http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51479
Bug #: 51479
Summary: Missing dependency on errors.o causes bootstrap
failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51376
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51408
--- Comment #5 from Kazu Hirata 2011-12-09 05:03:08
UTC ---
Author: kazu
Date: Fri Dec 9 05:02:59 2011
New Revision: 182153
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182153
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline:
2011-12-05 Kazu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51478
Dave Abrahams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave at boostpro dot com
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51478
Bug #: 51478
Summary: constexpr not doing short-circuit evaluation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51262
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-09 03:25:17
UTC ---
On 12/08/2011 11:46 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Dodji, Jason, can such anonymous name types ever have TYPE_DECL_ALIAS_P
> set?
They can't, but
> - else if (CLASS_TYPE_P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51220
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47868
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-12-09
02:26:52 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51376
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra 2011-12-09 02:21:46
UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Dec 9 02:21:43 2011
New Revision: 182151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182151
Log:
PR libgomp/51376
* task.c (GOMP_taskwait): Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51408
--- Comment #4 from Kazu Hirata 2011-12-09 01:45:57
UTC ---
Author: kazu
Date: Fri Dec 9 01:45:54 2011
New Revision: 182150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182150
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline:
2011-12-05 Kazu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51408
--- Comment #3 from Kazu Hirata 2011-12-09 01:27:05
UTC ---
Author: kazu
Date: Fri Dec 9 01:27:01 2011
New Revision: 182149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182149
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline:
2011-12-05 Kazu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #5 from junkmailnotread at yahoo dot com 2011-12-08 23:46:37 UTC ---
The problem is also present with glibc-2.13
Thanks for the PDF reference. If R_ARM_ABS32 has no alignment requirement then
this must be a glibc bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477
Bug #: 51477
Summary: [c++0x] ICE with initialization of invalid non-static
data member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51476
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51476
Bug #: 51476
Summary: [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid
pointer-to-member template parameter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
Bug #: 51475
Summary: [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid
initializer_list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #14 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-12-08 22:32:24 UTC ---
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, lucier at math dot purdue.edu wrote:
> Indeed, I couldn't find a place in the gcc sources where this macro was
> used:
>
> heine:~/programs/gcc/m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-08
22:28:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Dec 8 22:28:29 2011
New Revision: 182141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182141
Log:
PR c++/51459
* pt.c (tsubst_expr) [DECL_EXP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51318
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51318
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-08
22:28:41 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Dec 8 22:28:38 2011
New Revision: 182142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182142
Log:
PR c++/51318
* typeck.c (build_x_conditiona
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51474
Bug #: 51474
Summary: [c++0x] ICE with pure virtual function in
initialization of non-static data member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976
--- Comment #42 from William J. Schmidt
2011-12-08 22:00:52 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Dec 8 22:00:38 2011
New Revision: 182140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182140
Log:
2011-12-08 Bill Schmidt
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51473
Bug #: 51473
Summary: [c++0x] ICE with auto and friend
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51470
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51310
Toon Moene changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #6 from Toon Moene
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51310
--- Comment #5 from toon at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-08 20:58:31 UTC ---
Author: toon
Date: Thu Dec 8 20:58:23 2011
New Revision: 182138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182138
Log:
2011-12-08 Toon Moene
PR fortran/513
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
20:55:09 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 20:54:57 2011
New Revision: 182137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182137
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #13 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 20:54:18 UTC ---
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:37 +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
>
> --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51318
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-12-08 20:37:11 UTC ---
I think the soft-fp code tries to generate particular target-specific NaNs
because it's also used in the Linux kernel emulation of floating-point
instructions - whic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44641
--- Comment #28 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-08
20:18:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> is what we get on mips64-linux-gnu. The only difference between this and the
> IRIX one is the .cfi_startproc .
Submitted a fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44641
--- Comment #27 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-08
20:05:24 UTC ---
.loc 1 13 0
.cfi_startproc
.setnomips16
.entmain
.typemain, @function
main:
is what we get on mips64-linux-gnu. The only difference between this and t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51407
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51378
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44641
--- Comment #26 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-08
19:58:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/lineno-simple1.C also FAILs on IRIX 6.5, as does
> g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr46527.C for what seems to be the same reason:
They also fail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41208
--- Comment #2 from Sean McGovern 2011-12-08
20:00:45 UTC ---
If this issue no longer occurs in recent GCC, please go ahead and close the bug
report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472
Bug #: 51472
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid rhs for gimple
memory store with -fgnu-tm --param
tm-max-aggregate-size=32
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
Pinski 2011-12-08
19:51:03 UTC ---
Compiler version: 4.7.0 20111208 (experimental) [trunk revision 182096] (GCC)
Platform: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: --prefix=/home/apinski/local-gcc --target=mips64-linux-gnu
--host=mips64-linux-gnu --build=mips64-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c,c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45482
--- Comment #13 from Sean McGovern 2011-12-08
19:49:41 UTC ---
If this bug has been resolved, please go ahead and close it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
Bug #: 51471
Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040811-1.c and
gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c fails at -O3 -g
on mips64-linux-gnu
Classification: Unclassified
Prod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
19:49:11 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 8 19:49:02 2011
New Revision: 182136
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182136
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51466
* tree-ssa-forwp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner
2011-12-08 19:34:47 UTC ---
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:20:50PM +, gseanmcg at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701
>
> --- Comment #4 from Sean McGovern 2011-12-08
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51470
Bug #: 51470
Summary: [4.7 regression] make sure libgcj_bc=yes iff
enable_shared=yes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701
--- Comment #4 from Sean McGovern 2011-12-08
19:20:50 UTC ---
Is this fixed now? If so, it can be closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #10 from gee 2011-12-08 19:15:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
whereas with -findirect-dispatch, initializer code isn't omitted.
;; Function () (_ZN3gnu3gcj7convert10Input_UTF8C1Ev, funcdef_no=47,
decl_uid=3185, cgraph_uid=94)
()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression] jc1
|natClass.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29189
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
19:01:00 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 19:00:55 2011
New Revision: 182134
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182134
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41518
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51469
Bug #: 51469
Summary: attr-ifunc-* tests fail on PowerPC if
--enable-gnu-indirect-function is used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51378
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
18:57:01 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 18:56:58 2011
New Revision: 182133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182133
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39825
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51407
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
18:54:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 18:54:27 2011
New Revision: 182132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182132
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51448
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-08
18:51:33 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 8 18:51:28 2011
New Revision: 182131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182131
Log:
2011-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #8 from gee 2011-12-08 18:49:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26028
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26028
generated rtl from gnu.zip
/tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fno-shrink-wrap -quiet
-fhash-synchronizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #7 from gee 2011-12-08 18:47:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 26027
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26027
generated tree from gnu.zip
/tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fhash-synchronization
-fuse-divide-subrou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-08
18:46:13 UTC ---
The libraries you're trying to use are nothing to do with GCC, talk to the
MinGW people, or to the person who wrote that dlfcn wrapper - it's nothing to
do with GCC. If you have the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053
--- Comment #6 from gee 2011-12-08 18:45:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 26026
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26026
generated zip file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51310
--- Comment #4 from toon at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-08 18:38:39 UTC ---
Author: toon
Date: Thu Dec 8 18:38:32 2011
New Revision: 182127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182127
Log:
2011-12-08 Toon Moene
PR fortran/513
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #8 from Dwight Walker 2011-12-08
18:35:46 UTC ---
I guess your system does not work in Windows very well. It is a bug as the
libraries are not installing properly but I can't give you exact reason.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #10 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 18:32:56 UTC ---
Near the end of section 5.3.2 of
Book E:
Enhanced PowerPC Architecture
Version 1.0
May 7, 2002
it says
Any instruction that generates a QNaN as the result of a disab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-08
18:24:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I can't get it to work with mingw:
Bugzilla is for bugs, "I can't get it to work" is not a bug.
Please find a more suitable forum for seeking help with th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #6 from Dwight Walker 2011-12-08
18:18:54 UTC ---
http://code.google.com/p/dlfcn-win32/
I can't get it to work with mingw:
gcc -ldlfcn -> not found
Libraries on Mingw are in about 10 different folders.
I may use cygwin.
Linux may
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #4 from Dwight Walker 2011-12-08
17:40:16 UTC ---
C:\Users\Dwight>gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-w64-mingw32
Configured with: ../gcc44-svn/configure --target=i686-w64-mingw32
--host=i686-w6
4-mingw32 --disable-multilib --di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-08
17:23:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think the dl library is not in the path. I cannot set the path for the gcc
> so
> that is why the library is not found and the compile fails.
If you ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
--- Comment #2 from Dwight Walker 2011-12-08
17:07:52 UTC ---
QtSDK 1.1.4 built GCC (Mingw)
Windows 7 Home Premium
C:\Users\Dwight\Downloads\nokia\ZXing-1.7\zxing\cpp>c:\python27\python
scons\sco
ns.py
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
scons:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #9 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 17:05:43 UTC ---
Table 4.7 of the
AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volume 1:
Application Programming
has a footnote 3 that says
3. The floating-point indefinite value is a QNaN w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51262
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.7.0 |
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51468
Bug #: 51468
Summary: cannot find -ldl and collect 2 ld returned 1 exit
status
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-12-08
16:06:43 UTC ---
> Does IEEE say anything about the sign of the qnan?
>From "Draft 1.2.5 DRAFT Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic P754 October 4,
2006" at
http://www.validlab.com/754R/draft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51467
--- Comment #2 from Oliver Mueller 2011-12-08
16:04:17 UTC ---
Oh yes! It's the "promoted to 64 bit" thing.
I forgot. Sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #49 from Eric Botcazou 2011-12-08
16:00:34 UTC ---
> That is, first ada maps precisions 32, 64, and 80 to bit sizes 32, 64, and 96,
> respectively. Then ada turns around and tries to map _bit_size_ 80 to a
> precision, but bit size 8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
15:41:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 26024 [details]
> gcc47-pr51466.patch
>
> Another alternative. Note that apparently gimple_rhs_has_side_effects has
> been
> removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26021|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51467
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50395
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51467
Bug #: 51467
Summary: Stack Smashing Protector: Canary is destroyed in RAX
partially only on x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
15:02:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 26022
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26022
gimple predicate patches
GIMPLE predicate patches - that will now commit STRING_CSTs to a local
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
14:45:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 26021
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26021
gcc47-pr51466.patch
Possible fix. Though, I wonder if this isn't unnecessarily pessimistic.
The rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50395
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-12-08
14:37:24 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:37:19 2011
New Revision: 182116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182116
Log:
2011-12-08 Andreas Krebbel
PR target/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-08
14:37:14 UTC ---
Which means - taking addresses of literals should be disallowed (that
includes the prominent example of STRING_CSTs, but possibly that is not
the only existing case?). Instead when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #6 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 14:31:23 UTC ---
PS: I don't know whether IEEE says anything about the sign bit, but I doubt
it.
Brad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #5 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-08 14:30:00 UTC ---
Re:
Do the architecture manuals say anything about the sign of the qnan?
Amazingly enough, they do!
I downloaded the combined x86-64 manuals from
http://www.intel.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51466
Bug #: 51466
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_rhs_has_side_effects,
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo