http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28134
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26656
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51670
--- Comment #7 from Igor Pashev 2011-12-24
00:27:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26179
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26179
Diff of macros
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51670
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51670
--- Comment #5 from Igor Pashev 2011-12-23
23:51:31 UTC ---
Sorry, GCC 4.7 is installed in /usr, not in /usr/gcc/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51670
--- Comment #4 from Igor Pashev 2011-12-23
23:49:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 26178
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26178
Diff of test.46 and test.47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51670
--- Comment #3 from Igor Pashev 2011-12-23
23:48:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 26177
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26177
/usr/gcc/4.7/bin/g++ -E test.cpp -o test.47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51670
--- Comment #2 from Igor Pashev 2011-12-23
23:48:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 26176
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26176
/usr/gcc/4.6/bin/g++ -m64 -E test.cpp -o test.46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51670
--- Comment #1 from Igor Pashev 2011-12-23
23:47:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 26175
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26175
Trivial test program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51670
Bug #: 51670
Summary: [4.7.0] conflicts with new declaration with 'C++'
linkage
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51504
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-23
23:33:59 UTC ---
Nice tip.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51114
--- Comment #1 from Frédéric Praca 2011-12-23
23:02:36 UTC ---
In fact, the title is wrong as the problem occurs when declaring derived types,
not subtypes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51507
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51504
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-23
22:09:10 UTC ---
N.B. you don't have to rebuild the whole .so you can rebuild just thread.cc and
link thread.o into your program. The dynamic linker will do symbol
interposition and use the std::thre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51507
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-23
22:00:21 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 23 22:00:13 2011
New Revision: 182668
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182668
Log:
PR c++/51507
* search.c (at_function_scope_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48641
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-12-23
21:47:08 UTC ---
OK, the problem is that profile is wrong and jump threading gets into
conflicting results and the results are propagated through the testcase because
of specific CFG. I think all we can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51069
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48641
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-12-23
19:14:12 UTC ---
The frequencies are initially scaled to be in range 0...BB_FREQ_MAX, but
subsequent transformations may break the invariant (when two basic blocks are
unified). If it turns out to be nec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51662
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-23
19:02:55 UTC ---
Can you attach the testcase?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.gehr at gmx dot ch
--- Comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669
Bug #: 51669
Summary: ICE verify-gimple with openmp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51667
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51668
Bug #: 51668
Summary: class DW_AT_name does not match method's linkage name
prefix (char)1 vs. '\001'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37079
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-23
17:11:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
That's broken on x86_64 see bug 32415
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51667
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51667
Bug #: 51667
Summary: [4.7 Regression] new FAIL: 27_io/basic_*stream/*
execution test with -m32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37079
Kai Henningsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kai.extern at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49204
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-23
16:10:58 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Dec 23 16:10:48 2011
New Revision: 182658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182658
Log:
PR libstdc++/49204
* include/std/future (f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-23
14:41:17 UTC ---
Richard: yes.
[temp.names] p3 says
-3- After name lookup (3.4) finds that a name is a template-name or that an
operator-function-id or a literal-operator-id refers to a set of overl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51666
Bug #: 51666
Summary: NSDMI parse fails for template'd intializer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
--- Comment #3 from Timon Gehr 2011-12-23 14:02:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think it's valid, Clang and EDG reject it too
DMC accepts it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-12-23 13:56:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> A workaround for ICEs of this form is
>
> Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
> ===
> --- gcc/dwa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-23
13:47:04 UTC ---
wasn't the template keyword meant to avoid this ambiguity? Thus, if x.foo
is a template then you are required to write x.template foo because x is
template dependent?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51665
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-23
13:41:04 UTC ---
I don't think it's valid, Clang and EDG reject it too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51665
--- Comment #1 from Karl Krach 2011-12-23
13:38:22 UTC ---
g++ *.cpp --save-temps
MyClass.o:MyClass.cpp:function MyClass::doSomething(): error: undefined
reference to 'MyClass::M_SOME_CONSTANT'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51665
Bug #: 51665
Summary: undefined reference when passing static const int
member to template method
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51664
Bug #: 51664
Summary: comparison incorrectly treated as template
instantiation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-23
11:51:41 UTC ---
A workaround for ICEs of this form is
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c (revision 182652)
+++ gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-23
11:45:53 UTC ---
Even for
struct T;
struct C
{
typedef ::T T;
static T *m ()
{
static T *d __attribute__((used));
return d;
}
};
int
fn ()
{
C::m ();
}
int ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-23
11:23:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> We can fix the resolution with
>
> Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
> ===
> --- gcc/lto-symtab.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663
Bug #: 51663
Summary: LTO does not reclaim comdat-local statics
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-23
11:13:20 UTC ---
We can fix the resolution with
Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
===
--- gcc/lto-symtab.c(revision 182652)
+++ gcc/lto-sy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51662
--- Comment #1 from Max Kellermann 2011-12-23 10:34:50
UTC ---
Created attachment 26171
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26171
Backtrace of garbage collector; #19 is the allocation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51662
Bug #: 51662
Summary: Temporary objects gets garbage collected in cc1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51660
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51661
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50396
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-23
09:17:41 UTC ---
Thanks ... :(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50396
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-23
09:16:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 23 09:16:08 2011
New Revision: 182654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182654
Log:
2011-12-23 Richard Guenther
PR rtl-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51656
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50396
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-23
09:10:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 23 09:10:18 2011
New Revision: 182653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182653
Log:
2011-12-23 Richard Guenther
PR rtl-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-23
08:21:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 26169
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26169
gcc.i
Somewhat delta reduced gcc.i which still triggers it. Surprisingly even
removing an unused fu
58 matches
Mail list logo
