http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51535
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51549
--- Comment #1 from sami.lehtonen at digia dot com 2011-12-14 07:44:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 26077
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26077
Crash report
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51549
Bug #: 51549
Summary: QList::operator[] crash in 32bit release version on
MacOS for gcc 4.2.1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-14
07:22:59 UTC ---
This one segfaults right away for me, even with trunk as of today (though, I've
preprocessed it with 4.6.2 g++ -E -std=c++0x), so this is the more important
ice-on-invalid-code categor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51548
Bug #: 51548
Summary: It is impossible to provide translations of some gcc
error messages
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Christopher Yeleighton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-12-14 06:02:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 26075
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26075
Two resolution files
Here you are.
The resolution files differ depending on whether -fvisibility
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-14
05:18:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 05:18:39 2011
New Revision: 182322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182322
Log:
PR c++/51406
PR c++/51161
* typeck.c (b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51161
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-14
05:18:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 14 05:18:39 2011
New Revision: 182322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182322
Log:
PR c++/51406
PR c++/51161
* typeck.c (b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-12-14 05:17:04 UTC ---
PR 50148.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51547
Bug #: 51547
Summary: auto, type deduction, reference collapsing and const:
invalid initialization of reference of type 'const
X&&' from expression of type 'const X'
Classification
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
--- Comment #5 from Yuehai Du 2011-12-14 02:29:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, duyuehai at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
> >
> > Yuehai Du changed:
> >
> >W
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-14
02:02:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > const FOOwrapper & operator=(const FOOwrapper & othr)
> > {
> > memcpy(&m_uidl, &othr.m_uidl, sizeof(FOO));
> > return *this;
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51546
Bug #: 51546
Summary: [4.7 Regression] error: fallthru to exit from bb 2
compiling libstdc++-v3/src/strstream.cc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-14
01:53:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Here source exaple:
> //
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
You're missing and "using nam
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-12-14 01:43:11
UTC ---
The most recent patch is against gcc 4.6, and mainline is different.
I have just moved the support for reading export data out of the Go frontend
proper. The purpose of this move
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-14
01:16:28 UTC ---
I can still reproduce it with 182320. Note that quite a few of these ICEs filed
by Volker disappear or become "... bailing out" in release-mode. Not to say we
shouldn't fix them (when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51545
Bug #: 51545
Summary: missing -Wparentheses diagnostic with compound
assignment used as condition
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #23 from Cesar Strauss 2011-12-14
01:03:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Patch applied.
Thanks! Good to have Ada back on x86 MinGW.
Regards,
Cesar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51530
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544
Bug #: 51544
Summary: uninitialized variable false positive prevents
bootstrap at -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51543
Bug #: 51543
Summary: terrible diagnostic for wrong type when expected class
or namespace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51464
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51464
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-14 00:36:19 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Dec 14 00:36:15 2011
New Revision: 182320
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182320
Log:
/cp
2011-12-13 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
Bug #: 51542
Summary: bootstrap failure due to uninitialized variable use in
c-parser
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-13
23:41:26 UTC ---
what has complex got to do with it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
AssignedTo|redi at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-12-13 23:30:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It returns x*y, which may or may not be the product, the binary operator*
> could
> be overloaded for Tp with a completely different meaning.
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541
Bug #: 51541
Summary: ICE on ill-formed alias template declarations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-13
23:12:47 UTC ---
It returns x*y, which may or may not be the product, the binary operator* could
be overloaded for Tp with a completely different meaning.
Actually I'm wondering if it's worth adding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51473
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51473
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51473
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
Bug #: 51540
Summary: partial_sum (int *, int *, int *, multiplies < int >)
does not use operator +(complex, complex)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-13
22:52:13 UTC ---
Err, sorry the previous comment was for another bug. Forget about it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-13
22:50:55 UTC ---
I can't reproduce the behaviour on recent builds from trunk. E.g, on
r182308 I am getting:
$ cat -n test-PR51475.cc
1#include
2
3struct A
4{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-13
22:40:26 UTC ---
memcmp is not a strict weak ordering
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
Bug #: 51539
Summary: multiplies ::operator () undocumented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-13
22:18:44 UTC ---
The problem is the following, for:
allocate(t2 :: x(10))
one has:
x._data.data = (void * restrict) __builtin_malloc (640);
I had now expected that one would do:
for (i = 1; i <=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538
Bug #: 51538
Summary: std::set::insert(InputIterator first, InputIterator
last) makes set uniterable
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf |
Host|x86_64-unknown-linux-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51537
Bug #: 51537
Summary: ICE in verify_flow_info while building libstdc++-v3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477
--- Comment #1 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-13
21:53:07 UTC ---
Candidate patch posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01052.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51536
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips64-*-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51536
Bug #: 51536
Summary: ICE on mips64 with -march=octeon -O2 -g
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51535
Bug #: 51535
Summary: Optimization problem with -finit-real=snan at -O1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-12-13 20:47:47
UTC ---
The use of cas is currently dependent on TARGET_68020, which is true on cpu32,
but there needs to be a TARGET_CAS flag.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Walter Spector changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-12-13
20:04:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created attachment 25088 [details]
>
>
> After expanding 4.7 contains:
>
> (insn 52 51 53 6 (set (reg:QI 83 [ D.2723 ])
> (mem:QI (plus:SI (re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48420
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tutufan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51531
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18016
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tutufan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51533
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51531
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-13
19:53:02 UTC ---
with 4.7
b.cc: In function 'int main()':
b.cc:4:14: warning: converting 'false' to pointer type 'int*'
[-Wconversion-null]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51534
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-12-13
19:47:28 UTC ---
I truncated the actual error emitted by the assembler.
$ ./xgcc -B. -O3 -ftree-vectorize -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp ~/foo.c
-march=armv7-a -c
/tmp/ccCPCd9Z.s: Assembler messages:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #20 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-12-13
19:40:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Time to close this?
Not until the patch gets applied to gcc-4.6 branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49865
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini 2011-12-13 19:34:25
UTC ---
No, it should be easy. Just look at the EQ_USES in df_kill_notes and, if one
EQ_USE refers to a dead pseudo, kill the REG_EQUAL or REG_EQUIV note.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51533
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2011-12-13
19:29:03 UTC ---
-Winit-self ?
-libssp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20111213 (experimental) [trunk revision 182291] (GCC)
$ cat ~/foo.c
#include
void foo (unsigned * src, unsigned *dst, int width)
{
const int32x4_t vec_alpha_shift = vdupq_n_s32 (0);
const uint32x4_t vec_one = vdupq_n_u32 (1u);
const uint32x4_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-12-13 19:24:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 26073
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26073
Test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.1
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51533
Bug #: 51533
Summary: initialization with uninitialized member should warn
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
Bug #: 51532
Summary: Invalid Code Generated for cpu32.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51531
Bug #: 51531
Summary: bool conversion to pointer should warn
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #19 from Joel Sherrill 2011-12-13
19:10:10 UTC ---
Time to close this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
--- Comment #15 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 18:47:04 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Tue Dec 13 18:46:58 2011
New Revision: 182292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182292
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2011-12-11 Fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas 2011-12-13 18:14:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> $ gfortran -g gfortran.dg/class_to_type_1.f03
> $ MALLOC_PERTURB_= ./a.out
> $ MALLOC_PERTURB_=33 ./a.out
>
> A fatal error occurred! Backtrace for this error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51443
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51530
--- Comment #1 from Dave Abrahams 2011-12-13
17:46:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 26072
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26072
reproducer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51530
Bug #: 51530
Summary: internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:16854
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
Bug #: 51529
Summary: gfortran.dg/class_to_type_1.f03 is miscompiled:
Uninitialized variable used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499
--- Comment #14 from Ira Rosen 2011-12-13 16:27:19 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #13)
>
> However, I don't fully understand Richard Guenther's example. Yes his
> example requires -fassociative-math to be vectorized, however, my example
> would tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-13
16:08:19 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Dec 13 16:08:14 2011
New Revision: 182289
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182289
Log:
2011-12-13 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51439
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-13
15:58:17 UTC ---
Indeed it is and I have just verified that it is also fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51476
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-13
15:51:52 UTC ---
A candidate patch was posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00996.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51503
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
15:45:45 UTC ---
No, that doesn't seem to cause the C++ frontend to be enabled, instead we
do such magic via config-lang.in fragments - no such thing exists for
target libraries (yet). See the topl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-13
15:43:39 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Dec 13 15:43:36 2011
New Revision: 182288
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182288
Log:
2011-12-13 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51443
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-12-13
15:38:54 UTC ---
Proposed fix,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00995.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-13
15:26:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26071
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26071
Testcase
This is the aforementioned test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Bug #: 51528
Summary: SRA should not create BOOLEAN_TYPE replacements
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51524
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51524
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 15:00:19 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Dec 13 15:00:09 2011
New Revision: 182287
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182287
Log:
PR testsuite/51524
* gcc.target/i386
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51491
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 15:00:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 26070
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26070
update tentative patch
now testing on x86_64
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
