http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
--- Comment #18 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-12-01 07:29:25 UTC ---
Janne's latest patch now effectively 'removes' lseek:
26.840.108906 0242658 madvise
20.120.081608 045 read
19.27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51372
Carrot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51009
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51009
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-01
05:41:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Dec 1 05:40:54 2011
New Revision: 181872
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181872
Log:
PR c++/51009
* name-lookup.c (push_to_top_l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374
Bug #: 51374
Summary: Volatile access reordered.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51373
Bug #: 51373
Summary: ICE for static pointer to member initialized in-class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51372
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-01
03:25:17 UTC ---
__builtin_neon_sf is not really the float type.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51372
Bug #: 51372
Summary: internal compiler error: in write_builtin_type, at
cp/mangle.c:2204
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51371
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-01
03:00:47 UTC ---
t12.c:6:3: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true
[-Wtype-limits]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51371
Bug #: 51371
Summary: compilation should produce warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51272
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51272
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-12-01
02:37:26 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Thu Dec 1 02:37:06 2011
New Revision: 181870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181870
Log:
PR other/51272
* config/pa/stublib.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin 2011-12-01
02:08:20 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Thu Dec 1 02:08:10 2011
New Revision: 181868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181868
Log:
PR middle-end/50283
* config/pa/pa.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-01
01:07:27 UTC ---
Here's another testcase:
#include
#include
template
struct final_allocator final : std::allocator
{
final_allocator() = default;
template
final_allocator(const final_all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51370
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51370
Bug #: 51370
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid template
parameter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-11-30
23:50:59 UTC ---
b.2_8 = b;
D.2906_9 = (int) b.2_8;
D.2907_10 = bar.part.0 (s_5(D), a_1(D), D.2906_9);
This has been fixed already.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51229
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-30
23:35:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 25963
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25963
fix other parts of library
here's a proof of concept patch showing how to fix existing code that i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51325
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51369
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51369
Bug #: 51369
Summary: [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE using constexpr in
template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51044
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-30
22:02:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 30 22:02:14 2011
New Revision: 181861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181861
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51044
* dse.c (emit_inc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-30
22:00:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 30 22:00:28 2011
New Revision: 181860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181860
Log:
PR target/50725
* function.c (thread_prolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51089
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-30
21:59:08 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 30 21:59:04 2011
New Revision: 181859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181859
Log:
PR middle-end/51089
* tree-eh.c (cleanup_em
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51367
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368
Bug #: 51368
Summary: libstdc++ python pretty printers should use
--with-python-dir just like libjava
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
--- Comment #4 from Janis Johnson 2011-11-30
21:44:19 UTC ---
If following the spec works, then by all means do that. It's been quite a long
time since I've thought about decimal float support and my memory is a bit
hazy.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
--- Comment #3 from Ryan S. Arnold 2011-11-30 21:40:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The definitions that n2732 wants to add are typedefs to the C++ classes, but
> interoperability with C requires the typedefs using modes that Ryan shows. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
--- Comment #2 from Janis Johnson 2011-11-30
21:33:46 UTC ---
The definitions that n2732 wants to add are typedefs to the C++ classes, but
interoperability with C requires the typedefs using modes that Ryan shows. I
never got a good answer from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50066
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51367
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50619
Bud Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51367
Bug #: 51367
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Broken diagnostic: 'pointer_type' not
supported by dump_expr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-30
21:19:28 UTC ---
Thanks for the pointer, the hardest part was naming the new intrinsic ;)
We can't have the front-end define __is_final() as an intrinsic and also define
std::__is_final as a class t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-30
21:07:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 25962
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25962
library patch (missing tests)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-30
21:06:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 25961
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25961
front end patch (missing docs and tests)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50066
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358
--- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-11-30 20:46:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Compiling the following with g++ -gdwarf-4 -o length length.cxx
[...]
>DW_AT_frame_base : 1 byte block: 9c(DW_OP_call_frame_cfa)
[...]
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51346
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #12 from Denis Excoffier 2011-11-30
20:03:47 UTC ---
I have transfered my bug into #51366. Sorry for the noise.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
Bug #: 51366
Summary: [cygwin] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2244
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51321
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-11-30
19:55:41 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Nov 30 19:55:36 2011
New Revision: 181857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181857
Log:
2011-11-30 Andrew Pinski
PR c/51321
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
--- Comment #17 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-11-30 19:50:37 UTC ---
Janne's lseek patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-11/msg00251.html
has further nice results on CP2K (CP2K_2009-05-01.f90)
Thomas (trunk):
92.084.963429 0 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50622
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor 2011-11-30
19:40:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 25959
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25959
Untested fix
An untested fix. I will run it through bootstrap tomorrow and proceed to
submit it if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51327
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51009
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-11-30
19:32:51 UTC ---
<<< Unknown GIMPLE statement: gimple_with_cleanup_expr >>>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-30
19:22:32 UTC ---
Yes, should be pretty trivial given the infrastructure already in place. In
semantics should be just matter of calling CLASS_TYPE_P && CLASSTYPE_FINAL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50622
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365
Bug #: 51365
Summary: cannot use final empty class in std::tuple
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-30
18:58:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 30 18:58:33 2011
New Revision: 181856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181856
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48721
* sched-deps.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-30
18:57:38 UTC ---
n2732 says they should be defined in
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2732.pdf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-30
18:53:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 30 18:53:46 2011
New Revision: 181855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181855
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48721
* sched-ebb.c (b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
Bug #: 51364
Summary: C++ interoperability with ISO-C extension DFP types
requires explicit typedefs.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51363
Bug #: 51363
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in gimple_rhs_has_side_effects,
at gimple.c:2530 with -O -fno-tree-ccp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Bug #: 51362
Summary: [4.7 Regression ICE: SIGFPE (division by zero) in
good_cloning_opportunity_p at ipa-cp.c:2401
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51299
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51299
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-30 18:31:33 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 30 18:31:30 2011
New Revision: 181854
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181854
Log:
/cp
2011-11-30 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49986
Vasily Sukhanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgomp |bootstrap
--- Comment #1 from Vasily Su
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51361
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51357
Charles changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51356
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-30
17:28:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 25956
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25956
gcc47-pr51356.patch
The problem is that PowerPC returns a TImode vector from
get_vectype_for_scalar_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51361
Bug #: 51361
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 471.omnetpp of SPEC2006 fails to
build with -fprofile-generate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51221
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-30 17:16:11
UTC ---
(gdb) bt
#0 extract_insn (insn=0x16263f0) at /GCC/gcc-4-6-branch/gcc/recog.c:2109
#1 0x005d4090 in instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn (insn=0x16263f0) at
/GCC/gcc-4-6-branch/gcc/function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51356
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51360
Bug #: 51360
Summary: spurious unused-but-set-variable warning for var used
in OpenMP pragma
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49976
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51359
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51221
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-30 16:48:07
UTC ---
also on a cross from powerpc-darwin9 => powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.3.0
4.7.0 trunk (r181818 & r181773 resp.) builds OK (on powerpc-darwin9,
x86_64-darwin10)
is this a regression in the 4.6 bra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51359
Bug #: 51359
Summary: std::string::reserve inefficiency/possible accidental
behavior with reserve()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.6
Status: U
: debug
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: m...@gcc.gnu.org
CC: do...@gcc.gnu.org, tro...@redhat.com
This is related to the following systemtap bug report:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13420
This is using g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 2030
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-30 16:20:07 UTC ---
Denis,
please open a separate bug, and mention configure line there.
Thanks,
- Tom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51221
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51357
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51357
--- Comment #1 from Charles 2011-11-30 15:23:54 UTC
---
Created attachment 25955
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25955
Generated assembly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51357
Bug #: 51357
Summary: Simple program crash when enabling AVX
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51356
Bug #: 51356
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/anyallcount_1.f90
-O3 (internal compiler error) on
powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m32
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-30
13:21:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 25952
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25952
gcc47-pr48721.patch
Perhaps we should just consider tail calls as full barriers like asm volatile
et
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51355
Bug #: 51355
Summary: [4.7 Regression] cgraph_add_edge_to_call_site_hash, at
cgraph.c:765
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51089
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-30
12:51:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 25951
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25951
gcc47-pr48721.patch
begin_move_insn can be easily fixed, the question is why we try to schedule the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51089
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2011-11-30
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips64el-linux-gnu
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
