--- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-15
12:05:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
1) the define_expand isn't needed, just name the define_insn_and_split pattern
as "nonlocal_goto_receiver".
2) it should split always, either to nothing if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
--- Comment #33 from Iain Sandoe 2012-01-15 11:25:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 26330
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26330
second (non working) go
I'm finding this moderately hard.
I understand what you're suggesting that I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe 2012-01-15 11:16:42
UTC ---
Created attachment 26329
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26329
test code
firstly, apropos comment #22 and #23.
If you build this test case under linux (or darwin),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51863
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51863
Tyler Hardin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51863
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51848
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Ir
75 matches
Mail list logo
